God Bless Us, Everyone

Christian cross SC God bless us, everyone
As we enter the Twelve Days of Christmas, the words of Dickens’ Tiny Tim readily resonate at this special time of year for it is so convenient for so many to fail to see the blessings of daily life during the often monotonous grind of ordinary time. To be sure, some of us may seem more blessed than others and perhaps there is an arguable relativism to our comparative stations in life. It’s easy to garner envy for those who are wealthy and powerful but despite their material gains and successes, we are all in need of something beyond power or gold. For those with higher levels of creature comforts, we may find pity, sorrow or even feel guilt because of those who are wanting and struggling while they, perhaps without our realizing it, find comfort and solace in an unshakable faith.

The post-pagan understanding of a blessing is “to be favored by God.” The modern meaning of the term may have been influenced in translations of the Bible into Old English during the process of “Christianization” to translate the term benedīcere meaning to “speak well of,” resulting in meanings such as to “praise” or “extol” or to speak of or to wish well.

It is no secret that I strive to be a man of faith. Perhaps struggle is a more apt description because faith is merely a personal choice. Like some of you, I fight an almost daily battle to make sense of this existence and the circumstances that surround us. Depending on one’s state of mind, it can be overwhelming to even attempt reconcile good and evil. It just can’t be done.

Faith is trust. You either have it or you don’t. It often seems incongruous to trust in anything that cannot be seen or perceived directly by our senses. After all, our trust is broken time and time again from that disappointing moment when we realized the truth about Santa or the tooth fairy and on from there as years of broken promises accumulate. Our personal relationships and behavior test our trust for ourselves and others over the years. It is easy to become jaded and skeptical.

So what about this notion of blessings? Are we favored by God and we just don‘t realize it? I suppose the answer all depends on your acceptance or rejection of faith. Some may believe that everything which happens is purely random without plan or purpose. I don’t believe that our lives are a series of coincidences and events of probability. Believing otherwise is contrary to an ordered universe. Without waxing metaphysical, I believe in and accept St. Thomas Aquinas’ notions of natural law that concludes that God has in His intellect an idea by which He governs the world. We are supposed to use our human gifts of reason and understanding to perpetuate order and prevent chaos. Perhaps we cannot bestow blessings upon ourselves but staying focused on God’s will instead of our own helps.

Blessings often come disguised as disasters, illnesses or even the death of a loved one. How is it possible that such negative events might bestow us with anything except grief, misery and sorrow. Willingness and acceptance come to mind; willingness to accept current circumstances and patience to see what is yet to come. If we are watchful, the blessing eventually appears.

After the election last month, I was gravely disappointed for several days. My disenchantment has gradually dissolved into trust, not for our elected officials, but in God. There is no other option for me. I either turn my life and my will over to God or I will remain stuck in misery and fear. I prefer some semblance of happiness and contentment over gloom even though I have to sometimes work harder to attain the former. But joy should not require work to achieve and it really doesn’t. It can be found easily enough in so much of this world’s grandeur and wonder. It’s been said that happiness is an inside job meaning it is really nothing more than a decision, a choice just as Abraham Lincoln meant when he stated that “most people are as happy as they make up their minds to be.”

Like an aging masterpiece, delight in this day is often hidden beneath decades of accumulated filth and immoral grime. We only need to find an efficient solvent to remove it to see the glorious creation beneath it. My solvent consists of faith and my attitude. Regrettably we cannot restore our world to what it was. When you think about it, even a so-called restored masterpiece is not authentic because without reliable photographic or other evidence of its original appearance, the restorer can only rely on speculation or supposition to attain a reasonable facsimile of the actual creation. Studying history as Churchill taught us, will not only help us to avoid the pitfalls of our past but help us keep reason and morality in the forefront of our existence, conserving our sacred form of government.

We are blessed whether you want to recognize it or not. Although our personal freedoms seem to be shrinking and our country remains on a crash course for disaster, we have this moment to enjoy. And, if we have faith in God, all will unfold as it should according to His plan and in His time. Even if it all comes tumbling down, (as it most notably failed to do on 12/21/12), I still have this moment, and all the others before it, to remember the spectrum the blessings that have been bestowed on me. I hope you might find the same is true for you.

The New Killing Fields

Killing Fields SC The New Killing Fields

Following the terrible tragedy of a few days ago in Connecticut, so many are asking why. They are searching for some semblance of reason, a motive perhaps. We long to understand that which is so patently senseless. We desire an explanation in the hope that we might avert a recurring scenario that could personally involve us or a loved one.

The classic motive for homicide used to involve easily understood emotions like jealousy, envy, or uncontrolled rage. There were circumstances that connected victim with perpetrator. A marriage. A love triangle. A business venture steeped in greed and excess. They were the kinds of crimes that served as entertaining fodder for mystery and romance novels or motion pictures. Back then, the search for a motive was akin to finding a reason for the act of taking the life of another. It might not excuse the crime, but it helped those charged with determining the fate of the killer to come to a rational conviction or acquittal.

Like so many other social institutions, the face of homicide as we’ve known it has changed, perhaps permanently. The mass shootings that abound our malls, movie theaters, and schools are utterly irrational, disconnected, and cold, not unlike the lifestyles of large segments of people who we mingle with on a day to day basis. We may fail to notice that the tone and themes of our social culture at any given point in time have far reaching effects and touch every aspect of our existence. Like our present notion of sports or entertainment, even the way murder is committed has evolved into an inexplicable and incomprehensible extreme act.

Once upon a time, we were a nation of morals and etiquette. We valued behavior that was appropriate for the circumstances at hand. We even dressed accordingly. There was a moral code that defined decency and civility among us. A gentlemen treated a lady with deference and respect. Now, such gender-specific designations seem archaic and antiquated due in large part to the triumphs of feminism. Many women are reactive when a man merely opens a door to permit her to enter ahead of him. We now teach our children that gender doesn’t matter under any circumstances, from career choices to marriage and sexuality. We are taught to accept all deviations from the norm and not to judge them.

There was a time when we wore specific clothes depending on the formality of the occasion. Not so much anymore. It’s anything goes. Come as you are. Keep it casual. Why bother and run the risk of feeling the slightest bit uncomfortable even for a matter of a few hours. It’s acceptable to be lazy with our appearance. Individualism is encouraged. Pierce and tattoo yourself to your heart’s content. Wield wildly brazen hair colors and outrageous styles. The goal was shock and awe. The result? Boredom and indifference. Nowadays, even the young female clerk at the chain grocery store has limbs covered in ink to accompany the ring in her nose and stud in her tongue. No big deal.

Instead of focusing on our common ground in order to foster genuine integration, we continue to pigeonhole and separate more and more alleged minorities, affording them special protection and unique names. Today, you might be an unemployed, African-American, lesbian single mother instead of just a mother of a child living in America in need of work. We used to be a melting pot of cultures, but we’ve become a seething stew of incongruous ingredients that rarely meld together into a delectable serving of unity and cooperation.

At this time of year, we used to see public displays of the real reason for this blessed season. Nativities and likenesses of baby Jesus were easy to find in malls and even public schools. During the rest of the year, student children were free to talk about God and pray. No one seemed to object to “one nation under God” or “in God we trust.” Nowadays, just the right number of people are offended to justify legislated utter silence or minimization of Our Lord and Creator in public places.

Marriage and family have been under attack for decades, seen as yet another vestige of weary values and irrelevant institutions. My generation pioneered the open declaration of shacking up making it easy to swallow with the concurrent dismissal of traditional religion and morals. “Question authority” was our supposedly peaceful battle cry. It could have been “question everything” because we did. We thought we were non-conformists, but we unwittingly conformed along with our peers and were as easy to spot as a card-carrying member of the establishment.

We questioned drug laws. We questioned the relevance of our government. We questioned any rule that we thought unduly regulated or restricted our freedom to be ourselves. It was the beginning of a new culture that focused on me instead of we. Paradoxically, it initially expressed great disdain for material possessions or wealth in favor of living a simple life steeped in nature and relative spiritual beliefs. It was the beginning of the undoing of the social contract.

Somewhere along the way, the very economic system that was being castigated for its greed succeeded in luring us young social rebels into the fold by creating a ferocious appetite for the accumulation of high tech gadgets, designer clothing, and seductive cars. Dual income families became the norm. Living the high life in the right neighborhood and enrolling our kids in the right school dominated our lives. How much one had amassed became more important than cultivating meaningful relationships.

A few years before his death, Pope John Paul II aptly noted that we live in a culture of death, a way of life that justifies abortion, euthanasia, and violence. Our society has a seemingly unquenchable thirst for cinematic reproductions of bloody murders. Even some among us who oppose abortion still support the death penalty. We too condone the taking of people’s lives, ostensibly to teach them not to take the lives of others, a social paradox of a most irrational nature. Like a parent trying to teach a child not to hit other children, the parent thinks nothing of striking the child to teach them a lesson.

Horrific massacres like those of the past few years get the media’s attention. They are sensationalized and televised not just into our homes like the days of old but instantly to our personal communication devices like smart phones and electronic notepads. Those events are high profile violence. How much more daily violence goes unnoticed, unacknowledged in the inner cities among blacks or in white suburban homes filled with neglect, selfishness, and physical or sexual abuse?

We’re a nation of addicts with dependence on and devotion to everything from food to pornography. Even shopping has its devotees who find obtaining the latest before others the driving force for their existence. We drink. We take drugs, legal and illegal, so we don’t have to feel our emotions. We have affairs because we’re unsatisfied with our mates when they fail to meet our expectations of who they should be. We skip church to watch Sunday football or to attend our child’s weekly soccer tournament.  Then for good measure, we attend violent movies in droves thirsting for extreme acts of carnage, often in the name of eliminating the enemy or a nemesis. We revel as spectators of extreme sports where the safety (and often the very lives) of competitors are exposed to unreasonable risks of grievous injury or even death. Think X-Games and it’s precursors.

Mental and emotional illnesses, especially depression are rampant.  The use of anti-depressant and anti-anxiety medications are equally prevalent and are often effective, especially in conjunction with therapy or counseling to treat the underlying causes.  Regretfully, a lot of these maladies are left untreated or even undiagnosed.  When those circumstances collide with society’s dysfunction, the result is too often incomprehensible carnage.

We are surrounded by the new killing fields. Unlike the sites in Cambodia where the Khmer Rouge slaughtered and buried thousands of citizens seen as enemies to their regime during the late 70’s, these new killing fields have no rhyme or reason. There are no politics involved. Indeed, there is often no connection whatsoever between the death of completely innocent fellow humans and the monsters who slaughter them. The only reason for killing them is because they are alive and the murderer has the ability and desire to end those lives.

I do not speak with much authority on this topic as I have not done exhaustive research to determine the typical profile (if there is such a thing) of the shooters. Judging from the news reports, most of them seem to be males in their early twenties, often they are white with a smattering of ethnicity here and there, and they all have had some history of mental or emotional illness. According to Mother Jones, since 1982, 61 mass murders involving firearms have occurred throughout the country. Of these, 43 of the killers were indeed white males, and only one was a woman. Mother Jones focused on whether the killers obtained their guns legally (most did). They are often described by friends and family as brilliant but remote, or quiet and nice.  People seem surprised that they were capable of such indifference and horrific violence.  Most kill themselves before taking dozens of innocent lives.  The Sandy Hook massacre included very young children. another new benchmark of the increasing extremeness of the violence among us

John Lund, a columnist for National Review Online, offers a differing viewpoint. His focus is primarily on mental illness and the perceived need to loosen laws that make it difficult to locate and control mentally ill individuals.  He also offers some impressive statistics that indicate that the lion’s share of mass shootings typically occur at locations where weapons are prohibited, leaving the unwitting public as defenseless sitting ducks.  Neither he nor the studies he cites offer any opinion or facts concerning the motives of the assailants.

What could possibly move these individuals to act in such an ultra-violent manner?  We don’t really want an answer to that question because it might cause us to have to have some stake in changing the paradigm that helped create these killers. We might have to assume responsibility for speaking out in favor of right and wrong and moral behavior. We might have to be willing to reject non-conforming behavior by requiring adherence to respect and standards of decency. Worse yet, we might have to risk loving the unlovable, hugging the un-huggable, or helping the one in dire need who has no one. We might have to move from our comfort zone of apathy and emotional emptiness to one of action by helping the blind see, the deaf hear, and the lame walk.

I am a great fan of Dicken’s “A Christmas Carol”. During the appearance of the Ghost of Christmas Present, he implores Mr. Scrooge to be mindful of the two emaciated children who appear from behind his robes, describing the boy as Ignorance and girl as Want. The spirit warns Scrooge: “Beware them both, and all of their degree, but most of all beware this boy, for on his brow I see that written which is Doom, unless the writing be erased.”, underscoring the book’s social message of injustice and widespread poverty.

Today, our children labor under different circumstances; and instead of wanting for creature comforts, many are spiritually poor, lacking any semblance of formal religious education or instruction. Today’s children endlessly work video games and instruments of technology, distancing themselves from human, real time interaction. Instead of laboring under distressful conditions, they recreate with exhausting intensity. The Doom on the brow of the boy known as Ignorance remains, even though it has taken the form of indifference, unfamiliarity, obliviousness, and unawareness. The Doom on the brow of Ignorance has yet to be erased. It has merely taken a different form. Today’s Doom is born out of false bravado, neglect, selfishness, and a lack of faith.

Just as the Ghost of Christmas Present prophesied the need for action to erase the Doom of that generation, we must do the same if we are to affect any real change in the hearts and minds of our children, especially those wanting for love or emotional support. It’s easier and imminently more convenient to blame these unspeakable massacres on the need for more gun control. Unfettered access to arms has always been the go-to whipping boy to control violence. It has nothing to do with controlling who has guns and who doesn’t. It’s all about love and feeling connected to others and them feeling connected to us. When there is a short in the circuit of love,  and even one light fails to illuminate, all the others will eventually burn out from a voltage overload; and there will be darkness.  It’s getting darker already.

I challenge you to do something that makes you feel uncomfortable. Visit a shut in. Spend some time helping a local food pantry. Be a Big Brother or Big Sister. Share your faith and religious knowledge. Be an example of moral decency. Call out unacceptable behavior, and constructively redirect it. Avoid violent movies and television shows. Support wholesome entertainment and family activities. Spend memorable time with your kids and grandchildren. Involve them with your extended family and friends. Join a church group. Sing songs. Play board games. Eat ice cream together. Make time for children; and most of all, have faith and be a living example of the joy of living and giving to others.

There is a story about a man seeking sobriety from alcohol.  He began to regularly attend meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous.  He immersed himself into its program of recovery by finding a good sponsor.  He faithfully read the Big Book and applied the principles of the Twelve Steps to his life.  He achieved long-term sobriety but was not happy.  He told his sponsor.  His sponsor explained that it was not his purpose to be happy.  Rather, he told him, your purpose is to help others achieve happiness.  Go out and help others find their happiness by being of service.  Doing so may not have any immediate or noticeable effects curbing the unspeakable violence of the new killing fields, but it might be a small step in beginning to reverse decades of mounting separation from our fellow humans.  Merry Christmas.

 

Russell Moker is a retired lawyer and amateur political scientist.  He resides in Sedona, AZ with his family and is active in various non-profit groups including Catholic Education Arizona, Arizona Special Olympics, The Society of St. Vincent de Paul.  He also sits on the board for St. Joseph’s Catholic School in Cottonwood, AZ.

Photo credit: INABA Tomoaki (Creative Commons)

“Can We Still Be Friends?”

Republican Democrat SC Can We Still Be Friends?

The victorious liberals want to let bygones be bygones.  They urge the GOP to work cooperatively for the good the country. Democrats are genuinely perplexed by our disenchantment and fear about the future.  Some young lefties think we hate black people.  How else could their immature minds rationalize our disdain and distrust for this, the most opaque executive in the history of our country? Perhaps they are feeling the effects of the peace and love hangover of their parents’ and grandparents’ Woodstock ideals.  Government as the provider of the rule of law is oppressive.  Government that provides “free” services is essential.  They wonder what all the fuss is about.

I confess that I am a Facebook junkie.  I regularly spend too much time there reading the entertaining variety of useless speak and humorous pokes.  I have nearly 300 “friends”, most of whom are mere acquaintances who I would likely never socialize with in real time.  There are a handful of fellow Facebookers who are indeed good and genuine friends, some quite closely so and others a bit more distant.  Many of the latter are former high school classmates, including some who I knew well back then along with a smattering of younger and older alumni who I have become closer to as a result of that social network.  Some are liberal.  Most are conservative.  Before the election, I estimated that about 25 of my Facebook friends would likely vote for BHO with the remainder supporting Mittney.

During the firestorm of rhetoric that preceded the election, I found it increasingly challenging to withstand the ignorant and irrational mutterings from the left as much as they found equal difficulty in reading my conservative rants.   While I did not unfriend anyone, I was moved to block the irritating blasts of a few.  I wonder if they did the same to mine, even though I avoid personal attacks and aspersions.

After the election, I am pleased to report that there was not an overabundance of gloating and “I told you so”, but a quote attributed to Thomas Jefferson appeared multiple times that said: “I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend.”   I suppose that means Mr. Jefferson, unlike myself,  would not even block posts from his Facebook friends, let alone unfriend them.

The dictionary tells me that a friend is defined thusly:

1. A person whom one knows, likes, and trusts.

2. A person whom one knows; an acquaintance.

3. A person with whom one is allied in a struggle or cause; a comrade.

4. One who supports, sympathizes with, or patronizes a group, cause, or movement:

Despite the elucidate wisdom of one of our founders, it’s patently apparent that three of the four definitive options above pertain to trust, cooperative agreement, and unity.  An acquaintance is only loosely related to being a friend, a precursor to identifying the common beliefs and values that foster trust and a united front.  So, while I may agree in principle with TJ’s declaration of friendship, my only authentic and literal friends are necessarily those who I like, trust, mutally support, and are allied with my beliefs and values.  That being said, I am sorry to say that all the others are mere acquaintances or the least of friends.  Sounds harsh and insensitive, even flippant I know.  But I am prepared to be regarded in the same manner by those with whom I fall short of meeting their causes and struggles.  That’s the true nature of friendship.  After all, there is but a fine line of divide between bare friendship and enmity.

Perhaps this kind of evaluation of friendship is what causes the divisiveness across the aisles on East Capitol Street.  Maybe the Democrats really believe in a looser definition of friendship.  That would explain their inability to comprehend the right’s frustration and perceived obstinance.  It’s akin to a rerun of the Summer of Love’s generation gap.  We are miles apart in our perception of the world and its future.  Little was accomplished then to assuage that chasm, which causes me to contemplate whether much can be done now to exceed that less than stellar margin.  And it’s growing wider and deeper, garnering an even greater unlikelihood that it can ever be narrowed, let alone completely filled in.

I am instructed by my Lord to love my enemies, but I am also told to shake the dust of my sandals when I leave anyone who will not listen to the truth.  So, to my acquaintances with whom I share little in the way of things political, social, and economic,  I love you, even though we do not agree about most things.  If I block your Facebook posts, I understand if you shake your shoes off and leave because I was merely doing the same.

I am mindful that I am ignoring that time-tested fill dirt for the holes of division – compromise.  But that’s a whole ‘nother topic for another time.

Photo credit: DonkeyHotey (Creative Commons)

 

Strangers In A Strange Land

Obama Biden Fantasy Island Strangers in A Strange Land

When I first began to take an interest in things political as a  high school civics student, I garnered a sort of paradoxical love of country juxtaposed against a expanding distrust of the Establishment of the time.  I was secretly astonished by the genius of our Founding Fathers and the balanced government structure they gave to us; but it was 1969, and I was getting caught up in the youth revolution and opening volleys of the culture war  that has since unknowingly and insidiously accomplished the very objectives I so naively and innocently embraced.  Unfortunately, it has taken nearly 45 years for me to see exactly what has happened and how it transpired.

If my parents’ was the Greatest Generation, mine was probably the most ignorant and altruistically naive.  We laughed at the likes of Senator McCarthy and his successors.  We thought them alarmist buffoons with an agenda for perpetual wealth and social oppression of those with less.  We viewed communism as something as likely to happen in America as a fairy tale.  Rules were to be broken, authority questioned at every opportunity.  We did what felt good and did it as frequently as we wanted.  We regarded most laws as inane, unnecessary, and unduly authoritative and oppressive expressions of the ruling class whose banks and stocks were the very bane of our existence.

Back then, I was part of a liberal minority with hopes and dreams of permanent change; yet, any legitimate or objectively measurable change seemed distant and unobtainable.  I, along with many of you, were not aware that it was already surreptitiously happening slowly, quietly, and insidiously below the surface of the mainstream social strata that I was gradually embracing as my early career was underway. As I became a working taxpayer and then a parent,  I noticed even less the subtle transformations our social and moral fabric was undergoing while I moved from left to center and ultimately to the right. Things just seemed to be progressing normally and steadily.  Our country never seemed in domestic danger.

Now I am part of the conservative minority, aging, becoming more irrelevant by the day as our land continues to implement the changes and transformations that have been in the works for a half a century or more.  Like a distant unseen aging relative, I am astonished by the wear and seeming grotesque change in the manner of things American.

I am a stranger in a strange land.  I live in a country where God is not welcome in our public schools.  Education about “safe” sex is preferred over abstinence.  Marriage between two people of the same sex will soon become as mainstream as the institution and sacrament heretofore limited to a man and a woman.  Welcoming diversity is more important than unity and integration.  Patriotism is old-fashioned and barely hanging on by the weakly-sung verses of “God Bless America”  in the middle of the seventh inning at many major league baseball games.  The Pledge of Allegiance is essentially dead, irrelevant and ignored because of its proclamation that we are “one nation, under God.”   Atheism is the new religion of America as God is edged out no longer by ACLU lawsuits alone but by social and familial customs and practices. Business success and profits have become unpopular signs of greed, selfishness, and injustice.  Even our coins look and sound like the play money of my youth.

Political and social correctness is king.  Girls can do whatever boys can, but the reverse is not entirely true as 18 year old males continue to be obligated to register for the Selective Service.  What the media says about  potential leaders and their transgressions is more important than their ability and willingness to lead.  How ironic given the attitude of relativity that seems to apply collectively to the individuals who make up the American citizenry.  The winner of American Idol is as significant to so many as a successful candidate for the presidency because both exude coolness and hip (hop) relevance.

In the words of Michael Voris, host of ChurchMilitant.TV, “. . . the Culture War is lost. Let’s face it. Plain and simple. It’s over.”  Homosexuals and their gende- confused allies have been given preferential and protected class status, a first in American law.  Freedom of religion is on its deathbed, and separation of church and state is as good as if it were constitutionally mandated.  Our right to bear arms is under siege and will come under successful attack as higher priorities on the liberal agenda are checked off and accomplished.  Like a surrealistic Wonderland, we’ve become a nation of contradictions, uncommon sense, and non-sequitur economics.  Alice’s succinct summation that ” It would be so nice if something would make sense for a change” is more than prophetic.  It’s just simply true.

Why Did He Win?

President Obama face WH photo SC Why Did He Win?

Two days following the election, I rejoined a men’s Bible study at the parish church I attend.  One of the other members is an interesting fellow I’ve known for many years.  We both have law degrees, so I suppose our sense of camaraderie flows at least in part from the way we think about things.  After we finished our discussion of this week’s Sunday scripture readings, he asked me a provocative question.  During our closing prayers and petitions, I mentioned the hardships and losses of those still suffering from the aftermath of Superstorm Sandy who are, as I am writing this, under another weather siege popularly referred to as a nor’easter.  Many are still without heat or power, and the losses are almost incalculable.

The question my friend asked me was why did I think BHO won?  Given my expression of great disappointment and emotional upset during our meeting, I knew he was not asking this from a political perspective.  Rather, he was inquiring about a supernatural or spiritual perception.  Naturally, I paused for an instant, somewhat astounded by the astute nature of his interrogatory.

I told him about a liberal acquaintance on Facebook who prayerfully asked on Election Day that God’s will be done and that He select the best candidate as our president for the next four years.  I responded to her post by pointing out that it was not God’s will that would be expressed after the last vote was counted.  Rather, I opined that the selection of the president would be an expression of the free will of those who cast their ballots either way.  She thanked me for my opinion and stated that she hadn’t really thought about it in those terms.

It was not God’s will that the master of opaqueness was awarded another four-year term.  That resulted from slightly more than fifty percent of those who voted and happened to be in the right states that tipped the electoral college in his direction.  His take of ballot casters constituted just under three million more popular votes than Mr. Romney received. God’s hand was no more in the results of this election than it is when a psychopath enters a crowded movie theater armed to hilt and mows down scores of innocent film buffs.  Sometimes circumstances collide in unexpected ways that result in a bloody massacre or, in the case of last Tuesday’s election, a horrid ending that has many, including myself, gravely concerned for the well being of this once great nation.  For the first time ever, I use the adjective “once” to describe the state of our country.

As we left our meeting room, I continued to express my perception in an effort to provide some sort of answer to the question he initially posed.  I want the reader to understand that I am not a far-right religious fanatic.  Most Catholics are not, at least not the ones I know.  Nevertheless, I told my friend that I think he won for a variety of reasons, some objective and some less so, the latter being steeped in questions of faith and personal beliefs.  I mentioned the shredding of our moral fabric and the relativity of right and wrong that currently permeates our families, schools, and other public institutions along with new generations of citizens who expect something from others instead of deciphering what they might have to offer.

I thanked my friend for presenting his thought-provoking question and told him I was going to use it as a topic for my next article.  Having given it additional thought and analysis, it is too easy to say that the people have spoken and leave it at that.  There is much more to the story, as renowned radio commentator Paul Harvey used to remind us on a daily basis so many years ago.

From my perspective, the rest of the story can be summed up in two words – social evolution.  I do not use evolution in the sense of positive adaptation to natural changes because the circumstances that have caused us to evolve socially and politically are not natural.  Rather, they are the results of carefully orchestrated attacks and intrusions on what the offense has viewed an antiquated or inconvenient.   We all know the party lines.  I know I do as a reformed liberal myself.  They are the slogans and familiar vernacular expressed in time-worn phrases like “do your own thing” or “whatever.”

The attitude that pervades so many quite simply stems from the unabashed shunning of authority and accountability. If someone engages in activities or behaviors that allegedly do not hurt someone else, we are told (and even I have said), no one has the right to tell that person to refrain.   What so many fail to consider is that adherence to the rule of law does not stem from the right of someone else to judge and correct another’s actions.  Instead, it flows from our implied or expressed conviction to respect ourselves and each other.  Whether you like the Golden Rule’s succinct summation or you prefer more elaborate exhortations from religious books, it does not matter.  What matters is an acknowledgment that we are responsible for ourselves and for each other.

This begs the question “what role does the government play?”  Once upon an ancient time, the principles of organized government stemming from Aristotle to Rousseau taught us the simple premise that we need one another and as such are responsible for creating good political communities.  Aristotle told us:

Since we see that every city-state is a sort of community and that every community is established for the sake of some good (for everyone does everything for the sake of what they believe to be good), it is clear that every community aims at some good, and the community which has the most authority of all and includes all the others aims highest, that is, at the good with the most authority. This is what is called the city-state or political community.

I cannot fault the liberal left for believing that their current body politic is firmly engaged in accomplishing “some good”.  The standoff between us flows from what good we believe our government should be creating.  When the notion of goodness become relative instead of absolute, the delegation of authority to anyone is convoluted and ambiguous.

So why did he win? Why does it matter anyway save for those in the GOP who are already casting dreams towards 2016.  I’m not certain even God knows why, but I suspect it has something to do with the brilliant human characteristic He bestowed upon us that we call free will.   In the words of that great philosopher/singer from the Greatest Generation, “what will be will be.”

 

Strange Bedfellows

Chris Christie SC 1024x781 Strange Bedfellows

It’s bad science to play politics in the midst of a disaster.  In a moment of emotional, nonpartisan fog, Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey sent sticky, sweet accolades to BHO for responding so quickly with disaster relief in the Garden State.  BHO in his omnipresent arrogance responded by saying it was true that “we” were prepared and responded so quickly. In lieu of a simple “thank you” or acknowledgement of “It’s my job”, the President seemed unable to resist yet another opportunity for arrogant self-affirmation.  The Governor proclaimed he doesn’t “give a lick” about the upcoming election.  He went on to state that the election only matters to the people on the ballot.

While I can understand how an event of the magnitude of a superstorm could move people to re-structure their priorities, contrary to the Governor of New Jersey, the upcoming election matters to many more than just the candidates. The whole exchange between the two played out like a scene from a soupy soap opera where archenemies finally realize the futility of their evil ways and become lifelong friends from that moment forward.  The press has been quick to heap accolades upon BHO for taking time from his busy campaign schedule to make a personal appearance along side the behemoth Chris Chirstie, as if even an incumbent president would be stupid enough to catch a flight to a battleground state in the face of a regional disaster.

Call me old-fashioned, but I’m not one who expects praise and glory for doing my job.  Conversely, I fully expect to be castigated for failing to fulfill my duties and obligations. The same scale of excellence and failure applies to anyone who is under one’s charge to perform things properly and correctly.  The supervisor might not get all the approval and admiration for a job well done, but he sure as hell will catch hell for not keeping a fire beneath the underling to do his job right.

We should all be very happy and generally relieved that those stricken by Sandy on the eastern seaboard are getting the help they so deserve and need. If we can’t rely upon an overgrown, bloated albeit bankrupt government for disaster relief, then what good are its food stamps?  However, praising BHO and his minions for acting swiftly and preparedly under the circumstances is akin to congratulating the fire department for showing up at a residential blaze. Essential services are one of the hallmarks that justify organized government along with maintaining law and order.  The key word is essential, and therein lies the rub between the entitled and the self- sufficient.

There is no more opportune moment for nonpartisan politics than a major disaster or act of war like 9/11.  People should put aside their differences, work together, and help each other to overcome destruction and devastation.  It is human nature for us to disregard the differences that ordinarily divide us when anyone needs emergency assistance.  When someone’s life is in danger or they are suffering from a serious injury or wound, we instinctively step into action.  We do so ostensibly because we are human and not because of the office we hold or the title that precedes or follows our name.

The recent exchange of niceties between the president and the governor (who is not his opponent) are illustrative of nothing politically significant save for a moment of apolitical neutrality.  Despite the acclamation of Charles Dickens that  “It is a melancholy truth that even great men have their poor relations”, I presume the opposite might be true.  I’m not a great fan of the large man who governs New Jersey.  I find him sanctimonious and trite even in the face of his presumed directness and candor. My view of Mr. Obama is likewise not favorable. A half an hour spent in conversation with either of these self-aggrandizing politicians would be enough to make even the most patient counselor demand a much-needed timeout. Humility is not a character note that comes to mind when either Obama or Christie is mentioned.

So what was the point of the pleasantries?  I don’t know.  Perhaps it was nothing more than how two people act when one needs help and another provides it.  Or maybe it was a fleeting, legitimate, altruistic vision of unity. I’m skeptical of either supposition.  I opine that Mr. O jumped on this opportunity like a grizzly on a salmon headed upstream. He desperately needed something to happen this late in the race.

But what about The Big Guy from Jersey?  Maybe he seized the moment to reinforce his call for bipartisan bargaining or as an opportunity to reschedule Halloween via executive order.

With less than a week before the election, this act of God may have served the President well.  Governor Christie may have waxed prophetic when he uttered the following as part of his keynote address just a couple of months ago: “Our leaders today have decided it is more important to be popular, to do what is easy and say ‘yes,’ rather than to say ‘no’ when ‘no’ is what’s required.”

No one would argue that Mr. Obama’s “yes” to New Jersey’s need for disaster relief was both right, easy, and unavoidably popular.  Not even the self-assured Mr. Christie could have foreseen the circumstances wherein his assailment of the incumbent would so readily prove true in an ironic sort of way.

Will Obama Strike?

Barack Obama Phone SC Will Obama Strike?

As we taxi toward election Day, I’ve been hearing some pundits and prognosticators suggest the possibility that BHO may launch a retaliatory military operation against those responsible for the Benghazi massacre. The obvious reason would be an attempt to garner some twelfth hour support from undecided voters who would view him with greater deference and leadership. Personally, I don’t think he will do anything of the sort because he has more to lose than gain.

It’s no secret that the biggest concern on the mind of most Americans is the current state of the economy and not another al Qaeda strike. Voters understand that you cannot hit one out of the park and win the game when you’re already too many runs behind. We also understand that there will be another game at another time in another place. That time will eventually come when Governor Romney becomes President Romney.

I was not particularly impressed by the foreign policy debate a few nights ago. Bill Maher (whom I generally despise) quipped that he has seen greater ideological differences between Jehovah Witnesses. I took away more than a seeming alignment between the candidates on matters international.

Mittney may lack hands-on experience with international political affairs save for his extensive business dealings. However, like another Republican former governor-turned-president, Mr. Romney has enough leadership wisdom to not tip his hand during a pre-election debate with the incumbent. Instead, he elegantly succeeded in presenting himself with an authentic sense of moderation and diplomacy. In short, he was presidential in appearance and demeanor.

When the Governor becomes our next president, he will surround himself with the best military and foreign affairs experts available. He will lead with confidence and appropriate assertiveness without apologies or appeasement. His administration, unlike the current one, will be prepared to respond swiftly and definitively to any international aggression against the United States and its territories. He is not likely to take any new offensive military actions because at least one of those is still lingering in Afghanistan.

If BHO were to strike this late in the game, it would be seen for what it is – a last-ditch effort to flex already atrophied military might intended to improve his image as an international weakling. There are some who believe such a strike could precede an ulterior motive to ultimately declare a state of Martial Law in order to justify the cancellation of the upcoming election.

While I regard myself as an arch conservative, I believe that declaring a national state of emergency is highly implausible because it would lead to widespread civil unrest if not outright civil war. I do however acknowledge at least the possibility of the imposition of military rule if BHO is granted another four year pass to the White House. Doing so would be a logical result of four more years of social and economic destruction brought about by continuing BHO’s current policies.

BHO is a narcissistic political animal well versed in the politics of Marx entwined with a personal vision of a new world order. He perceives himself more as a world leader than the leader of the world’s greatest republic. He wants to level the playing field (his words, not mine) for more than just the middle class. He would like to see a United Nations of Earth that includes as many countries as possible while equalizing the exploitation of our planet‘s resources.

Some will disagree that Barack Hussein Obama is a dangerous man. They see him as a well-intentioned, altruistic leader who sincerely wants the greatest good for the highest number of people. The question we should be asking ourselves is: how encompassing is his vision of a constituency?

I for one surmise that he does not limit his dream to the citizens of this country. Rather, he envisions the citizens of the world in the long run because his upbringing is rooted in international cultures. We are all products of our childhood experiences. He is unquestionably an internationalist first and an American second. Even though it has not been unequivocally established that he has at least dual citizenship, circumstantially he is a citizen of multiple countries and cultures. He spent a significant amount of his childhood in Indonesia. Is he Christian or Muslim? He proclaims the former while sympathizing with the latter.

No other president has ever proclaimed the Islamic morning call to prayer “one of the prettiest sounds on earth.” During an interview as candidate Obama, he may have slipped when he stated that “John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith,” but he did not correct this awkward moment until the interviewer did. People ordinarily do not commit such a faux pas unless the subject is firmly ingrained within.

It is not just BHO who envisions himself as a world leader. In a recent “worldwide” poll taken in 21 countries, Obama is overwhelmingly the preferred candidate above Mr. Romney. France was the top country with 72%, indicating they are pro-Obama, giving credence to the widely-held perception of many American voters that the current president favors a Euro-ization of the United States. His support is also very high in Australia, Kenya, Nigeria, and Canada.

If the best predictor of future action is past behavior, there is little basis for taking a chance that BHO’s chronic policies will change one iota. He has not indicated in any public forum that he intends to change anything. Rather, his new slogan is “Forward”, indicating full speed ahead with no change in course. The only change we can all count on is the eventual decimation of the United States of America as we know it.

Las Vegas Odds Maker Picks Mittney

 mittromney purepencil portraits 796x1024 Las Vegas Odds Maker Picks Mittney

I was listening to “The O’Reilly Factor” in my car while running errands a few days ago.  When I heard that he was going to talk with Las Vegas odds maker Wayne Allyn Root about the probability of the upcoming election, I turned up my radio.

“I’ve been saying since May,” Root said , “that Romney will win in a landslide. It will be a 5 to 7 point popular vote and 100 electoral vote victory for Mitt Romney.”

For what it’s worth, Mr. Root correctly predicted BHO’s imminent victory in 2008.  With an impending sense of deep regret and disappointment, I also knew in my heart of hearts that he would win back then; and I know with equal conviction and certainty that he will not be re-elected on November 6th.  Here’s why.

Las Vegas gambling establishments do not establish favorable odds for bets they may even remotely lose.  Theirs is a policy of stacking the odds in favor of the house. They do NOT base their determinations on mere gut feelings or instinct.  They watch and listen to people, and they look at the statistical facts.  When athletic contests are involved, the primary factor they look to is past performance. They also fundamentally rely on good old common sense.

In addition to setting the odds on bets in Las Vegas, Wayne Allyn Root is an outspoken former Libertarian and former Vice Presidential candidate for his party.  I guess I’ve been under a rock because before hearing him on the radio, I was not familiar with Mr. Root or his work. I’m glad I do now because I’m not alone in my perception about the upcoming election.  He has his own website known as Root For America, which promotes him as an all around political and financial star.

As he aptly points out, most  political predictions are made by biased pollsters, pundits, or prognosticators who are either rooting for Republicans or Democrats.  Mr. Root is none of these.  He calls ‘em like he sees ‘em. He plans on voting for Mr. Romney as well.

As I noted in my article entitled “Call It A Correction or A Gift:  It’s Coming”, all the polls fail to consider one simple factor – common sense.  I opined that the quiet and unpretentious voters across middle America will slam BHO to the ground while delivering a popular mandate to the Governor.

Mr. Root clarifies this point further with uncanny simplicity:

Not one American who voted for McCain 4 years ago will switch to Obama. Not one in all the land. But many millions of people who voted for an unknown Obama 4 years ago are angry, disillusioned, turned off, or scared about the future. Voters know Obama now – and that is a bad harbinger.

Mr. Root also aptly notes that BHO will likely lose a significant number of black votes due to his stance on same-sex marriage and general disillusionment among that voting block as well.

Another sage profession I admire and listen to are barbers and hairdressers.  If you want a dose of common sense and logic, listen to what they say.  They deal with a broad segment of society day in and day out.  They hear what people think about our government and political system.  Customers unwittingly express their values and beliefs in the course of their seemingly general conversations. Chances are your barber or beautician knows more about you than many people in your life because you are relaxed but confined to a chair while you engage in small talk as the appearance of your coif is improved.

I took my son for a haircut this afternoon and got a little trim myself.  I’ve been visiting the same barber in the small town where I live for nearly 25 years now.  He’s a bit older than I, conservative and a Mittney supporter.  He owns his shop with his wife, who is a typical talkative but very observant hairdresser.  She’s closer to my age and has supported the Governor well before he received his party’s nomination,  when I was still pinning my hopes on the likes of Herman, Rick, and Newt.  According to the barber and hairdresser polls, Mittney will win, and he will do so for the same reasons enumerated above; to wit, people are generally fed up and tired of nearly four years of failed/non-existent policies and economic demise.

I have faith in the American voting public even in the face of the popular adage that common sense is very uncommon.  That may be true with respect to excessive red tape and unnecessarily complicated means to accomplish an eventual end.  But when it comes to its citizens choosing their leader for the next four years, America has a long history of making the right choice at the right time.  Those who voted for BHO in 2008 thought they had a candidate who would fulfill his hope and change rhetoric.  Instead, we got a president who has instilled fear and worry among the populace.

If you have watched any of the three debates between the candidates, it is painfully obvious that BHO has not only failed to explain what his administration has alledgedly accomplished, but he has not told America what he is planning to do for another term if he is re-elected.   His television ads proclaim “We’re not there yet, but we’ve made real progress. And the last thing we should do is turn back now.”  In light of that proclamation, one can only reasonably assume he intends to do nothing new or different save for promoting the same policies (or lack thereof) that he has promulgated these four years past.

The only thing that has progressed during this President’s watch is the amount of the national debt.  Seriously, what progress could he possibly be referring to? Contrary to BHO’s assertion, the first thing President Romney should and will do is to make a u-turn in an effort to undo the catastrophe called the Obama Administration.  If not a u-turn, Mittney will at least make the right turn that is necessary to restore this great nation of ours back to a place of domestic tranquility and international leadership.

Call It A Gift Or A Correction: It’s Coming!

Obama Whats The Problem SC1 Call It A Gift or A Correction: Its Coming!

It could be my age or my deepening conservatism, but the first Tuesday of next month is more important this year than reaching legitimate senior status when I turned sixty last March. In fact, I haven’t felt this excited about an election since I was a kid looking forward to Christmas morning.

The gift I am hoping and praying for this year will be presented by the American electorate. I am counting on them to deliver just like Santa did in the days of old. Excluding myself, I believe there are enough voters across America in the right places who don’t have the uncontrollable urge to speak out publicly or express their opinions about a lot of things, least of all matters political in nature.  These are quiet, private men and women who see no value in making known their personal political or religious beliefs. They go about their daily business and toil without shooting off their mouths like I do. They exercise great restraint of the tongue and rarely express themselves beyond a friendly greeting or engaging in conversations about news, weather, and sports. They may gladly offer advice if you ask for it, but they’re not likely to volunteer it. I admire that.  On the internet, these quiet observers are known as lurkers.  They watch in silence, and they don’t participate in election polls.

There are millions of such citizens. They are scattered throughout heartland of America in places like Kansas, Montana, Iowa, or the Dakotas and in countless small, quiet towns that speckle our national map. They are hard-working, God-fearing, patriotic Americans who love this country and recognize the disarray and chaos that occupies the White House. They’re not buying it anymore, and they will let that be known on November 6, 2012.

Clichés like stereotypes become broadly known and repeated because they have some elements of truth to them. The tall, lanky Illinois lawyer who became the sixteenth executive to live and work at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue uttered many common sense phrases but none more prophetic as “You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.”

The third and final segment of this often-overused quote sums up with elegant simplicity why BHO will be removed from the Office of the President by a significant majority of popular and electoral votes. The fraud who now calls himself Barack Hussien Obama succeeded in accomplishing what Mr. Lincoln acknowledged possible by misleading and fooling hoards of loyal followers for nearly half a decade, but that is about to come to a glorious and welcome end.

You can take all the proclaimed scientific polls and throw them out the window. There are simply too many variables and uncontrollable circumstances to make any sample realistic or reliable. Even the most current surveys that show Mitt Romney only slightly ahead of BHO are incorrect. The only poll that counts will happen in just a couple of weeks. On that day, Americans who do not call themselves either liberal or conservative will decide who will be our next president, and his initials are not BHO.

Four years ago, that same block of commonsense voters thought it was time for a black president. He projected enough sincerity and ideals, and sufficient numbers bought his story while concurrently disregarding his inexperience, murky past, and questionable association with a bevy of unsavory characters. Despite the blind allegiance of certain minorities and vocal opposition from the hard right, this decisive segment of voters thought it reasonable to give this unknown a chance to prove himself.  They now recognize that he has woefully fallen short of what they expected he might be capable of doing. They gave him the benefit of the doubt which has, for the past four years, evolved into unquestionable failure; and they are well aware of it.

The people who decide the major political contests in this country are not unlike the droves of individuals and investment houses that drive the stock market. It’s really not very different.  There are huge numbers of professionals who make their entire living expending countless hours analyzing past trends while attempting to predict future performance. They are rarely able to either project or explain sudden ups or downs in security prices except to dismissively designate them as market corrections.  Such so-called corrections are a result of an enigmatic combination of fight or flight emotions sprinkled with a self-serving dash of common sense.

A correction usually comes about when both buyers and sellers realize that there has been some artificial force at play that is most typically continuing to drive prices up. No one knows the point where genuine value ends and inflation begins, but there is some unspoken understanding that price increases cannot continue upwardly at a constant rate without any logical financial basis for doing so; hence the connotation that a certain stock is deemed overvalued. Simply put, it is not worth what people are paying for it and when potential buyers or present owners realize that, there is often a whole sale sell off in order to free one’s self from continuing to hold something that no longer has the value it once had.  The desire to free one’s self from a particular security is also steeped in the certain expectation that there will ultimately and eventually be an equally impressive decline in value as widespread divestment occurs.

It is time for a political correction in America. Just like investors, many voters speculated that BHO would be good for this country but they now realize he has become grossly overvalued. They initially valued his promise of hope and change as a reasonable offer for correcting all that was supposedly wrong with the U.S.A. four years ago when this unknown, young black senator from Illinois suddenly appeared on the scene.  Not unlike an initial public offering for a newly minted corporate stock, there is a lot of excitement and anticipation on the front end but unless the hype meets performance its value will plummet often significantly beneath the original asking prices as demand dissipates.

The need for change was not something BHO had to extoll to the American people back then. They were already weighing the virtues of  change on the heels of eight years of President Bush, preceded by four years of executive residence by his father before President Clinton’s two terms. There was also not a meeting of the minds between candidate BHO and the American public. His concept of change has proven to be something completely different from that envisioned by a significant number of his former supporters.  The balance of his support is from his pop star, minority infused persona that he has so successfully capitalized upon.

Like the one term allotted to George H.W. by the electorate, along with eight other presidents before him, BHO will soon join that non-elite club of U.S. executives who spent only four years in the oval office. Each time this has happened in American history, there has been a glaringly obvious and widespread unrest and dissatisfaction among the electorate at large concerning one looming issue or the incumbent was not eligible to serve another term.  BHO is of course facing the former with his failed and non-existent domestic and foreign policies.

In 1980 when Jimmy Carter was denied a second term in favor of Ronald Reagan it was also unsuccessful economic and international policies. Voters rejected a foreign policy of appeasement and weak diplomacy. Anyone with an inkling of common sense understands that you cannot spend more than you take in. Similarly they recognize that placating and appeasing our avowed enemies without limitation or consequences is a dismal failure. These same people are willing to accept a certain degree of big (federal) government under the right circumstances like Medicare or Social Security but they will not tolerate or accept an unfettered incursion on their freedoms or beliefs.

Gerald Ford might have defeated Carter’s bid if not for the political reality that the populace was still fed up with the Republican party and the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration. President Ford was also an anomaly because he rose to the highest office in the land by appointment and Senate confirmation following the disgrace ridden resignation of former Vice President Spiro Agnew. Gerald Ford became the first, (and so far, the only), individual to be President who was not elected to either the presidency or the vice presidency. He was never selected by the very electorate who later denied him the privilege of remaining in office. He was also the reluctant candidate and America knew it.

BHO is a goner. He will be resoundingly defeated on the first Tuesday of next month which will surprise a lot of people. Those who will not be surprised like political author, former advisor and campaign director to President Clinton, Dick Morris understand why and how this will happen. Despite his less than stellar record of predicting election outcomes, he was among the earliest to publicly state that BHO would not serve a second term. His reasoning is not entirely the same as mine but  a lot of time and events have transpired since that March 2011 prediction including the appearance and growing popularity of candidate Romney.  Although a lot of recent unpopular press is being filtered by the selective liberal media, enough is getting through to those who will consider it as part of their presidential preference.

We humans are basically pretty simple creatures.  We just don’t like to admit it. We often sit in the same place in public and private places. We follow the same routes of travel to our regular destinations. We like routine and regularity. We prefer predictability in lieu of surprises and the unknown. When we don’t have to expend time or energy on daily mundane tasks, our lives are easier and less stressful. It goes without saying that the BHO administration has caused interminable stress in the form of partisan politics and orchestrated divisiveness. His legacy will be class warfare and the revival of racial tension in America.  The Office of President should not be fraught with so much tension and controversy concerning the execution of its duties and privileges.   The voting public has however expressed its tolerance of personal misbehavior and sexual shenanigans so long as the person in office is minding the store and still getting the job done.  Conversely, Americans don’t care much for anyone who can’t perform the duties they were selected to execute regardless of how hip, slick and cool they appear to be.

The human characteristics of routine and rational discernment make up the moderate middle of the American electorate. Although they will readily give an underdog a chance, they also promptly recognize ineptitude and incompetence as easily as raindrops on a kitchen window in the face of sunshine. They cannot and will not ignore the obvious. Whether you call them swing voters or independents, they have too much common sense coupled with a simple understanding of how things are supposed to work to ignore the obvious.  They’re not stupid or lazy.  Fortunately for those among us who do not miss an opportunity to communicate our pointless opinions and expressions of disgust or outrage, this quiet majority is in control and will do what needs to be done just as sure as they would close an open front door on a cold and frosty night.

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

The Teflon President

Barack Obama speech 9 SC The Teflon President

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is a synthetic fluoropolymer of tetrafluoroethylene that has numerous applications. It’s best known by the brand name Teflon which is produced by DuPont. You probably own some non-stick cookware coated with it. If someone familiar with its properties thought it possible to apply to humans, Barack Hussein Obama would be the perfect example.

Since the day I first heard the name of this proclaimed rising star sometime before the 2008 elections, it was readily apparent that he had more of a celebrity pop status than that of a serious candidate. The adulation and adoration came well before the details or lack thereof were slowly and with measured cadence, released to the general public. He was anointed before he was elected and it is my belief that his meteoric elevation is the result of one thing and one thing alone – his race. I am well aware that I am not among even the earliest to have noted this.

If an alien visiting this planet for the first time was given a set of history books, ostensibly to learn about the social and political evolution of our world, and, having not lived through the subtleties of those changes, he would be confounded by where we now find ourselves. Without realizing it, we are where we started. Progress if any as it pertains to race relations in America has been circular rather than lineal.

The ultimate ideal of the Civil Rights movement and legislation of the 60’s was to attain racial equality primarily focusing on black Americans. (I loathe the moniker African-Americans because it instantly delineates a difference that is a significant source of racial separation.) If any distinction is needed, black and white work just fine. Light skinned people are not categorically known to as European-Americans supposedly because we recognize the broad brush limited scope of that title. The same should apply to our darker skin brothers and sisters.

While I cannot support it statistically, I venture to guess that there are more people known as white with European roots than there are blacks with a relatively recent traceable African heritage. There are certainly more European-Americans with fewer generations in the United States than true African-Americans. My grandparents on both sides immigrated to America in the early 1900′s but I rarely refer to myself as Italian-American or Slovak-American. Even the outmoded anthropological classifications of Caucasian and Negro bear greater logical and relevant application. Regardless, any of these adjectives are pointless save for perpetuating fragmentation and divisiveness among us.

This is particularly apparent in the rock star status of BHO. He is regularly referred to as our first African-American president. Ironically, he, more than most black Americans, actually has very recent, traceable African heritage. Despite his identifiable racial mix, as an American president, there is no justification for distinguishing it. He is never referred to as the first half-white executive, (at least not seriously), nor is he frequently known without some reference to his ethnicity. BHO’s racial background has served him well and has been the basis for ignoring everything negative or undisclosed about this man. Using the Teflon analogy, nothing sticks to him.

If I had not seen it with my own eyes, like the uninformed alien mentioned above, I would not believe it. I would not believe that so many rational, thinking human beings are so willing to accept an endless string of non-sequiturs and suppressed events without question or further inquiry. While I might not believe it, I understand why this has happened.

The paradox in race relations in America today is no more clearly illustrated than seeing throngs of white teens and twenty-somethings popularly embracing black culture in their dress, music and slang while completely ignoring all demonstrable negative aspects of the same. They readily accept misogynistic lyrics which they would (hopefully) otherwise reject especially those disrespecting or dishonoring either gender. I am hard pressed to think of anything positive about these aspects of recent black culture. It doesn’t matter though because it’s “cool” or whatever current buzz word is used to describe it. It’s all good.

The only other explanation I can fathom is that attitude of certain social segments that like to bandy about popular meaningless phrases like “don’t judge me”, “it’s all good”, or “whatever.” But that is not consistent with a typically inquisitive press that lives to find the dirt and deliver it in droves to a controversy hungry public. Whatever the reason, it is indeed regrettable that successful and truly integrated black individuals are mostly ignored or even dismissed as sell outs to our mainstream American culture especially among their own race.

Many Americans have a deep guilt about the historical plight of enslaved blacks. (Personally, I don’t share that guilt. My ancestors had their own bag of burdens to overcome ultimately and eventually resulting in full social and economic integration while preserving familial and Old Country traditions.) This guilt runs so deep that instead of working toward true equality and forgiveness, those who suffer from it have swung the pendulum beyond true middle to the other extreme. The failed experiment known as affirmative action best illustrates this contention.

One of my liberal leaning constitutional law professors explained the then embryonic program of affirmative action with this analogy: If you have a foot race and allowed one group to start before the other, you have to stop the first group so that those lagging behind have time to catch up in order for both groups to finish with an equal chance of victory. As a young, impressionable undergrad, this sounded logical, altruistic and a worthy cause. With four decades of application, we now know it is a dismal failure that has perpetuated the racial divide and reinforced social resentment in America. My 20th century immigrant ancestors didn’t have a head start!

Many Americans do not want equality for so called minorities. Instead they want preferred, elevated status. Affirmative action mandated a preferential legal class for racial minorities and recent federal legislation has accomplished the same for homosexuals and sex change operatives.

BHO enjoys popularity because of this inexplicable racial adoration but there’s even more to it than just that. As our national executive, he is in a class all by himself. The press is not impressed by an endless stream of facts that would have resulted in a public crucifixion of any other politician. Reams of sealed records. A blurry and vague childhood; questions surrounding his birthplace and his choice of religion. He has no significant political experience; no experience with business or economics. He has a well documented and indisputable history of deep connections with unsavory and hate filled individuals. Can you imagine this list of hot topics being passed over for any other politician?

But even Teflon loses its non-stick properties when the food you are cooking burns. That is what happened in last week’s debate between BHO and Mitt Romney. Millions of Americans watched intently as BHO was annihilated by Mittney’s flame thrower of preparedness and true cool.

Polytetrafluoroethylene is not permanent, even on pots and pans so when it comes to BHO, that is indeed fortunate for America. BHO’s non-stick coating is wearing off due to four years of constant overuse. It is wearing thin, not because of his race but in spite of it. People are listening to the facts and they are looking closely at a record of failed and non-existent policies.

Hope is not a policy. It is a virtue. But without the support of other virtues like faith, wisdom, prudence and truth, it is merely a hollow vice. Mittney’s recent assertion that BHO’s weak and appeasing foreign policy is a failure by stating that “hope is not a strategy” is correct. “Hope and Change” is merely a slogan and like all the others before it, they fade along with the people who coined them. Catchy phrases don’t govern, governors do.

Americans who want to see BHO fired on November 6th should not however rest easy. Along with racial guilt and popular acceptance of black culture, there are many among us who will still cast their lot for their messiah. So long as the heat on the burner continues to char BHO’s non-stick coating, more voters will realize the truth and reality of who he is – an inexperienced, incompetent and unaccomplished would be rock star whose politics are no more relevant to the very survival of this great nation than those of Mick Jagger’s. At least Mick knows how to rock and roll.