
Mid-20th century Feminism has taught us that women don’t need men, that we can do anything men can do from business to close combat, that taking on the worst behavior of promiscuous men is desirable, and that we can avoid the physical and emotional consequences that result. Chivalry is long since dead: Feminism declared it the relic of an oppressive patriarchal society rather than what it was: a standard that held women up in order to protect them. And they have convinced themselves that any differences between the sexes exist because they have been artificially imposed by men. Meanwhile men have been emasculated and fathers relegated to mere sperm donors.
Has anyone noticed all the heroines in our films and television shows in recent years? No longer are chivalrous men protecting vulnerable women. From Alias to La Femme Nikita to any female-centric film you can name, the women are portrayed as fighting machines (with guns), often rescuing their male counterparts. You know these films. Michelle Rodriguez plays the same exact cardboard badass in so many of them. They take down fighting man after fighting man. But this is all fiction – take it from a female black belt and Iraq War veteran. And don’t get me started on that twig LeeLee Sobieski on NYC22 playing a veteran who can take down street thugs. The reality is that even Rhonda Rousey isn’t put in the ring with male fighters.
If women could do the same things men can, there wouldn’t be separate standards for them in police work, firefighting, and the military, or as is true in some cases, lower standards for both sexes that women can pass. Most women can’t wield the fire hose, carry a 200-lb man off the battlefield, or take down a male criminal. The last example was proved just recently when a female cop was overpowered by a criminal who had been taken into custody. He stole her gun and three cops were shot.
Yes, some women are stronger than some men, but they are never stronger than strong men, and a woman without a weapon is no match for a man who wants to do her harm, even if she knows how to fight. I earned that black belt, I became a Marine, I went to the combat zone. But I also got cancer, and what happens when you can no longer physically fight? What if you don’t want to fight? How many women or moms, married or not, have time to train to become proficient fighters to be ready for that one random time the criminal comes at them in the parking lot? You need to be able to own a weapon for self-defense if you choose. You need to be able to nullify the threat before it comes down to hand-to-hand combat.
No matter how much the Feminists rail, and no matter how many times Hollywood portrays heroic fighting women, women are the weaker sex. This doesn’t mean lesser, it just means physically weaker and that’s a fact no amount of affirmative action or double standards can change. Leave it to hypocritical liberals and feminists to ignore scientific reality in favor of the brave new world they want to force into existence. You would think that girl-power philosophy would extend to empowering women to protect ourselves with any weapon available, especially after teaching us for so long that we don’t need men. But no, the hypocrisy is ubiquitous. Women don’t need men and they don’t need weapons either. Feminism thus fails women.
Existing and new gun control laws coupled with Feminist ideals just means that we all have to become fighters, whether we want to or not. A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle until a strong man decides to take advantage of her and/or her children. For 50 years now we’ve been taught that government will fill that void, but of course, the police usually come only come after a crime has been committed. And now the cop might be some chick who made it on a double standard who gets overpowered by the criminal in your home. Without a strong man to provide for and protect her, she not only must be a bread-winner, she must be a black belt – unless she can arm herself for protection. Guns are the real equalizer between the sexes.
This post was originally published Here:
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism

The real tragedy about this gun control fraud is that most women are physically vulnerable and, unless you are a liberal, you already admit to that but women have an even more urgent threat today – their own government! I don’t even consider that a women should not be able to defend herself from the scum that prowl our streets. As hard as it may be for some to hear, if you have to shoot, shoot to kill!
I really would like for my american protect me, and l really do not think l am as strong or as smart as most american men. I can not help depending on men .
Women have a God-given right to defend themselves with guns as well as anyone else. I don’t agree with so-called ‘feminism,’ though. I’m a woman, but I’m conservative. I believe in equal rights/treatment of women and that they should have equal opportunities as men. I don’t believe in ‘feminisms’ efforts to gut the family as ordained by God and to kill the unborn. I don’t think it’s right for a woman to be hired for a job just because she’s a woman yet not qualified for the job — Affirmative action. This resorts to discimination against men. Any form of discrimination is WRONG whether it’s against women, men, blacks, whites, browns, etc.
Excellent! The male is genetically programmed to seize, hold and maintain the territory!
Interestingly, pop culture tells us that women are smarter than men, kids are smarter than women, and animals are smarter than kids!
Generally I prefer the company of little kids and doggies preferable to the company of adults. However kids and doggies generally prefer the company of each other!
The truth is sometimes blinding, great article! Let’s hope women open their eyes. This was very compelling, I am sharing!
[[ Meanwhile men have been emasculated and fathers relegated to mere sperm donors.]]
Men are not only sperm donors, but they are sex seekers too. Women are sometimes used in this sense, not just by husbands, but rapes from husbands as well as street men.
Women dont deserve equal pay…. mainly cause they get to take off weeks to have a baby.. they also get to take off work when the baby is sick, etc. or they are having a bad day once a month.
Women are not as capable as men…. I dont care if it’s firefighters, policemen, wrecker service duties or bounty hunters. Physically, women just cant match men — also another man is likely to take advantage of her if she were a body guard, or bouncer. God made them differently for a reason.
The reason there are separate standards for men and women in all the different fields where they exist is so that wimpy women could get the jobs. So men could still feel superior. If the standards had never been changed only women who could live up to them would have the jobs and they would truly be the same. Yes there are some women, a whole lot of women who would have been up to the challenge. They were never given the opportunity, because the standards were changed before the first one ever tried. Women never asked for the standards to be different, they only wanted to be able to hold the jobs if they qualified for them. Who ever this person is that wrote this article is full of crap and did not live through all the time things were changing. As a woman who did and one who has had to physically fight with strong men in my life, I can honestly tell you this woman is full of crap. Women’s biggest trouble when fighting men is they don’t fight dirty and they don’t take opportunities to do damage when they present themselves. In other words they are never taught to fight. A black belt in what ever ain’t going to do it. Stop trying to be ladies and fight dirty, that’s all you need to know.
http://youtu.be/rrBNNaZP5jg—Video of Nullification of gun control ‘laws’ rally in New York. A big crowd.
We are in serious trouble–women and men alike.
As for discrimination of women remember the scene in Lincoln when BOTH sides of the Congress rose to their feet to protest the idea of women getting to vote…Just ask Hilly. They, (Bilderbergers, Soros and the liberated men of the ‘DNC’), made her (an offer she couldn’t refuse to) give up the nomination that she had in the bag in 2008.
Men with slightly darker skin get to be ‘POTUS’, not women of any color. Women’s Lib was a farce.
P.S. Don’t get me wrong, women such as HRC should never be allowed in a position of having power over others. She is purevil.