Floyd Reports

floydreportslogo2 Floyd ReportsWelcome to the new home of FloydReports.com. Enter for conservative commentary, conservative videos, and conservative news from veteran political expert Floyd Brown,  President of the Western Center for Journalism. If you are a subscriber of FloydReports.com, you will still get the same great content to your inbox, just at a new home. The blog’s move to WesternJournalism.com will allow it to have greater reach and a more powerful server. Please take a look around, and if you have any comments, please use our contact page to reach us.

 


Complacency Vs. Reality

Obama Romney SC Complacency vs. Reality

I don’t want anyone on the right to become complacent with just about 100 days until the Presidential election, but history is definitely on our side! Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are virtually neck and neck in the polls, which most likely spells disaster for Mr. Obama. If you are the incumbent in a presidential election year and you’re tied in the polls with the challenger at the end of July, you may want to be looking for 2nd semester schools in the Chicago area for your two girls.

Of course, Romney could make a major gaffe, or there could be an October surprise that could change things in a beneficial way for Obama; but as it stands right now, things do not look good for his reelection campaign. Why? Because when you have the majority of the media on your side, plus you’ve outspent your opponent and you’re still tied at this point in the game… it’s time to start throwing some hail Mary’s towards the end zone!

Yes, John Kerry was ahead of George W. Bush at this point in 2004, but I really don’t think Mitt has a “Swift Boat” in his past. By comparison, George H. W. Bush and Jimmy Carter were both up in the polls at this time in their campaigns, and they both lost. Plus, we have to take into account the validity of polling at this juncture in the campaign. Common sense tells you that Romney’s current polling numbers are steadfast and can only go up because his numbers reflect the “anyone but Obama” mentality. On the other hand, can you really trust Obama’s numbers? Of course he has his ardent supporters, but the current Gallup poll shows him only up by one percentage point at 46%-45%. In the 2008 Presidential election, Mr. Obama received 53% of the popular vote to McCain’s 46% (the oddball 1% was thrown away on various losers.) Using the same math: 46+45=91%…sadly, we can throw away the oddball 1% again, leaving 8% who are undecided. You tell me: if the incumbent has done a bang-up job, kept most of his promises, and proven to be a good leader, would 8% still be undecided? Also, I don’t think you can trust his current 46% because there has to be a small to moderate percentage of Obama 2008 voters who don’t want to admit (in July of 2012) that they made a mistake. But when they’re in that voting booth in November, their unwavering support may just waver.

On a side note, I realize that presidential elections are not won or lost by the popular vote, but the swing state numbers closely reflect the national numbers. Barack Obama is barely holding on in Colorado, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. Plus, there are several states where Obama’s support is 6-12% less than it was in 2008.

So, do I believe it’s a slam-dunk for Romney? Of course not! But I do believe the reigning champion is very tired and leaning up against the ropes a lot. If Romney can just be patient, throwing a jab and a hook in here and there but continually keeping his guard up, he can knock out Obama in the final couple rounds! …8,9,10…DING, DING!

Photo credit: Cain and Todd Benson (Creative Commons)

Obama Indirectly Tied To The Colorado Massacre?

Barack Obama has embraced and emboldened the Occupy movement since its inception, and despite increasing lawlessness reaching to the point of domestic terrorism in the form of the Occupy Black Bloc group, Obama has refused to distance himself from them.

Why?

We need only look at the history of those who have shaped Obama’s ideology, beginning with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, and a host of other socialists and communists.

Ayers took part in the famous “Day of Rage” in 1969, calling for an end to the Vietnam War, but more importantly calling for an end to capitalism.

When the Vietnam War began to wind down, the prop for Ayers’ socialism ceased to exist, but his  band of domestic terrorists, the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), lived on as capitalism still needed to be destroyed.

Despite Ayers’ bombs, America wanted nothing of his socialist utopia, so Ayers went about putting socialism in place with the help of groups like ACORN.

Then George W. Bush came along.

The radicals again put their “anti-war” movement together, including Obama with his October 2, 2002 anti-Iraq War speech at Chicago Federal Plaza, complete with former SDS members Mike Klonsky, Carl Davidson, and Marilyn Katz putting together an anti-war protest as a prop to give drama to Obama’s speech. Per the Obama campaign, video of the event (except for thirteen seconds of Obama’s speech, including his “dumb war” statement) was “lost.” It was “lost” because the crowd was filled to the gills with radicals that would in 2009 become the Occupy movement: same ideology, same players.

So in effect, we could say Obama is part of the Occupy movement.

What is different between Ayers’ ideology/ domestic terrorism of the 1960s and 1970s and the Occupy Black Bloc group?

Nothing. They are indistinguishable.

So if it is determined that the Colorado mass murderer James Holmes was part of the Occupy Black Bloc group, which is nothing more than a continuation of Obama and Ayers’ “anti-war” movement,  and Black Bloc researcher Bill Warner is correct that Holmes fits the Occupy Black Bloc profile to a tee, then President Barack Hussein Obama is indirectly tied to the massacre in Colorado.

The Democrats’ Latest Pathetic Attempt At Enthusiasm

Democrat SC The Democrats Latest Pathetic Attempt At Enthusiasm

It has been a long time since the Democrats stood for Christian principles, but under Barack Obama, they have taken to attacking Christians as enemies.

The latest Democrat attack on Christian values comes in their calls to boycott Chick-fil-A, a family-owned restaurant chain run on Christian values. Chick-fil-A won’t open on Sundays or kowtow to Democrat demands to recognize gay “marriages”, so the restaurant chain has become an enemy.

The Democrat Party runs on hate. They hate and want to destroy anybody who will not act the way THEY demand them to. They have survived by keeping their base angry and hate-filled so they will march like zombies to the polls to keep Democrats in power.

Democrats are a morally bankrupt and hate-filled bunch that feels it must destroy anything that is wholesome. “We hate people who don’t hate what we hate, or love what we love” sums up their position on everything.

Now after years of using the same tired old playbook, they have run out of plausible targets to tell their robotic voters to hate. With no one else left to hate, they are aiming their guns at Christians because Christians won’t bow down to the homosexuals who bankroll Democrats. Nevertheless, hating one’s own faith seems to be where even the Democrat base draws the line. Trying to stir up hatred of Christians crosses a line, and it’s chasing people away from the Democrats.

The Democrat base doesn’t plan to vote because they can’t be bothered, and being asked to hate their own religion to satisfy the Democrats is too much. Years of hearing that they are being excluded from “the white man’s world” have left many minority rank-and-file Democrats with the impression that voting isn’t worth the effort.  These attacks on Christianity have pushed the Democrat base to a tipping point about voting in November.

A new Gallup survey underlines this truth. It says compared to 2008, Republican enthusiasm is up 16 points, and Democrat enthusiasm to vote is down 22 points.

Hating Christian chicken sandwiches won’t help the Democrats. It will make things worse. A Democrat boycott ought to be countered with a “mancott” of Chick-fil-A to show support for our right to resist the immoral Democrats’ demands for ever-increasing depravity. By the way, the Chick-fil-A deluxe chicken sandwich comes with great lattice cut fries and a drink for a great price.

Follow Coach at twitter.com @KcoachcCoach

Photo Credit: DonkeyHotey (Creative Commons)

Why Are Obama, Democrats Economically Illiterate?

Ladies and gentlemen, meet conservative columnist and small business owner Wayne Allyn Root. Here, Mr. Root tells it like it is.

Parody: Obama Supporter Interviews Her 2008 Self

Just like that viral video where the guy interviews his 12-year-old self. But with Obama. And sadness. And regret.

Why Virginia Democrats (and Obama) Should Be Scared

Virginia SC Why Virginia Democrats (and Obama) Should Be Scared

The disparate claims of racism to explain why Mitt Romney is now tied with Barack Obama in Virginia speak volumes about the fear they feel as November approaches. And fearful they should be.

Obama’s collapse in Virginia is not hard to understand.

In May, when Barack Obama “evolved” into a fan of gay marriage, there was an immediate uproar from his African-American base. A large segment of black Christians made it very clear they were not happy about Obama’s latest “evolution” (he has been on both sides of the issue for long periods at a time) on gay marriage. Polls done in North Carolina and Georgia a few days afterward found 20% of African-Americans intended to cast their ballots for Mitt Romney, most likely because of gay marriage.

Virginia Democrats must be getting the same numbers in their internal polls. Virginia African-Americans must be telling pollsters they are unhappy enough to either stay home or vote Romney in November.

These voters are the same kind of people who sit in the Baptist or AME churches each Sunday in North Carolina and Georgia. They hear the same message from their pastors: we can’t support Obama because he is pushing gay marriage on us.

A recent Quinnipiac poll of Virginia’s registered voters found that the 50/42 lead Obama had in March fell to 47/42 last month, and Obama and Romney are now in  a 44/44 tie.

Despite the still-high percentage of Virginia’s African-Americans who are expressing support for Obama (88%), even this is a decline of 4 points since 2008. Nevertheless, in this cycle, who a voter WANTS to see elected and whether or not that voter will actually go out and vote are not necessarily the same.

Gallup’s numbers:

Moans about racism don’t explain Romney’s surge in Virginia, but new information from Gallup might. A Gallup spokesman said, “Democrats are significantly less likely now (39%) than they were in the summers of 2004 and 2008 to say they are ‘more enthusiastic about voting than usual’ in the coming presidential election. Republicans are more enthusiastic now than in 2008, and the same as in 2004.” The enthusiasm spread is 51/39 in the GOP’s favor.

It’s the lack of Democrat enthusiasm to vote that is ending Obama’s chances of winning in Virginia, not racism.

Follow Coach at twitter.com @KcoachcCoach

Photo credit: tango.mceffrie (Creative Commons)

Deranged Man Attacks Group Protesting ObamaCare HHS Mandate

Free speech is less free in Arkansas. In fact, volunteers with Tradition Family and Property (TFP—Louisiana) were recently attacked in Little Rock during a peaceful rally against Obamacare and its HHS mandate. The incident occurred on July 17.

100 Million Gun Owners Didn’t Kill Anyone Last Week

guns SC 100 Million Gun Owners Didnt Kill Anyone Last Week

“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.” – Thomas Jefferson

For my tenth birthday, I wanted a BB gun. Like the mother in “A Christmas Story,” mom simply said, “You’ll shoot your eye out.” Dad had a wiser response. He gave me a choice. I could have the BB gun or a pair of Roy Rogers cap pistols I had been admiring. He made it clear to me that once I owned a weapon that actually fired real projectiles — even if they were only BBs — my toy gun days were over. I chose the pistols, and he knew I wasn’t ready for the real thing.

Two years later, at age twelve, with my toy gun days behind me, Dad bought me a bolt-action .22-caliber rifle and taught me how to use it — safely. I still remember the three simple rules he taught me: this is not a toy, never point it at anyone, and always assume that it is loaded.

As I grew into a teenager, I always knew where Dad kept our guns — mine and his. They were not locked up. They were standing in their cases in the closet in my parents’ bedroom, with the ammunition on the shelf above. Yet never once did it occur to me to take those guns to school and shoot my classmates. Nor did I ever contemplate walking into a packed movie theater or a crowded mall and begin firing.

None of us has any way of knowing whether James Holmes, the shooter in Aurora, Colorado, is simply an evil genius putting on an act in court or if he is a loon who really believes he is Batman’s nemesis, the Joker. We don’t know if his father ever taught him how to use firearms, or if he got his knowledge from watching TV and movies and playing violent video games.

What we do know is that a society that once lived in reality has evolved into a culture wallowing in fantasy violence, ruled by people whose goal is to disarm the good guys, leaving us all at the mercy of the bad guys.

We know that, like so many communities today, Aurora, Colorado, did not allow law-abiding gun owners to carry their weapons into the theater that night. Perhaps if they had, someone might have been able to stop Holmes before he killed a dozen innocent people and wounded scores of others.

Even in states that allow concealed carry of firearms, politically correct business owners can forbid the possession of such weapons in their establishments. A sign on the door of the Von Maur department store in Omaha, Nebraska announces that guns are not allowed. On December 5, 2007, 19-year-old Robert Hawkins read that sign as follows: “Even our security guards are unarmed! Come on in and shoot us!” So he did, killing eight people and wounding five others.

Shortly after my dad bought me those cap pistols instead of that BB gun, a teenage punk named Charles Starkweather went on a rampage across Nebraska, killing eleven people. The entire Midwest was terrified. As the debate again heats up over banning certain-sized magazines for particular weapons, limiting the quantities and calibers of ammo, and other new forms of gun control, it is instructive to note that Starkweather’s weapons of choice on that spree were a pistol, a knife, a .22 rifle (similar to mine), and a .410 shotgun like one I almost bought a few years later.

Charles Starkweather proved in 1958 that he could kill just as many people with a .22 rifle and a small caliber shotgun as Robert Hawkins or James Holmes could a half-century later with a so-called assault rifle. Evil finds a way. As Bruce Wayne’s butler tells him in a previous Batman movie, “Some men just want to watch the world burn.”

In the wake of these latest murders, as you hear our politicians blather on about more gun control, remember that 100 million gun owners didn’t kill anyone last week. They are the good guys. They are on our side.

© 2012 by Doug Patton, Doug Patton describes himself as a recovering political speechwriter who agrees with himself much more often than not. Astute supporters and inane detractors alike are encouraged to e-mail him with their pithy comments at dpatton@cagle.com. Now working as a freelance writer, his weekly columns are syndicated exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. For info on using his column at your publication or website, please email Cari Dawson Bartley at cari@cagle.com. 

Photo credit: Gregory Wild-Smith (Creative Commons)

Rush Rips Obama’s “Life Story”

As Rush Limbaugh says, there is no reason to vote for “history” twice.

Trump: Obama Needs To Be More Transparent

Yesterday, Donald Trump appeared on ratio station 89 WLS (“Chicago’s Talk Leader”) and called on Obama to be more “transparent.”