It’s Not Just The IRS, And It’s Clearly Coordinated

DC Aerial 300x200 Its Not Just the IRS, And Its Clearly Coordinated

To anyone with any sense of political propriety, the growing story of IRS abuses targeting conservative groups is beyond unsettling. Even administration supporters must realize that with a change of administration, groups and individuals of their political orientation could be the next targets. But the IRS isn’t the only agency involved in this targeting, which even more clearly validates the hypothesis that it’s all coordinated from the White House, and not just some “rogue agents.”

We now know the IRS was targeting applications for non-profit status by conservative groups. We also know, from recent revelations, that the Department of Justice (which seems increasingly to be an oxymoron) has been targeting media organizations and reporters that are seen to pose a threat to the administration. But that’s just the proverbial tip of the iceberg.

The IRS is further implicated in this web of corruption by their audit division. Idaho resident Frank VanderSloot served as a national co-chair to the Mitt Romney campaign, and was a major donor. In April, 2012, the Obama Campaign published a scurrilous piece on their website, attacking the character of eight conservatives who were backing Romney, including VanderSloot.

Shortly after that posting, VanderSloot was subjected to three federal government audits. Two of those were by the IRS, one for his personal income and one for his businesses. The other was a Labor Department audit of one of his businesses. Is this a coincidence? Not according to VanderSloot, who said he “wasn’t the only one” on that list that received the royal Obama treatment.

In 2009 and 2011, Gibson Guitar Corporation was raided by armed federal agents from the FBI and the Justice Department, for allegedly using “endangered” wood in the construction of their acoustic guitars. The agents seized raw materials, electronic files and finished guitars. The raid cost the company over $3 million, not including a $300,000 settlement with the government. None of Gibson’s competitors received this kind of treatment, even though Martin & Co. is known to use exactly the same “endangered” wood. The difference? Gibson CEO, Henry Juszkiewicz, actively supports Republican candidates, while Martin’s CEO, Chris Martin IV is a Democrat supporter.

Catherine Engelbrecht, saw a need to educate citizens to prevent voter fraud. She founded a non-profit organization, True the Vote, for that express purpose. Her organization’s non-profit filing was one of those held up for years by the IRS’s “Advocacy Group,” which has admitted to targeting conservative groups.

After filing for tax-exempt status, she has gone through four IRS audits; two of their personal finances, and two of their family business. Her business was also inspected several times by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), where only minor issues were found, but they were fined $25,000. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) made an unannounced audit of her business. And not to be outdone, the FBI started contacting them, probing for improprieties. Neither the ATF nor the FBI could find anything to charge them with. It was all harassment.

To believe all of this is coincidental is tantamount to suspension of all cognitive functionality. It is targeted, coordinated, and implemented with the precision that would make Stalin, Mao, or Hitler envious.

Kim Strassel of the Wall Street Journal revealed a year ago that the president maintained an “enemies list.” Not enemies of the state, but people who oppose his agenda and are outspoken in their opposition. As she said, “Any president who targets a private citizen for his politics is de facto engaged in government intimidation and threats. This is why presidents since Nixon have carefully avoided the practice. Save Mr. Obama, who acknowledges no rules.”

Peter Wehner in Commentary Magazine said recently, “We have seen from this White House Nixonian tendencies and, it would appear, a burning anger and resentment toward its critics. Whether it’s Fox News, the Chamber of Commerce, or companies that sponsor reports that take issue with the administration’s assessments, there seems to be a cast of mind that views critics as enemies, as individuals and institutions that need to be ridiculed, delegitimized, or ruined… there are lines that ought not to be crossed, temptations that need to be resisted, and people in the White House who need to say ‘no’ to tactics that begin to drag an administration, and a country, down.”

Obama and his cronies have painted targets on groups and individuals who don’t buy into their statist ideology, and his henchmen in the federal government take the shots. And the proof that it’s coming from the very top is in the pervasive use of government agencies to stifle dissent and intimidate critics. It’s not just the IRS, but includes the Labor Department, the Department of Justice, FBI, ATF, and OSHA.

These are the consequences of sending a Machiavellian to lead a government that has such expansive control of our lives. Obama and his gaggle of “Csars” and government henchmen are only curtailed in their insidious intimidation and attacks on his political adversaries by bringing the administration’s atrocities to light. These are the tactics of tyrants, and have no place in America!

AP award winning columnist Richard Larsen is President of Larsen Financial, a brokerage and financial planning firm in Pocatello, Idaho, and is a graduate of Idaho State University with degrees in Political Science and History and former member of the Idaho State Journal Editorial Board.  He can be reached at rlarsenen@cableone.net. You can connect with him on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rlarsenen.

Photo Credit:  Site.gov/SC

The IRS – Attempting To Influence Elections And Public Policy

IRS The IRS   Attempting to Influence Elections and Public Policy

Can anyone feel safe from persecution? Despite the neglect of the liberal media, the world is learning about the corruption of the IRS in targeting conservative groups.  But the corruption goes much deeper than harassing groups seeking first time non-profit designations, into actively sabotaging existing non-profit groups by releasing confidential information.

According to published records and John Eastman, a constitutional law professor at Chapman University, who is chairman of the National Organization for Marriage, in March of 2012 the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) published a confidential tax return of the National Organization for Marriage (NOM), which was immediately republished by The Huffington Post and other liberal news media outlets. The HRC and NOM are the leading national groups on opposing sides of the fight over the rights of homosexuals (gays) to marry. The HRC wants to redefine marriage to make it genderless, while the NOM wishes to preserve marriage as the union of one man and one woman, as God intended.

The National Organization for Marriage was not the only conservative-leaning group or business that appears to have faced illegal actions from IRS employees.  The liberal ProPublica reported that the IRS handed over to them confidential documents of nine conservative organizations whose applications for non-profit status were still pending. Among them: Crossroads GPS, a key group backing Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign.

Aside from the blatant Constitutional issues, the leak of confidential information may have directly and indirectly influenced the 2012 elections, and not just at the presidential level, but State, county and local jurisdictions as well. For months before March 2012, the pro-gay marriage HRC had been demanding that the NOM, publicly identify its major donors, something that NOM and many other non-profit organizations refuse to do. The reason is simple. It is well documented that gay marriage advocates have used such information to launch campaigns of intimidation against traditional marriage supporters.

Gay marriage proponents demanded the information, and it appears that the IRS illegally gave them exactly what they were looking for. The tax return released by the HRC contained the names and addresses of dozens of major donors to NOM. And there’s little doubt where the documents came from. The tax returns contained internal coding added by the IRS after the returns were originally submitted.

For the IRS to leak any organization’s tax return to its political opponents is an outrageous breach of ethics and, if proven, constitutes a felony. Every organization — liberal and conservative — should shudder at the idea of the IRS playing politics with its confidential tax return information. But the situation here is even more egregious because the head of the HRC was at the time serving as a national co-chair of President Obama’s re-election campaign. Does anyone see a pattern here? Conservative organizations were and are being purposely targeted for unreasonable scrutiny because they dared to criticize the Obama administration’s programs or initiatives.

The release of the National Organization for Marriage’s confidential tax return to the Human Rights Campaign is an undeniable indicator of IRS corruption. Contrary to assertions that the targeting of Tea Party groups was an error in judgment by low-level IRS bureaucrats which has since been debunked by Fox News, the release of NOM’s confidential data to a group headed by an Obama campaign co-chair suggests the possibility of complicity at the highest levels of politics and government. This wasn’t a low-level error in judgment; it was a conscious act to reward a prominent Obama supporter while punishing an opponent. “We will reward our friends and punish our opponents”. This should send a shiver down the back of every law abiding citizen.

I don’t know why the IRS has not been very interested in getting to the bottom of what happened. Federal investigators have interviewed NOM officials about the matter, but nothing seems to have been done beyond that. Now it is becoming more clear why the IRS is not excited about following up on NOM’s case. They have a lot more on their plate.

At this stage, nobody is accusing the White House or the Obama re-election campaign of illegal activity. But there is a serious question about whether there was communication or possible collusion between the IRS and the HRC, and if there was, whether anyone at the White House or the Obama re-election campaign was involved. As it appears the head of the IRS was making regular trips to the White House. According to the White House visitor’s log, Mr. Shulman visited the White House on 157 occasions, more than the Secretary of State, Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Defense combined. Either there was a lot of secret egg rolling going on or there were other secrets being discussed.

It is imperative that congressional investigators get to the bottom of these issues. If the IRS can get away with leaking NOM’s confidential tax return to its chief political opponent, and targeting other Conservative groups for nefarious reasons then no taxpayer is safe from political retribution by the federal government. We must demand satisfaction and put an end to the tyranny of the liberal minority in this country. It is time for all God fearing people to stand up for what they believe in. We need to demand equal justice and integrity from our government and our elected officials. If the IRS is acting in a partisan fashion it should be dismantled. Urge Congress to enact the Fair Tax. Every one pays their fair share including Obama and the members of Congress. You get to keep your pay check and only pay tax on what you buy. Or you could vote for the Flat Tax which could be completed on a post card. Either initiative would greatly curtail the actions and authority of the IRS.

Photo Credit:  Site.gov/SC

Weiner Holder 2016

My name is Barney Frank and I endorse this advertisement

Weiner Holder 2016 300x108 Weiner Holder 2016

War Not Over; Al Qaeda Still Threatens America

AL QAEDA 300x200 War Not Over; Al Qaeda Still Threatens America

A week ago, Obama declared that Al Qaeda was on a path to defeat. Not only is that not true of Al Qaeda as a whole; it’s not even true of Al Qaeda in Iraq.

During his multiple withdrawals from Iraq, Obama claimed that the mission had been successfully concluded and that the war there never had anything to do with Al Qaeda. Unfortunately Al Qaeda in Iraq begged to differ.

This May, over a thousand Iraqis have been killed, nearly equaling the death toll from the worst days of the Iraq War. Car bombings in Baghdad no longer make the evening news, but they are commonplace and despite the withdrawal, Americans haven’t been immune from the violence.

Among the Benghazi attackers were about a dozen members of Al Qaeda in Iraq. The four Americans who died in the attack could be considered four additional Al Qaeda in Iraq kills.

But Al Qaeda in Iraq’s real mission lay in Syria. The Al-Nusra Front has dominated the Sunni side of the Syrian Civil War. Robert Ford, the United States ambassador to Syria, has said that the Al-Nusra Front is just Al Qaeda in Iraq operating under another name.

Read more here

Photo credit:  site.gov/SC

Time Running Out For Illinois’ Gun Grabbing Politicians

Illinois SC Time running out for Illinois’ gun grabbing politicians

If Illinois lawmakers cannot pass a concealed carry law acceptable to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals by June 9th, the constitutionally prescribed right to keep and bear arms will immediately take effect in the Prairie State. That is, just as codified in the 2nd Amendment, all Illinois gun owners will have the right to bear a weapon anywhere they wish in the state.

On December 11th of last year, a 3 judge panel from the 7th Circuit ruled Illinois’ near-total ban on the carry of firearms unconstitutional. The 47 page decision in Moore v Madigan gave the Illinois legislature 180 days to craft legislation “…consistent with the public safety and the Second Amendment as interpreted in this opinion…”

Last week, the Illinois House voted 85-30 in favor of a new concealed carry statute that would institute both a “shall issue” provision and statewide preemption for the first time. Under the terms of the statute, the state would be required to issue a concealed carry license to any Illinois resident who completes a mandatory training program and pays a $150 tax. In addition, the new law would take precedence over any local regulations. For example, the statute passed by the City of Chicago banning “assault weapons” would bow to  statewide rules.

Though one would hardly realize it from the state’s record of vehemently anti-gun rights legislation, the vast majority of Illinois is very pro-gun! Yet just as Chicago liberals have spent decades forcing their brand of anti-second Amendment lunacy on the rest of the state, the Chicago-dominated, Senate Executive Committee voted down the House bill on Tuesday, demanding all anti-gun regulations of the Windy City and other localities remain part of any new legislation. The Chicago clan also want to incorporate strict mental health review provisions along with a mandatory 16 hour training program in any new law.

Will members of the Illinois House and Senate get together on constitutional, concealed carry legislation that will win the blessing of fiercely anti-gun Governor Pat Quinn prior to the court-imposed June 9th deadline?  If a new law has not been fashioned, the State of Illinois could be subject to the United States Constitution for the first time in decades!

“Nobody wants us to not do anything and the federal court ruling take effect and thereby allow ‘constitutional carry’,” said Democrat State Sen John Sullivan. A predictable statement from a typical Democrat. Indeed, what a frightening thought for Illinois’ ruling Democrat Party—constitutional rights in the form of the 2nd Amendment actually being granted to residents of a state whose lawmakers have so fervently ignored the document for such a very long time!

Should Democrats fail to resolve their differences, it will be very interesting to see just how many folks in Illinois strap on pistols on June 10th —concealed or otherwise—in response to their new-found rights.

Why Liberals Insist On Living In Cities

New York City SC 1024x723 Why Liberals Insist On Living In Cities

One constant we have experienced under the reign of Barack Obama has been government and non-governmental agency (NGO) lies and distortions about the statistical state of our nation.  Believing the unemployment numbers, for instance, has become an exercise in suspension of disbelief. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has used a fabricated dysfunctional formula for counting our unemployed neighbors for so long that people have forgotten they are being lied to, if they ever knew the difference.

Recently, a new insidious lie was quietly slipped into the public area. Under cover of Obama’s multiple scandals, the Brookings Institute, a reliably liberal NGO, proclaimed that there are now a million more poor people in our suburbs as compared to our cities.

Our suburbs are being called “ghost towns” to make the lie work and give the appearance that Americans are coming back to our cities.  This and the other lies about crime and poverty in our suburbs being greater than in our cities serve the great “good” in the sycophant Leftist mind. These lies not only attack the governance of suburbs that are more likely to be conservative and Republican; but they promote and perpetuate the lie that liberalism works and makes our lives better and safer. The truth is that there is nothing true in the Left’s assertion of a better life in our cities. Our suburbs are growing, not shrinking.  The truth is that the latest demographics show that 75% of those living in our 51 major metropolitan areas live in its suburban portion.

Urban poverty rates are 20.9% versus 11.4% in our suburbs (and more likely getting worse.)

FBI data shows that cities suffer 3.4 times the amount of violent crime suburban areas experience.

Clearly,  the suburbs are not shrinking, do not have more poverty, and do have less crime than our cities.  So why the lies? A good guess would be a Goebbels-like attempt to spray perfume on the stink-holes that decades of Democrat rule have made our cities. How else can the Left explain away Detroit, a city infected by Democrat liberalism?

“Every city is a paradise comrade, so shut up and pay your taxes.”

Militant Agnostic: I Don’t Know, And You Don’t Either

Atheist SC Militant Agnostic: I don’t know, and you don’t either

At first blush, this seems mildly confusing. “Agnostic” implies maintaining a continuing doubt as to the existence of God, whereas “atheist” affirms that there is no God. One would think that in taking a “militant” position, a person would be sure, rather than doubtful. Then again, the exhibitor of this bumper sticker could be sure that he is doubtful, I suppose.

But there is much more here.

The main conceit is that the exhibitor is not prone to mere exercises of faith. Whatever he believes to be true must be proven, and be based on reason. However, as you will see, he falls into a fatal contradiction.

Any fact the exhibitor feels comfortable as being “known” was first learned at some time in the past. When that particular fact was being learned, there were already certain fundamental assumptions being made, that cannot be proven:

  • A certain sequence of letters signifies a specific word
  • Any word that is learned refers to a unique object—physical or otherwise
  • The concept of numbers

Less fundamental is his acceptance of all sorts of facts that, at best, can only be verified by consulting reference books; but even this verification must assume some faith in some source. Indeed, if he were not to accept certain matters on faith, he would never learn anything at all. For example, he may learn that Richmond is the capital of Virginia. This assumes the geographical entities mentioned, along with the notion of a “capital.”

Therefore, based on but a moment’s reflection, you will see that there is no difference between faith and reason.

He may then counter that certain things—such as the existence of God—are simply unknowable. But this stance creates further problems. Based on the standards of the bumper sticker, for him to contend something, he must be able to prove it; and now he is forced to prove that something can be unknowable.

For him, this is fatal. Assuming that it is even possible to prove that something is unknowable, if he does prove this, all he has done is underscored the necessity to take certain matters on faith, as I have already demonstrated. However, if he is unable to prove that something is unknowable, he has destroyed the very sentiment of the bumper sticker.

“[A]nd you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” (John 8:32)

Photo credit: reuvenim (Creative Commons)

Mr. Rubio, Fold Up Your Tent And Go Home

Rubio SC Mr. Rubio, fold up your tent and go home

When Lyndon Johnson lost the support of Walter Cronkite for his prosecution of the war in Viet Nam, he was sufficiently impressed that he pulled out of the 1968 presidential election. Recognizing the gravity of this defeat, Johnson said, “If I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve lost Middle America.”

While the squishy “Republicans” at the “Weekly Standard” are in no way as influential as “Uncle Walter” was in 1968, the advice from William Kristol of the Weekly Standard to Marco Rubio to “get out” of this effort to “fix” immigration is nonetheless quite telling.

During a recent interview about the Senate’s efforts to provide amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, Kristol spoke directly to the Gang of Ocho’s Senator Marco Rubio – a Cuban American from South Florida, saying “He should walk away from it. He should say, ‘I made a good faith effort, but you know what, this is not a piece of legislation [I should support after all].’”

Labeling the Gang of Ocho’s “Schumer/Menendez Amnesty and Democrat Party Registration” legislation a “big government’ bill,  Kristol warned Rubio that what he was helping to create is in fact just another bill that will not do what it was intended to do.

In a surprising moment of clarity, Kristol – a RINO in good standing himself – implored Rubio to reconsider his quixotic effort to grant amnesty to those who are here illegally, saying,  “Think of the trust you have to have in bureaucracy to make all this work. There’ll be certifications and border security, there’ll be tests of whether people paid back taxes. … If you like Obamacare, you should like this immigration bill. And I honestly think conservatives should oppose it on those grounds alone.”

The money quote in this interview came toward its conclusion when Kristol added, “I’m a liberal, as you know, on immigration reform. I was more liberal than you were, I think, in ’06, ’07. I’ve got to say, I couldn’t vote for this bill. I just don’t think it’s good conservative governance, and I don’t think there’s any need to compromise with Chuck Schumer and Barack Obama at this point. There’s no crisis.”

Mister Rubio, you have lost “Walter” Kristol. The next move is up to you.

White House Prepares Lois Lerner For Burial In IRS Scandal

Build It IRS Will Come SC White House prepares Lois Lerner for burial in IRS scandal

On May 21st, leftist bloggers and columnists were summoned to the West Wing for the purpose of planning the summary execution of IRS Exempt Organizations Director Lois Lerner. Two of the three known to have attended the meeting—Josh Marshall and Ezra Klein–published scathing attacks against Lerner the very next day, just as the IRS fall-girl was butchering a well-publicized 5th Amendment pleading before Darrell Issa’s House Government Oversight Committee.

The call for Lerner’s scalp was immediately seconded by Democrat congressman and Committee ranking member Elijah Cummings, who stated that Lerner “…should be fired for her role in the scandal.” Massachusetts Democrat Stephen Lynch went so far as to compare Lerner’s targeting of conservative organizations with “…the practice of tyrannical regimes that enact human rights on paper but fail to honor them in practice.”

Let’s face it: Democrats don’t do this to dependable, fellow leftists unless under order by their superiors. In the late 1990’s, while at the Federal Election Commission, Lerner launched an investigation against the Christian Coalition. She undoubtedly won her current job as a result of that thoroughly corrupt action, it being known she would continue the same sort of unscrupulous targeting of conservative and Christian organizations at the IRS!

Yet now the left is turning on her. She received criminally incompetent legal advice for her 5th Amendment declaration, advice from a law firm with strong connections to Barack Obama and the Administration. Certainly, the Regime does not want Lerner to testify before Issa’s committee; so why did her attorney open the legal door, allowing committee Republicans to claim Lerner had waived her 5th Amendment privilege?

News of the IRS scandal was released by Lerner 2 weeks ago when she “suddenly” admitted that the Service had been targeting conservative groups for extra scrutiny. Does anyone think that a revelation so damaging to the Administration could have originated with Lerner (or with former Acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller, who claimed to have dreamed up the planted question scheme that made the corruption public)? Clearly, this well-publicized admission of guilt was arranged with the full knowledge and approval of the White House.

So Lerner was ordered (or at least agreed) to play the role of sacrificial lamb; admit to wrongdoing that violated IRS rules; and face, well, who knows what sort of future difficulties at the hands of congressional Republicans (or perhaps the federal courts.)

Would she not demand some guarantee of Executive Branch protection in return for such a public leap upon the sword?

On Friday, Lerner was asked to resign by new IRS acting commissioner Danny Werfel. She refused and was promptly placed on administrative leave (or as non-federal employees would call it, paid vacation.)  Lerner probably knows who originally orchestrated the corrupt IRS targeting of conservative groups (and perhaps a whole lot more), which could prove embarrassing at the very least to Barack Obama and the Regime. If she senses betrayal at the hands of her liberal friends, she might make a deal with Issa for immunity. That would be the last thing Barack Obama would want.

It’s difficult to imagine that Obama’s people could so completely botch a scheme whose only purpose was to get bad news out ahead of the Inspector General’s report on IRS corruption. But they have clearly plotted the demise of longtime liberal activist Lois Lerner. And that is usually the last resort of someone who finds he has bungled everything else along the way.

The Error At The Core Of Obamacare

Quagmire Obamacare The error at the core of Obamacare

Although there are literally hundreds of things wrong with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act–aka “Obamacare,” the most fundamental error is the quite foolish notion that making insurance more available (albeit not necessarily more affordable) was somehow the biggest problem facing our failing health care system.

For the record, the biggest problem with our health care system is that we pay way too much (by far the most in the world) for generally poor to mediocre outcomes. That can be a subject for another day. For now, let’s destroy the insurance meme, with an analogy…

Imagine for a moment that there was a horrendous crisis involving house fires. Destruction and injury were rampant. The root causes were manifold, and many people were dying.

Imagine further that the brilliant political solution to this problem did not involve hiring more firefighters, nor even any efforts toward fire prevention. Rather, the Government decided that more fire insurance was the answer. To spread the burden, even if you did not own a house, you still had to obtain insurance or face a penalty (sorry, a tax). A massive bureaucracy would be put in place to ensure that any work done to fix your home had to be performed in accordance with certain guidelines and for a certain price. Don’t try asking for anything off the page.

Meanwhile, houses would continue to burn, people would continue to die, and the underlying situation would not be improved in any measurable way. Some home rebuilding “providers” would find ways to game the system, so the bureaucracy would have to expand to monitor the fraud while making it even more difficult to get your home rebuilt at an ever-increasing cost. Likewise, honest providers would simply gear their projects toward those home-rebuilding “procedures” that were more remunerative, rather than what might be best for the homeowner.

The only possible result of this madness is ever-increasing costs for ever-worsening outcomes.

Now, imagine you’re not imagining. Except that instead of a house fire crisis, we have ourselves a legitimate health care crisis that is being addressed in this same manner.

There is simply not enough money in the world—under any conceivable scheme—to support the prevailing disease care model (as used here and everywhere else) of health care. This model exists only because under the current rubrics, there is far more revenue in treating acute disease than there is in health maintenance and disease prevention. As such, elaborate chicanery and pettifoggery has to be put in place to at least give the illusion that a disease care model is sustainable. Thus…the huge tax increase—finally labeled as such by Johnnie Roberts—that is the PPACA.

Photo credit: terrellaftermath