You are here: Home / Blogs / Coachisright / Is Mitt That Different From Obama?

Is Mitt That Different From Obama?

February 23, 2012 By 3 Comments

mitt romney12 243x300 Is Mitt That Different From Obama?

Believing Willard Romney when he is talking about not forcing Catholic hospitals to dispense R U 486 pills is not easy.

During last night’s Republican Presidential primary debate in Arizona, Willard used strong unequivocal words to deny that as governor of Massachusetts he had forced Catholic hospitals to dispense “morning after” RU 486 abortion inducing pills which is against the moral teachings of the Catholic Church. Romney said, “No, absolutely not. Of course not. There was no requirement in Massachusetts for the Catholic Church to provide morning-after pills to rape victims. That was entirely voluntary on their part. There was no such requirement.”

Did Willard tell the truth? You decide.

On December 8, 2005 as governor of Massachusetts Willard Romney announced that private hospitals including those run by the Catholic Church would be forced by the power of the State of Massachusetts to offer emergency contraception to sexual assault victims without regard for the moral convictions of the hospital’s administration.

What made this still worse was that right up until his flip flop on this issue Willard had defended the right of Catholic hospitals to refuse to dispense these RU 486 pills. It came out of the blue.

The cynical explanation for the turnaround was that a Romney lawyer had concluded the recently enacted Romneycare program (callously signed  the preceding spring during Easter Week) supersedes a preexisting state law that allowed an exemption for Catholic and other faith based conscious driven organizations.

This turnabout presupposes that Romney honestly did not realize his monstrosity would nullify the earlier exemption.

The grounds for Romney’s announcement were undermined by a Massachusetts Department of Public Health statement, made around the same time, which reaffirmed the exemption. It  disagreed saying Romneycare does not supersede a previous statute protecting the conscious rights of private medical facilities.

When you add the fact that in a September 2002 meeting with NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts Romney promised the ghouls in attendance that they would have a friend in “Washington” (if they helped him someday get elected president) it becomes difficult to believe Mister Romney when he says he never forced Catholic hospitals to dispense R U 486. Don’t you agree?

Bypass the Mass Media: Get Articles Just Like This Straight To Your Inbox!


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.


Read More on this Subject

  1. Warning To Pro-Life Voters: The Real Mitt Romney On Abortion Romney on Abortion There are a number of “Voter’s Guides”...
  2. Blood Money: Mitt Romney’s Medicare Scandal Debating in Tampa, Florida in late-January, while falsely characterizing Newt...
  3. How Obama’s Policies Are Spiking The Catholic Vote “We cannot — we will not — comply with this...
  4. This Is No Time For Mitt Romney’s Coronation With one caucus and one primary completed, there is a...
  5. Why Obama Desperately Wants A HUDNA (Muslim Fake Truce) With The Catholic Church Catholic Bishops take note: It’s a HUDNA!  Please don’t do it. Barack Hussain...
Filed Under: Coachisright, Commentary, Featured Stories Tagged With: ,

Comments

  1. Avatar of pklamb pklamb says:
    February 23, 2012 at 2:36 pm

    Romney was being completely accurate and honest. This is the kind of article meant only for destructive purposes–and I mean destructive to conservatives. Romney is an honorable, conservative man, and we can believe what he has said. To portray him as anything else is dishonest.

    Report user
  2. Avatar of Dark_Archer Dark_Archer says:
    February 23, 2012 at 5:04 pm

    watch these two videos , this man is a constitutional scholar and he is telling us obama is not eligible to be president of this country according to our Constitution, no other constitutional scholar has come forth to deny these facts , no one in our govt is doing anything about it , obama is a fraud and a traitor to our republic our laws and constitution, what do we do ? do we have to start a civil war to rid our govt of this usurper ? our congress and senate do nothing , they are cowards , they are afraid of a black uprising if we kick the first black president out of office and imprison him or worse hang him for high treason, this man is destroying our nation he is dividing us using class warfare to keep the sheepels minds off the real problem… our govt has been hijacked by a conman and he has pulled the biggest hoax in the history of our republic on ”WE THE PEOPLE” , we have been deceived by this fraud obama and we need to do something about it befor he destroys this country…. pass this on if your a patriot …delete it if you’re not or you just dont care about whats happening to our America

    The evaluation of the meaning of “natural born citizen” in the Constitution comes from Dr. Herbert W. Titus, of counsel to the law firm William J. Olson.
    He previously taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools. From 1986 to 1993 he was the founding dean of the College of Law and Government at Regent University.
    And before that, he was a trial attorney and special assistant U.S. attorney with the Department of Justice.
    His degrees are from Harvard and the University of Oregon, and he’s admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court, appellate courts in the 6th, 7th, 9th, 10th and other districts. His practice has taken him into courts more than a dozen different states.
    His perspective:
    part 1 & 2

    PT 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PqeV0ZlZ1Cw

    PT 2
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ&feature=player_detailpage

    Report user
  3. Avatar of teapartier teapartier says:
    February 23, 2012 at 9:11 pm

    I don’t believe Willard Romney, either, especially after he told NARAL, a pro-abortion group, that they’d have a friend in the White House if they help elect him president. He’s lying just like Obozo does. I don’t trust Romney. It’s easy to say you are a conservative, but if your record shows that you supported liberal issues, that tells the ‘truth.’ Actions speak louder than words. Romney did support child-killing and same-sex marriage when he was Governor of Mass. That’s how he’ll be as president. He, also, wastes big money on attack ads against Santorum and Gingrich which I do not like at all. This is the same technique Obama uses. Romney should be using his money to attack Obozo instead. See website: http://www.haasstrep68.com
    If you want to help stop the corrupt Obama political machine from stealing the 2012 elections contact: Thomas Fitton, President of Judicial Watch, 425 Third Street SW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20024; Tel: (202) 646-5172; FAX: (202) 646-5199 email: info@judicialwatch.org http://www.JudicialWatch.org

    Report user

Speak Your Mind