Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Huckabee On O’Reilly: Did Obama Get Foreign Student Loans In College?
January 21, 2012 by 7 Comments
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Comments
Speak Your Mind
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Loading ...
O’Reilly has a deaf ear when it comes to the illegal antics of the Mysery Man who refuses to produce a BC, remove the legal restraint from his records, produce a college thesis, GPA or transcript, his SS# is in question and yet to O’Reilly this doesn’t seem to be of any major matter…..the guy in the WH is a flagrant fraud Billy and it would be good of you to push for inquiry…..Fair and Unbalanced.
O’Reilly says what he’s told to say!
Thats right, just as they told Beck to shut up before he left FOX.
You can bet you booty on this: Billy O’Reilly will not touch this subject! His staff has already done the investigation and, “sure ‘nough, Obozo is exactly who and what he says he is”, Billy has said it many times and if Billy says it’s so, it’s so! O’Reilly doesn’t have the guts to take this on, it might make his chances of being invited to the White House press dinner go down.
I quit watching O’reilly when he started defending Obomination. I felt that “fair and balanced” had flew out the window. We have heard from far too many who should know ( governor, head of elections, Obama’s grandmother, etc) that he was not born in Hawii. This is irrelevant though because his father was not a citizen of the USA and so Obomination doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen even IF he were a native born citizen. He was adopted by Lolo Soetoro and moved to Indonesia where only Indonesian citizens were by law allowed to attend school, and he went to school there for some years. There are several places on You-Tube where both he and Mooshell refer to Kenya as his home country. At present in Kenya, the press is barred from visiting Obomination’s family there by Kenyan troops and they have a school named after him. So, like it or not he is guilty of fraud, using forged documents, and spying (as Comander-in=Chief ). Considering all of this, O’reilly is a pin-head.
The facts will never be known unless public investigative authority is invoked to dig them out.
A Georgia case, Welden v. Obama, has finally reached the merits of Obama’s eligibility, on misleadingly incomplete facts, which do not include Obama’s original birth certificate showing his actual birth parents, or any consideration of his possible loss of U.S. citizenship. Amicus curiae objects; his suggestions to the Court follow, with a cover letter. Hearing will be on 26 January 2012 in Atlanta, The Honorable Michael M. Malihi presiding. Judge Malihi’s Case Management Assistant, Valerie Ruff, vruff@osah.ga.gov, might be urged to call the judge’s attention to the suggestions, and ask the judge to read and heed their appeal for an exhaustive investigation of Obama’s eligibility, which will probably elicit evidence of his concealment of foreign citizenship and anti-American allegiance in the bargain. (And prove that Obama was an natural born U.S. citizen on the day of his birth; sorry, birthers. There are dreams that will not be, and there are storms we can not weather.)
The sly malice of the Obama cabal combined with the grievous stupidity of the birthers do not augur well for a just and true resolution of the open questions of Obama’s birth and U.S. citizenship.
But we’re obliged to keep trying.
Cover letter:
Office of State Administrative Hearings
Attention: Hon. Michael M. Malihi, Judge
230 Peachtree Street, N.W., Suite 850
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1556
RE: Crucial Investigation of Presidential Candidate
Dear Judge Malihi:
Enclosed please find the original and three copies of amicus curiae suggestions in Welden v. Obama.
As indicated in the suggestions, it is reprehensible and highly prejudicial to good order, the Court, and Your Honor’s state and nation to try the case on misleadingly incomplete facts.
I am confident that Obama’s vital records will disclose that his claimed alien father was not in fact his birth father, and will corroborate Dr. Fukino’s finding that Obama was a natural born U.S. citizen on the day of his birth.
Thereafter the Court could move to the real eligibility issue, whether Obama relinquished his U.S. citizenship through foreign naturalization, a potentially expatriating act.
Disclosure of Obama’s true birth parents should allay the risk of public disorder.
The Court’s attention to these matters is greatly appreciated.
Suggestions:
OFFICE OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF GEORGIA
DAVID F. WELDEN, :
:
Plaintiff, : Docket Number: OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-
: 1215137-60-MALIHI
v. :
: Counsel for Plaintiff: Van R. Irion
BARACK OBAMA, :
: Counsel for Defendant: Michael Jablonski
Defendant. :
________________________
Application and Suggestions of Amicus Curiae
Comes now Albert W. L. Moore, Jr., of the Missouri and United States Supreme Court bars and others, and prays that the Court, in the interests of justice, judicial economy and enforcement of the United States Constitution, waive any pesky formal requirements for his submission of amicus curiae suggestions and take the following suggestions in this case and those consolidated with it, made on information and belief:
GENERAL
1. Court and counsel are to be commended for reaching the merits of the constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama (“Obama”). However, the Court risks decision on incomplete facts posing a false issue regarding Obama’s eligibility at birth. Plaintiff in this case has been tricked by Obama into erroneously stipulating that Obama’s father was a man known to be an alien at the time of Obama’s birth, without obtaining discovery of Obama’s original birth certificate showing his actual birth parents. This wastes the Court’s time on a false issue. The Court should take over and conduct thorough discovery to avoid confusion, waste of judicial time, and a false precedent in disregard of the real constitutional eligibility issue, which is Obama’s possible loss of American citizenship from his naturalization as a citizen of Indonesia, a potentially expatriating act. Obama presses the Court extra-judicially by implicitly threatening the Court with violence in the streets, if it decides against Obama’s eligibility, by those who still believe Obama’s hoax that his birth father was a black alien.
2. The Court can quickly verify Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility as a natural born United States citizen, on the day of his birth, by taking over discovery and subpoenaing Obama’s DNA and all of his Hawai’ian vital records, probably consisting of an original birth certificate showing his actual birth parents and his amended birth certificate showing adoptive parents Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama, an alien black Luo tribesman. Analysis of Obama’s DNA will prove that it is biologically impossible for him to be the son of his claimed birth parents, which conclusively disproves the “birth certificate” (actually an adoption certificate) proffered by Obama on 27 April 2011. Obama’s real, original birth certificate will show two American citizens, genetically consistent
- 2 -
with Obama, as his birth parents, thus corroborating the statement of Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino on 27 July 2009, set out in full in the discussion below. Obama refuses to release his original birth certificate, partly because it proves that he is not half Negro, but also to evade consideration of the real eligibility issue, his possible loss of American citizenship in acquiring Indonesian citizenship. If direct subpoena of the Hawai’ian custodian of Obama’s vital records be a problem, the Court could require that they be produced by Obama’s consent to their release by the custodian, with a certification by the custodian that they comprehend all of Obama’s vital records held by Hawai’i’s Department of Health. As substantiation of the Court’s finding and part of the case file, Obama’s vital records, or copies duly certified to be true and complete, should be public property open to public scrutiny, not held under seal and in secrecy. This Court is not a Star Chamber.
3. The Court should conduct thorough discovery of Obama’s Indonesian citizenship and its effect on his American citizenship. Investigation of Obama’s American citizenship is long overdue. It will take a long time, and must be started soon to complete before the Democratic Party’s 2012 nominating convention and the 2012 general election.
4. The Court should appoint an officer in the nature of a special master, or assign the Obama ballot matter to a specific judge, in either event the judge or
- 3 -
other officer to devote full time to verifying by original documents, and real evidence including genetic analysis, Obama’s eligibility at birth, and to confirm his naturalization as an Indonesian citizen and its effect, if any, on his American citizenship. Alternatively, the Court might require Obama’s consent to the release of all of his Hawai’ian vital records and such other evidence as the Court might require to confirm his American citizenship and his current status as a natural born American citizen as the term is used in Article II Section 1 of the United States Constitution.
5. It appears that Obama has spun an elaborate scheme to be elected to the Office of President by pretending to be the son of the alien black man who adopted him. In furtherance of the scheme, he used a contrived controversy over his constitutional status at birth to distract attention from the question of whether he lost his American citizenship by voluntarily becoming a naturalized citizen of Indonesia with the intent of relinquishing American citizenship. This has been done with the able assistance of many dishonest lawyers, another subject that should concern the Court and attract its attention. In this very proceeding, counsel for Obama in particular should have known that there was an additional undisclosed long form birth certificate in Hawai’i’s Department of Health proving that the alleged alien birth father to Obama was not in fact Obama’s birth father.
- 4 -
Obama’s counsel has either been less than candid on the facts stipulated, or he has neglected to make due investigation of his client and the pertinent facts of the case. If the stipulated alien father is not in fact Obama’s father, it would seem that there is no case or controversy and the Court has no jurisdiction to decide the academic point of law. Should the controversy be more broadly defined, as whether Obama is eligible, the Court should be entitled to demand either directly or through the parties all evidence relevant and material to his citizenship. Counsel have served the Court and the law poorly by putting the case to the Court on incomplete and misleading facts that purport to create a case or controversy that is merely academic, or is a significantly incomplete and materially misleading statement of the facts of an actual case or controversy. The Court has jurisdiction to determine its jurisdiction. Confirmation that Obama retained his American citizenship (which is conceivable, though he might have long ago foresworn any allegiance that he might have had to the United States) requires extensive official investigation. If such investigation is not initiated very soon and prosecuted expeditiously, election officials and the Court will find themselves caught short. Bush, et al. v. Gore et al., 531 U.S. 98, 108 (2000): “The press of time does not diminish the constitutional concern. A desire for speed is not a general excuse for ignoring equal protection
- 5 -
guarantees.” Part of the Obama strategy is to play for time until it is too late to investigate the real issue of his constitutional eligibility.
OBAMA A NATURAL BORN AMERICAN CITIZEN AT BIRTH
6. “Birthers”, those who believe Obama was constitutionally ineligible at birth, have often lost objectivity in analyzing the facts. (In all fairness, this is in part due to the paucity of known facts on the Obama matter.) Consequently, they have blundered into profound error and specious speculation, much of which has been counterproductive. Obama has played them as a toreador plays a bull – shaking a distraction off to the side, which the poor dumb beast charges. In this case, Plaintiff is tantalized by the prospect of a “quick fix”, a purported alien father to Obama. The problem is, the alien is not his father. He adopted him. This conjecture is hardly in a league with Poincare’s, which required many years, some geniuses, and computer science to solve. The Court can prove or disprove this conjecture by obtaining and analyzing Obama’s vital records and DNA. However, there are very strong clues pointing to Obama’s Hawai’ian adoption, starting with the 27 July 2009 statement by Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino, then the Director of Hawai’i’s Department of Health and custodian of vital records, which follows in its entirety:
I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the
- 6 -
Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama
was born in Hawai’i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.
Indeed, this statement precludes any truly candid counsel from representing to a court that Obama’s father was Obama the alien black man. Such a representation is inconsistent with Dr. Fukino’s finding that Obama was “a natural-born American citizen.” Dr. Fukino refers to “vital records”. Obama was still alive, so there would not be a death certificate, but there must be a vital record in addition to his original birth certificate. How would such an additional vital record come to be? Read on.
7. When a child is born in Hawai’i, a contemporaneous record of birth is made, showing actual birth parents. This is retained to protect against violation of the rule against consanguinity. Dr. Fukino was referring to the original birth certificate when she stated that Obama was “a natural-born American citizen”.
8. When the child is adopted, as by hypothesis Obama was at birth, an amended birth certificate is created, showing adoptive parents. Obama’s amended birth certificate was the basis for the abstract entitled “CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH”, the proof of birth typically used in part to conceal the fact of an adoption. On 27 April 2011, Obama presented a photograph of his amended birth certificate, cropped or masked to delete the word “AMENDED”, probably typed above the printed title of the long form “CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH”.
- 7 -
9. Dr. Fukino had to contend with the confidentiality of adoptions when making her statement of 27 July 2009. But she could not avoid giving away the fact of an adoption, by claiming the “original vital records” showed that Obama was “a natural-born American citizen”. Barack Hussein Obama the black Luo tribesman could not be Obama’s birth father if Obama was a natural born American citizen, because the Luo tribesman was an alien. Dr. Fukino was relying on the original birth certificate component of the “original vital records” to which she referred.
10. I assume that Dr. Fukino made her finding on the basis of an original birth certificate showing two U.S. citizen birth parents, but the Court’s subpoena of the “original vital records” referred to by Dr. Fukino is required for a definitive determination of Obama’s eligibility at birth. If the Court finds all the relevant facts, it need not decide whether to set a false precedent, confirming eligibility on a frivolous argument based on false facts that include an alien father who was not Obama’s, or denying eligibility on the false stipulation of the parties that Obama had an alien father. Either way, appeals would be taken, wasting the time of this and other courts, and Obama would eventually, if necessary, use his original birth certificate, submitted under seal and an order not to disclose, so that the electorate would not learn that he only pretended to be half Negro for fraudulent political
- 8 -
purposes. The Court can foreclose this waste of time and delay by obtaining all of Obama’s vital records from Hawai’i’s Health Department Director. Adoption confidentiality must yield to the interests of the state in determining Obama’s eligibility and the true basis for it. It must not be used to perpetrate election fraud or fraud on the Court.
11. Other clues pop up, from time to time, indicating that Obama’s original birth certificate remains undisclosed. Early in 2011, a character named Tim Adams, who had sworn that there was no long form birth certificate for Obama, broadcast a suggestion that Obama release his long form birth certificate, “if he has one”, even if it did not “go along with” Obama’s official autobiography. Adams offered the lame excuse that Obama was “fibbing” in his autobiography, standard operating procedure with politicians according to Mr. Adams. It seemed the cat was out of the bag, or was feared to be, and Adams was doing damage control. But the “birth certificate” released on 27 April 2011 was entirely consistent with the fraudulent autobiography; hence there must be another vital record, the original birth certificate, still undisclosed.
12. Dr. Fukino, in an interview with Michael Isikoff, described the original birth certificate as half typed and half handwritten. The document released by Obama on 27 April 2011 was entirely typed. This is another significant clue that
- 9 -
Obama’s original birth certificate, and the “birth certificate” released on 27 April 2011, are two different documents, and that Dr. Fukino based her conclusion that Obama was a natural born American citizen on the original, not the adoption certificate that Obama falsely claimed on 27 April 2011 to be his original birth certificate.
13. Obama conceals his original birth certificate identifying his actual birth parents because neither was Negro, not because it disproves his constitutional eligibility. The original would confirm his constitutional eligibility at birth, per Dr. Fukino. He fraudulently claims his adoptive parents as birth parents so that he can make racist appeals for votes while denigrating critics and opponents as racists.
14. Hence when Plaintiff says on page 1 of his Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, “The only fact relevant to this case is the fact that the Defendant’s father was not a U.S. citizen”, he could not be more mistaken. He speaks in ignorance or willful disregard of Obama’s original birth certificate, showing actual parents, which has not been disclosed. If the Court will subpoena or otherwise obtain Obama’s original birth certificate, the Court will find that Obama was a natural born American citizen at the time of his birth. (And it will find other significant information not directly pertaining to constitutional eligibility.) Obama’s original birth certificate is the key documentary evidence required to
- 10 -
confirm Obama’s constitutional eligibility at birth. As the Court is charged with the duty of verifying Obama’s constitutional eligibility, it must have inherent power to discover and use the evidence necessary to that end, or to deny placement of the candidate on the ballot if the Court is denied access to the requisite evidence. When the Court has all of the relevant and material evidence pertaining to Obama’s constitutional eligibility at his birth, it becomes unnecessary to decide the academic point of whether a candidate with an alien parent is eligible or not. Again, the original birth certificate will prove that Obama was “a natural-born American citizen” at the time of his birth.
OBAMA’S POSSIBLE LOSS OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP
15. The Court should then move on to the real issue of Obama’s constitutional eligibility, his possible loss of American citizenship. The status of natural born American citizen can be acquired only at birth. But it can be lost thereafter, by loss of American citizenship altogether. The term “natural born U.S. citizen” subsumes the term “citizen”. Obama can not be a natural born U.S. citizen
if he is not a U.S. citizen at all, even if he was a natural born U.S. citizen on the day of his birth. If in fact Obama relinquished his American citizenship, he became constitutionally ineligible for all time, and never became President.
- 11-
16. The State Department has noted that naturalization as a foreign citizen is a potentially expatriating act, as is a conviction for treason:
POTENTIALLY EXPATRIATING ACTS
Section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1481), as amended, states that U.S. citizens are subject to loss of citizenship if they perform certain specified acts voluntarily and with the intention to relinquish U.S. citizenship. Briefly stated, these acts include:
1. obtaining naturalization in a foreign state [my italics] (Sec. 349 (a) (1) INA);
2. taking an oath, affirmation or other formal declaration to a foreign state or its political subdivisions (Sec. 349 (a) (2) INA);
3. entering or serving in the armed forces of a foreign state engaged in hostilities against the U.S. or serving as a commissioned or non-
commissioned officer in the armed forces of a foreign state (Sec. 349 (a) (3) INA);
4. accepting employment with a foreign government if (a) one
has the nationality of that foreign state or (b) an oath or declaration of allegiance is required in accepting the position (Sec. 349 (a) (4) INA);
5. formally renouncing U.S. citizenship before a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer outside the United States (Sec. 349 (a) (5) INA);
6. formally renouncing U.S. citizenship within the U.S. (but only under strict, narrow statutory conditions) (Sec. 349 (a) (6) INA);
7. conviction for an act of treason (Sec. 349 (a) (7) INA).
- 12 -
ADMINISTRATIVE STANDARD OF EVIDENCE
As already noted, the actions listed above can cause loss of U.S. citizenship only if performed voluntarily and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. citizenship. The Department has a uniform administrative standard of evidence based on the premise that U.S.
citizens intend to retain United States citizenship when they obtain naturalization in a foreign state, subscribe to a declaration of allegiance to a foreign state, serve in the armed forces of a foreign state not engaged in hostilities with the United States, or accept non-policy level employment with a foreign government.
See http://travel.state.gov/law/citizenship/citizensh….
17. Obama’s volition and intent are factual issues that require extensive evidence-taking, legal and factual analysis, and argument. Obama seems to believe (perhaps wrongly) that the issue would be resolved in favor of his relinquishment of U.S. citizenship, for he has almost certainly made criminal and seditious bargains with, among others, the government of Indonesia to conceal evidence of his Indonesian citizenship.
CONCLUSION
18. Determination of Obama’s current citizenship or citizenships does not lend itself to the birthers’ dream of a quick fix at his birth. Exhaustive official investigation is essential to resolve the issue of his American citizenship. A congressional or legislative investigating committee, or a prosecutor, would have the luxury of finding the facts inconclusive. A court, it is suggested, has an
- 13 -
obligation to decide one way or the other, on such evidence as can be found and inferences therefrom, or through sanctions for withholding evidence relevant and material to eligibility. Obama’s citizenship will require exhaustive investigation, much of it international. It would seem appropriate for the Court to appoint a special master, perhaps a retired judge, to take evidence on a full-time basis. I have over a decade of international legal experience worldwide, including Indonesia. I would be willing to help the special master for expenses only, and would plan to form a team that would tentatively include, if they be willing, Philip J. Berg, Esq., an attorney who has worked with Indonesian counsel on Indonesian citizenship, Tom Schweich, Missouri’s State Auditor, who has audited accounts in Afghanistan, Kris Kobach, Secretary of State for Kansas, an expert on the law of U.S. citizenship, and Wayne Madsen, who has reported on Stanley Ann Dunham’s activities in Indonesia.
19. For decades the United States Supreme Court held itself above the fray with regard to congressional reapportionment, refusing to enter that “political thicket”. Finally, it concluded that the political process could not cure itself, and took on the matter. Similarly, in this case, officials such as congressmen have refused to inquire into the facts, for fear of being branded racists, even though actual inquiry would reveal that the basis of Obama’s racist political appeal was a
- 14 -
hoax. Hence once again the courts must find the facts and enforce the law, the political process having failed. And the adversary system is failing.
20. The adversary system, for all its virtues and general effectiveness in grinding slowly but finely to find the truth, has its limits. A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds. Here both sides have their reasons for proceeding on the basis of misleadingly incomplete facts, but their want of candor or caution puts the Court needlessly in the position of risking race war if it decides the academic point consistently with over two hundred years of understanding. Plaintiff thinks he can win at the starting gate on the true definition of natural born citizen as used in Article II Section 1 of the Constitution. Defendant thinks he can prevail on a false and frivolous definition of natural born American citizen and a “birth certificate” proffered by Obama on 27 April 2011, which is a forgery in the sense that it is not what it purports to be: Obama’s original birth certificate. If so, this would not be the first time the law has changed as a result of specious and frivolous argument aided by judicial ignorance of the facts and a risk of civil strife if the Court decides according to the correct view of the academic point presented. Defendant also presses this Court extra-judicially with the implicit threat of a race war if the Court does not allow onto the Georgia ballot a presidential candidate fraudulently pretending to be half Negro. Further, if Defendant does not prevail on
- 15 -
the incomplete and misleading facts, then Defendant counts on his ability to disclose his hole card, his true original birth certificate showing two U.S. citizen parents, and to submit it under seal and safeguarded by a non-disclosure order, so that the electorate will remain ignorant of his true racial heritage and the real basis of his constitutional eligibility at birth. This after wasting the time of this Court and others in verifying Obama’s constitutional eligibility at birth, which could have been swiftly confirmed by the full disclosure of Obama’s vital records and DNA. Moreover, the real eligibility issue, the possible loss of Obama’s American citizenship by his naturalization as an Indonesian citizen, would have been totally ignored, and it would be too late to investigate it (see ¶¶ 5 & 15 above).
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, Albert W. L. Moore, Jr., representing no party in this case or any other before this honorable Court, and wishing only to be the Court’s trustworthy and faithful friend in obeying his solemn oath as a lawyer to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, prays the Court read and heed his suggestions to cut to the heart of Obama’s constitutional eligibility by taking charge of discovery and uncovering the relevant and material facts required to effect a just and true resolution of open questions regarding Obama’s eligibility to the Office of President, and prays further that esteemed adversary counsel adopt
- 16 -
these suggestions and co-operate, with all diligence, probity and candor, to assist the Court.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On this twenty-first day of January 2012, I sent emails of this application and suggestions to the following adversary counsel:
Orly Taitz, orly.taitz@gmail.com
Van R. Irion, van@libertylegalfoundation.com
J. Mark Hatfield, mhatfield@wayxcable.com
Michael Jablonski, michael.jablonski@comcast.net
and to another aspiring amicus curiae, Paul Andrew Mitchell, supremelawfirm@gmail.com.
____________________________________
Albert W. L. Moore, Jr.
Missouri Bar No. 18921
Central Professional Building, Suite 114
221 West Lexington, Suite 114
Independence, Missouri 64050-3719
816.461.0993
Telefacsimile: 816.461.3231
eingriff@gmail.com
Applicant for Amicus Curiae
- 17 –
Oooo K, my “comment is awaiting moderation.” Who says moderation in defense of liberty is a sin? I fear that moderation in these comments is a path to oblivion. The problem is probably a copy of suggestions in support of Judge Malihi of Georgia taking over discovery and conducting an exhaustive investigation on his own motion in Welden v. Obama, where the merits have finally been reached (but on misleadingly incomplete facts stipulated by counsel for plaintiff AND OBAMA, and there’s the rub).
The facts will never be known unless public investigative authority is invoked to dig them out. Even this will not work if the public investigative authority sabotages its own efforts by accepting abbreviated factual presentations by others, especially when those others include Obama.
Once more into the breach, this time limiting myself to the cover letter to Judge Malihi, which conveys some flavor of the suggestions. Hearing will be on 26 January 2012 in Atlanta, The Honorable Michael M. Malihi presiding. Judge Malihi’s Case Management Assistant, Valerie Ruff, vruff@osah.ga.gov, Tel: (404) 651-7595, Fax: (404) 818-3751, might be urged to call the judge’s attention to the suggestions, and ask the judge to read and heed their appeal for an exhaustive investigation of Obama’s eligibility, which will probably elicit evidence of his concealment of foreign citizenship and anti-American allegiance in the bargain. (And prove that Obama was an natural born U.S. citizen on the day of his birth. Sorry, birthers, there are dreams that will not be, and there are storms we can not weather.) Just call me Smiley. Not Tavis. George.
The sly malice of the Obama cabal combined with the grievous stupidity of the birthers do not augur well for a just and true resolution of the open questions of Obama’s birth and U.S. citizenship.
But we’re obliged to keep trying.
Cover letter to Judge Malihi, 21 January 2012::
Office of State Administrative Hearings
Attention: Hon. Michael M. Malihi, Judge
230 Peachtree Street, N.W., Suite 850
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1556
RE: Crucial Investigation of Presidential Candidate
Dear Judge Malihi:
Enclosed please find the original and three copies of amicus curiae suggestions in Welden v. Obama.
As indicated in the suggestions, it is reprehensible and highly prejudicial to good order, the Court, and Your Honor’s state and nation to try the case on misleadingly incomplete facts.
I am confident that Obama’s vital records will disclose that his claimed alien father was not in fact his birth father, and will corroborate Dr. Fukino’s finding that Obama was a natural born U.S. citizen on the day of his birth.
Thereafter the Court could move to the real eligibility issue, whether Obama relinquished his U.S. citizenship through foreign naturalization, a potentially expatriating act.
Disclosure of Obama’s true birth parents should allay the risk of public disorder.
The Court’s attention to these matters is greatly appreciated.
Copies of letter and suggestions to:
Orly Taitz, orly.taitz@gmail.com
Van R. Irion, van@libertylegalfoundation.com
J. Mark Hatfield, mhatfield@wayxcable.com
Michael Jablonski, michael.jablonski@comcast.net
Paul Andrew Mitchell, supremelawfirm@gmail.com.