In this video, the attorney for these two patriots argues that the NJ Secretary of State is obligated to ensure that candidates who want to appear on the state’s presidential election ballot must be constitutionally qualified.
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
What a JOKE. The judge essentially said that the Secretary of State couldn’t have made a mistake so he can’t look to see if it was a mistake.
Does not the Supreme Court decide if folks made mistakes?
WEENIE!
Did anyone see that judge stick out his tongue and run from the court room?…..what a phoney
Check his political affiliation. I bet he is another Democrat judge; just like all the others who have ruled Obama is eligible to be on the ballot. We are living in dangerous times because with judges who make decisions based on Party affiliation unrest will surely follow.
This judge should lose his license and never practice law ever again. The justice in this country does no longer exist.
The Chicago thugs, Soro and Obama win again.
Just another Judge selling out his country. These people need to be listed and rounded up after we get Obummer out of office so appropriate charges can be made against them.
Looks like the birthers lost to their own stupidity again.
Their approach, I gather, was that the document proffered by Obama on 27 April 2011 was not his birth certificate. They are right, in a way. It’s his amended birth certificate, required by law in adoptions, masked or cropped to eliminate the word AMENDED, with perhaps a few anomalies added to make it a stronger decoy.
Further, I assume the birthers paid no mind whatever to the real issue of Obama’s eligibility, the effect of his naturalization as a citizen of Indonesia on his American citizenship. He voluntarily confirmed his Indonesian citizenship in 1981 to evade liability for Selective Service registration by relinquishing his American citizenship. At that point, he lost his American citizenship and , ergo, his constitutional eligibility to the Office of President.
The birthers have the hysterical delusion that Obama must have been ineligible at birth; otherwise, he would be eligible forever. Not so. True, the status of natural born citizen can only be attained at birth. But it can be lost by relinquishing U.S. citizenship. The term “natural born citizen” subsumes “citizen”. Obama can’t be a natural born U.S. citizen if he’s not a U.S. citizen at all. Ah, but more than a quarter of a century later, in 2008, Obama files a back-dated selective service registration, with a cobbled-up date-received stamp, changed from “2008″ to “80″.
Obama plays the birthers like a toreador plays a bull – shaking a cape off to the side, which the poor dumb beast charges.
If a state Secretary of State rejects the 27 April 2011 “birth certificate” and correctly requires the original birth certificate, Obama can release it to the official, and it will show that he has two U.S. citizen parents and was, as Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino pointed out in her press release of 27 July 2009, a natural-born American citizen on the day of his birth. Both parents were U.S. citizens, so he was a natural born U.S. citizen by the most stringent standards.
But when he confirmed as an adult his Indonesian naturalization, in order to evade the obligation he would have had as an American citizen to register with the Selective service, re relinquished American citizenship and could never again acquire the status of natural born citizen of the United States.
If only the birthers would demand exhaustive official investigation of Obama’s eligibility, such as a congressional investigation, instead of irrationally jumping to the conclusion that they have the answer, they would not look so foolish, and we might finally get the truth, that Obama is ineligible from loss of U.S. citizenship – oh, and by the way, he’s a Comintern mole.
Judge, Old Sport, it is NOT “common knowledge” that Obama’s father was the alien Luo tribesman Barack Hussein Obama. Disclosure of Obama’s original birth certificate would show his actual birth parents and confirm the statement of Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino on 27 July 2009:
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai’i and is a natural born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
As Obama was a natural born American citizen, the Luo tribesman could not be his birth father, because the Luo was an alien. Comparison of Obama’s Y-DNA with that of close male relatives of the Luo confirms, to a reasonable degree of scientific certitude, that it is biologically impossible for Obama to be the son of Barack Hussein Obama the alien Luo tribesman. That’s why Obama trots out a modified picture of his amended birth certificate – effectively his adoption certificate – and pretends it’s his original birth certificate. He doesn’t want to disclose that the black Luo tribesman was not his real father. He was his adoptive father. The original birth certificate will confirm Dr. Fukino’s finding that Obama was a natural born citizen at birth. She does not really speak to the question of whether Obama LOST his American citizenship.
Why do birthers and judges insist upon trying this matter on false and unsubstantiated factual assumptions, and avert their gaze from the real issue of Obama’s eligibility, his relinquishment of American citizenship by foreign naturalization to evade Selective Service registration?
I have utmost trust in Dr. Fukino. I’m serenely confident that Obama’s original birth certificate will verify her finding that Obama was a natural born citizen at the time of his birth. But until that original birth certificate is produced, Obama’s constitutional eligibility at birth is UNVERIFIED! Ballots are exclusively for constitutionally eligible candidates.
State secretaries of state do not have the evidence to do their job of deciding whether Obama was constitutionally eligible at birth and RETAINED his American citizenship thereafter, in the light of reasonable grounds for inferring that he was naturalized as a lad by operation of Indonesian law and voluntarily confirmed that naturalization, with intent to relinquish American citizenship, as an adult in 1981.