Pages: 1 2 3

 

Requirements of an Agency of the State of Hawaii Contradict Officials Statements


Advertisement-content continues below


Until sometime in 2009, the State of Hawaii required a “Certificate of Live Birth” to prove Hawaiian ancestry, supposedly unavailable since statements by DOH and Vital Statistics personnel declare only COLB available from 2001 forward.  Certificates of Live Birth were not available since the mid 1980’s as well, according to a statement of Bob Bauer, White House counsel.

In order to process your application [to prove native Hawaiian ancestry], DHHL [Department of Hawaiian Homelands] utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.

This statement was taken from an investigation performed on behalf of a retired CIA officer to look into Obama’s birth certificate.  He produced evidence that the State of Hawaii, through their Department of Hawaiian Homelands Homestead and Ancestral lands program, needed the “Certificate of Live Birth” or more commonly known as the long-form birth certificate.

The Governor, the Director of the Department of Health, two spokespersons for the Health Department, and the State Attorney General’s office have all made duplicitous and misleading statements in this matter. Why?

These statements look like opening salvos in Operation Sideshow and could be the culmination of these efforts, and entail not only the president and his aides but officials of Hawaii as well.


Advertisement-content continues below


Jerome Corsi’s article of February 25, 2011 is prophetic, or there actually was and is an active conspiracy to give credence to the now discredited and forged documents that reside on whitehouse.gov.

The only statements we have are Obama’s lame “no matter what we put out” and Dr. Fukino’s impeached remarks of April 11, 2011 to Michael Isikoff on what it is that is contained in Obama’s bona fides regarding his birth and the forged certificate placed on whitehouse.gov on  April 27, 2011.   None of these statements is from any State of Hawaii official, then or now!

The president’s stubborn refusal to submit his documentation to third party verification leaves gaps in the narrative, through which a semi truck can now be driven and makes Operation Sideshow appears to have spanned at least 2 ½ years in the making, with 3 ½ after execution.

Is There a Dirty Secret Behind Obama’s Birth Certificate, Making the Case for a Birth Certificate by Affidavit

The question we should be asking is: what type of birth certificate does our president have?  Obama’s long-form birth certificate has been declared a forgery.  We are wasting our time in spending any more effort on what is posted on whitehouse.gov and need to turn our attention elsewhere.  The Territorial Public Health Statistics Act of 1955 and the revised laws of Hawaii allowed for the issuance of birth certificates by filing a sworn affidavit for any births that occurred in the Hawaiian Islands from 1911 to 1972.

Pages: 1 2 3

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.


Don't Miss Out. Subscribe By Email Or Facebook

Email

Facebook