Informing Americans Who Love Freedom
[...] Fox News Extensive Report On Obama’s Benghazi Cover-Up FNC Special Report on what many are calling a scandal… [...]
[...] Fox News Extensive Report On Obama’s Benghazi Cover-Up FNC Special Report on what many are calling a scandal… [...]
[...] Fox News Extensive Report On Obama’s Benghazi Cover-Up FNC Special Report on what many are calling a scandal… [...]
[...] Fox News Extensive Report On Obama’s Benghazi Cover-Up FNC Special Report on what many are calling a scandal… [...]
[...] on September 12. The prisoners may have been held in the compound for several days.Related posts:Fox News Extensive Report On Obama’s Benghazi Cover-Up FNC Special Report on what many are calling a scandal…Fox News Defends Benghazi “Stand [...]
[...] Fox News Extensive Report On Obama’s Benghazi Cover-Up FNC Special Report on what many are calling a scandal… [...]
[...] Fox News Extensive Report On Obama’s Benghazi Cover-Up FNC Special Report on what many are calling a scandal… [...]
[...] Fox News Extensive Report On Obama’s Benghazi Cover-Up FNC Special Report on what many are calling a scandal… [...]
[...] Fox News Extensive Report On Obama’s Benghazi Cover-Up FNC Special Report on what many are calling a scandal… [...]
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Loading ...
Federal employees supplying weapons through Fast and Furious to known murderers when there is a high probability they will be used in further murders, and those murders actually occur, constitutes the crime of second degree, depraved-heart murder.
Federal employees not defending Libyan embassy employees when they have foreknowledge terrorists will attempt to kill those employees on 9-11 also constitutes the crime of second degree, depraved-heart murder.
There is ample probable cause justifying the arrest and jailing of many suspects. Impeachment can come later. Saddle up.
http://elect.ErnestHuberForCongress.com/
You’ve got my vote! How about impeaching AND locking that POS Blowbama up…..
Saddle up!
just vote him out
HEY, hitlery and ohomo, YOU SLIPPED UP AND TOLD THE TRUTH THE FIRST TIME…………..IT WAS A TERRORIST ATTACK, NOW YOU SOB AND BEOTCH ARE WALKING THAT BACK, TALK ABOUT A COUPLE OF GUTTER RATS!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU FIENDISH, SLIMY SUBHUMAN MICRO-ORGANISMS……..YOU WILL ROT IN HELL!!
You go guy. Never heard of depraved heart but it fits.
THIS IS A PS, THE AMBASSADOR NO DOUBT WAS RAPED, BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT YOUR FILTHY RADICAL ISLAMIC HORDES DO, AND YOU CALL IT A PEACEFUL RELIGION, YOU COULDN’T BE MORE WRONG, BUT OF COURSE YOU ARE 99.99% OF THE TIME ABOUT EVERYTHING, THEIR ARE NO MODERATE MOOOSLUMS, WHEN PUSH COMES TO SHOVE ANY OF THE POS WILL SLIT YOUR THROAT IN A HEART BEAT. YOU ALL CAN TAKE YOUR ISLAM BULL SHYT AND SHOVE IT WHERE THE SUN DON’T SHINE!!
YOU CAN BELIEVE NOTHING IN WHAT THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TELLS YOU !
BOTH OF THESE LIARS WILL SOON BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE. ALL THEY DO IS HORRIFIC !
I can’t understand why the Senate and House are covering up for this SOB>
Besides the fact that our president is a professional liar, why does no one demand that the Commander-and-Chief take full responsibility for the inadequate defense of the compound, and the associated deaths?
He deserves a court martial!
It’s not just incompetence and a cover-up; it’s complicity.
The assault was agreed to by Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood. Obama agreed to the specious cover story of an obscure video, and agreed to lift the guard, which he did.
See:
http://www.westernjournalism.com/october-surprise-gone-horribly-wrong/#comment-139869
and
http://www.westernjournalism.com/benghazi-attack-was-botched-kidnapping-to-trade-blind-sheik/#comments
The latter has the following comments, among many others. One might have found the smoking gun, an express order for security ordered to Benghazi to stand down:
rob_mcewen says:
October 17, 2012 at 3:42 pm
NORMALLY… I’d blow off articles like this as “hear-say”… and consider stuff like this to be almost like tabloid trash. For example, many people believe ALL sorts of bad things about Sara Palin which really aren’t true… because they took “hearsay” to levels it shouldn’t have been taken to.
HOWEVER…
(a) I’m finding this article to be very believable, given what I know about Obama. For example, try to explain ObamaShopped.com …that one will blow people’s minds!
(b) (AND THE FOLLOWING IS HUGE!!!)…. I have personal friend whose own VERY-CLOSE-RELATIVE is a CURRENTLY serving as a marine in The Fleet Anti-terrorism Security Team (FAST). FAST is assigned the responsibility of going to “hot spots” and securing American installations (such as embassies!) from attack. This is their #1 job and they are good at it. And they are already forward-deployed around the world for quick deployment, on a moment’s notice, to any hotspot desired. They can get there and have a location fully secured and protected within hours. MORE HERE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_Corps_Security_Force_Regiment#Fleet_Antiterrorism_Security_Team
OK… here is the shocking part. My friend told me… that his/her’s (trying to protect my source!) VERY-CLOSE-RELATIVE’s unit was told the day BEFORE the Benghazi attack that they were being ordered to deploy to Benghazi.. THEN… just before they were to leave, they got a call from high up to stand down and NOT deploy. When the attacks happened in Benghazi the next day, they were literally sitting around playing cards & stuff. Then, of course, they did get that deployment the next day. Their original deployment order would have had that embassy EASILY secured BEFORE the attack had happened!
CONCLUSION
(1) That they were initially told to deploy BEFORE the attack means that someone high up in Washington know SOMETHING was up! They means that they can’t claim that they were “blindsided”. Even if this article is wrong, that indicates some level of incompetence or poor judgement.. for this deployment to have been cancelled. Whoever decided that was VERY wrong! (and WHO made that decision?.. how high up did that decision go?)
(2) That the FAST teams were later notified to NOT go is POSSIBLY a “smoking gun” that supports this article. Notice I didn’t say “prove” this article correct .. and notice my word “possibly”. But this is DEFINITELY supporting evidence!
Someone should investigate this further! And while I’m keeping my source anonymous (I didn’t ask permission from him/her)… I’m NOT an anonymous person. I stand by the facts I’ve stated here. My source is (a) a VERY trustworthy person, and (b) he/she didn’t even know about these two western journalism articles at the time he/she told me this… he/she told this to me weeks ago!…and he/she has ZERO motivate to make this up.
(he/she stuff is to protect my source)
Again, someone should investigate this further!
rob_mcewen says:
October 17, 2012 at 5:45 pm
I have to make one minor correction. The timetable on the initial deployment order.. and stand-down order.. may have been earlier than a day before. But (a) it was still not very many days before the attacks (b) they would have still been there at the time the attacks occurred. My friend corrected me on that minor detail, so i’m passing this along. He said he’d also go back and double-check all the details directly from the source.. and I’ll pass along any more information as it becomes available. I’d like to get this confirmed from other sources, and into Romney’s hands ahead of Monday’s debate, if possible.
End of quotes from comments.
Will Chairman Issa’s Oversight Committee follow up on these leads, or shirk its duty?