FoxNews Finally Covers Obama Birth Controversy

Comments

1. Joy says:

   January 9, 2012 at 1:39 pm

   There is not a Congressman that will stand up and demand thia Usuper be removed and therefore any and all should be impeached and tried for TREASON. Amazing that a foriegn immigrant is the only one that has the guts to do what NO American Congressperson will do. Time for America to rise up or lose all our freedoms.

   Log in to ReplyReport user
   • Casper777 says:

     January 9, 2012 at 2:03 pm

     Yes Joy, Orly Taitz has really been persistant in this fight. I read that one judge, who needs to be impeached, has even fined her for appealing. The Judicial Branch and Legislative Branch has failed the American Citizen. Government is indeed is corrupt. We, the American Voter, need to continue to raise hades.

     I keep saying, anyone who votes for a Democrat (or RINO) at any level of Government –

     Federal, State or Local, is either uninformed or may be an idiot.

     Log in to ReplyReport user
     • jb80538 says:

       January 9, 2012 at 2:28 pm

       I’d go with “uninformed idiot”

       No other explaination.

       Log in to ReplyReport user
   • momsenior says:

     January 9, 2012 at 3:21 pm

     Why not? He just testified against himself…… as having something to hide! The fact that he is NOT qualified to even be on a ballot for president. I know early on, I heard several spout they didn’t care whether or not he was a natural born citizen! Well I care and every citizen who believes in our constitution and or country must care or as far as I am concerned they are all oath breakers. They all swore an oath to defend and unhold this sacred document when they became representatives. Of course BO swore the same oath even though he botched it the first time and had to take it over.

     This sorry excuse of a human can’t do anything right! He is screwing the citizens of this country and I believe this is his goal! Since this is so clea to me, why isn’t it clear to the House and Congress?

     Log in to ReplyReport user
2. ONTIME says:

   January 9, 2012 at 2:05 pm

   So why would the Mysery Man challenge this law if he had the proper credentials, which he has not produced to this date? He would find it to his benefit to comply with the law or risk opening up a can of worms as he tries to establish his run for another term or even finnish the one he is now serving, in other words with out the legal credentials and a proper BC, he may face charges of fraud. If this happens the there are a numerous host of collaborators to be named as complicit in this conspiracy and it would not bode well for RINO’s or socialist left Deemers. I can imagine those involved would be looking for homes and places outside the US that did not deal with extradition…one can only hope the rule of law will work again.

   Log in to ReplyReport user
3. romal says:

   January 9, 2012 at 2:32 pm

   All of Washington is in on this scam. They all became instant millionairs. They needed the dumest, least experienced clown, with a mass appeal to the dumest voteing block of citizens (The Demacratic Party) and the selfish Republican party members, that would give up there freedoms, so they would not look Racist. America needs to defeat this bafone in 2012, or we will never beable to reverse the madness.

   Log in to ReplyReport user
4. eingriff says:

   January 10, 2012 at 9:41 am

   Following is a draft application and suggestions of amicus curiae for the Georgia court.

   It should be finalized and submitted in 48-72 hours. Some flip asides might be deleted.

   [DRAFT]

   OFFICE OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

   STATE OF GEORGIA

   DAVID F. WELDEN, :

   :

   Plaintiff, : Docket Number: OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-

   : 1215137-60-MALIHI

   v. :

   : Counsel for Plaintiff: Van R. Irion

   BARACK OBAMA, :

   : Counsel for Defendant: Michael Jablonski

   Defendant. :

   ________________________

   Application and Suggestions of Amicus Curiae

   Comes now Albert W. L. Moore, Jr., of the Missouri and United States Supreme Court bars and others, and prays that the Court, in the interests of upholding the Constitution, justice and judicial economy and efficiency, waive the pesky formal requirements for appearance as amicus curiae and take his suggestions in this case and those consolidated with it, made on information and belief, as follows:

   GENERAL

   1. Court and counsel are to be commended for reaching the merits of the constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama (“Obama”). However, the Court risks decision on incomplete facts posing a false issue regarding Obama’s eligibility at birth. Plaintiffs have been tricked by Obama into erroneously assuming that Obama’s father was an alien, without obtaining discovery of Obama’s original birth certificate showing his actual birth parents. This wastes the Court’s time on a false issue. The Court can and should take over and conduct thorough discovery to avoid confusion and a false precedent in disregard of the real issue, which is Obama’s possible loss of American citizenship from his naturalization as a citizen of Indonesia, a potentially expatriating event.

   2. This Court can quickly verify Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility as a natural born United States citizen, on the day of his birth, by taking over discovery and subpoenaing Obama’s DNA and all of his Hawai’ian vital records, probably consisting of an original birth certificate showing his actual birth parents and his amended birth certificate showing adoptive parents Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama, an alien Luo tribesman. Analysis of Obama’s DNA will prove that it is biologically impossible for him to be the son of a Negro father and a Caucasian mother, which conclusively disproves the “birth certificate” (actually an adoption certificate) proffered by Obama on 27 April 2011. Obama’s real, original birth certificate will show two American citizens, genetically consistent with Obama, as his birth parents, thus confirming the statement of Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino on 27 July 2009, set out in full in the discussion below. Obama does not disclose his original birth certificate partly because it proves that he is not half Negro, but also to evade consideration of the real eligibility issue, his possible loss of American citizenship in acquiring Indonesian citizenship.

   3. The Court should conduct thorough discovery of Obama’s Indonesian citizenship and its effect on his American citizenship. Investigation of Obama’s American citizenship is long overdue. It will take a long time, and must be started soon to complete before the general election in November 2012 and to inform Democratic Party rank and file before its nominating convention.

   4. The Court should appoint a special master, perhaps a retired judge, to conduct discovery to verify by original documents and genetic analysis Obama’s eligibility at birth, and to verify his Indonesian citizenship and its effect, if any, on his American citizenship.

   5. It appears that Obama has spun an elaborate scheme to be elected to the Office of President by pretending to be the son of the alien black man who adopted him. In furtherance of the scheme, he used a contrived controversy over his birth to distract attention from the question of whether he lost his American citizenship by voluntarily becoming a naturalized citizen of Indonesia with the intent of relinquishing American citizenship. This has been done with the able assistance of many dishonest lawyers, another subject that should concern the Court and attract its attention. Confirmation that Obama retained his American citizenship (which is conceivable, though he might have long ago foresworn any allegiance he might have had to the United States) requires extensive official investigation. If such investigation is not initiated very soon and prosecuted expeditiously, election officials and the Court will find themselves caught up short. Bush, et al. v. Gore et al., 531 U.S. 98, 108 (2000): “The press of time does not diminish the constitutional concern. A desire for speed is not a general excuse for ignoring equal protection guarantees.”

   OBAMA A NATURAL BORN AMERICAN CITIZEN AT BIRTH

   6. “Birthers”, those who believe Obama was constitutionally ineligible at birth, have often lost objectivity in analyzing the facts. In all fairness, this is in part due to the paucity of known facts on the Obama matter. Consequently, they have blundered into profound error and capricious speculation, much of which has been counterproductive. Obama has played them as a toreador plays a bull – shaking a distraction off to the side, which the poor dumb beast charges. In this case, Plaintiff is tantalized by the prospect of a “quick fix”, a purported alien father to Obama. The problem is, the alien is not his father. He adopted him. This conjecture is hardly in a league with Poincare’s, which required many years, geniuses and computer science to solve. The Court can prove or disprove this conjecture by subpoenaing Obama’s vital records and DNA. However, there are very strong clues pointing to Obama’s Hawai’ian adoption, starting with the 27 July 2009 statement by Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino, then the Director of Hawai’i’s Department of Health and custodian of vital records, which follows in its entirety:

   I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai‛i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.

   Dr. Fukino refers to “vital records”. As Obama was still alive, there would not be a death certificate, but there must be a vital record in addition to his original birth certificate. How would such an additional vital record come to be? Come, let us learn and reason together.

   7. When a child is born in Hawai’i, a contemporaneous record of birth is made, showing actual birth parents. This is retained to protect against violation of the rule against consanguinity. Dr. Fukino was informed by the original birth certificate when she stated that Obama was “a natural-born American citizen”.

   8. When the child is adopted, as by hypothesis Obama was at birth, an amended birth certificate is created, showing adoptive parents. Obama’s amended birth certificate was the basis for the abstract titled “CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH”, the proof of birth typically used, in part to conceal the fact of an adoption – even from the adoptee. On 27 April 2011, Obama presented a photograph of his amended birth certificate on, cropped or masked to delete the word “AMENDED”, probably typed above the printed title of the long form “CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH”.

   9. Dr. Fukino had to contend with the confidentiality of adoptions when making her statement of 27 July 2009 above. But she could not avoid giving away the fact of an adoption, by claiming the “vital records” showed that Obama was “a natural-born American citizen”. Barack Hussein Obama the black Luo tribesman could not be Obama’s birth father if Obama was a natural born American citizen, because the Luo tribesman was an alien. Dr. Fukino was relying on the original birth certificate component of the “vital records” to which she referred.

   10. I assume that Dr. Fukino made her finding on the basis of an original birth certificate showing two U.S. citizen birth parents, but the Court’s subpoena of the “vital records” referred to by Dr. Fukino is required for a sound judicial determination of Obama’s eligibility at birth. If the Court finds all the relevant facts, it need not decide whether to lay out a false precedent, confirming eligibility on a frivolous argument based on false facts that include an alien father who was not Obama’s, or denying eligibility on the false representation of both parties that Obama had an alien father. Either way, appeals would be in order, wasting the time of this and other courts, and Obama would likely try to use his original birth certificate to qualify for the ballot, submitted under seal and an order not to disclose, so that the electorate would not know that he only pretended to be half Negro. The Court can foreclose all this by subpoenaing all of Obama’s vital records from Hawai’i’s Health Department Director. Adoption confidentiality must yield to the interests of the state in determining Obama’s eligibility and the true basis for it. It must not be used to perpetrate election fraud or fraud on the Court.

   11. Other clues pop up from time to time indicating that Obama’s original birth certificate remains undisclosed. Early in 2011, a character named Tim Adams, who had sworn that there was no long form birth certificate for Obama, broadcast a suggestion that Obama release his long form birth certificate, “if he has one”, even if it did not “go along with” Obama’s official autobiography. Adams offered the lame excuse that Obama was “fibbing” in his autobiography, standard operating procedure with politicians, per Mr. Adams. It seemed the cat was out of the bag, or was feared to be, and Adams was doing damage control. But the “birth certificate” released on 27 April 2011 was entirely consistent with the fraudulent autobiography; hence there must be another, the original, still undisclosed.

   12. Dr. Fukino, in an interview with Michael Isikoff, described the original birth certificate as half typed and half handwritten. The document released by Obama on 27 April 2011 was entirely typed. This is another significant clue that the original birth certificate, and the “birth certificate” released on 27 April 2011, are two different documents, and that Dr. Fukino based her conclusion that Obama was a natural born American citizen on the original, not the adoption certificate that Obama falsely claimed on 27 April 2011 to be the original birth certificate.

   13. Obama conceals his original birth certificate identifying his actual birth parents because neither was Negro, not because it disproves his constitutional eligibility. The original would confirm his eligibility at birth. He fraudulently claims his adoptive parents as birth parents so that he can make racist appeals for votes while denigrating critics and opponents as racists.

   14. Hence when Plaintiff says on page 1 of his Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, “The only fact relevant to this case is the fact that the Defendant’s father was not a U.S. citizen”, he could not be more mistaken. He speaks in ignorance of Obama’s original birth certificate, showing actual parents, which has not been disclosed. If the Court will subpoena it, the Court will find that Obama was a natural born American citizen at the time of his birth. (And it will find other significant information not directly pertaining to constitutional eligibility.)

   OBAMA’S POSSIBLE LOSS OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP

   15. The Court should then move on to the real issue of Obama’s constitutional eligibility, his possible loss of American citizenship. The status of natural born American citizen can be acquired only at birth. But it can be lost thereafter, by loss of American citizenship altogether. The term “natural born U.S. citizen” subsumes the term “citizen”. Obama can not be a natural born U.S. citizen if he is not a U.S. citizen at all, even if he was a natural born U.S. citizen on the day of his birth. If in fact Obama relinquished his American citizenship, he became constitutionally ineligible for all time, and never became President.

   16. The State Department has noted that naturalization as a foreign citizen is a potentially expatriating act, as is conviction for treason:

   POTENTIALLY EXPATRIATING ACTS

   Section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1481), as amended, states that U.S. citizens are subject to loss of citizenship if they perform certain specified acts voluntarily and with the intention to relinquish U.S. citizenship. Briefly stated, these acts include:

   1. obtaining naturalization in a foreign state [my italics] (Sec. 349 (a) (1) INA);

   2. taking an oath, affirmation or other formal declaration to a foreign state or its political subdivisions (Sec. 349 (a) (2) INA);

   3. entering or serving in the armed forces of a foreign state engaged in hostilities against the U.S. or serving as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer in the armed forces of a foreign state (Sec. 349 (a) (3) INA);

   4. accepting employment with a foreign government if (a) one

   has the nationality of that foreign state or (b) an oath or declaration of allegiance is required in accepting the position (Sec. 349 (a) (4) INA);

   5. formally renouncing U.S. citizenship before a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer outside the United States (Sec. 349 (a) (5) INA);

   6. formally renouncing U.S. citizenship within the U.S. (but only under strict, narrow statutory conditions) (Sec. 349 (a) (6) INA);

   7. conviction for an act of treason (Sec. 349 (a) (7) INA).

   ADMINISTRATIVE STANDARD OF EVIDENCE

   As already noted, the actions listed above can cause loss of U.S. citizenship only if performed voluntarily and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. citizenship. The Department has a uniform administrative standard of evidence based on the premise that U.S.

   citizens intend to retain United States citizenship when they obtain naturalization in a foreign state, subscribe to a declaration of allegiance to a foreign state, serve in the armed forces of a foreign state not engaged in hostilities with the United States, or accept non-policy level employment with a foreign government.

   See http://travel.state.gov/law/citizenship/citizensh….

   17. Obama’s volition and intent are factual issues that require extensive evidence-taking, legal and factual analysis, and argument. Obama seems to believe (perhaps wrongly) that the issue would be resolved in favor of his relinquishment of U.S. citizenship, for he has almost certainly made criminal and seditious bargains with, among others, the government of Indonesia to conceal evidence of his Indonesian citizenship.

   CONCLUSION

   18. Determination of Obama’s current citizenship or citizenships does not lend itself to the birthers’ dream of a quick fix at his birth. Exhaustive official investigation is essential to resolve the issue of his American citizenship. A congressional or legislative investigating committee, or a prosecutor, would have the luxury of finding the facts inconclusive. A court, it is suggested, has an obligation to decide one way or the other, on such evidence as can be found and inferences therefrom. This will require exhaustive investigation, much of it international. It would seem appropriate for the Court to appoint a special master, perhaps a retired judge, to take evidence on a full-time basis. I have over a decade of international legal experience worldwide, including Indonesia. As Nick Nolte has said in a different context, “It’s easier to go there if you’ve been there before.” I would be willing to help the special master for expenses only, and would plan to form a team that would tentatively include, if they be willing, Philip J. Berg, Esq., an attorney who has worked with Indonesian counsel on Indonesian citizenship, Tom Schweich, Missouri’s State Auditor, who has audited accounts in Afghanistan, Kris Kobach, Secretary of State for Kansas, an expert on the law of U.S. citizenship, and Wayne Madsen, who has reported on Stanley Ann Dunham’s activities in Indonesia. I would play first violin to the Court’s special master as conductor.

   19. For decades the United States Supreme Court held itself above the fray with regard to congressional reapportionment, refusing to enter that “political thicket”. Finally, it concluded that the political process could not cure itself, and took on the matter. Similarly in this case, officials such as congressmen have refused to inquire into the facts, for fear of being regarded as racist, even though actual inquiry would reveal that the basis of Obama’s racist appeal was a hoax. Hence once again the courts are called upon to find the facts and enforce the law, the political process having failed.

   20. The adversary system, for all its virtues and general effectiveness in grinding slowly but finely to find the truth, has its limits. A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds. Here both sides have their reasons for proceeding on the basis of false facts. Plaintiff thinks he can win at the starting gate on the true definition of natural born citizen as used in Article II Section 1 of the Constitution. Defendant thinks he can prevail on a false and frivolous definition of natural born American citizen as used in Article II Section 1 of the United States Constitution and a birth certificate that’s a forgery in the sense that it’s not what it purports to be: Obama’s original birth certificate. If so, this would not be the first time the law has changed from specious and frivolous argument aided by judicial ignorance of the facts. And further, if Defendant does not prevail on the incomplete and misleading facts, then Defendant counts on his ability to disclose his hole card, his true original birth certificate showing two U.S. citizen parents, and to submit it under seal safeguarded by a non-disclosure order, so that the electorate will remain ignorant of his true racial heritage. This after wasting the time of this Court and others in verifying Obama’s constitutional eligibility at birth, which could have been swiftly confirmed by Defendant’s full disclosure of vital records and DNA, and in total disregard of the real eligibility issue, the possible, even probable, loss of Obama’s American citizenship by naturalization as an Indonesian citizen.

   PRAYER

   WHEREFORE, Albert W. L. Moore, Jr., representing no party in this case or any other before this honorable Court, and wishing only to be the Court’s true friend in obeying his solemn oath as a lawyer to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, prays the Court read and heed his suggestions to cut to the heart of the Obama matter by taking charge of discovery and uncovering the relevant and material facts required to effect a just and true resolution of open questions regarding Obama’s eligibility to the Office of President, and prays further that esteemed adversary counsel adopt these suggestions and co-operate, with all diligence, probity and candor, to assist the Court.

   CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

   On this ___ day of January 2012, I sent emails of this application and suggestions to the following adversary counsel (inimici curiae?):

   Orly Taitz, orly.taitz@gmail.com

   Van R. Irion, van@libertylegalfoundation.com

   J. Mark Hatfield, mhatfield@wayxcable.com

   Michael Jablonski, michael.jablonski@comcast.net

   and to another aspiring amicus curiae, Paul Andrew Mitchell, at (so help us all): supremelawfirm@gmail.com.

   ____________________________________

   Albert W. L. Moore, Jr.

   Missouri Bar No. 18921

   Central Professional Building, Suite 114

   221 West Lexington, Suite 114

   Independence, Missouri 64050-3719

   816.461.0993

   Telefacsimile: 816.461.3231

   eingriff@gmail.com

   Applicant for Amicus Curiae

   Log in to ReplyReport user
5. Drawer22 says:

   January 11, 2012 at 2:15 pm

   I asked that an O’Bamacrat with expert credentials in Adobe Photoshop download the official White House site purported copy of OBama’s long-form “Birth Certificate” and show me that it had not been altered. It was her conclusion that it HAD been altered by an amateur. (She did, however, state that it was likely altered for good reason and non-fraudulently. Once a Kool-Aid drinker is addicted to Kool-Aid, it’s almost impossible to get them into Recovery, for all reason goes out the window.)

   Log in to ReplyReport user
6. DwightMann says:

   January 15, 2012 at 9:21 am

   The fact is, that as a constitutional scholar, Øbama should know better, and needs to be charged with treason, as he has affected each and every American citizen in a very real way.

   Treason is a Capital offense, and there should not be any statute of limitations on this kind of crime. There are many other politicians that are complicit in this corruption also. . .

   Log in to ReplyReport user
7. Bronk says:

   January 15, 2012 at 12:45 pm

   Don’t underestimate Obama, he is no fool and he knows exactly what he is doing.

   The hard part to understand is, even as corrupt as Congress is, why Congress and the American citizens are allowing him to take over our country without a fight.

   Congress should realize that once Obama is entrenched in the palace with his shiny new crown, he will no longer need Congress and he has already shown a penchant for operating without the help of Congress.

   Log in to ReplyReport user
8. willyrho says:

   January 15, 2012 at 11:36 pm

   @eingraff – Have you sent this brief/information to Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Posse in Arizona. He might be able to publicize/broadcast your thoughts and theory and other information to a wide audience to raise the political pressure on the US Congress and Courts and also State Legislatures and Courts. The more people that are made aware of the Presidents probable ineligibility, the more likely an investigation at many levels will occur. I hope you succeed in your endeavor and pray for our Nation’s survival as a Free Republic.

   Log in to ReplyReport user

Speak Your Mind Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.