When The Accused Is A Democrat, Even Sex Crime Charges Seem To Vanish

Democrat SC When the accused is a Democrat, even sex crime charges seem to vanish

Last year, a 27 year old elected Democrat who represents Scottsville in the Albermarle County Virginia Board of Supervisors was charged with a serious sexual crime. As the charges go, while he was a law student, Christopher Dumler committed the vilest type of criminal sexual assault on a fellow female law student.  Both were at the University of Virginia Law School at the time.

Court records show that Democrat Supervisor Dumler was accused of committing an act of forcible anal sodomy “by threat or intimidation upon the victim.”

The police in Albermarle County investigated the charge and say Democrat Supervisor Dumler knew the victim and that they are “working closely with the commonwealth attorney’s office” in their investigation. Denise Lunsford, the Commonwealth’s Attorney for Albermarle County, is an elected Democrat, so what do you think happened?

When the case was settled, Dumler was convicted of “sexual battery” which is the crime of sexually abusing a complaining witness against his/her will, by force, threat, and/or intimidation, as a Class 1 misdemeanor. In Virginia, conviction of a Class 1 misdemeanor calls for a jail sentence of up to “twelve months and a fine of up to $2,500, either or both.” He was sentenced to thirty days in jail with no mention of a fine.

The worst part of this plea bargain was that when the news of his arrest went public, two more women came forward to allege they too were victimized by the Democrat Supervisor.

Every report of this case describes Dumler as a “rising star in the Democrat Party.” He is a young lawyer, an Army Reserve Captain, and has already been elected to a county-level position.

Now the Democrat voters of Albermarle County aren’t so pleased with Dumler, whom they voted for 54/46 without really knowing. He had lived in the county just three years before winning his Board of Supervisors position, but being a Democrat was all they needed to know about him.  An angry female resident of Albermarle County asked when he will “just go away?” She said “He’s an embarrassment to our community. Why doesn’t he just resign? We don’t need a sex criminal to hang on to his office here just because he legally can.”

It goes without saying Democrat Dumler is refusing to resign even in the face of his ridiculous thirty day jail sentence. Democrats just don’t have to face the same punishments the rest of us do.

Photo Credit: DonkeyHotey (Creative Commons)

Race Cards Fly As Whites Flee Corrupt, Black-controlled Atlanta

Atlanta SC Race Cards fly as Whites flee corrupt, Black controlled Atlanta

Blacks officials in the rapidly deteriorating city of Atlanta decided to sue rather than allow successful white “evacuees” to incorporate prosperous new cities in the Northern suburbs of Dekalb and Fulton counties.

For years, government scandals, rackets, political corruption, and charges of bribery have plagued a city that is becoming known as “The Detroit of the South,” all culminating in the threatened 2013 loss of accreditation for the Dekalb County School System. During that time, communities in the North Atlanta suburbs “…began the process of incorporating into cities,” with 6 having been carved out of the Atlanta hinterland by 2011 as hundreds of thousands of taxpayers were lost from the city’s tax base.

But the continued electoral fortunes—and perhaps, increasing personal wealth– of Atlanta’s politicos depend upon preserving the lynchpin of Democrat politics–robbing from the rich in order to acquire the votes of the poor. And that’s a system that doesn’t work very well when the rich are spending their tax dollars elsewhere.

So in March of 2011, the Georgia Legislative Black Caucus filed suit seeking the dissolution of the newly incorporated cities, claiming that “…the creation of the new cities diluted African-Americans’ voting power, access, and influence.” In short, plaintiffs pointed out that although blacks had been numerous enough to control election results in and around Atlanta, thanks to incorporation of “super-majority white” cities, blacks who live in them are no longer able to put fellow blacks in office in the overwhelming numbers to which they had become accustomed.  As a result, a significant number of residents in the counties that make up Atlanta have escaped the liberal rule that is destroying the city economically, black politicians are losing power and control, and a city already struggling financially will have to make due with even less revenue in the future.

As the Georgia NAACP sees it, such hard-heartedness toward minorities is “…part of an alleged conspiracy to get rid of black office holders and deprive black voters of their rights.” “We’ve fought too hard and bled too long to allow our officials to be removed by a dictator,” said NAACP President Edward Dubose of the plight of 6 members of the Dekalb County School Board, removed from office by Governor Nathan Deal as a result of the threatened accreditation loss.  Five of those Board members are black.

On February 8th, a federal court panel rejected the claims and demands of the Black Caucus, refusing to dissolve incorporation of the Northern county cities. A lawyer representing the plaintiffs said he would not appeal, but rather file an amended lawsuit.

Those who believe the recent incorporation of suburbs to be a function of racism rather than a longed-for escape from the corruption of Atlanta politics should know that the ousted school board members are demanding that taxpayers foot the bill for their defense “… because [they]… see their positions as a civil rights entitlement…” Lose a job as a result of incompetence (or worse), and demand that taxpayers get it back for you. How could that be upsetting to anyone, unless of course you’re a racist?

Needless to say, the creation of brand new school districts managed by brand new Boards is a priority in the newly incorporated cities!

Photo credit: k1ng (Creative Commons)

Board Game Teaches Kids To “fight Tyranny”

American Flags SC Board game teaches kids to fight tyranny

The entrepreneurs behind a new board game combine fun, engaging play with an unmistakably patriotic message in an effort to teach traditional American values too often avoided by today’s educators.

I recently had the pleasure of hearing about the venture from co-creator Robert Snizek, who explained the idea for “We the People” came when he realized the next generation’s dearth of knowledge concerning the basic principles of Capitalism.

During a game of Monopoly with his young children, Snizek said he illustrated the game’s roots in teaching the free market system to post-Depression adolescents.

“I started laughing as I compared the principles of Capitalism to the ones we were being taught by the media and advocates of big government today,” he said. “When I had to explain the humor to my kids, I realized that they are oblivious to what America has traditionally stood for in the world.”

That experience led Snizek to develop “a game that taught history but also taught the difference between the Founders’ vision of a small, limited government and the various systems of big government that exist throughout the world today.”

The resulting game is intended to reach kids of all ages and assist parents in sharing a message vital in today’s culture.

“Our primary purpose for creating this game was to make a tool parents can use to teach American history and the different political systems of government in an entertaining way,” Snizek said.

He explained this generation of youth is especially distracted by technology; and thus, it can be much more difficult for a board game to make an impact.

“Today’s youth … live in a fast-paced wold of text messages, tweets, and Facebook comments,” he said, noting his game “presents the Founders’ words, deeds, and beliefs as well as the documents and events surrounding the Revolution through modern-day America in the form of tweets, not chapters and chapters of information.”

He said each short, researched bit of information “encourages discussion to facilitate learning and interest.”

A source listed on each card provides further information for more in-depth discussion of any topic.

Gameplay of “We the People” involves three decks of cards – History, Social Justice, and Disappoint Big Brother.

According to Snizek, the bulk of information is contained among the 500 history cards; but the other two decks help create the opportunity for teaching by example.

“Social Justice cards [and] spaces cause the player to lose their winnings to other players – redistribution – or to the Pork Barrel,” he said, explaining “they also provide comic relief in the game.”

Disappoint Big Brother cards give players rewards “for doing patriotic, moral acts, or good deeds in their everyday lives and for modeling self-reliant behaviors,” he explained.

Though the object of any game is to provide an entertaining diversion, Snizek said he hopes his also serves a higher calling.

In distributing “We the People,” Snizek said he wants to help create “an informed American people. We want America to remain independent and free by reaching the rising generation and those who may be undecided.”

For more information or to order this unique product for your family’s next game night, visit wethepeoplegame.com.

 


Click here to get B. Christopher Agee’s latest book for less than $5! Like his Facebook page for engaging, relevant conservative content daily.

Photo credit: Roger Smith (Creative Commons)

A Christian’s Response To Cries Of “Discrimination”

Christian cross SC A Christians Response to Cries of Discrimination

What is compassion? What is tough love offered out of good will to a fellow sinner? One who also struggles with urges and desires that, although of a different variety, run contrary to God’s sanctioned, intended purpose?

Here’s my response to Phil, a self-declared homosexual, who openly expressed his frustration with ‘intolerant’ Christians.

“Brother Phil,

If a Christian acts morally, spiritually, or naturally superior in any way to another, they are not coming from a place of genuine, spirit-led humility.

However, if the God of the Bible is true, then so is Original Sin. Hence, we all struggle with dispositions and tendencies that run counter to God’s natural, desired, and created order.

If you don’t keep that in mind, in your discussions with Orthodox Christians, you will be frustrated.
But we are not Islamic. We desire you peace and the salvation of your souls! We just can’t embrace the lifestyle. We don’t believe this to be a state issue, but a personal one.

However, all sinners need grace that their spiritual eyes be opened. Then the issue of sexual predisposition no longer matters. I am not saying that there is no struggle, but a much greater good takes precedence.”

I am left to wonder if my words are that of a bigot or of a concerned, sober-minded Christian. If what we believe is true, we must hold fast to truth in a charitable, honest, and loving manner.

As WE remain consistently honest about these truths, WHO are the ones with blood on their hands?

Think about it….

Unfortunately we are living in a time where science is now replacing accountability. I don’t believe we need to be defined by our sexual predispositions. Fornication, infidelity, divorce, sodomy, etc. are all sins (in fact, infidelity and sodomy are still on the books as criminal offenses in many states).

The fact that openly gay individuals want to embrace their same-sex desires and marry proves they have no concept (or are simply in denial) of essential spiritual realities. We wind up simply talking past each other. That’s why apologetics is so important, that we may declare the historical veracity and fantastic, absolute claims of the Triune God of the Bible. Without this understanding, all kinds of madness will prevail. What we have today is a complete denial of the sin and depravity of man, despite the fact that we are living in a day when the evidence abounds like never before.

Christianity provides the most historically reliable and reasonable explanation of our natural order, the existence of all things, and our ultimate purpose in this life. Unlike those nations that encourage the discrimination and persecution of gays in their midst, we are merely making our case for a healthy, well-ordered, civil society. However, we remain supportive of those with same-sex desires, and they’ve remained free to do whatever they will in their personal lives. But you can’t tell us that we have to support or even accept gay marriage as good for society…because we don’t.

We are not going to just casually adhere to those who aggressively demand a complete submission to this worldview. Gay marriage is just the beginning of the agenda, an agenda that is poised to intersect with all facets of society:

* The gay agenda will fully and shamelessly infiltrate our schools with the expansion of sex education to accommodate homosexual normalization. (See Kevin Jennings, the safe school czar chosen by President Obama, who resigned in disgrace in 2011)

* The Boy Scouts of America have been a recent target and will eventually be forced to submit to the ruthless demands and self-interests of those who seek full compliance on their terms. If complete submission to their agenda is not realized, they will be more than happy to tear down and completely destroy this organization.

* Business owners and religious institutions also will be forced to sacrifice their ‘rights of conscience’ or face the wrathful legislative and litigative tactics of the powerful progressive machine. We are already seeing evidences of these realities, and it will only get worse!

Gay activism wholly supports pushing complete indoctrination over mere tolerance. The envelope will keep getting pushed, and the boundaries of tolerance will continuously be expanded, as a form of forced compliance reigns supreme. We’ve already seen what has happened to the military, while numerous other entities are being bullied, ultimately forced into submission by this radical cause.

We must ask, exactly what’s the purpose of embracing the lifestyle that is homosexuality? What noble purpose does it serve? What purpose does it serve society?

People have all kinds of tendencies and desires; that does not mean it must me be officially recognized or celebrated. Sodomy is not a natural, God given act of love….it’s sexual perversion.

But we are all the same. We are all depraved. Homosexuals have a unique sinful disposition (lusting after same-sex individuals – but we all struggle with lust). We are commanded to love individuals with same-sex desires, and we should endorse outreach efforts to those in bondage to sin.

The message to sinners is universal, that we may deny ourselves, hold fast onto Jesus, and be reconciled. This is not a popular message these days, and many are completely blind to it; but it doesn’t make it any less necessary or true.

I’d like to end by sharing a quote, featuring some heartfelt words of candid encouragement,

“Claiming the label “celibate gay Christian” means, for me, recognizing my homosexual orientation as a kind of “thorn in the flesh.” When the apostle Paul used that phrase in his correspondence with the Corinthian church, he made clear that his “thorn” was indeed an unwelcome source of pain (2 Corinthians 12:7). But he also made clear that it had become the very occasion for his experience of the power of the risen Christ and, therefore, a paradoxical site of grace (2 Corinthians 12:8). Paul, I think, would have had no qualms about labeling himself a “thorn-pricked Christian”—not because he recognized his thorn as a good thing, in and of itself, but because it had become for him the means by which he encountered the power of Christ. Likewise, living with an unchanged homosexual orientation may be for many of us the means by which we discover new depths of grace, as well as new vocations of service to others.” -Wesley Hill (SpiritualFriendship.org)

Obama A Free Market Guy In Drag? Or When It Suits Him?

Obama Free Market SC Obama A Free Market Guy In Drag? Or When It Suits Him?

I rarely end up agreeing with the Obama Administration on much of anything, but we seem to have some common ground on the issue of copyright law as it affects the nation’s telecommunications policy.

Now I know that sounds eye-glazingly long and ominous.

So, let’s put it a different way.

Do you know what those morons in Congress have brought about?

Imagine that you bought an iPhone 4 from Verizon, paid them well over $100 a month for the two year contract, and the contract has expired.  Let’s say you’ve paid $1,500 or so.

Sprint offers you a better deal.  But the phone is “locked” on Verizon.  So you buy an inexpensive piece of software on eBay which will unlock the phone.

Because of an obscure law passed by the same clowns who can’t cut the budget (or, in the case of the Senate, even pass a budget) and an even more obscure decision made by the Librarian of Congress, you could be fined $50,000 and go to prison for five years.

That’s right.  Eric Holder—despite his boss’ agreement with me that this is nonsense—can come thundering after you and your unlocked iPhone on behalf of a cellular carrier and put you in Gitmo.  (OK, probably not Gitmo, but you never know.)

Now it might be one thing if you stole the phone.

But this is a phone that you not only paid for but honored the contract on with your original carrier.

What the hell kind of public policy is that?

I’ll tell you what it is.  It is the same kind of public policy that was written by a consortium of Apple, Nokia, AT&T, and Verizon. And handed to Congressional staffers by K-Street lobbyists.  And inserted in a bill without ever having been read by an elected official.  Just like Obamacare.

If you ever wanted to know about the corrosive effects of allowing the foxes to guard the henhouse, this is it.  Business executives lobbying for laws to enrich them and screw everyone else.

I hasten to add that I am not picking on just these companies.  It is the nature of most competitive businesses that if they can use a law to enrich their own positions, they will.  That’s why the government should just keep its nose out of business and avoid doing anything that has the effect of picking winners and losers.

While the public spirited Warren Buffet will suggest that it is improper for him to pay a lower tax rate than his secretary, he will also have one of his companies fight a tax increase until there’s blood all over the floor.

Steve Wynn will excoriate the President on job creation and overregulation while he uses the Clark County District Attorney’s office to collect gambling debts at his casinos in the criminal courts.

The law—and its use—creates hypocrites of us all.

But those businesses that stand to benefit from these ridiculous laws are both willing to take the chance of being called a hypocrite and the results of a little negative publicity if they are held up to public ridicule.  It’s kind of like being tossed out of a ballgame for calling the umpire an obscene name.  It’s considered a cost of doing business.

The obvious answer here is to have a truly free market.  Copyrights are for original works of intellectual property, and patents are for genuine innovations.  They were originally designed to provide incentives to be creative and innovate—not to allow companies to dictate the terms of commerce.

When I buy a phone with your software inside, I buy the right to use it as I see fit.

You shouldn’t have the right to dictate to me how or where I use it, any more than Ford Motor Company has the right to tell me I can’t speed in the F-150 they sold me.

But merely selling a phone and service isn’t enough for some executives at some companies.  They have to somehow rig the system to give themselves a commercial advantage.  And that would be ok if we had a choice in the matter. But instead of using their own technology, they choose to try and use the government to accomplish their goals.

And that’s wrong.

Let me be clear.

If you can accomplish what you want to in the free market, I’m all for it.

If Steve Wynn can sue someone in civil court to collect his markers, more power to him.

But just as I don’t think the threat of debtor’s prison should be allowed to be used to collect gambling markers in Las Vegas, I also don’t think a misguided copyright law should be allowed to be used to stop you from taking your paid-for iPhone from AT&T to T-Mobile.

Strangely, the Obama Administration appears to agree with me.

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

A Letter To Tyrants

The Bible is no mere book, but a Living Creature, with a power that conquers all that oppose it. – Napoleon Bonaparte

On a daily basis, America’s biblical and constitutional foundation is under hostile attack by atheist and homosexual groups that are being used as a political battering ram in an attempt to usher in communism.

For example, an atheist group filed a brief on Feb. 15 fighting the federal government’s motion in support of a permanent shrine to Jesus in the Flathead National Forest. Outrageous!

I find that these groups operate on the defense rather than the offense, falling into the very holes they themselves have dug (Psalm 7:15).

Another example: Outgoing Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has defied the Defense of Marriage Act and unilaterally issued a directive stating that the U.S. military will now extend certain benefits to unmarried domestic partners that were formerly reserved for married couples—but will only do so if the domestic partners certify in writing to the Department of Defense that they are of the same sex. Absurd!

The question is, who has been responsible for encouraging the onslaught of attacks against America’s Christian heritage and constitutional republic? You need not look any further than Obama and his vile minions for the answer.

Scripture comes to my aid: “The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted” (Psalm 12:8).

Barack Hussein Obama has been labeled the “Architect of a New America” by Time magazine, and Newsweek featured him as the “First Gay President.” Obama is also known as America’s most biblically hostile president. He has placed himself above We the People time and time again, as if to say we derive our rights from Obama instead of God.

Obama has personally attacked biblical values, the bedrock of our republic, over 50 times since he took office.

Day by day, Obama’s tyrannical measures are beginning to take shape. And what should America expect from one who is at war with God?

It is clear to see the narcissism of this president, but just as obvious is the hypocrisy and lack of duty from the professed church and the modern government (leaven of the Pharisees and of Herod, Mark 8:15). After all, leaders will only do what the people let them get away with.

Theologian John Calvin said “And ye, O peoples, to whom God gave the liberty 
to choose your own magistrates, 
see to it that 
ye do not forfeit this favor 
by electing to the positions of highest honor, 
rascals and enemies of God.”

Study the Past

At the entrance of the National Archives in Washington, D.C., you will see a monument stating: “Study the Past.”

Why study the past? Our forefathers suggested this so we might learn from history, so it does not repeat itself.

History has shown time and time again that when a nation departs from God, there will be a tyrant in the midst attempting to move into His position. Then follows devastation and massive loss of life. This is what God warned would happen to nations that refuse to keep His commandments (Leviticus 26:21).

God commands us to go back to the old paths “where is the good way” (Jeremiah 6:16), not to dare His justice by taking on the new paths.

Here are ten lessons men have learned from history:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Nothing.

Indeed, America is emulating those who have not learned from history. If you do not learn from the lessons history has to teach, then history will repeat itself.

History also teaches a lesson to tyrants who are at war with God and attempt to usurp His law (Isaiah 14:13-15). What man forgets, God will not.

What did Bonaparte say? Those who oppose God and His Word will be conquered – and that is exactly what history teaches us.

Let me show you the little-known history of those who dared to crucify Christ, kill His apostles, and behead John the Baptist. Let me also show you what happened to tyrant Mussolini, French Queen Marie Antoinette, godless Voltaire, and the vain Senate of Rome:

Who is Bradlee Dean?

Photo credit: SS&SS (Creative Commons)

Stunning Revelations From Eric Holder

Eric Holder 13 SC Stunning revelations from Eric Holder

John Cruz, a former HSBC (global Swiss Bank) Senior Vice President for Relationship Management has charged Obama’s Department of Justice under Eric Holder as handing them a virtual “slap on the wrist” for being a criminal enterprise. HSBC agreed to pay a fine of $1.92 billion dollars for money laundering profits from Mexican and Columbian drug cartels, which is the least offensive crime they commit on an ongoing basis, to end the matter and DOJ involvement.

A Senate hearing on this matter was held last week in what has become standard operating procedure (SOP) for the Obama administration on the corruption of the “Rule of Law.”

In effect, Mr. Holder believes that some “banks” are too big to prosecute for illegal and criminal activity, as it will cause irreparable harm to the national and world economy. It makes no difference that this action gives tacit approval to the financing of global terrorism or drug cartel efforts to spread their poison onto our streets (and allows the American people to pay a heavy price for this lawlessness in increased criminal activity.) Chicago’s horrendous murder rate comes to mind as just one consequence…culminating in over 510 homicides in Chicago last year alone, with a majority fueled by the illegal drug trade.

The following excerpts are from Eric Holder’s revealing testimony before the Judiciary Committee as relayed in an article from WND (video of John Cruz, parts 1 and 2, at the end of the article is worth watching):

“Banks the size of HSBC are “too big to jail,” as a member of the Senate panel put it.

“I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large,” the attorney general confessed, “that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if you do prosecute, if you do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy.

“And I think that is a function of the fact that some of these institutions have become too large,” said Holder.”

Holder’s later testimony showed the callous indifference to the workings of a criminal enterprise that has engaged in money laundering, financing of terrorism, and outright fraud. A criminal enterprise that is masquerading as a legitimate bank that can affect the entire world’s economy is in desperate need of investigation and prosecution as relayed by Sen. Grassley:

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, asked Holder to explain why federal and state authorities decided not to indict HSBC after it admitted funneling cash to Mexican drug cartels, helping rogue regimes avoid sanctions and assisting Saudi banks tied to terrorism.

The senator said, “I’m concerned that we have a mentality of too-big-to-jail in the financial sector of spreading from fraud cases to terrorist financing and money laundering cases – and I cite HSBC.”

Holder replied: “The concern that you have raised is one that I, frankly, share.”

However, Holder said he was not specifically referring to HSBC, because it would not be “appropriate.”

“Again, I’m not talking about HSBC,” he said. “This is just a – a more general comment. I think it has an inhibiting influence – impact on our ability to bring resolutions that I think would be more appropriate. And I think that is something that we – you all need to – need to consider. So the concern that you raised is actually one that I share.”

Obama and Mr. Holder have a specific duty in Article II, Sec. III of the Constitution to simply “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” The prosecutorial discretion of the Obama administration makes it more of a regime than a legitimate government. These men shame their offices by the selective enforcement of laws and entities that share their collective political goals. The decision to allow a civil penalty to stand in light of the multiple criminal actions of HSBC reveals the true intent of Obama’s DOJ to allow these activities to continue unabated.

Talk about leaving the American people with plenty of law, but no justice.

Since their actions diminish the “Rule of Law” our nation was founded on, we deserve better.

Photo Credit: European Parliament (Creative Commons)

Gun Control 2.0 In California…And America!

Gun Control SC Gun Control 2.0 In California...And America!

Bloomberg reports that in California, they are seizing guns from formerly legal gun owners who no longer qualify to own them because of criminal charges or commitment to a mental hospital.  Taking guns from criminals? Good.  Taking guns from the mentally ill and unstable?  Also good, since they make up 99.9% of those who have committed mass murder with guns in the United States.  But with a government that is pushing for increasing measures to disarm citizens and Obamacare in control of medicine, how long before the sane gun-owning citizens are deemed mentally unstable in the name of gun control?

According to the article, Lynette Phillips was the subject of such a gun seizure due to a two-day involuntary commitment to a mental hospital.  The alarming part is her assertion that “the nurse who admitted her had exaggerated the magnitude of her condition.”  Now, we don’t know the circumstances, why she was thought to be crazy, or what behavior made the nurse think Phillips should be committed.  And of course, the crazy don’t think they’re crazy.  If one is involuntarily committed, one has an opportunity to contest the decision before a judge; but it is permanently on the record.  But this raises an important question because judgments on another person’s sanity are made by individuals – fallible, subjective humans.  Those individuals make a determination nearly impossible to disprove that now affects one’s Constitutional right to own a firearm.

Under Obamacare, doctors, nurses, and other medical staff are no longer beholden to their patients; they are beholden to the State.  It holds the taxpayer-funded purse that allocates budgets, and it controls the standards and directives by which medical staff and facilities must operate.  If doctors and nurses answer to the State, and the State wants to enact gun control, what’s to stop them from dictating judgments of insanity for those they want to disarm?  A doctor’s job or a hospital’s budget might depend on compliance with, for example, a new directive on what behavior indicates insanity or potential future violence.  Do you oppose this Administration’s policies?  You may be hostile.  You may be a danger to yourself or others.  The Administration certainly thinks so, and now they write the doctor’s checks.

The idea of a doctor asking a patient the question “Are there any guns in your house?” was raised after the Sandy Hook massacre, when Obama proposed 23 executive orders to limit the use of guns.  Of these, order #16 states, “…the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes”; and according to the White House fact sheet on the orders, “…no federal law prevents health care providers from warning law enforcement authorities about threats of violence.”  Obama wants doctors to be able to get information on the firearms one owns; and under Obamacare, he also controls the staff who diagnose things like mental stability and illness.

We know that gun ownership and conservative values overlap heavily across the United States.  With the help and compliance of the mass media, this Administration has tried to defame and marginalize anyone who opposes its policies and doesn’t agree with its ideology. We also know whom the government deems to be a threat – the new Enemy of the People.  It’s not Islamic terrorists who scream “Allahu Akhbar” as they murder innocent civilians. Those are the justified “freedom fighters” of the “religion of peace.”  Janet Napolitano’s Department of Homeland “Security” has said that all returning Veterans are potential terrorists and that those who are against aborting babies are extremists. And we all know how they characterize the Tea Party in particular and conservatives in general.  Now they have ubiquitous control over the medical staff to dole out judgments of insanity.  What better way to further nullify your enemy than to declare them crazy – one gun-clinger at a time?

Photo credit: krazydad / jbum (Creative Commons)

How To Deal With Fake “Catholic” Politicians…

Pope Francis SC How to deal with fake “Catholic” politicians...

First, the good news: the Catholic Church has a new pope. Now the better news: Pope Francis is a strong conservative who has expressed strong opinions about what constitutes adherence to Catholic doctrine.

The elevation of Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Argentina as the new Pope, who is now known as Pope Francis (not Francis I because there has  never been another Pope Francis)  is a clear signal that the Roman Catholic Church has taken a decided turn to the right. Pope Francis will redefine the roll of priests to one that is more inclusive of evangelizing in an increasingly secular world and much more.

While Pope Francis is the first Jesuit Pope and first non-European Pope in more than a thousand years, the importance of his elevation is that he is exactly the right man to step forward and protect orthodox Catholic doctrines. The doctrine of marriage as a sacred union between a man and a woman, the doctrine of only male priests, and the doctrine of life’s beginning at conception will be fiercely protected by Francis. He has told us this in his pronouncements and writings throughout his priesthood.

Francis has also written about the necessary requirements to receive Holy Communion. This is where things get difficult for the C.I.N.O.s (Catholics In Name Only) who flourish in American politics. Francis has opined that public support for abortion and gay marriage represent impediments to the individual seeking to receive Holy Communion. He has said “we should commit ourselves to ‘Eucharistic coherence’, that is, we should be conscious that people cannot receive Holy Communion and at the same time act or speak against the commandments, in particular when abortion, euthanasia, and other serious crimes against life and family are facilitated. This responsibility applies particularly to legislators, governors, and health professionals.”

Words like this should cause the Obama Administration to take note, but they haven’t. Barack Obama is sending Joe Biden, a man the secular world refers to as a “devout Catholic”, to Francis’ installation next week.  Biden has been barred from receiving Communion by several Catholics dioceses, including Delaware (where he is from) and Scranton (where he grew up.)

The stage is already set for a confrontation with America’s CINO politicians. It will come sooner than most of them believe. When Obamacare’s “contraception/abortion” mandate comes into effect in August, things will heat up for them.

Photo credit: Catholic Church (England and Wales) (Creative Commons)

“Trump The Race Card” Session At CPAC

k. carl smith Trump The Race Card Session At CPAC

K. Carl Smith, the “Conservative Messenger!” will host a CPAC event where he”ll share his method for victory after liberals deploy the only winning card in their deck: the race card.

He will be holding a break-out session called “Trump the Race Card” on Friday, March 15th from 3:00-4:00 p.m. in the Chesapeake L Room, 2nd floor of the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center, 201 Waterfront Street, National Harbor, MD.

Mr. Smith founded the Frederick Douglas Republicans organization and authored “Frederick Douglas Republicans” as a guide to how this great figure inspired his modern reform movement.

FULL DISCLOSURE: I’m a Frederick Douglas Republican and fully support K. Carl Smith in his effort to save America with this eye-opening method.

If you’re attending CPAC this Friday, experience K. Carl Smith and use his method to beat the race card hidden up progressives’ sleeves!

Tell him Cap Black sent you!

http://frederickdouglassrepublican.com/