Though I write to defend the natural gas industry from the junk science hurled at it and the drilling technique known as hydraulic fracturing (fracking), I do so with mixed emotions.
Two recent government reports, one from the United Kingdom and the other from Oklahoma, have tried to draw a connection between fracking and seismic activity occurring in those areas. In the UK, the seismic activity registered 3 on the Richter scale (vibrations similar to a passing truck). In Oklahoma, the activity registered between 1.0 and 2.8. Neither report could attribute with any certainty the seismic activity to the local fracking, as that would be nearly impossible to do given the multifactorial nature of seismic activity.
So: of the more than one million fracking or fracking-like operations that have occurred, unattributable seismic activity has been detected twice. Moreover, no structural damage was attributed to any of the seismic activity. Scientifically and from a risk management perspective, fracking should be off the hook. But of course it’s not, because radical environmentalists loathe fracking — cheap natural gas means that the world won’t be giving up fossil fuels anytime soon — and so they have their long knives out for it. You can safely bet that anytime seismic activity coincides with fracking activity, they will use that coincidence to whip up fear.
And if it’s not earthquakes, it will be fracking fluids in drinking water. Or fracking’s greenhouse gas emissions. Or whatever can be dreamed up to scare people about the expanding industry of extracting natural gas from shale formations.
As we’ve learned with other environmental scaremongering, there are countless junk science-based ways to scare the public, and you can rest assured the radicals will dream them up and employ them to great effect. What this means is that the shale gas industry will be under continual attack, and that the attacks won’t stop until fracking does.
However, while I’m more than happy to spotlight and debunk the enviros’ use of junk science, I’m also more than a little annoyed at the junk science that the shale gas industry itself is apparently quite happy to use against its brethren fossil fuels.
If you’ve followed the 21st century environmentalist war against fossil fuel, you’ve probably heard of the “Dirty Faces” anti-coal campaign: advertisements featuring coal-smudged faces, proclaiming that coal is “dirty” because its emits greenhouse gas carbon dioxide — ironically, a colorless and odorless gas.
By Steve Milloy, EPAabuse.com
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
About Breaking News
Loading ...
if the radical environmentalists were really environmentalists, they'd be screaming and supporting instead of fighting the 'Free Energy' inventors. which they do along with the corporations, bankers, et al.
FREE ENERGY! what? someone didn't like that? just google it, 'Wade Frazier', or his interview on youtube. his website aHealedPlanet.net.
Natural gas is 'clean'. Coal is dirty. Any questions?
I am about as non-green weenie as a person can get, BUT, for a long time I have been concerned that we are doing all of this in an "unknown" type of situation. We do NOT actually have any idea if fracking will leach into upper water areas……. we just do not know. If it does…. will it ever go away? How can it go away? If we ruin huge stores of underground water…… well you probably get my concerns.
Another thing is that we all rest attop bedrock at some point…. we all hope that it will be VERY stable long term. How stable will it be if broken up when a real earth quacke hits?? Yup, another unknown. I am NOT against fracking….. but I am very concerned that what they are doing could have very long term suffering to pay for later on.