Who’s Minding The Hen House In DC?

DC Aerial Who’s Minding the Hen House in DC?

If one should wonder who’s minding the “hen house” in DC, they either just landed here from Mars, or they can’t speak or read English.  The “hen house” was exterminated back in early 2009, and the foxes have taken up residence.  They receive exorbitant salaries for hiding, participating, and creating crimes against Americans and our Nation.

First on the list of devious activities would be the disappearance of taxpayer money amounting to 787 billion dollars.  Rapidly following that smooth move was the Fast and Furious gunrunner program funded by Obama and choreographed by Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano.  Ask them who was responsible for these crimes, and Obama would shake his head and say “I don’t know anything about this, but I’ll set up a special committee to investigate it (meaning my sidekick Holder will sweep everything under the rug.)”

Then came Obamacare, and one must wonder how a bill can be passed when no one has read it.  But that didn’t bother the foxes – they passed it; helped themselves to a huge bite of our Medicare; and sent the insurance companies, the medical field, and taxpayers the bill. Obama will tell you it’s the greatest thing since Ford’s auto invention and not to worry because the IRS will monitor who’s naughty and nice.  And a bunch of Obama creeps will dictate who gets healthcare and who doesn’t.

Obama said that the cost of insurance will be reduced; we can keep our own primary care physician and live happily ever after. News flash – he lied; doctors are leaving their professions, insurance rates are skyrocketing (along with horrendous out of pocket charges), businesses are in limbo, and the quality of patient care just keeps taking one hit after another. As of May 16th, 2013, there’s not one Republican, Democrat, or rocket scientist in the “hen house” who has the guts to remove this bill.

We learned that we own all of these various expensive solar panels that no one will buy (and ugly defunct wind mills, electric cars that blow up, expensive batteries for the electric cars that don’t work, and a bunch of green companies continuing to declare bankruptcy as we speak.)

Next comes the Benghazi murders. Obama, Clinton, and Panetta all knew about the attack and flew the coop knowing that our Ambassador and other Americans were being attacked by terrorists.  Guess Lamb was the only pigeon in the hen house watching the massacre in real time.

But to hear the three tell the story, not one of them knew about it. And not one of them was in charge – so the question is: who really is running the hen house?  Could it be Valarie Jarrett and the old Soros clown?

Along comes the AP, James Rosen, the IRS scandal, and the National Security Agency’s dragnet.  Obama does what Obama always does: he shakes his head, scratches his ear, and says he doesn’t know anything about anything and passes the buck one more time.  Behind the scenes, Obama and his administration are frantically scrambling to cover up the cover ups; and they’re up to their armpits in lies and on the verge of self-destruction.

Maxine Waters probably followed Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s footsteps, opening her mouth and inserting her foot when she started bragging about Obama’s secret database to Roland Martin.

Waters said that the president has put in place an organization that contains the kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life. That’s going to be very, very powerful. That database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that have never been done before. Guess Maxine was right!

Ironically, Maxine just exposed why the IRS and AP scandals preempts all other news at this time. This confirms why Conservatives, churches, donors to Mitt Romney, etc. are being targeted.

Big Brother is watching you, knows what you eat for breakfast, taps your personal phone lines, watches your every move, and has infringed on all of your freedoms and rights. Is this really America?

May God Bless America.

 

As Always,

Little Tboca

Backlash To Obama’s Gay Rights Agenda

obama gay marriage sc Backlash to Obama’s Gay Rights Agenda

An Obama-allied group that is at the center of the scandal over IRS harassment of conservative organizations was the target of a protest outside its own headquarters.

“The escalation of homosexual activist power is bad for America, and American liberty,” declared Peter LaBarbera of the group Americans for Truth outside the headquarters of the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) in Washington, D.C. He said Christians and conservatives in favor of traditional values are being subjected to “intimidation, bullying, violence, [and] dirty tricks,” such as the HRC’s acquisition of the National Organization for Marriage’s IRS donor filings, for the purpose of harassing opponents of the gay agenda.

The Huffington Post had also received and publicized the confidential information, a violation of federal law.

A banner, “Homosexuality Is Nothing to Be Proud of, but overcoming it is,” was displayed in reference to President Obama’s proclamation of June as “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month.”

Obama previously celebrated the 1969 homosexual riots at a seedy Mafia-run bar known as the Stonewall Inn.

Aware of the planned press conference, the HRC put a “Welcome Peter” sign on its headquarters.

But LaBarbera didn’t return the welcome, saying that “The deviant sexual revolution represented by the Human Rights Campaign headquarters behind us is built on a foundation of lies.”

He called the homosexual revolution “one of the most amazing marketing stories of all time: a sexual sin once defined by Noah Webster as the ‘Crime Against Nature,’ condemned by God for millennia, was repackaged as the supposed basis for ‘civil rights.’”

Matt Barber of Liberty Counsel Action, one of several participants in the news conference, denounced the Human Rights Campaign for its role in receiving and using confidential financial records from the IRS to attack donors to the National Organization for Marriage (NOM).

HRC President Joe Solmonese was a co-chair of President Obama’s re-election committee, and Obama spoke at an HRC dinner in 2011.

Mr. John Eastman, the NOM Chairman, was on Capitol Hill at about the same time, describing the criminal conduct involving the HRC. He testified that NOM’s 2008 Form 990 Schedule B information was obtained illegally by the HRC and The Huffington Post and that such actions constitute “a serious felony punishable by a $5,000 fine and up to five years in federal prison…”

Yet, he went on, NOM has been stonewalled in its attempts to discover on its own the source of the felonious conduct; and the organization has “received no satisfaction from the law enforcement authorities of the United States, whose duty it is to prosecute felonious disclosure of confidential tax returns.”

The Washington, D.C. protest outside the headquarters of the HRC also included Eric Holmberg, producer of the documentary “Is Gay the New Black? Homosexuality and the Civil Rights Movement.” He released a YouTube clip of his film titled “From Selma to Stonewall” and said the homosexual movement has used the comparison with blacks to “propagandize” for their cause and to try to “normalize” homosexuality.

During the question-and-answer period, a reporter for BuzzFeed, a financial backer of the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association, said he had just spoken to a former top adviser to Mitt Romney’s campaign who said it was impossible to reverse the trend for homosexual rights in America.

LaBarbera rejected that view, noting that a homosexual marriage bill just failed in Illinois, Obama’s home state, in part because of opposition from blacks and Latinos. LaBarbera, who is based in Illinois, pointed out that Baptist Minister James Meeks, a former member of the Illinois State Senate, recorded robocalls against the bill. Meeks is the Senior Pastor and Founder of Salem Baptist Church of Chicago, the largest African American church in Illinois with over 15,000 members.

Matt Barber commented on the fact that in secular France, where a socialist government just legalized homosexual marriage, hundreds of thousands of people have turned out in the streets in protest. Many are calling for the resignation of Socialist President François Hollande.

“Same-sex marriage has provoked the most prolonged and powerful right-wing demonstrations in France for three decades,” a British paper noted.

Asked about how the U.S. Supreme Court would rule on homosexual marriage this month, Barber said he was not sure, but that it would be surprising and absurd if it found there to be a constitutional right “for Patrick Henry to marry Henry Patrick.”

Using facts and figures from the federal Centers for Disease Control, Diane Gramley, President of the American Family Association of Pennsylvania, addressed the ongoing homosexual health crisis:

“It is unbelievable that in an era of escalating STD [sexually transmitted disease] rates, especially for homosexual men…that the Human Rights Campaign is talking about ending the homosexual blood ban,” LaBarbera added.

Other speakers included Linda Harvey, founder of Mission America and host of Mission America Radio, and Patrick Mangan, Executive Director of Citizens for Community Values of Indiana.

LaBarbera noted that one of the founding fathers of the homosexual movement, communist Harry Hay, supported the participation of NAMBLA (the North American Man/Boy Love Association) in “Gay Pride” parades, and that “a new PRO-pedophile movement is making its case, copycatting ‘gay’ activist tactics of victim-mongering and distorting the meaning of words.”

This new phase of the homosexual movement refers to pedophiles as just “Minor Attracted Persons” or MAPs.

 

This article originally appeared at AIM.org and is reprinted here with permission.

Photo credit: khalid Albaih (Creative Commons)

It’s Not Just The IRS, And It’s Clearly Coordinated

DC Aerial 300x200 Its Not Just the IRS, And Its Clearly Coordinated

To anyone with any sense of political propriety, the growing story of IRS abuses targeting conservative groups is beyond unsettling. Even administration supporters must realize that with a change of administration, groups and individuals of their political orientation could be the next targets. But the IRS isn’t the only agency involved in this targeting, which even more clearly validates the hypothesis that it’s all coordinated from the White House, and not just some “rogue agents.”

We now know the IRS was targeting applications for non-profit status by conservative groups. We also know, from recent revelations, that the Department of Justice (which seems increasingly to be an oxymoron) has been targeting media organizations and reporters that are seen to pose a threat to the administration. But that’s just the proverbial tip of the iceberg.

The IRS is further implicated in this web of corruption by their audit division. Idaho resident Frank VanderSloot served as a national co-chair to the Mitt Romney campaign, and was a major donor. In April, 2012, the Obama Campaign published a scurrilous piece on their website, attacking the character of eight conservatives who were backing Romney, including VanderSloot.

Shortly after that posting, VanderSloot was subjected to three federal government audits. Two of those were by the IRS, one for his personal income and one for his businesses. The other was a Labor Department audit of one of his businesses. Is this a coincidence? Not according to VanderSloot, who said he “wasn’t the only one” on that list that received the royal Obama treatment.

In 2009 and 2011, Gibson Guitar Corporation was raided by armed federal agents from the FBI and the Justice Department, for allegedly using “endangered” wood in the construction of their acoustic guitars. The agents seized raw materials, electronic files and finished guitars. The raid cost the company over $3 million, not including a $300,000 settlement with the government. None of Gibson’s competitors received this kind of treatment, even though Martin & Co. is known to use exactly the same “endangered” wood. The difference? Gibson CEO, Henry Juszkiewicz, actively supports Republican candidates, while Martin’s CEO, Chris Martin IV is a Democrat supporter.

Catherine Engelbrecht, saw a need to educate citizens to prevent voter fraud. She founded a non-profit organization, True the Vote, for that express purpose. Her organization’s non-profit filing was one of those held up for years by the IRS’s “Advocacy Group,” which has admitted to targeting conservative groups.

After filing for tax-exempt status, she has gone through four IRS audits; two of their personal finances, and two of their family business. Her business was also inspected several times by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), where only minor issues were found, but they were fined $25,000. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) made an unannounced audit of her business. And not to be outdone, the FBI started contacting them, probing for improprieties. Neither the ATF nor the FBI could find anything to charge them with. It was all harassment.

To believe all of this is coincidental is tantamount to suspension of all cognitive functionality. It is targeted, coordinated, and implemented with the precision that would make Stalin, Mao, or Hitler envious.

Kim Strassel of the Wall Street Journal revealed a year ago that the president maintained an “enemies list.” Not enemies of the state, but people who oppose his agenda and are outspoken in their opposition. As she said, “Any president who targets a private citizen for his politics is de facto engaged in government intimidation and threats. This is why presidents since Nixon have carefully avoided the practice. Save Mr. Obama, who acknowledges no rules.”

Peter Wehner in Commentary Magazine said recently, “We have seen from this White House Nixonian tendencies and, it would appear, a burning anger and resentment toward its critics. Whether it’s Fox News, the Chamber of Commerce, or companies that sponsor reports that take issue with the administration’s assessments, there seems to be a cast of mind that views critics as enemies, as individuals and institutions that need to be ridiculed, delegitimized, or ruined… there are lines that ought not to be crossed, temptations that need to be resisted, and people in the White House who need to say ‘no’ to tactics that begin to drag an administration, and a country, down.”

Obama and his cronies have painted targets on groups and individuals who don’t buy into their statist ideology, and his henchmen in the federal government take the shots. And the proof that it’s coming from the very top is in the pervasive use of government agencies to stifle dissent and intimidate critics. It’s not just the IRS, but includes the Labor Department, the Department of Justice, FBI, ATF, and OSHA.

These are the consequences of sending a Machiavellian to lead a government that has such expansive control of our lives. Obama and his gaggle of “Csars” and government henchmen are only curtailed in their insidious intimidation and attacks on his political adversaries by bringing the administration’s atrocities to light. These are the tactics of tyrants, and have no place in America!

AP award winning columnist Richard Larsen is President of Larsen Financial, a brokerage and financial planning firm in Pocatello, Idaho, and is a graduate of Idaho State University with degrees in Political Science and History and former member of the Idaho State Journal Editorial Board.  He can be reached at rlarsenen@cableone.net. You can connect with him on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rlarsenen.

Photo Credit:  Site.gov/SC

Ronald Reagan’s Speech On Memorial Day 1984

Reagan point from podium Ronald Reagans Speech On Memorial Day 1984

Memorial Day is a day of ceremonies and speeches. Throughout America today, we honor the dead of our wars. We recall their valor and their sacrifices. We remember they gave their lives so that others might live.

We’re also gathered here for a special event — the national funeral for an unknown soldier who will today join the heroes of three other wars.

When he spoke at a ceremony at Gettysburg in 1863, President Lincoln reminded us that through their deeds, the dead had spoken more eloquently for themselves than any of the living ever could, and that we living could only honor them by rededicating ourselves to the cause for which they so willingly gave a last full measure of devotion.

Well, this is especially so today, for in our minds and hearts is the memory of Vietnam and all that that conflict meant for those who sacrificed on the field of battle and for their loved ones who suffered here at home.

Not long ago, when a memorial was dedicated here in Washington to our Vietnam veterans, the events surrounding that dedication were a stirring reminder of America’s resilience, of how our nation could learn and grow and transcend the tragedies of the past.

During the dedication ceremonies, the rolls of those who died and are still missing were read for 3 days in a candlelight ceremony at the National Cathedral. And the veterans of Vietnam who were never welcomed home with speeches and bands, but who were never defeated in battle and were heroes as surely as any who have ever fought in a noble cause, staged their own parade on Constitution Avenue. As America watched them — some in wheelchairs, all of them proud — there was a feeling that this nation — that as a nation we were coming together again and that we had, at long last, welcomed the boys home.

“A lot of healing went on,” said one combat veteran who helped organize support for the memorial. And then there was this newspaper account that appeared after the ceremonies. I’d like to read it to you. “Yesterday, crowds returned to the Memorial. Among them was Herbie Petit, a machinist and former marine from New Orleans. `Last night,’ he said, standing near the wall, `I went out to dinner with some other ex-marines. There was also a group of college students in the restaurant. We started talking to each other. And before we left, they stood up and cheered us. The whole week,’ Petit said, his eyes red, `it was worth it just for that.”’

It has been worth it. We Americans have learned to listen to each other and to trust each other again. We’ve learned that government owes the people an explanation and needs their support for its actions at home and abroad. And we have learned, and I pray this time for good, the most valuable lesson of all — the preciousness of human freedom.

It has been a lesson relearned not just by Americans but by all the people of the world. Yet, while the experience of Vietnam has given us a stark lesson that ultimately must move the conscience of the world, we must remember that we cannot today, as much as some might want to, close this chapter in our history, for the war in Southeast Asia still haunts a small but brave group of Americans — the families of those still missing in the Vietnam conflict.

They live day and night with uncertainty, with an emptiness, with a void that we cannot fathom. Today some sit among you. Their feelings are a mixture of pride and fear. They’re proud of their sons or husbands, fathers or brothers who bravely and nobly answered the call of their country. But some of them fear that this ceremony writes a final chapter, leaving those they love forgotten.

Well, today then, one way to honor those who served or may still be serving in Vietnam is to gather here and rededicate ourselves to securing the answers for the families of those missing in action. I ask the Members of Congress, the leaders of veterans groups, and the citizens of an entire nation present or listening, to give these families your help and your support, for they still sacrifice and suffer.

Vietnam is not over for them. They cannot rest until they know the fate of those they loved and watched march off to serve their country. Our dedication to their cause must be strengthened with these events today. We write no last chapters. We close no books. We put away no final memories. An end to America’s involvement in Vietnam cannot come before we’ve achieved the fullest possible accounting of those missing in action.

This can only happen when their families know with certainty that this nation discharged her duty to those who served nobly and well. Today a united people call upon Hanoi with one voice: Heal the sorest wound of this conflict. Return our sons to America. End the grief of those who are innocent and undeserving of any retribution.

The Unknown Soldier who is returned to us today and whom we lay to rest is symbolic of all our missing sons, and we will present him with the Congressional Medal of Honor, the highest military decoration that we can bestow.

About him we may well wonder, as others have: As a child, did he play on some street in a great American city? Or did he work beside his father on a farm out in America’s heartland? Did he marry? Did he have children? Did he look expectantly to return to a bride?

We’ll never know the answers to these questions about his life. We do know, though, why he died. He saw the horrors of war but bravely faced them, certain his own cause and his country’s cause was a noble one; that he was fighting for human dignity, for free men everywhere. Today we pause to embrace him and all who served us so well in a war whose end offered no parades, no flags, and so little thanks. We can be worthy of the values and ideals for which our sons sacrificed — worthy of their courage in the face of a fear that few of us will ever experience — by honoring their commitment and devotion to duty and country.

Many veterans of Vietnam still serve in the Armed Forces, work in our offices, on our farms, and in our factories. Most have kept their experiences private, but most have been strengthened by their call to duty. A grateful nation opens her heart today in gratitude for their sacrifice, for their courage, and for their noble service. Let us, if we must, debate the lessons learned at some other time. Today, we simply say with pride, “Thank you, dear son. May God cradle you in His loving arms.”

We present to you our nation’s highest award, the Congressional Medal of Honor, for service above and beyond the call of duty in action with the enemy during the Vietnam era.

They Destroyed Our Country

Democrats Despise Taxpayers SC They destroyed our country

They knew Obama was an unqualified crook; yet they promoted him.  They knew Obama was a train wreck waiting to happen; yet they made him president, to the great injury of America and the world.  They understood he was only a figurehead, an egomaniac, and a liar; yet they made him king, doing great harm to our republic (perhaps irreparable.)

We are talking about the Clintons, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer, Frank, Wasserman-Schultz, Biden, Leahy, Durbin, Murray, Kennedy, Hagel, Kerry, Dodd, Hoyer, Baucus, and many others.

They all knew Obama was an empty suit; yet for private gain and personal advancement, they trampled on the flag, betraying the very people they claim to serve, preferring Party to principle.  During the 2008 campaign, they said he was unqualified, ill-prepared, and unsuited for the office. Yet when his crooked ways carved out primary victory, they jumped on board the Ship of Fools, stoking his engine with lies, deception, and propaganda.  Hillary knew he stole victory; but like a good Party operative, she buttoned her lip and took orders, submitting to authority and covering criminality.

The Ship of Fools also carried members of the ‘progressive’ propaganda press, people who made it a full time job to promote the Democrat agenda and the joke called the Obama Administration: Chris Matthews, Rather, Maddow, Schultz, Olbermann, Moyers, Sullivan, Friedman, Huffington, Sharpton, and Krugman and legions of others.

They banded together with the likes of Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, George Soros, Saul Alinsky, Khalid Al-Mansour,  Rashid Khalidi, and legions of other radical Islamists, communists, and assorted America-haters.   Embarrassingly, many Republicans and so-called conservatives either helped the farce along or were used as pawns in the promotion of the hoax.  But the greatest disgrace of all were evangelicals.  Through sloth or ignorance, they either voted for the poser or stayed at home on election day.

And what progress have the “progressives” delivered?

  • A ruined economy.
  • Insurmountable debt.
  • Bankruptcy.
  • Record numbers on disability and food stamps, a dependency class mushrooming out of control.
  • Federal despotism.
  • Domestic chaos, violence, and deepening divisions.
  • Systemic demoralization.
  • Emboldened enemies.
  • Erosion of constitutional protections.
  • Looming tyranny.
  • Loss of global standing.

Now, with whistleblowers finally getting an ear on The Hill and in the media, we are learning the truth about Benghazi. We are seeing the end of Obama as a consequence; but, even if he exits, the disease remains.

They knew he was a catastrophe.  They knew ObamaCare was a train wreck.  They knew.  Yet they proceeded, and they may have destroyed our country.  For that, they can never be forgiven.

_______

Allan Erickson enjoyed an 11-year career in radio, television and print journalism as a reporter, talk show host, and operations manager. He then turned to sales and marketing for a decade. Twelve years ago he started a training and recruitment company. Allan & wife Jodi have four children and live in California. He is the author of the book “The Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence,” Tate Publishing, 2012, and his columns appear in www.ClashDaily.com and www.WesternJournalism.com. He is available to speak in churches addressing the topics of faith and freedom.  To contact him, email:  allanlerickson@gmail.com

 

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

“Rainbow Journalism” Is The New Enemy Of Children

220px Dan Savage Provided 218x300 “Rainbow Journalism” is the New Enemy of Children

Dan Savage writer of sex column perverting young minds

In this column we coin the term “rainbow journalism.”

If you’re young, trendy and hip, and are strolling through downtown Minneapolis, you might grasp a copy of City Pages from the newstand. Its stories, appealing graphics, attractive restaurant ads and reviews of the local night club scene would seem to set you up for an upbeat weekend.

But look a little further, and you’ll uncover a fanatically-driven editorial policy that promotes sleeze and liberal causes. For example, “Savage Love” is a weekly sex advice column by the notorious sex activist Dan Savage. His recent advice includes using online resources to find a worker in the sex industry for a reader’s 22-year old mentally-ill brother. Ugh. The column is filled with trashy advice and crude language.

City Pages is part of a chain of 16 “alternative” free weekly papers around the country with a hefty combined circulation of 1.8 million. You wonder, an alternative to what? It’s an alternative to what is wholesome and true; City Pages promotes strip clubs, homosexuality, and condemns any moral message of Christianity. It scorns patriotism as well. One front-page display contained a mock-up photo of the Statue of Liberty with the words, “One nation under tacos.”

Screamed at readers

Around 1900, yellow journalism screamed at its readers with sensational headlines, weakly-supported facts, with a show of being legitimate by claiming to champion the underdog. Today’s yellow journalism jabs at morality, criticizes Christian organizations, all with name-calling and mockery. The only underdog it champions is the radical homosexual who demands that all of his sexual practices become codified in law, while crushing those with contrary beliefs.

It’s a kind of news adolescence that never grows up. Let’s call it “rainbow journalism.”

More than one hundred years ago, newspapers of integrity separated themselves from yellow journalism, and medical professionals likewise distanced themselves from snake-oil salesmen and abortionists. It was a time for the growing professions of the day to disavow themselves from shady and base practices.

But some news outlets never grow up. Like the crowd that shouted for Christ’s condemnation on Good Friday, City Pages relies on a lot of emotion, few facts, and is quick to slam anyone who stands for morality.

Hate-mongering

It’s no wonder then, that every few weeks New City trots out hate-mongering articles against Christian rock musician and preacher Bradlee Dean and his ministry, You Can Run International, based in Annandale, just outside of Minneapolis. (Disclosure: You Can Run International is a client of our PR firm.) New City has covered Dean’s defamation lawsuit against MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow in snarling tones. They accuse his ministry of not only gay-bashing, but now have made dangerous accusations about his family.

I don’t care what your politics are, but going after your enemy’s family is just plain evil. What could be done against the paper if it were not protected by a too-broadly defined First Amendment interpretation today that allows the big media to destroy someone’s reputation?

What enraged City Pages: You Can Run International’s school presentation in Dunkerton Iowa, above, which quoted Elton John and Lady Gaga in their support of homosexuality.

Dean’s presentations in more than three hundred schools around the country warn about bullying, drug use, and yes, the very real dangers of abortion and the homosexual lifestyle. The talks also emphasize the Biblical basis of our country’s Constitution. Having grown up in a broken family himself, Dean knows what it’s like to struggle through the teen years. Now he is driven by a passion for helping youth not make the same mistakes, to turn to wholesomeness and integrity of character. What’s wrong with that?

Building an enemies list

All of this is threatening stuff for City Pages. As a matter of fact, the newspaper has teamed up with its Phoenix look-alike New Times (both are owned by Voice Media Group) to slander Dean’s attorney Larry Klayman, the founder of Judicial Watch, a non-profit law firm which attained notoriety through 18 civil lawsuits against the Clinton Administration. New Times, which had never heard of Klayman until he represented Dean in his lawsuit against MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, now puts Klayman in its sights. The paper has in fact dragged Klayman’s family into the battle, making up stories about his failed marriage.

Voice Media Group has thus added Dean and Klaymen to its enemies list, which also include Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the popular elected sheriff of Arizona’s Maricopa County, who has taken an outspoken stance against illegal immigration. Klayman has represented Arpaio, fighting his recall effort.

So the new enemy of youth and children is “rainbow journlism.” And it’s no surprise, since sex to them is something enshrined unto itself, something only for pleasure, practiced to the exclusion of the possibility of children. Maybe the patrons of these papers’ many advertisers should stay away from them like the plague.

For Dean’s syndicated columns, read the Bradlee Dean Blog.

At This Point, What Difference Does It Make? The Blind Sheik Lives!

Muslim Brotherhood 2 SC At This Point, What Difference Does It Make? The Blind Sheik Lives!

The Muslim Brotherhood wants the “Blind Sheik” released from federal prison and returned to the people of Egypt. There are reports and speculation that the White House entertained the possibility of releasing him, figured that it would not be politically possible, and dreamed up a plan to trade him for a hostage or hostages, resulting in the four American deaths in Libya.

The only defense that the Obama administration has is that all the branches of government failed with such incompetence and are so bureaucratic that not one single agency, group of people, or person is at fault.

In Mali, more Americans are dead; and whether the administration is involved or asleep has yet to be determined. What we do know is that the initial demands were for the release of the Blind Sheik as well as other terrorists.

The Muslim Brotherhood considers the Blind Sheik a hero at the highest level for preaching hate, successfully bombing the World Trade Center, and murdering Americans. The Muslim Brotherhood holds this radical Islamic terrorist and religious zealot in such high regard that they will do almost anything to get him back. Do they need him back to help rally more radicals to their cause, fighting against the Great Satan and driving Jews into the sea?

What we do know is that until Omar Abdel Rahman draws his last breath, Americans will continue to die. Secretary of State Clinton may have well have said “At this point, what difference does it make? The Blind Sheik still breathes and is confined to a cell in a US prison”. Likely true conspiracy theories aside, a more appropriate response would have been: “Our policies have created an unstable region filled with people that hate us and will take every opportunity to kill us. At this point, what difference does it make …that we lied about it leading up to the election?” I think the latter is a given fact. Unfortunately, nobody cares; and I think that was her point. The people in the room can’t prove it, the election is won, and it doesn’t serve the progressives’ radical Muslim appeasement agenda.

Photo Credit: forwardstl (Creative Commons)

Congresswoman: GOP Voted To “Take The Food Out Of The Mouths” Of Babies

Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) makes another baseless claim on The Ed Show…

Deportation Of Obama’s Uncle On Hold

cb0c33d8430b48dc948a7f5ea348e11a 0 Deportation of Obamas Uncle on Hold

(CNSNews.com) — The U.S Board of Immigration Appeals has agreed to reopen the immigration case of Onyango Obama, delaying the deportation of the 68-year old Kenyan who violated an order to leave the United States in 1992.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a division of the Department of Homeland Security, confirmed to CNSNews.com on Tuesday that Obama, who is the president’s uncle, was granted a rehearing last week and his case is being re-opened.

“The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case back to Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) for reconsideration. It is inappropriate for ICE to offer any further comment on this case,” Brian P. Hale, ICE assistant director for public affairs, said in a statement to CNSNews.com.

The Cleveland, Ohio-based immigration law firm of Margaret Wong and Associates, which is handling Obama’s case, said the delay may allow the Kenyan national to apply to stay in the U.S. permanently.

“We are delighted that the Board of Immigration Appeals has decided to reopen the deportation case of President Obama’s uncle, Obama Onyango,” Wong said in a statement.

Read More at cnsnews.com . By Patrick Burke.

Photo Credit: AP Photo MetroWest Daily News

Fast And Furious Whistleblower Sues Time

Fortune Cover 2 SC Fast and Furious whistleblower sues Time


Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives special agent John Dodson is suing Time, Inc., The Daily Caller has learned, alleging that its Fortune Magazine libeled him in an article it ran this summer. Dodson is the ATF agent who blew the whistle on Fast and Furious, exposing the failures of the operation to the American people.

The article, authored by Katherine Eban, claims that a “Fortune investigation reveals that the ATF never intentionally allowed guns to fall into the hands of Mexican drug cartels. How the world came to believe just the opposite is a tale of rivalry, murder, and political bloodlust.” The article was headlined “The Truth about the Fast and Furious Scandal.”

In his libel lawsuit complaint, obtained by TheDC, Dodson said that “predicate is false and deceptive in that it leads readers to erroneously believe that it is the only accurate account of these events.”

Dodson also alleges “the article is fictitious in the sense that it contains facts that Defendant knew to be false prior to publication. Further, the contentions made in the article have been eviscerated in the public domain.”

“[T]he article generally concerns the United States Justice Department’s ‘gun walking’ operation known as ‘Fast and Furious,’ which allowed firearms to end up in the possession of Mexican drug cartels,” Dodson said in the lawsuit. “Despite the admitted and unquestioned Justice Department directive to implement this program, known to Defendant prior to publication, the Defendant nonetheless characterized the ‘public case’ of this program as being ‘….. replete with distortions, errors, partial truths, and even some outright lies.’”

Read More at The Daily Caller . By Matthew Boyle.

Photo Credit: Mike D. Merrill (Creative Commons)