Q. What’s this? A spouse decides whether one runs for president? Has this ever happened before?
A. No. Of course not. I think it’s a joke and makes a laughingstock out of Daniels who on a number of fronts…budgetary expertise, excellent governor…is a well-qualified candidate. The proper way would be for the couple quietly to make that decision up or down and then either go for it or no. Throwing the ball to Cherie in public to make the decision for Mitch makes Mitch a sad joke of the GOP candidates—the weenie runt of the litter.
As we all know, Cherie left him and their daughters for another man, divorcing Mitch and marrying an old flame because she despised Mitch’s chosen vocation of politics…and then did a reverse switch, divorcing him and returning to Mitch. Do they think this device…leave it to Cherie… will insulate her from another switcheroo when the press heat comes on? Looks a lot like it. But with her already demonstrated instability I’m not so sure. This stupid p. r. device should disqualify him from election if anything does. This smacks of Dick Lugar, his topmost adviser.
Read More at Tom Roeser by Thomas F. Roeser, Tom Roeser
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
What a pathetic man he must be indeed to allow that two timing wife to dictate whether or not he will run. That right there will put him out of the running……who would vote for that!!!!
Being a woman i could never vote for Mitch Daniels !
What the Republicans need now more than ever is a real man & no Rhino to run against Obama.
i do find Cherie Daniels as being a very attractive lady & her attire as being impeccable.
Being members of Drudge, WND, Rush, Savage, etc. whatever is fine. Your reason for why you like one over the other is not a reason to allow our country to be split up by foreign powers. Who rah for my guy and here is my problem with your guy are vain distractions. We are not limited to the best of the bad. Experienced speakers are not the best qualified to serve. They are the best at deception. You and I the laymen are the best hope for the future. When we stand as one the media attack on our experience will fall on mostly deaf ears.
Protect your right to self-preservation. We must stand together as one. Only those with a strong will to maintain numbers and a defensive army will prosper. The more people that engage in distraction first and the best of the bad second the easier it is for the focused.
Goooh.com, NumbersUSA.com and SBA-list.org depend on active rolls from people as any movement needs in order to succeed. Reformdc.com links to these movements, you might be able to click on my name.
My friend in Indiana says Daniels is a typical, progressive globalist. Isn't it weird that, out of 320,000,000 people, we can't find one suitable candidate who won't sell us out? I think maybe the good ones are too smart to take on such a horrible mess!
Watch Herman Cain then tell us what you think. Listen with open mind and pay close attention.
I would not vote for Mitch Daniels. He is a RINO and I surely would not want a first lady with his wife's history. The Bushes and the other elite RINO's are trying to use their money and power to produce our candidate.
I want to hear the debates and make my own decsion as to whom I would support and vote for.
I will not vote for Romney he is too a RINO.
So are Santorium and Pawlenty. They are politicans , not Federalist. I
Maybe Mitch is better off without her. She can't seem to make up her mind what man she wants to
be with.