This is a picture of a schedule that was just handed out to me at CPAC in Washington, DC. (Western Journalism is here working to connect with citizen journalists and bloggers in the conservative movement.) Notice anything strange?
Although, “In Defense of Big Labor” by Santorum could have just been a attention getting title, I doubt Romney would want, “Author of Obamneycare” behind his name.
This is an interesting and pretty humorous tactic to slip campaign propaganda into unsuspecting conventioneers’ hands. I’ve got to give a hand to Gingrich’s marketing strategist. But we will see if these sort of tactics help Gingrich get back in the conservative movement’s good graces.
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
Why would any conservative take in NEWT GINGRICH? He’s is for increases in government size, he wants Obamacare. He voted for the government control of the Dept of Education giving us the socialistic schools we have now which teach the ethics of the New Socialist Society. It’s the bases of taking religion out of schools and teaching internationalism which is against our nations sovereignty. Newt is not following the Constitution, he wants it replaced, he’s a Builderburg. He has been a member of the Council of Foreign Nations that was started to abolish national sovereignty. He voted for GATT which controls the World Trade Organization, NAFTA and TARP. Newt voted to give amnesty to illegal immigrants, now he wants to change our immigration system. Newt wants to continue foreign aid, Obama is giving it to our enemies. Newt Gingrich is diametrically opposed to the principles of the Constitution and Ron Paul. He backs the UN, the UN backs Agenda 21, NAU and NWO OWO OWG.
Don’t listen to what he says, look at his voting record and what bills he’s for. Anyone attending this CPAC that is for Newt isn’t a conservative and should get a progressive name-tag put on his back..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=02HX5v5Thpk
“And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” ! John 8:32 I quote scripture on line a lot. First of all because we all need to be familiar with it. Secondly, there is no such thing as a vacuum on earth, if you remove one thing something else will take it’s place. The something is islime. Thirdly, it comforts the mind and soul. Fourthly, and maybe most importantly, it makes OJUDAS mad as hell ! I too, never let a potential crisis go to waste !!!!!!
Mr. Jusko…did you miss taking your medication today ? You’re fruitier than a nut cake. I’d be willing to bet that you’re a dumbocrap or a mixed nut Ron Paul supporter. If you’re gonna spout doucherisms at least try and use some facts. All you have said is evidentiary of the traits of a dumbocrap who visits Conservative sites to disrupt and muddy the water. Your type is easy to spot. You have nothing good to say, you find fault like there’s a reward for it and you run all the Conservatives down. This time it was Newt because the post was about Newt. If you want to run down somebody try Romney Zombie or the munchkin nut Ron Paul. “Great spirits often encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds.” (Albert Einstein) You and your type remind me of what Groucho marx once said…”He may look like an idiot and he may talk like an idiot. But don’t let that fool you, he really is an idiot.” After reading your rant once more I may have missed what you are. Everything you threw at Newt , OJUDAS has implemented. Now I KNOW you’re a instigator. Every single thing you said can be traced back to Clinton or OJUDAS. You need a new playbook. This one needs to be used for something useful….like toilet paper ! Apparently Newt represents what you are diametrically opposed to…FREEDOM FOR WE THE PEOPLE ! You sir are a wolf in wolves clothing. You need to go back to the dumbocrap school of deception. You need more training in the art of Conservative bashing !
Gingrich is unfortunately behaving just as sophomoric as his critics have heretofore implied with their repeated references to his lacking discipline. The fantasy CPAC schedule of events with an altered title for Santorum in particular is just such an example. Being a Santorum supporter, I believe he has all the necessary conservative and moral credentials needed to defeat Obama and attract a huge electoral following unlike his chief rivals, Romney and Gingrich, similar to what we saw at the midterm elections. The republican establishment on the other hand and as usual has its collective heads buried in a place where the sun never shines presumably because it enjoys the view while believing that their annointed candidate choice, Romney, is the only won capable of defeating Obama. Santorum was my choice from the beginning along with Michele Bachmann. He isn’t quite as smooth in debates as Gingrich, the acknowledged strong debater, but he’s good enough. Grading a candidate on his style points is a worn out and flawed method of choosing our nominees. One needs to listen carefully to what the candidate says, not how he or she says it nor how they look when they say it. To that extent, Radio is still a superior medium for judging candidates because it eliminates the image and largely the style criteria that TV invariably injects into the judgement as a distraction while forcing the listener to focus on the substance of what was said.
It all began with the first TV debate between Richard Nixon and John Kennedy in 1960. Those who listened to it on radio judged Nixon to have won the debate while those who watched it on TV judged Kennedy to have won it. Harry Truman would almost assuredly have never won election had he been forced to debate Dewey on TV if its assumed for the sake of argument that everyone at that time, 1948, had a “boob toob” on which to watch it. But the former Haberdasher, County Roads Commissioner and Missouri Farmer, Truman, sounded just fine to the common folk of the day on radio or to those that gathered at the back of his whistle stop train that criss-crossed rural America leading up to the election while the republican establishment’s candidate, Dewey, remained ensconced in mostly eastern metropolitan areas so assured of victory that the Chicago Tribune published and distributed its extra Wednesday morning election edition well before all the election returns were in and counted declaring in emblazoned headlines that “Dewey Wins” which an elated Truman held aloft at his acceptance speech in mocking tribute to his victory. Truman had retired to bed earlier in the evening after drinking a glass of buttermilk aware that he was trailing in the vote count with mostly eastern returns counted at that point but was awakened the following morning to the surprising news that he had been elected president.