Here is Obama’s proclamation against gun violence from his SOTU address, followed by footage from an interview with Obama hero Frank Marshall Davis…
In early 2008, it was reported that a low-level employee at Analysis Corporation, a State Department contracted company that processed and stored passport records, had breached Barack Obama’s passport file on three different occasions.
The incident was reported to simply be mischief, and the employee involved was reprimanded. We would later find out that John Brennan, then-advisor on intelligence and foreign policy to the Obama campaign, headed the company.
After Barack Obama won the election, the issue was quietly forgotten.
Obama, a radical leftist ideologue—anti-military, anti-war, and anti-torture—proceeded on Day One to surround himself with far left ideologues.
So it was odd when Obama put John Brennan at the top of the list for CIA chief.
For years, Brennan was knee-deep in Bush’s use of waterboarding, use of psychotropic drugs to gain confessions, a proponent of the Iraq War, a proponent of drones to carry out assassinations, and a Republican—all things Obama and his leftist base hated.
Obama’s leftist base was livid and demanded that Brennan’s name be withdrawn.
Brennan then decided to bide his time until Obama’s second term. By then, Obama would not care whether he stabbed his base in the back, as evidenced by his most staunch radical Marxist group Code Pink—long aligned with Obama—disrupting Brennan’s confirmation hearing on February 7.
It has been theorized that the 2008 breach of Barack Obama’s passport file was not in fact simply mischief by an employee, but was a cover to purge Barack Obama’s passport file of any reference to foreign citizenship.
What if in fact Brennan, as head of Analysis Corporation and obviously with access to Obama’s passport records, breached Obama’s passport file not to cover for him, but to blackmail him? What if what Brennan found in Obama’s passport records was what most of America already knows—that Obama became an Indonesian citizen when his mother married Lolo Soetoro, as evidenced by Obama’s school records, indicating also that he was a Muslim with the legal name of Barry Soetoro. What if Brennan is holding this over Barack Obama’s head in order to obtain what many deem—as CIA chief—to be the most powerful position in the U.S. government—possibly the world? He would have access to a mammoth database on every American, access to virtually every single electronic communication sent: phone, email, text, video—everything. Combine this with Brennan’s new authority as revealed by an uncovered secret memo whereby the Obama administration—that is, Brennan, as head of the drone assassination program—has the authority to kill any U.S. citizen at any time and anywhere, without oversight and without having to provide any evidence to anyone.
Whether John Brennan breached Barack Obama’s passport record in order to cover for him or blackmail him matters little. America should be very afraid of this Administration. But let fear bring us to action. To remove Barack Obama from power. To remove John Brennan from power. Soon. Before we pass the point of no return.
Today, February 15, 2013, Attorney Orly Taitz brings her request to move the Obama eligibility challenge from conference to the oral hearing stage at the US Supreme Court. She is moving forward in spite of the fact that four African-American Supreme Court clerks refused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who denied her petition originally. “But I resubmitted to Justice Roberts, and he sent it to the conference,” Taitz said.
The California attorney is asking “…how do we know that he (Kennedy) ever saw the brief?” In no uncertain terms, clerk James Baldin told her that “I (Taitz) [was] not allowed to see the signature.” This denial of her right to see Kennedy’s signature “does not make any sense.” Perhaps her Russian ancestry and background knowledge of the suppression of citizens caused her to note similarities with DC police actions that blocked “more and more streets” during Obama’s State of the Union address. The group of eligibility challengers were pushed farther and farther away, making it impossible for the public to see or question those who attended the event. When school students touring the buildings came up to the Taitz group to ask questions, their teacher was said to have made them leave!
The crux of the Taitz challenge to Barack Obama’s legitimacy to serve as US President involves the following charges: use of forged IDs and a stolen CT Social Security number; last name not legally his; fraudulent claim to being US Citizen; legal last name is SOEBARKAH on certified copy of passport records of Obama’s mother S. Ann Dunham (Taitz is presenting this passport evidence!); Obama’s Indonesian school records show his citizenship to be Indonesian; credible expert testimony by law enforcement individuals in sworn affidavits showing the birth certificate and selective service certificates are forged; the 2009 Social Security number on Obama’s tax returns failed both E-Verify and SSNVUS.
Also, Attorney Taitz is presenting evidence that 1 1/2 million invalid voter registrations were filed in the state of California! She is asking US citizens to “please, write and fax SCOTUS and demand to see the order by Justice Anthony Kennedy, who allegedly originally denied my case Noonan v Bowen before it was sent by Justice Roberts to the conference.” Is not this the very least we can do to attempt to clear up this matter?
Photo Credit: Laura Padgett (Creative Commons)
Editor’s note: The views expressed by the author below do not necessarily reflect those of the Western Center For Journalism.
If Barack Obama could pick a single thing to both make conservatives mad as well as his liberal base, it would seem to be his drone campaign against terrorists who happen to also be American citizens.
But this also may be one of the few times in my life that I feel a need to, at least partially, come to the defense of the President.
Is there any American out there who can seriously argue that Anwar al-Awlaki didn’t need to be taken out?
This clown—despite his American birth and his attendance at New Mexico State University in Las Cruces—took up arms against America. There’s a word for that in the dictionary and a penalty for engaging in that act. The word is “treason” and the penalty is death. For all I know, al-Awlaki may have been an NMSU cheerleader at Aggie basketball games (there’s a visual for you); but when you take up arms against the nation, you forfeit your rights as a citizen. And when you go into hiding overseas, we can’t arrest you and put you on trial.
As the New York Times, hardly a conservative stalwart, reported: “Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the Army psychiatrist accused of shooting 13 people at Fort Hood, Tex., in November 2009, had exchanged e-mails with Mr. Awlaki before the deadly rampage. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab met with him before he failed to blow up an airplane with a bomb hidden in his underwear in December 2009. Faisal Shahzad, who tried to set off a car bomb in Times Square in May 2010, cited Mr. Awlaki as an inspiration.”
In short, this is a guy, who in the lexicon of Texas, needed killing.
And, whatever his and his administration’s tortured reasoning, President Obama did what had to be done.
What amazes me is that the conservatives are screeching about “slippery slopes,” which is normally a liberal argument; and the libs are screeching that Americans who take up arms against America have “rights” (which is normally an argument reserved for chimpanzees.)
Killing terrorists is a very important issue because that’s the only thing a terrorist understands. They say they are willing to die for their cause, and we must be willing to accommodate them. You cannot negotiate with them; and as long as they are allowed to keep coming at us, we are not safe.
Given those circumstances, the right thing to do is to dispose of the threat.
Now if we start using Hellfire missiles from Predator drones to take out American criminals on the streets of south central LA, that’s a different issue. But that’s not what we’re talking about.
When someone goes overseas, establishes that he’s a leader of an organization dedicated to bringing down America, and participates in that organization’s actions to do so, then, by definition, he or she has committed treason and unilaterally relinquished his or her American citizenship.
If Congress wants to establish a special, classified court to review such instances, similar to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act courts that give us permission to wiretap conversations involving such intelligence, it should do so.
Absent that, the President—any President—should be allowed the flexibility to protect America and Americans.
I know that many people literally hate Barack Obama. I know that many different people literally hated George W. Bush.
But both of these guys have one thing in common.
They were elected by Americans to the office, and they have a responsibility to all of us to keep us safe.
As I outlined above, I’m not in agreement with the legal reasoning which Obama used to come to his conclusion because the actual reasoning should be crystal clear. Further, there is a big element of hypocrisy in the Eric Holder department of so-called Justice’s ability to play intellectual twister to get to this position. He could have just called a press conference and said that after a few years in office, their views had changed. That when you commit treason overseas, all bets are off.
But, however he came to his conclusion, I support his actions in these limited cases; and I don’t think you are going to see drones over Nevada taking out conservative, gun-owning citizens.
Because if that were to happen, there probably would be an armed revolt.
Many refer to the President of the United States, leader of the sole superpower in the world, as the most powerful person on the face of the Earth. It follows then that Barack Hussein Obama, as President, would be considered this person.
But that would be an incorrect conclusion. Even Obama with his “we can’t wait for Congress to act” meme, spurning the legislative branch, spurning the checks and balances the Founding Fathers put in place—even with Obama spurning the Courts in the recent NLRB ruling deeming his “recess” appointments unconstitutional, there is one man who wields more power than Obama: CIA appointee John Brennan.
How can that be? Brennan is man who is actually relatively low in the White House food chain, who is nothing more than an adviser to the President, with the title of Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.
Yet this man has a virtually unchecked amount of power—no, let us call it for what it is—unchecked power. Congress, the Courts, the CIA, even the Pentagon have no reign over this man as we shall see in a moment.
It was recently discovered that Brennan, running something akin to a fiefdom with his drone assassination program, has the power to decide who lives and who dies and doesn’t have to provide evidence to any entity that the “target” presents any threat to America—even if they are an American—even if the American is living in the United States!
Investigative Reporter Michael Isikoff uncovered a secret memo, entitled:
“Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen who is a Senior Operational Leader of Al Qa’ida or An Associated Force.”
The memo gives the Obama Administration—in effect Brennan—the authority to kill any American citizen at anytime for any reason without proof, without due process, and with absolutely no oversight.
The key passage in the sixteen page memo is the following:
The condition that an operational leader present an “imminent” threat of violent attack against the United States does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future.
This was the basis for the drone strike against American-born al-Qaeda-linked terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki in September of 2011 in Yemen. And this was the basis of the murder of al-Awlaki’s sixteen-year-old son Abdulrahman, along with several other teenagers who were engaged in an outdoor barbecue. While it is debatable whether al-Awlaki as an American citizen should have received due process, it is doubtful that his son, murdered two weeks after al-Awlaki, had any connection to al-Qaeda.
But this unchecked power exercised by John Brennan is mild compared to what we learned with the recent release of an extensive book on the Benghazi consulate attack on September 11, 2012.
The book, Benghazi: The Definitive Report, released on February 12 makes the shocking claim that Obama’s chief counter terrorism officer, John Brennan, aside from having the authority to murder American citizens, has been waging a series of secret wars in North Africa and the Middle East against Al Qaeda and Al-Qaeda-linked groups. How secret? So secret that he and his minions at JSOC, Joint Special Operations Command, operated not only outside the purview of Congress but outside the purview of the Pentagon and CIA. Former CIA head David Petraeus wasn’t even aware of Brennan’s secret wars!
According to Benghazi: The Definitive Report, the attack on the Benghazi consulate had nothing to do with, as we were told, an amateurish anti-Muslim YouTube video leading to a “protest turned violent,” but was retaliation for John Brennan’s JSOC attacks on the Libya-based terrorist group, Ansar al-Sharia. This was the group that we learned had taken responsibility within two hours of the attack, of which information was emailed directly to the White House Situation Room. After said information was uncovered, the Obama administration denied was true.
It turns out that, per the book, the West, particularly the United States, leading up to the 2011 Libyan civil war had been flooding Libya with literally millions of weapons. After the West—NATO, with Obama at the helm—decided to topple Gaddafi, these millions of weapons then fell into Al-Qaeda and associated groups’ hands. And what Team Obama wasn’t funneling to the Syrian rebels (what Benghazi: The Definitive Report calls an “open secret”)—they wanted to get back from groups such as Ansar al-Sharia. Brennan, throughout North Africa, had been conducting his secret JSOC wars against al-Qaeda and associated groups; and lo and behold, yes, Mr. Brennan, there was retaliation. And that retaliation resulted in the deaths of four Americans at the consulate in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11.
The whole Obama Benghazi cover-up was only partially about hiding the illegal funneling of Libyan weapons to Syria and was mainly about the real—but illegal—Commander-in-Chief John Brennan conducting secret wars in Libya—without approval from Congress, without approval from the Pentagon, and hidden even from the CIA, with only a behind-doors approval by Barack Hussein Obama.
How can the “adviser” to Obama—John Brennan—have the authority to make war on any country in the world?
The answer is he doesn’t have the authority.
Brennan should be arrested, not appointed to lead the CIA. And the man who is doing the appointing—Barack Hussein Obama—should be immediately impeached.
After he is impeached?
Prison will come in due time.
As a postscript, for the record, Benghazi: The Definitive Report makes it clear that when the Benghazi consulate was attacked and requested help, the CIA annex was told to stand down. They were ordered to stand idly by while Americans were slaughtered. They refused. According to Benghazi: The Definitive Report:
[Tyrone Woods’] leadership that day, and his refusal to sit by and all his fellow Americans to be overrun, is a testament to his character. His willingness to stand up to his CIA boss and do what was right is an example of true American heroism. Glen Doherty ran toward the sound of gunfire…
You can count on Barack Obama having a clear vision of how the United States should look, entering into (what we think is) his final term. The narcissistic perception of success will obviously be antipodal to the conservative, clear-thinking American; but he is hell-bent on turning this country into a socialist cesspool nevertheless.
Indeed, we are stuck with the Kenyan-in-Chief for another term, thanks to liberal ignorance, a cold and calculating anti-American mainstream media, and a pinch of voter fraud for good measure.
This is not hyperbole — the damages that we have seen and continue to see in the wake of this administration is unfathomable and certainly threaten our children’s future, so take note.
The best opportunity to slow Obama’s destruction is an impeachment process, which clearly is in order even if you base it solely on the Fast and Furious atrocity (let alone the latest Benghazi cataclysm, which incidentally went largely unnoticed thanks to the Lame Stream Media.) Obama’s deluge of treasonous policies are far-reaching and will only increase now that he has more “flexibility” to execute them.
We can only pray the Republican party will suddenly grow the kahunas needed to take Barry to task, but I have serious doubts — there’s simply not the leadership in place to take down this Terrorist-in-Chief and his gang of ruffian handlers. The fact remains we are now staring back at the contemptuous aftermath of Obama’s bellicose policies and looking forward to the future that looks even bleaker and more tyrannical.
Obama’s past Marxist-influenced policies, including Obamacare, incessant entitlement programs, historical debt levels, classless economics, and now the contemptible “Fiscal Cliff” plan (or lack thereof) have weighed heavily on an already distressed economy.
We can calibrate the damage and possibly even counter imminent future vexatious policies if we understand his philosophies and framework from which he draws from — at the risk of sounding obstinate and callous, we must know the enemy. He has clearly displayed to the American people over the past four years that he is indeed the “enemy within.”
So what critical information can we glean from history? What philosophies has he leaned on to deliver assault after assault on the U.S. economy and foreign policies? Can we counter and even circumvent any of his future stratagem? This blogger thinks so and will attempt to lay out this Marxist-in-Chief foundation and principles.
Influencers — The Early Years and Beyond
Obama’s early years were strongly influenced by a number of certified nut jobs. Many of his so-called mentors instilled a strong sense of racial bigotry and anti-colonialism, including his own father, Barack Obama Sr., and communist extraordinaire Frank Marshall Davis. In fact, the characters Obama has been palling around with throughout his career have been nothing short of astonishing, including the anti-American domestic terrorist-turned university professor confidant Bill Ayers, the “audacity to hope” hate monger Jeremiah Wright, slum-lord Tony Ruzko, and much more. The list is endless and staggering.
Do liberals really believe these facts and relationships do not exist or never occurred? Do liberals really believe Obama does not act on the very principles that got him there in the first place? Please, somebody wake me up from this bad dream!
Marxism — The Adaption
One of the predominant theologies that Obama aligned himself with early on was Marxism, where he embraced the classless society theorem.
Marxism: the political, economic, and social principles and policies promoted by Karl Marx, esp: a theory and practice of socialism including the labor theory of value, dialectical materialism, the class struggle, and dictatorship of the proletariat until the establishment of a classless society” – Marxist.
Obama’s early years were also earmarked by extreme anti-American principles, including his anthropologist mother who despised her country so much, she enlisted him to Frank Marshall Davis’ tutelage.
Even though Obama had his fill of anarchistic preaching, let’s not forget his other lost treasure, such as being purported of Muslim faith. Maybe this is the explanation for his abhorrent sensitivity of sorts, bowing to Muslim kings, apologizing to the Islamic terrorists that killed four Americans, and other kiss-ass exploits, all made to look America weak. This “apology tour” has made a percentage of Americans very ignominious to this administration, and rightfully so.
One could easily draw the conclusion that the “education” and exposure he received throughout his life makes him ideally suited to take on the socialist underpinnings.
My personal belief is one of Obama being a relativist and Atheist, holding Christianity in contempt, taking on a Chameleon appearance and personality when the need or situation arises, with the unrelenting long-term pursuit of making himself the “center of the universe.” This appeasement-at-will personality was never more obvious after watching Obama’s 2007 Divisive Race Speech — but I assure you there’s more where that came from. No matter how you slice or dice it, Obama has clearly hoodwinked a majority of this country (52% to be exact) and has been deemed Entitlement Messiah and rightly so — Obama is the chosen one to carry the progressive torch.
Alinsky — The Breakout
From all indications, Obama’s policies his first four years had been likened to a radical framework using very calculated means to accomplish end goals. The characteristics include a gaping shift in ideology and a sharp divide among society, culture, and politics, all practiced with calculus longanimity. This ideology can be traced back to none other than Saul Alinsky — not exactly a chap you would bring home to meet Mom and Dad, unless of course they were Madonna and Sean Penn.
Alinsky is best known for his 1971 book “Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals.” The premise of the book and teachings are intended to instill radical change in American culture and economics through public discontent and moral confusion. Alinsky developed these strategies to achieve power through mass organization. If this sounds manipulatory, well, it is. This radical style is coming through loud and clear in many of Obama’s philosophies and policies.
According to the Alinsky model, “organizing” is a euphemism for “revolution” — a wholesale revolution whose ultimate objective is the systematic acquisition of power by a purportedly oppressed segment of the population, and the radical transformation of America’s social and economic structure. The goal is to foment enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos to spark the social upheaval that Marx, Engels, and Lenin predicted.
Alinsky’s infamous rules of ethics draws a considerable level of similarity to how Sharia and the Islamic code is spread to western culture, as well as a haunting semblance to what we’ve seen from Alinsky-in-Chief himself. Remember, it was during Obama’s formative years he learned the “outside looking in” adaption to take advantage of any situation and “get what you want.” Obama has obviously gained a thorough grasp of it based on the lies and deceit he has sown — birds of a feather flock together.
By most conservative standards, Obama has failed Alinsky’s Rule #12 of Tactics, one that puts him at odds with a certain policy failure and obvious fiscal irresponsibility.
The Cloward-Piven Strategy — The Perfect Complement
Then came the Cloward-Piven Strategy, which naturally complements the Alinksy method: a call to overload the welfare system in order to initiate a crisis that requires government intervention. This same strategy has also been well-documented as an Obama staple.
“The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward (1926–2001) and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.” —Wikipedia
Essentially, the strategy forces radical political change through orchestrated crisis — this is Obama’s nexus.
Many of Obama’s policies and strategies draw a distinct similarity to the Cloward-Piven strategy. It’s not far-reaching to prove Obama’s despisement of our beloved free market system driven by the private sector. In fact, he despises American capitalism as much as we despise him. If that sounds foreign to you, well, consider the fact that this Socialist-in-Chief has never held a real job in the private sector and is very careful to to appoint cabinet members with the same credentials. After all, birds of a feather…
“If this strategy were implemented, a political crisis would result that could lead to legislation for a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty. It seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.”
Doesn’t it seem odd that this president has gone out of his way to avoid what’s necessary to get this country out of the abyss (that is, cost-cutting)? Did I say benefit?
A surge of continuous regulations will help support and further entrench a national socialism framework, inevitably causing the cancer of capitalism to metastasize until all Americans are utterly dependent on the government to run their lives. It’s not far fetched at all; in fact, we are very close to this hypothesis becoming reality.
So there you have it, Obama’s foundation of principles with an abbreviated look at the direction he’s taking to dismantle this country.
Connecting the dots from Obama’s past all the way up to the present gives us a clear road map to accomplish America’s demise under the American president’s guise. He will continue to impose relentless and extreme-left socialist standards onto this country, breaking her down economically and then piling on regulations and policies to slowly snatch power away from the people and into the hands of the government. That’s his plan anyway. It’s up to us to take that plan away from him.
It’s time to reflect but not lament — follow this bit of anecdotal and slightly modified advice to take back America. I will not tip my hat to the new Constitution, nor will I take a bow for the new revolution. Instead, I’ll get on my knees to pray and hope we the people don’t get fooled again.
Photo credit: SS&SS (Creative Commons)