At the beginning of yesterday’s hearing to determine the legal and Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama for placement on the State of Georgia ballot in November, Judge Michael Malihi was said to have read “the last paragraph of [Obama] Attorney Michael Jablonski’s letter” to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp. And in the barely 2 hour proceedings which reviewed 3 lawsuits demanding Obama not appear on that ballot, this might have been the most significant “statement” made by the otherwise reserved Malihi.
Like Obama, Jablonski was a no-show in the Georgia courtroom, leaving Obama represented by no counsel at the proceeding.
And although the judge adjourned the hearing with no decision, no ruling, in fact nothing more than a “thank you” to the participants, the last paragraph of Jablonski’s letter states “We await your taking the requested action and as we do, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26th.”
Well Obama had been subpoenaed to appear in that courtroom. The subpoena had been specifically and without reservation upheld by Judge Malihi just 6 days earlier. So Obama was in obvious violation of the court’s order.
So maybe, just maybe Judge Malihi read the final words of Jablonski’s hyper arrogant, “we don’t believe your little state or your silly hearing are worth our time” letter for the purpose of reading into the record the fact that it was indeed the decision of Obama and his attorney to NOT attend and to NOT honor legal subpoenas.
And if that is the case, it means Malihi is clearing the decks for either a default judgment against the president, or the implementation of a legal remedy of some sort for Obama’s self-important refusal to appear or even respond to the proceeding with counsel.
Naturally it would take an attorney to decipher any “legal” significance in Malihi’s actions, but through his past rulings the judge has made it abundantly clear that he will follow the laws of the state of Georgia to the letter and accept no grandstanding or phony arguments from either side, not even from a president.
And it is against the law to ignore a subpoena, perhaps all the more so when the judge himself refused to allow Obama’s earlier request that the subpoena be quashed.
It might be significant that Georgia Secretary of State Kemp backed Malihi to the hilt in his response to Michael Jablonski’s letter, telling the lawyer “…If you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.”
In short, though you and your client clearly don’t think much of our state or its laws, we will conduct the business of both just as though you were mere mortals rather than privileged characters.
When will Judge Malihi issue a ruling and what weight of law will it carry? Attorneys for both sides have until February 5th to present additional evidence for their claims. Soon after that we will know how determined the State of Georgia is in seeing to it their laws are obeyed…even by a president.
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Read More on this Subject
- Judge Rules Obama Must Prove Presidential Eligibility In Georgia Courtroom On Thursday For those who have waited 3 years for a judge...
- Eligibility Attorney: Obama Needs Impeaching One of the attorneys who argued before a Georgia judge...
- Watch The Eligibility Proceedings Against Barack Hussein Obama Live Mark your calendars: On January 26, 2012, The Honorable...
- Judge Sets ‘final’ Calendar For Eligibility Challenge U.S. District Judge David Carter today issued a final schedule...
- Results Of Obama’s Eligibility Hearing In Georgia Watch the entire proceeding on video here: Video Of Georgia...
Loading ...
Writing in Malihi for president.
see my REPLY below… AND SAVE YOURSELF FROM READING ALL THE BS in this LAME THREAD… if you disagree then come back up here and regurgitate this idiocy!
You’re a moron and I wonder if you have changed into some new clothing? But either way you are actually lower than a moron you are an imbecile!
For some reason politicians in general do not believe they are subject to the laws they write for all others, Deemers such as the uncredentialed ultra liberal Mysery Man are especially in contempt of the rule of law and the Constitution, they demean it by ignoring it’s guidelines and usurping the law. The Deemers exhibited this by providing us with a unqualified candidate and then without vetting let him run as a qualified candidate, all this is quite proveable and the actions of this individual are blatantly evident.
The time is “now” for redefining the way all elected and appointed officials hold office, it is imperative we demand term limits and salary only, incumbency has bred elitism and this has lead to the loss of integrity, merit and abuse of office, leaving the voters and tax payers without decent recourse to remove or deselect these offenders from their elected offices. Couple this with the removal of the progressive tax and the IRS and the use of the fair tax, no VAT and we the people again have a strong voice by putting this on the national ballot every ten years…..or we can lose this Constitutional Republic.
One change that needs to be made is that all elected officials should be held accountable and arrested for treason, or at least a felony, should they not adhere to the laws of the land, namely the Constitution.
you are the best yet
I totally agree, we need to hold all of them to enjoy everything the common folk enjoy (sarcastic) especially our health care, and reasonable retirement not the millions they make for life and the best health care there is
With any luck whatsoever he will sentence him to jail time! Oh well, nice to dream.
Oh please let it be so! My wish would come true! Then while in jail we can attack our do nothing Congressional houses respectively and charge them with complicity and that of being accomplices in his criminal activity. We will probably be able to clean house with this method! Look out Billary and Biden and Pelosi. Get your passports in order or haul tail to Mexico where your drug lords can protect you!
It is encouraging to find at least a judge in one state that has the guts to stand up to the dictator in chief.
We can only hope that this will encourage other states to follow suite. And in deed other states are starting to rebel against some of Obama’s actions, but not nearly enough yet.
Obama has broken enough laws to keep an army of lawyers and judges busy for years to come.
“Obama has broken enough laws to keep an army of lawyers and judges busy for years to come.”
But the sad part of this issue is the fact that the Democrat Party has perpetrated this fraud upon the nation, and the Congress neglected to do its job and impeach him when the first “high crime and mistermeanor” occurred. With each new victory, this dictator has become bolder and is now thumbing his nose at our legal system. Even our Supreme Court refused to weigh in on this issue and Justice Scalia himself admitted that the court was deliberately avoiding the issue. There are enough lawyers in the House of Representatives to correct this issue, but unfortunately a lot of them are Democrats and they will not challenge their own party leader. Impeachment is the only recourse, but that requires a 2/3 majority and it’s not there.
That he is but any crazy man will doom himself with the rope lol
“Attorneys for both sides have until February 5th to present additional evidence for their claims.” Moved up to the 1st.
Judge Michael Malihi:
Thank you sir, For instilling the rule of law. In observing many judges.. I’ve seen only a few whom are known as REAL judges. You Sir, are of such profound character… and history will deem you as such … a rectifier of the rule of law… not the rule of man.
As an adjudicator.. you bring new hope to over a hundred million Americans. … and Sir, Our Constitution, Our Founders and We, The American People… have your backside covered.
Duke-Jinx
There is an urgent need to send messages of support to Judge Michael Malihi, the judge who heard the Georgia Obama Ballot Challenge on 1-26-2012. We need to send Judge Malihi a note of thanks for his courage and willingness to stand for the US Constitution.
Here is Judge Malihi’s web site for a better presentation that I have copied below. Send your appreciation to:
Contact:
Valerie Ruff for Judge Malihi
Case Management Assistant
vruff@osah.ga.gov
Tel: (404) 651-7595
Fax: (404) 818-3751
http://www.osah.ga.gov/judges-dir-detail.aspx?StaffID=mmalihi
Call, email respectful appreciation. Some have said it’s essential for Judge Malihi to sense that “we the people” are behind him and his action. So let’s remove any doubt the Judge might have of the strong support we’re offering.
Thanks for posting the contact info! I just sent this email;
Your Honor;
It is with great appreciation of your display of judicial Integrity that I write to you! Your recent actions of 26 January 2012 are in accordance with both “We the People” and the United States Constitution. Today there are hundreds of millions of people in this great country who can once again believe that we are indeed a Nation of LAW. Your resolve in this matter is refreshing , and most commendable. I await your decision with great anticipation!
I hope MANY others will follow suit and comment this Judge for his correct actions.
Bear, That was perfectly stated, I couldn’t improve on this whatsoever. I hope you also sent this to Judge Mahili, I’m sure he would like it as well.
Duke-Jinx,
A great post. I emailed Malihi’s office, thanking him for his guts and adherence to the law. It would be great if he got about 5 million more saying the same sort of thing.
It’s extremely uplifting to see a judge that abides by the law and isn’t intimidated by this piece of crap in Washington. What I’d like to see happen is somebody take OJUDAS out behind the barn and teach him some manners. Like when you speak to the Governor of a state. You don’t insult them and walk off. Secondly never ever ignore a subpoena. I don’t care if you do consider yourself king…you ain’t any such thing and you are not above the law unless…..he ISN’T a citizen and that may be why he feels exempt from our laws. Since the messiah ignored the subpoena the judge is well within his rights to order a bench warrant, have the federal marshalls go to the white house, cuff OJUDAS and bring him to a Atlanta jail to await a hearing. If it were anybody else we’d be sitting in jail right now. I want to publicly thank the Honorable Judge Mahili for exhibiting esprit de corps in this matter. He showed dignity, honor and professionalism. Sir you are admired in my eyes. WE THE PEOPLE are with you 1000%. If I had my desire fulfilled I’d love to see OJUDAS sitting in a Georgia jail and tried for treason,purgery,lying and pretending to be the president. He should be tried for treason first and foremost. He has given Britain’s nuclear secrets to the Russians and just this week there was an article that he is now going to reveal our nuclear secrets to the Russians. Anyway you slice it that treason. The same charge was made for Julius and Ethel Rosenberg in the 1950′s for working with the Russians to obtain nuclear secrets. It’s past time to take off the gloves and bare knuckle OJUDAS. I would pay good money for that honor. Again thank you Judge. You are a great American Patriot !
Good info mr. duke-jinx I also thank you for the contact info. You are the man of the hour! Thanks dude!
SURELY every STATE has been watching this case in GEORGIA!!!! Now how do we awaken other states to follow suit? I understand 2 so far have been quick to respond,,,,,,,it will say a lot about those states that follow suit, as in my way of thinking any state that wants freedoms granted by our constitution and bill of rights should do so,,,,,,,,,those who do not will contain the most illegals and foreigners like Minesota? will be silent? Fellow Americans PRAY for justice,,,,,,,,From Obummer on down must pay, we know who they all are,,,,,we know the names and the CRIMES they committed, they can not hide!!!!
This story has changed VERY quickly as can well be imagined. After it was written, plaintiffs attorneys revealed that Judge Malihi had offered a default judgment on behalf of their clients prior to the start of the hearing. That’s why the 9:00 am start time was pushed back to 9:30. All of the attorneys refused the deal as it would have meant none of their information and testimony would have gone into the record of the court. After all, the hearing itself would not have taken place.
Did they make the right decision? I believe so. Judge Malihi has given attorneys for both sides until Feb 5th to provide additional evidence, documents, whatever, after which he will make his decision. That decision is then forwarded to Brian Kemp, the Georgia Secretary of State. HE will make the final ruling on Obama’s ballot eligibility. Had there been no hearing, no presentation of evidence, no testimony and no arguments made, Kemp’s decision would be based on…well, I don’t know what!
He will now have a record of evidence to help him determine the best course of action according to Ga. law.
Also, though Orly Taitz is far from Clarence Darrow, she worked hard for 3 years, absorbing insults and attacks from the entire MSM, Democrat Party and even many on the “same side” as herself! I’m sure she wanted her hour in court to finally present her story, just as the other attorneys undoubtedly did.
Here’s hoping Brian Kemp and Michael Malihi have both a spine and a strong sense of duty and honor. If so, I’m sure they will render the proper decision.
If the judge’s recommendation – and I’ve been told that it’s going to be to disqualify Mr. Obama as a candidate – is followed by the secretary of state, Mr. Obama has got a real problem,” said Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation.
The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there. We argued that all the evidence needed to be entered in to record so the Judge allowed for a speedy hearing where all evidence was entered into the court record.
What that means is this… Any appeal, if one is even possible, would be based on the evidence provided by the lawyers in each case. …
Now we’re merely awaiting the publishing of this Judge’s ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment. – Carl
The judge has no option but to rule against obama
or else he admits the United State of Tyranny
A MAJOR CRIME IS BEING COMMITTED AGAINST THIS NATION
with the help of MANY Corrupted officials.
God help us all. Capt-Dax
The below information is not part of the eligibility briefs. It should be!
“I had presumed that the idiom “natural born citizen” appeared nowhere in U.S. Law other than A2S1C5, but I found it in administrative law and it is contrasted with native and naturalized citizenship. I’ve never seen any mention of this fact before and wonder how many are aware of it in the ineligibility camp. Here’s the quotes:
http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45104/0-0-0-48602.html
He then quoted two provisions from the link provided, but there’s actually three at the official INS “.gov” site which establish official recognition by the federal government that native-born and natural-born should be separately delineated. When you visit the suggested link to the Immigration and Naturalization service, it brings you to “Interpretation 324.2 Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage.”
Interpretation 324.2 (a)(3) provides:
“The repatriation provisions of these two most recent enactments also apply to a native- and natural-born citizen woman who expatriated herself by marriage to an alien…” (Emphasis added.)
Then, Interpretation 324.2(a)(7) provides:
“(7) Restoration of citizenship is prospective . Restoration to citizenship under any one of the three statutes is not regarded as having erased the period of alienage that immediately preceded it.
The words “shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922″, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen (whichever existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.” (Emphasis added.)
And again, Interpretation 324.2(b) provides:
“The effect of naturalization under the above statutes was not to erase the previous period of alienage, but to restore the person to the status if naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen, as determined by her status prior to loss.” (Emphasis added.)
http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45077/0-0-0-48438.html
Three times in this official INS Interpretation – currently published by the Obama Administration – native-born and natural-born are given separate consideration. And in the third example – from Interpretation 324.2(b) – the INS clearly states that each delineation, “naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen“, is a separate status.
The INS includes the following explanation of Interpretations:
“Interpretations were created to supplement and clarify the provisions of the statute and regulations as interpreted by the courts. These materials usually are not included in the regulations because they deal generally with procedural matters and do not deal directly with application and benefit requirements. They are still a useful tool to help you understand how the DHS Bureaus performs their different immigration services and enforcement functions. Users of the Operation Instructions and Interpretations should always consult the relevant regulations and manuals in conjunction with these materials. As the DHS Bureaus have grown, the trend has been towards inclusion of more materials in the regulations and field manuals, and the Operations Instructions and Interpretations have been updated less frequently.”
As the story goes….Ojudas visited a Native American reservation before the election in 2008. In that visit he was bestowed a great honor. He was made an honorary member of the tribe and given an official Native American name. The chief named him Walking Eagle. It must have been an odd name because one of the fellow tribesmen asked the chief about the name. He asked..”Chief why did you name him Walking Eagle” ? The wise chief replied ” I had to name him Walking Eagle. An Eagle that full of shit can’t fly” !
I love it so eddie very good! My compliments to you on this one I am still laughing!
For those that don’t get it, see if this helps explain it better.
Read the first line of the, still in effect today, Civil Rights Act of 1866, which says:
“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States;”
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/reconstruction/section4/section4_civrightsact1.html
Now read the frist line of the Naturalization Oath of Allegiance (Sworn to when you are naturalized):
“I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen;”
Each one validates the other and clearly proves that all Citizen’s (Natural Born & Naturalized) must have full allegiance to the United States. Do you really think they would make an immigrant denounce all allegiance, but not require the people born here to immigrants (dual citizens) denounce all allegiances as well?
You can’t tell me that immigrants from other coutries that are naturalized, have a higher allegiance above a person born here (to a foreign father, DUAL ALLEGIANCE), do you? The founders did not recognize dual allegiance.
The Declaration of Independance was more or less a mass Naturalization Act, making all the inhabitants US Citizens. Some were natural born, others were naturalized, which led to the grandfather clause in article 2 section 1 (or a citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution) This clause is not obsolete because there is no one alive that was alive at the adoption, so all presidential candidates MUST be natural born citizens.
CORRECTION ABOVE (This clause is NOW obsolete instead of NOT)
Jablonski should be sanctioned for his absurd 1-25-12 letter, which is full of untruths. Orly Taitz was sanctioned merely for persisting in telling the truth. Judge Malihi should throw the book at this Obot creep.
Doug, you might re-word that sentence containing “we don’t believe your little state or your silly hearing are worth our time”” , as it appears you are quoting Jablonski instead of merely reading his mind.
It sure would be glorious if the Judge throws the proverbial book at this usurpe rand his attorney neither of which are worthy of capitalization, my way of discrediting the sleaze bags! Brian Kemp has already insinuated that he intends to support the Judges decision all of which is great news!
gmiller,
I really thought readers would understand this was just my way of appraising the arrogance of Obama and his attorney and not literally their words! But you’re probably right. Should have made it clear.
Duke-Jinx,
Thanks for the link to the Judge. I just sent an email to him and a copy to all on my email list.
mrshinola
For obummer to snub his nose at Georgia court is one thing for he needs to spew his lies to the American people in Colorado and around the USA, but my question is what the heck is the matter with Jablonski? Did he join obummer in his quest for re-election? He had no excuse not to show up at all and if I was Judge Malihi, I would throw the entire stack of legal books against them both for they have just made a mockery of the judicial system. If the judge’s decision is anything else but to hold obummer and his counsel accountable, then anyone and everyone that receives a subpoena from any court can just ignore it. This would bring down the judicial system as was devised thru the original Constitution of the USA, not Obumma’s interpretation of it!
Obama is a mockery of the judicial system, but then again the Judicial system has become a mockery in many cases.
“Since, Senator Obama, a constitutional law professor, knew he was ineligible to seek or accept the office of president, because his Kenyan father was not an American citizen…he is also guilty of fraud in misleading campaign contributors, supporters, voters, courts and Congress. Further more, the millions of their and our money, he spent on legal fees to block, prevent and suspend judgment or action on his known fraud and ineligibility, sadly will have served to pervert and ignore the very oath of office he made on the bible, “to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Sadly Honorcode1 I have been corrected many times with this! Remember the inauguaration was moved inside the White House before ,well obama would not put his hand on the bible so behind closed doors with pictures released only he perportedly swore in with the Quaran! Not even a legal oath of office I also was informed that Roberts (Justice) is the guilty crook that performed this act of unconstitutionality! Have you heard this before? Regardless his is a fraud and is not our President! Question for those of History: Why was JFK Assinated and then NOW? While JFK was a fairly good Democrat with a few bad marks, overall he was acceptable and Very much American! And what do we have Now! We definitely have some evil forces at work here!
…all a fucking waste of time… continue to rattle your mouths like idiots…
The government machine is bought and paid for across the entire congress
Most people who fight Obama only fight him because they cannot regurgitate the fact that a black man in President… shutup I know he is hybrid.
They have succeeded in creating the perfect BICKERING contest to keep you all busy being fucking ignorant idiots.
There is much more behind it than ANY of you will spend the time to figure out.
SO, THEY WIN, NO MATTER WHO THE FUCK IS PRESIDENT!!! 1 clue: Rothschilds
…everything else is BULLSHIT stirred up to create a big stink of IGNORANCE!
…while you think you are so intelligent joining the fake battles they mire you in!
IDIOTS, wateva!
So what is the answer genius?
That is a good question but so far I have seen no answer!
Sounds like you’re actually pissing all over yourself because they’ve got Obama like a deer in the headlights. Are you sniveling because your great leader Messiah Obama is under big scrutiny? We’re so sorry you feel so bad about all this. We should take up a collection so you can move your sorry ass to any communist country of your choice. Cuba, N. Korea, Russia. Any of those countries make you smile?
GET A LIFE YOU MORON!
Thank you Richard you helped save me a lot of typing along these same lines! You are a Gentleman and a Scholar! Wish we could just round them up and Ship them! Then check on them in 30 days to determine how many would be shot, for the commies love to kill their own!
Calling us idiots for standing up for the rule of law makes you the opposite of perspicacious and it is perspicuous to me furthermore that your mixing f bombs with the English language only distracts people from your efforts to communicate and reveals a subconscious sexual hangup.
Damn, Honorcode1 Your reply came out close to one of my post and I thought you may be talking to me but after a little backtracking I know who you are talking to and I think he is fresh out of some Prison somewhere, it is obvious that he is the idiot!