There is growing evidence that Obama had indirect and possibly direct communication with Blagojevich about the Senate Selection process.
Not according to Obama’s internal report, which has Obama saying “he had no interest in dictating the result of the selection process and he would not do so, either directly or indirectly through staff or others.”
Now that the allegations are pouring forth, the White House is refusing to comment.
Here is what really happened (via Backyard Conservative)

The picture could have been taken before, but the questions about a meeting between Obama and Blago remain. Big Journalism. That question is connected to another big one–the direct contradiction by SEIU Illinois leader Tom Balanoff of the President’s contention that he had no contact or communication with the Blago people on the Senate seat. Apparently in Obama’s mind communicating through Balanoff was not communicating.
Will the media ask them? The subject came up at the White House press briefing. (Was that Ann Compton of ABC Radio, who hails from suburban Chicago New Trier) Time, the Politico and Morning Joe have noticed.
The Obama Greg Craig whitewash report has been questionable from the get-go, and looks very questionable now:
Transition aides said it wasn’t until after Nov. 12 that Emanuel, a North Side congressman with close ties to Blagojevich, and Obama talked about a preferred list of Senate candidates, and the president-elect authorized Emanuel to relay it to the Illinois governor’s office.
Balanoff says the president called him on the day before the election, Nov. 3rd to say Jarrett was his choice and convey it to Blago. And are we really to believe that the president wouldn’t have discussed this with Rahmbo at that time? And that Rahmbo would have called Blago without the president’s knowledge to recommend Jarrett between Nov. 6-9th? In addition to that, Jarrett withdrew on Nov. 9th. What prompted that? And what about this:
The report also said that between Nov. 6 and Nov. 8, Louanner Peters, a Blagojevich deputy governor, tried to contact close Obama friend and former state public health director Eric Whitaker about the Senate vacancy.
In that conversation, the report said, Peters said the governor’s office wanted to know who spoke for the president-elect regarding the Senate vacancy. Whitaker contacted Obama, and the president-elect said no one was authorized to speak for him on that issue, the report said.
Obama also said “he had no interest in dictating the result of the selection process and he would not do so, either directly or indirectly through staff or others,” the report said, adding that Whitaker relayed that information to Peters.
Balanoff’s evidence is key, and contradicts the president. He’s under oath.
Will the president eventually have to testify?
And it’s not just Balanoff. Blago’s chief of staff John Harris opens the door to raising questions about what Obama knew and when did he know it. Did he meet or phone Blago directly, and did he cover that up through the Craig report. Did he lie to the FBI?
That’s what got Nixon impeached, the cover-up, not the Watergate break-in itself. I’ve always wondered whether U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald pulled the plug on the investigation before the White House could get really embroiled in this–and did he give them a heads up that Blago was on tape–recall Jarrett’s abrupt withdrawal from consideration for the Senate seat. (See this.)
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Read More on this Subject
- Obama Was Blago’s Ticket To The Good Life A former top aide to Rod Blagojevich testified Tuesday that...
- Video: White House Refuses To Answer About Obama Blagojevich Connection Obama has lied, and the White House is trying to...
- Evidence Challenges Claim Over Obama’s Birth Address Documents uncovered by WND strongly suggest Barack Obama Sr. and...
- Evidence Against Obama’s Hawaiian Birth Story Mounts Various news outlets have matter-of-factly stated in the recent past...
- Obama Coverage Reflects Growing Media Infatuation Fox News NBC’s “Today Show” opened Wednesday morning with President...


Obama should be burnt toast by now! His "redness" is so obvious now.
What is black and white and red all over? Only one guess allowed.
obama
SURPRISE, SURPRISE, OBAMA TOLD ANOTHER LIE?????
Obamacrat is absolutely a congenital liar….. The photo’s of him and Blago are all over the internet. They have been sent to me a few times. There are at least 8 photo’s of Blago and Oblama together…..Wouldn’t you think someone would have shown the photo’s to Oblama by now. Or maybe “they” get a kick out of him tripping over his lies and tongue…..
The Oreo's nose could reeach the moon considering the number of lie's he has told since he took office….
you will notice I did not say since he became President as he is not qualified for that position…..
I agree the cookie is smarter then obama
Is there such a tree as a ropetree? If there is I would like to buy and plant it on the White House Lawn!
Why are we not surprised?
Unless the judge lets them call Obama on the witness stand they will never know the truth.The teflon president has evrybody in his pocket,typical Chicago style politics.The standard saying is everybody does this so it makes it right except for the American public.
As if Oilbama would tell the truth on the witness stand. Swearing an oath to tell the truth wouldn't mean any more to him than the oath he swore to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
How many more cases are we going to hear and not follow through with Impeachment. We've got a list of lies, bribery, more lies, fraud on the scientist report by Salazar, treachery, traitor of the constitution, and going against his oath to uphold the constitution when he was sworn into office, and that is just the tip of the iceberg. consider also his failure to let those 13 ships from other countries help with the gulf oil spill, and all the red tape and beaurocratic bull they had to go through, and still don't have the help they need to contain the spill. What incompetence…I am so upset at all that I hear ….I feel so helpless in doing anything that will get this present danger and administration impeached and in jail…that is where they belong. behind bars…or send them all to Mexico or Iran. Obama aught to fit right in there. He can be Irans new right hand [oh, I mean left hand] man.
In the Bible it says satan will reighn for 4 yrs so Obama will be gone in 2012 as he is satan…
THE BIBLE,IN REVELATIONS,SAYS HE WILL REIGN FOR 3 1/2 YEARS IN PEACE. THEN HE WILL DESCECRATE THE TEMPLE PROCLAIMING HIMSELF GOD. THE NEXT 3/1/2 YEARS WILL BE HELL ON EARTH. RUSSIA,IRAN,AND OTHER MUSLIM NEIGHBORS,WILL LAUNCH AN ATTACK ON ISRAEL. 2/3 WILL BE DESTROYED. THE 1/3 WILL HIDEOUT IN PETRA. GOD WILL DESTROY ISRAEL'S ATTACKERS. BRIEF SUMMARY.
Obama is just another two bit Chicago gangster. I just hope we can reverse all the damage he and his ilk have done in DC before the Constitution is "set aside" by these Marxists.
This president is garbage. I can't stand the sight of him!
Me neither, too.
SO WHAT'S NEW? OBAMA ASSUMED THAT WHAT HAPPENS IN CHICAGO WOULD STAY IN CHICAGO. WRONG! AFTER LOUISIANNA,CHICAGO IS THE 2ND MOST CORRUPT CITY IN US. MOST AMERICAN VOTERS ARE EASILY LED LIKE SHEEP TO THEIR OWN SLAUGHTER.
Psssst…Louisianna isn't a city.