The November 5, 2009, shooting rampage by the cowardly Muslim Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan was wake-up call that has become an example of why America made a grave error in electing Barack Hussein Obama.
Hasan murdered 13 innocent people. All but one were soldiers either just returning from theaters of war or preparing to deploy to combat areas. One of the dead soldiers was pregnant. The remaining victim was an Army civilian employee.
Hassan’s guilt is indisputable. After being shot by an armed civilian guard the only armed personnel at the scene (thanks to Bill Clinton Military bases are “gun free zones”), Hassan was immediately taken into custody. His weapons were recovered. Eyewitness statements were taken, and then the unexpected happened. Nothing further has taken place.
The White House immediately set up whatever roadblocks it could to thwart the Army’s case against Hassan. By December 2009 the ranking Republican member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-MI, had to publicly call Obama out to demand he quit stalling and release the necessary official report on the case so the prosecution could begin. That was 19 long months ago.
Last week Hassan’s civilian lawyer, John Galligan, who has since been fired by the murdering punk, also complained he was being denied access to a number of pertinent documents which could easily be delivered, but just as easily be withheld.
Aulaqi Connection “Red Herring”
Information has surfaced that Intelligence agencies knew this Islamist terrorist Hasan was communicating with another terrorist Anwar al-Aulaqi, who fled our shores to run a jihadist web site in Yeman. This begs the question: So what?
If Hassan and al-Aulaqi are connected that fact can be introduced during this punk’s trial. Holding up a final White House report for 19 months with no end of this delay in sight, to investigate this “connection” is only an excuse to slow this case down. Things like this are nothing new for this Chicago thug.
We’ve seen this kind of subversion of justice to help Obama before. Remember Tony Rezko? Remember he was supposed to hand Obama up when he was finally sentenced? Not surprisingly Rezko has not been sentenced for his June 4, 2008, conviction of 16 federal crimes. That’s more than three years. Moreover, in last January his sentencing was postponed indefinitely.
Does anyone believe for a second that Rezko will allow himself to be sentenced without trying to sellout Obama? Does anyone believe for a second that Obama will allow Hassan’s case to conclude before next year’s election or ever?
To contact your Congressional Representative use this link:http://www.contactingthecongress.org/
To read more use these links:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/11/10/john-lott-ft-hood-end-gun-free-zone/
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/58470
This article originally appeared on CoachIsRight.com and is reprinted with permission.
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
Yes and no! While he is not Islamic, he is a Marxist and both are "Anti-Christ" in belief! In fact there is and soon will be recognized as being a caliphate between Islam and Marxism to destroy America and WE VOTED FOR IT! At least the "majority" voting block did voted for it! Next, comes the two-witnesses of Revelation to severely punish u.s. for 3 1/2 year, which most likely will start next fall(2012), but this fall(2011) is also possible? Watch! p.s., Don't you think it strange that our government obviously now is out to destroy u.s.? Just saying…
i would argue we did not vote him in with all the rampant voter fraud going on.
POLITICAL ELECTIONS voting VOTE PAPER TRAIL MACHINE VOTE VARIFICAION VVPAT http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_…
This development comes after a year long effort by the election integrity organization, TrueVoteCT, along with Common Cause, Verified Voting and other national organizations to promote accurate and verifiable election in the state. Last Spring, in the face of determined resistance from Bysiewicz and U.S. Senator Christopher Dodd, the Connecticut legislature unanimously passed legislation requiring a voter verified paper record of every vote and establishing a random mandatory audit of vote totals.
* http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_…
Yeah we know about Dodd…..
The day the democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009 it was actually
January 3rd 2007 the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives
and the Senate, the start of the 110th Congress. The Democratic Party
controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the
103rd Congress in 1995.
For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that
everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this: January 3rd, 2007 was the day
the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress: At the time: The DOW Jones
closed at 12,621.77 The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5% The Unemployment
rate was 4.6% George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT
MONTHS of JOB CREATION!
Remember the day… January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over
the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate
Banking Committee. The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in
what part of the economy? BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!!! THANK YOU DEMOCRATS
for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% Unemployment… to this CRISIS
by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the
economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOS! (BTW: Bush asked Congress
17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie – starting in 2001 because it was
financially risky for the US economy). And who took the THIRD highest pay-off
from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac???? OBAMA And who fought against reform of
Fannie and Freddie??? OBAMA and the Democratic Congress So when someone tries
to blame Bush… REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007…. THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK
OVER!"
Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal
and steering wheel they were driving. Set the record straight on Bush! "
It's not that liberals aren't smart, it's just that so much of what they know
isn't so" -Ronald Reagan
Obama has always been out to destroy us. Any idiot that couldn't see what he was saying when he said he is going to" change the greatest country in the world" Who would vote for that? Those interested in destroying us or IDIOTS! Obama is outright evil! He needs to "go" away
Who would vote for that? How about we who just finished with Bush. That's the change we wanted, instead Obama just continued and added to Bush's policy's. He bare-faced lied to us to get elected. Since than he has committed 54 impeachable offenses.
Don't call me an idiot.
Don't forget this speech "The United States is a Super Power, whether we like it or not".
Hussein IS a freaking MUSLIM!
Mmmm, yep
I have a simple solution, anyone blocking or impeding this trial effort will be required to take the place of the accussed! That should rectify the situation.
DEarSkydiver: It sounds like the right thng but too out of sight!
Ready, aim, fire..
It would not surprize me if Obama tries to find a reason to not execute the Fort Hood shooter.
He would be shooting himself in the foot, but he would like to I'm sure.
Execute them both!
Obama is not the only saboteur.
http://www.reformdc.com
P.S. Did you vote this week at “you cut”? http://majorityleader.gov/YouCut/
YES, obama is a closet muslim.
too YELLOW to even tell the truth, BUT what do you expect from a serial LIAR !!
He is sabotaging the trial of the muslim that killed people at Ft. Hood probably because he is a muslim. Otherwise why would he be sending millions of dollars overseas to the muslim countries to repair their damn mosques?
Yet, Lt. Col. Lakin was court martialed in quick time for asking for proof that the man acting as his Commander-in-Chief was legitimate!
And, our federal employees, at all levels, do not act to defend Our Constitution – and We the People, their employers, remain complacent….
I just got this email, you may like it.
In church one I overheard the lady in the pew next to me saying a short private prayer.
Dear Lord,
This has been a tough 12 months …
You have taken my favorite actor, Patrick Swayze ;
my favorite actress Farrah Fawcett ; my favorite musician, Michael Jackson ;
my favorite salesman Billy Mays ; and my favorite athlete Steve McNair.
I just wanted you to know that my favorite president is Barrack Obama.
Amen!!!
AMEN, AMEN TO YOUR COMMENT. I PRAY THE GOOD LORD WOULD TAKE THE ILLEGAL ALIEN AS WELL AS THIS ISLAMIC/MUSLIM TERRORIST. PUNISHMENT-"FIRING SQUAD"!!! THAT ILLEGAL ALIEN WOULD BE THE IMPOSTOR TAKING UP SPACE IN THE OVAL-NO ONE -REALLY-KNOWS WHO HE IS!!!! FOR SURE-WE KNOW HE IS PLAYING TREASON/TERRORIST AND DEVIL DESTRUCTION OF USA AND ISRAEL.I WOULD SAY-SOROS PLANTED THE SEED THERE SO HE COULD PULL HIS STRINGS TO DO WHAT THE COMMUNIST WANT!!!
How asinine is it that a military base is a "gun-free" zone. We trust our military to put their lives on the line everywhere else, but they can't have weapon on an American base because someone might get hurt? Well, lots of soldiers got hurt because they were not armed.
How is it that after nearly TWO YEARS this worthless lump of pig excrement is still breathing. How is it that this lump of pigsh*t has a "civilian" lawyer. His is a military officer who slaughtered military personel – he certainly is not entitled to a CIVILIAN ANYTHING.
Obama had Terry Lakin Courts Martialed for asking for proof – as REQUIRED UNDER THE UCMJ – that Obama is "Commander-in-Chief".
Obama was not "elected" to the office he now occupies as an Usurper – you must be "eligible" in order to be "elected".
Obama has never taken an "Oath of Office" – the first was flubbed in public, the second, in private, no Bible? The Oath must be "word for word", before WE THE PEOPLE, and an Oath cannot be sworn without it being sworn to something higher than yourself – even if Obama does think he is above ALL.
Obama is guilty of fraud, deceit, piracy, treason …… the list goes on.
Obama, unilaterally, invaded the Nation of Libya in an attempt to depose Gaddafi and is now openly supporting a known, recognized enemy of this country.
Obama, by these actions, has caused the entire Joint Chiefs to commit High Treason.
Obama and Hillary just stole $30B belonging to the Nation of Libya, entrusted to American banks and GAVE IT TO AL QEADA – a known enemy with whom we are in open conflict in at least two other countries.
Obama and Holder had ensured that weapons would be taken into Mexico and Honduras, illegally and unlawfully, against the better judgement of firearms dealers, and with the assistance of FBI, BATF. American Law Enforcement personnel have been killed with those weapons – Obama and Holder are guilty of MURDER.
Obama and his entire entourage must be captured and held accountable – to death, if necessary.
Our ENTIRE CONGRESS is guilty of aiding in Obama's endeavors.
Obama's latest fraud – the second Birth Certificate – issued (supposedly) after the State of Hawaii "verified" the first one and claimed that that was all there was because 'all other copies were destroyed after the electronic copies were made'. Not only was this 'second document' resurrected from the nether world, but dozens of "experts in their respective fields" have examined it and stated that it is fraudulent.
Any member of Congress who does nothing to arrest this fraud is now guilty of TREASON and should be arrest, tried, and (if found guilty) put to death.
How long must WE THE PEOPLE wait. It is not only the RIGHT, but THE DUTY of WE THE PEOPLE to undo a government than no longer honors and upholds the principles and LAWS upon which this nation was founded.
Your right on and you have just touched the tip of the criminal iceberg. What we have is the greatest collection of criminals in American history operating our former government. The world is watching in disbelief as the sheep sit idly by. We are the most heavily armed citizenry in history and everyone just sits on their hands as we go sliding into the dust bin of history. They work for us, we have the right, no, we have a duty to arrest them all for treason, sedition and bushel full of treasonous acts. They must be tried publicly, like the post WWII Nuremberg trials and gifted with a rope necklace!
Can we now all say we have a Muslim in the White House, because it is no longer up for discussion!
You sure have all of that right! I agree 100%
“Blackberry” and his wife both hate the United States and they want to destroy it by destroying the economy through spending. Why can’t people see this? This is why we are in Libya. No matter which side wins we lose but Blackberry wins because there he can spend millions of dollars every day by firing missiles. Look at the vacations they take both together and separately. Blackberry is flying somewhere in AF-1 almost every other day. This costs millions. Why don’t we have both Democrats and Republicans with enough courage and most of all LOVE OF THIS COUNTRY, to begin impeachment proceedings?
These people are all working with the globalist elites of the NWO to bring down our economy and destroy our currency. We are slated to become a third-world country .. by design. Our Congress and Judiciary are all complicit in high crimes and misdemeanors, treason and sedition. Unfortunately, the American people have been so dumbed down they don't have a clue. When all their freebies are cut off, and the dollar is dead, they will be dumbfounded, but it will be too late. It is also too late for talking.
If he stalls long enough they can all swing together.
Well the truth be told is that Hassan Holder and Obama are complicit and responsible for the deaths of Fort Hood Soldiers and also through the Obama Holder Project Gunrunner and Project Fast and Furious also duplicitous in the murder of Border Patrol agents — All three of these rotten bastards are murderers
and should suffer the same fate — Death by firing squad
Where are the obots that are usually spouting o's praises on this blog? None have an opinion? Where are his defenders?
Ern just like a reoccurring nightmare they will be back on Monday. Until we get closer to the election the D.N.C. is not paying for overtime or weekends.
They are here, all three of them, I can tell by your up and down clicks. You can basically add 3 ups to most posts.
donjusko you are so right! Plus we know all three of them. Anything I post usually has two or three thumbs down almost immediately which just shows their immaturity. But then again they are getting paid for it so i guess you could say they are just doing their job?
donjusko & Ern listed below is the latest on the Obots.
WND Exclusive CERTIFIGATE
Top anti-'birther' confirmed to be ex-Fannie Mae chief
'There isn't much point to denial,' source says of White House-linked James A. Johnson
Posted: July 31, 2011
5:18 pm Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WND
This is the fourth in a series of continuing articles aimed at exposing the "OBOTs" – radical supporters of Barack Obama dedicated to disrupting people who question Obama's eligibility to be president.
The first article exposed former California lawyer William L. Bryan, aka "P.J. Foggy." The second article exposed Foggy's sidekick, Kurt Coleman, aka "Rikker." The third article exposed James A. Johnson, former head of Fannie Mae, as "JimBot," the White House contact and organizer of the "Fogbow" OBOTs posting on Bryan's website Fogbow.com.
A radical Obama supporter who organizes an "Obama-Robot" website has admitted in online posts that WND correctly identified former chairman of Fannie Mae chairman James A. Johnson as the group's White House-associated ring-leader. William L. Bryan, who posts under the username "P.J. Foggy," is the organizer of Fogbow.com, a self described "OBOT," or "Obama-Robot" website. On his weekly "Reality Check Radio" broadcast July 21, Bryan began the show by acknowledging the veracity of the WND report.
"As far as I know [WND] got the boss," he said. "There just isn't much point to denial."
Read more: Top anti-'birther' confirmed to be ex-Fannie Mae chief http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=327369#ixzz1Tv5POzTf
Yes he is. This low-life scumbag should already been tried and executed. They would go back to tdhe middle ages for the method of execution. Nineteen months and Hassan is still laughing it up.
Here's a game changer, the Supreme just made a new ruling and it backs State and Individuals Sovereignty while protecting the Constitution and reversing lower courts rulings against it.
On June 16, 2011, the US Supreme Court overturned a US Court of Appeal ruling;
"In short, a law 'beyond the power of Congress,' for any reason, is 'no law at all."
Carol Anne Bond vs. United States, No. 09–1227, 564 U. S. ____ (June 16, 2011)
Full document: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-122…
Excerpts:
"The Court of Appeals held that because a State was not a party to the federal criminal proceeding, petitioner had no standing to challenge the statute as an infringement upon the powers reserved to the States. Having concluded that petitioner does have standing to challenge the federal statute on these grounds, this Court now reverses that determination…
"The federal balance is, in part, an end in itself, to ensure that States function as political entities in their own right…State sovereignty is not just an end in itself: ‘Rather, federalism secures to citizens the liberties that derive from the diffusion of sovereign power.’” New York v. United States, 505 U. S. 144, 181 (1992) (quoting Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U. S. 722, 759 (1991) (Blackmun, J., dissenting))…
"Federalism secures the freedom of the individual. It allows States to respond, through the enactment of positive law, to the initiative of those who seek a voice in shaping the destiny of their own times without having to rely solely upon the political processes that control a remote central power…the individual liberty secured by federalism is not simply derivative of the rights of the States…
"Federalism also protects the liberty of all persons within a State by ensuring that laws enacted in excess of delegated governmental power cannot direct or control their actions. See ibid. By denying any one government complete jurisdiction over all the concerns of public life, federalism protects the liberty of the individual from arbitrary power. When government acts in excess of its lawful powers, that liberty is at stake…
"The limitations that federalism entails are not therefore a matter of rights belonging only to the States. States are not the sole intended beneficiaries of federalism.…
"An individual has a direct interest in objecting to laws that upset the constitutional balance between the National Government and the States when the enforcement of those laws causes injury that is concrete, particular, and redressable. Fidelity to principles of federalism is not for the States alone to vindicate…
"The public policy of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, enacted in its capacity as sovereign, has been displaced by that of the National Government…
"Impermissible interference with state sovereignty is not within the enumerated powers of the National Government, see New York, 505 U. S., at 155–159, and action that exceeds the National Government’s enumerated powers undermines the sovereign interests of States. See United States v. Lopez, 514 U. S. 549, 564 (1995)…
"Bond, like any other defendant, has a personal right not to be convicted under a constitutionally invalid law…See also North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U. S. 711, 739 (1969) (Black, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) ('Due process . . . is a guarantee that a man should be tried and convicted only in accordance with valid laws of the land.')…
"In this case, Bond argues that the statute under which she was charged, 18 U. S. C. §229, exceeds Congress’ enumerated powers and violates the Tenth Amendment. Other defendants might assert that a law exceeds Congress’ power because it violates the Ex Post Facto Clause, or the Establishment Clause, or the Due Process Clause. Whatever the claim, success on the merits would require reversal of the conviction. “An offense created by [an unconstitutional law],” the Court has held, “is not a crime.” Ex parte Siebold, 100 U. S. 371, 376 (1880). “A conviction under [such a law] is not merely erroneous, but is illegal and void, and cannot be a legal cause of imprisonment.” Id., at 376–377. If a law is invalid as applied to the criminal defendant’s conduct, the defendant is entitled to go free.
"…a court has no “prudential” license to decline to consider whether the statute under which the defendant has been charged lacks constitutional application to her conduct. And that is so even where the constitutional provision that would render the conviction void is directed at protecting a party not before the Court…(reversal required even if, going forward, Congress would cure the unequal treatment by extending rather than invalidating the criminal proscription).
"In short, a law 'beyond the power of Congress,' for any reason, is 'no law at all.' Nigro v. United States, 276 U. S. 332, 341 (1928). The validity of Bond’s conviction depends upon whether the Constitution permits Congress to enact (18 USC) §229. Her claim that it does not must be considered and decided on the merits."