Fox Protects Obama: Corsi Interview On Fox Business Network

Comments

1. ellen says:
   May 21, 2011 at 2:21 pm

   It is hardly surprising that Fox Business Network, along with the rest of the media, realizes that 1+1=2. It would be surprising if they had treated the Corsi fantasy seriously.

   It should be obvious that a child born outside of the USA requires either a US visa on a foreign passport or to be entered on the mother’s US passport to get to the USA. Those documents or the applications for them would still exist and would have been found easily IF Obama was born outside of the USA. But no such document has been found.

   Second, there were notices of Obama’s birth in the newspapers in Hawaii in 1961. And these were not ads placed by relatives. They could not have been ads because the Hawaii newspapers did not accept birth notice ads in 1961. They only took the official notices sent to them by the government of Hawaii, which only sent out the notices for births IN Hawaii. And, the government could not have been fooled by a claim of a birth at home because in those cases it demanded witness statements.

   So Obama’s parents would have had to have:

   (1) traveled to Kenya or some other country late in pregnancy at high risk and high expense (particularly to Kenya);

   (2) got the child back to the USA without either a visa or his being entered on his mother’s US passport or somehow had the files of the document and the applications for the document all sealed;

   (3) lied about the place of birth (which is also unlikely because when you have done something interesting like give birth in a foreign country you generally boast about it. And it is also unnecessary to lie since for all purposes but the presidency a naturalized child is as good as a natural born one);

   (4) gotten away with the lie despite evidence that Hawaii demanded witness statements whenever there was a claim of a birth outside of a hospital;

   (5) got three Republican officials in Hawaii to lie about the fact that the original birth certificate in Obama’s files verified that he was born in Hawaii.

   ALL of that would have had to have happened for Obama to have been born outside of the USA.

   Log in to Reply
   • Gary in Colo says:
     May 21, 2011 at 2:47 pm

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUyLwXhqlWU

     Log in to Reply
2. ellen says:
   May 23, 2011 at 7:52 am

   Re: "he does not meet the clause of the CONSTITUTION, i,e born in the U.S.A of parents who were BOTH US CITIZENS. "

   Who told you that? It is WRONG. There is not a word in the US Constitution that mentions parents, and the meaning of Natural Born in America (not Switzerland) at the time that the Constitution was written referred ONLY to the place of birth. It meant citizenship due to the place of birth, not citizenship due to the parents. And a search of the writings of Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, James Madison, and yes, John Jay, shows that they never used the phrase Natural Born to refer to parents, only to citizenship due to the place of birth.

   “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are “natural born citizens” and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are “natural born citizens” eligible to serve as President …”—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

   Here is a quotation from 1803.

   "Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. …St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)

   As you can see, the definition of a Natural Born Citizen is "those born within a state."

   The reason that the US Congress voted to confirm Obama's election UANIMOUSLY was that not one single member in the 100 Senators and 435 members of the House of Representatives believes that the citizenship of Obama's father has any effect on Obama's Natural Born Citizen status.

   Log in to Reply

Speak Your Mind Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.