Sean Hannity gets to the bottom of this question…
The answer is here with the links to the case law and the Constitution – It is the 14th amendment that controls and the Courts – the definition of Natural born in the time of the Founders was set by the King – – as anywhere in the Colonies or under the kings control – it did not mention parents . .
Neither Rubio, Jindal or Ted Cruz are eligible to run for President. One or both of their parents were not citizens at the time they were born. When talk was stirring about who Romney might name as VP, I wrote him urging him to please not look at Rubio as he isn’t eligible and we didn’t want the problems with his status as we have with Obama.
I love Ted Cruz – we worked at the grassroots level here in Texas to get him elected over our Lt. Gov. However, his father did not become a citizen until 2005 so he not eligible to be President. Let’s just elect him as Senate Majority leader after voting in enough Republicans in 2014 to take over the Senate!
Sorry to break it to you, but Rubio was born in Miami Florida. His parents do not need to be citizens for him to qualify. He was born here in the United States, not in Cuba. That makes him eligible. If this were not the case, then why are all the children of illegal immigrants who are born on our soil automatically citizens, which is what makes it so hard to deport the parents. His parents may not have been citizens at the time, but they were here legally and he was born on American Soil in an American city. He is eligible to be prez, unlike the current occupant of the white house.
the “of citizen parents” doesn’t seem to apply to all children born of illegal immigrant parents, their children are considered legal citizens and we get to pay for them…
a native citizen can do anything under the Constitution except run for president. Article 2 was never ammended. The 14th ammendment does not say natural born it says citizen: The reason was to readmitt all those confederated who waged war against the United States and the freed slaves who were without papers as well. Every president except Obama and Chester Arthur has been a natural born citizen and your lack of education on this manner shows why the argument still continues.
Both parents must be American Citizens. It is not merely that YOU were born in this country. A “natural born” citizen is one American born of 2 American parents. I guess people need to re read the constitution
Does it say to falsify and hide all your records to impede justice? Does it say to give the American People no standing in the courts to debate the issue? Does it say to tell the press to ignore the evidence or you’ll have to pay? Let the proof be on the evidence. If Obama was using a social security number that was not his are all those income tax returns filed sine 1980 false? What income is he hiding?
The 14th amendment gave the Federal government power over the States and the Federal courts to legislate from the bench . . Read the case I gave all can argue but until we do the Article v project I have shared with you – if the group pushing the repeal amendment can succeed [will if you help] the issue becomes moot as the Federal government will have no money and limited power of Article I section 8 and the courts Article III. If you take a active interest in pushing a positive action we can win – for the argument here is lost already. http://articlevprojecttorestoreliberty.com/index.html
see also, e.g., Diaz-Salazar v. I.N.S., 700 F.2d 1156, 1160 (7th Cir. 1983) (noting in its recitation of the facts that despite the fact father was not a citizen of the United States, he had children who were “natural-born citizens of the United States”), cert. denied 462 U.S. 1132, 103 S. Ct. 3112 (1983).
Ok…well, it depends on who Ted Cruz really is, (and who his parents are), as most, if not all, of our ‘elected’ ‘officials’ are selected and even fictional, (actors). This will make you drop a deuce unless, (since you site the Royals), you are in on the massive fraud being perpetrated on the everyone who watches ‘the news’, movies, etc.
Wellaware1 is your go-to place for much of the truth; I don’t agree with all of it, even he, Ed Chiarini/Dallas Goldbug, has corrected himself more than once.
Before you delete my comment or write me off as a nut, OPEN YOUR MIND, check out the ear biometrics video he has on his site. After you see how the usual suspects are involved in these many staged events, (including Occupy, Sandy Hook, Trayvon Martin, Chris Dorner), maybe you will see the light.
We are being had on a massive scale. Throw out your history books, and stop watching TV, they’re spewing 90% lies.
The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, establishes that the President must be a “Natural Born Citizen”. At the time the Constitution was written, “Natural Law” was a Fairly new concept.
Natural Born Citizen Came from the Treatise on Natural Law written by Emmerich de Vattel written in 1758 and translated into English in 1765. The is named “Law of Nations or Properties of Natural Law”. Everyone in Law has known since 1791 that a Natural Born Citizen was defined when it was placed in the Constitution after John Jay sent a memo to George Washington at the Constitutional Convention, requesting that he add that requirement to the Constitution, which Washington did. The meaning per Vattel is, “Born in country of Citizen Parents. This was taught in Constitutional Law for 200 years. In 1875 a Supreme Court Ruling, Minor V Happersett ruled that the Natural Born Citizen means, “Born in country of citizen parents, almost exactly mirroring the “Law of Nations”. The Law of Nations is mentioned in the Constitution, but most people, even those that are supposedly “Experts” on the Constitution do not know it. Look and see if you are not a Lazy Liberal Coward that really does not want to know the Truth. See Article 1, Section 8, paragraph 10, it has in Capitals meaning a Proper Name for a Work, It says… “Offences against the ‘Law of Nations’ “. There was another case that the NaziCommieCrats mention to allow any undesirable person to be the President; it is Kim V Wong. And is very likely Unconstitutional.
The Democrats tried 8 times between 2003 and 2007 to remove the NBC Clause from the Constitution, but it failed all 8 times. But the Red/Green Alliance had to move as part of its 50 year Plan to Take control fo the USA Government, so the Democratic Party nominated Barack Obama, even though it was Illegal to nominate an ineligible person for the Presidency.
As much as I love Ted Cruz and I worked to get him in the Texas Primary and the Runoff and the General Election, he “IS NOT” a Natural Born Citizen, just like Marco Rubio who I also Love. But Barack Obama is not even an American Citizen and proof of that is ALL of his Identity Documents are Forgeries and Fraudulent. If he had real ID’s he would not have presented all of those Fraudulent ones.
Thank you for writing this information. I am so sick and tired of hearing the case for Rubio who is not eligible to be President of the United States of America. I really like Ted Cruz but his eligibility is the same, not eligible! I have written about this on other sites where all the people continue to mention Rubio and I ask them if they know the Constitution and if so are they willing to have another illegal president in office if Rubio is given the green light. Even though I like Rubio I am losing respect for him and that is because he will not step forward and say that he is not eligible for the office of President of the United States of America.
See my comment above, but once i saw how he delivered that speech at CPAC, (before I had gone to Wellaware1), I couldn’t help being gagged by the way he was doing the left-right thing with the teleprompter like Barry does. I don’t want a lame, non-natural born citizen, cherub as POTUS.
They are all either frauds like Barry or complicit in the fraud…voting is a futile exercise. WE HAVE NO SAY in what goes on in ‘gov’t’ that is of, by and for Hollywood, the Rockefellers and Greenbergs.
PS, the 14th Amendment is a left over patch made after the Civil War to make Negros freed by that war to be citizens without proving citizenship, because they had been slaves, not citizens. The 14th Amendment does not change the meaning of Natural Born Citizen as required for a President. The purpose of the Natural Born Citizen is to have a President with singular loyalty and also have the mainstream philosophy of the Citizens of that Nation as Natural Law provides. The Nazis and Commies and others that Hate the USA and its Culture, History and society hate the NBC clause because they hate the USA.
Well that worked out well as we have a non citizen fraud in the white house who hates this country and cozies up with the muslim brotherhood.
And the Muslim Brotherhood???
Tes Cruz mother was an American citizen at the time of his birth, his Cuban father had been in the USA since 1958, and if 12 years later, at the time of Ted birth he had not become a citizen, the fact that his mother was a citizen does not make him a ‘natural born citizen’. The same goes for Marco Rubio, whose parents did not become citizen until four years after his birth.
However, if Congress, SCOTUS, the Electoral College overlook Obama’s ineligibility, both Marco and Ted could claim job discrimination under the Fair Employment Act, if Obama is able to finish his second term, without the other two Branches intervening and preventing him to do so.
They both could claim that, “What is good for the goose, ought to be good for the gander.”
Do any of us know who Rubio really is? I think not…No one is trustworthy in ‘gov’t’.
Wellaware1–go there and get your eyes opened.
National politics are not going to change a single issue or save our economy only State actions here can save the republic . . http://articlevprojecttorestoreliberty.com/index.html
You can also study the Constitution and our History in the huge web library.
I do not like being accused of lying . . and the Vattel statement is no where in the founders records and it would have been quoted if that was their intent. This has been debated by many many legal and Constitutional scholars here is my take . . for what it is worth – for it is my OPINION based on reading the following information.
This is a 14th Amendment issue of “NATURAL BORN” and what the Court says is their position.
SCOTUS cases on issue – the Slaughter house case addresses citizenship as a citizen of the United States of America and a separate citizenship of a individual State. the others all come off Slaughter and show the new found power of reach through to the States by the Federal government and the courts. Ending and diminishing States rights and powers. If the founders intended the Bill of rights to apply to the States would they have not spelled that out in detail?
We have debated this many times but you keep trying to say that the SCOTUS must define Natural born – that is not within their power nor is it going to rule on that issue it would at best specify a conflict and send it to Congress for legislative action – IMHO
Here’s a case from 1983 affirming that an anchor baby is a Natural Born.
illegal aliens are not under the juristiction of the US goverment and if they were citizens after having been naturalized the baby would be natural born not merely a citizen.
Split those hairs any way you want, none of it matters. There are too many laws that can be interpreted any way the little dictators want and the ones that matter don’t apply to the ‘ruling’ elite. Our entire ‘gov’t’ is a ‘joke’ and a product of Hollywood.
Wellaware1—go there and get your eyes opened. I did.
Same with obozo,we know he is office ilegaly and we know he wasn’t born in this country because no hospitals anywhere including the one in Hawaii have no records of his birth whatsoever and I’m not talking about a forged B-certificate which was proven to be a fake,that hospital actually came out and said they had no records of any kind showing he was born there plus there’s the fact that if he was born here only one of his parents was a legal citizen,his mother had not remained in this country long enough to be a legal citizen but all in al I still go with he was not born here at all.His relatives say he was born in Kenya and he did to up until 2007 when he found out that the powers to be were going to make certain he got placed in the Wh,as for the others I do not believe they are legal to run for office either but I may be wrong on 1-2 of them
Democrats say no Ted Cruz is not eligible to run for president. But if Hitler was a democrat he is eligible to run according to democrats ie: barack hussein obama.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Would that really be a good thing?