You are here: Home / Archives for Kris Zane

Were Saudis Behind Benghazi Attack?

March 28, 2013 by 29 Comments

The hacker known as Guccifer first came to prominence in February after breaching the AOL email account of Dorothy Bush Koch, the sister of George W. Bush. Guccifer released photos of Bush’s amateurish oil paintings and details regarding the ailing elder Bush. The mainstream media idiotically focused on Bush’s prowess as an artist rather than the fact that the public was being offered a glimpse into the secret world of the elite that pull the levers in American society and the world.

Guccifer’s real treasure, however, came in the form of a series of emails hacked from the AOL account of former Bill Clinton aide Sidney Blumenthal to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The emails are significant because there is one dated September 12, 2012, which of course was the day after the attack on the Benghazi consulate. Blumenthal cites a number of what can only be called spies throughout the world in order to supply Clinton with a clear picture of current events.

Some jaw-dropping revelations are revealed in the September 12 email, involving the Muslim Brotherhood and the CIA.

First, on the day of the attack on the Benghazi consulate, Libyan President  Mohammed Yussef el Magariaf summoned his advisors to discuss the attack, among them members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Per the email:

During the afternoon of September 11, 2012 new interim President of Libya Mohammed Yussef el Magariaf spoke in private with senior advisors, including the members of the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood, to discuss the attacks by demonstrators on U.S. missions in Tripoli and Benghazi.

Second, the attack on the Benghazi consulate was in part due to revenge for the CIA supporting the Qaddafi regime.

Third, when Qaddafi was overthrown, the rebels found a treasure trove of documents linking the CIA to the Qaddafi regime.

Again, continuing with the September 12, 2012 email:

At the same time, this individual noted that several of el Magariaf’s advisors share his concerns in this matter, pointing out that the return of Qaddafi’s intelligence chief Abdullah al-Senoussi for trial in Libya has heightened public interest in the liaison relationships conducted by the CIA and British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) with Qaddafi’s intelligence and security services. These same individuals note that they believe Islamist militia forces under the command of General Abdelhakim Belhaj captured files and documents describing this relationship from Qaddafi’s offices in Tripoli.

By February 13, 2013, Blumenthal had discounted the ludicrous “protest turned violent” story regarding the attack on the Benghazi consulate. It was clear according to his sources that it was a terrorist attack by the group Ansar al-Sharia, of which Hillary Clinton early on publicly stated was untrue, despite the al-Qaeda-linked group taking credit for the attack, and despite the fact that this information was sent to the White House Situation Room hours after the attack on the consulate.

According to Blumenthal’s February 16, 2013 email to Clinton, the Benghazi attack was well-planned and well-funded by Saudi billionaires:

The attack…originated with wealthy Sunni Islamists in Saudi Arabia. During July and August 2012 these financiers provided funds to AQIM [Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb] contacts in Southern Europe, who in turn passed the money onto AQIM operatives in Mauritania. These funds were eventually provided to Ansar al Sharia and its allied militias in the Benghazi region in support of their attack on the U.S. consulate.

Blumenthal’s email correlates with information revealed in the recently published book Benghazi: The Definitive Report, in which it is reported that the Benghazi attack was in retaliation for the CIA’s secret war—led by John Brennan, now CIA chief— against Ansar al-Sharia and other terrorist groups in North Africa.

The question becomes: if the CIA was backing Qaddafi, why then did NATO, with Obama at the helm, decide to topple the Qaddafi regime? Why is the Obama administration now backing the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya and Egypt? The answer may lie in the fact that Obama is largely aligned with globalists, and the Muslim Brotherhood’s stated goal is a global, totalitarian caliphate. Globalists tend to be uber-secularists, eschewing all forms of religion or morality, whereas the Muslim Brotherhood calls for a theocratic police state mandating strict adherence to morality through sharia. But as Jim Marrs points out in his extensively researched book The Rise of the Fourth Reich, the globalists often create artificial conflicts in order to make money and to further their goal of a totalitarian utopia.

Regardless, it is clear from Libyan President Magariaf’s close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood that the Obama administration decided to switch sides from Qaddafi to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Further, it is no secret that Obama called for the removal of long-time U.S. and Israel ally Egyptian President Hosni Muburak and is now backing Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi. Additionally, the Obama administration has extensive ties with Muslim Brotherhood front groups, including the so-called “outreach” groups CAIR and ISNA, both designated as unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation terrorist-funding trial—organizations that the Obama administration has admitted to having literally hundreds of meetings with.

Another Blumenthal email from March 13 of this year states that even though the Obama administration knew that Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi had instituted de facto martial law, the U.S. was still planning on providing up to one billion dollars in aid, along with supporting $4.5 billion from the IMF.

The Muslim Brotherhood is an organization that has vowed to destroy the United States, with the stated goal of subsuming the world under the thumb of a global, Islamic totalitarian government.

Why then are Obama and his rogue CIA chief John Brennan backing the Muslim Brotherhood?

A better question might be: Why has Congress not charged Obama and John Brennan with treason?

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports, Videos Tagged With: , , , ,

Muslim Brotherhood President

March 23, 2013 by 69 Comments

What if the President of the United States was aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood?

What if the President of the United States as far back as 2009, during the so-called “Cairo Speech” (where Obama tells us he was “reaching out to the Muslim world”) was setting the wheels in motion for the Arab Spring and the subsequent removal of long-time U.S. and Israel ally Hosni Mubarak from power? What if Obama was backing an organization and movement that calls for a global caliphate whereby the United States would exist under the thumb of an Islamic totalitarian government?

This is exactly what The Jerusalem Post columnist Caroline Glick argued in her piece “Obama’s Mysterious Visit” after Barack Obama made his first visit to Israel as President of the United States on March 19. Speaking of Obama’s 2009 “Cairo Speech,” her chillingly sentient piece says in part:

In contempt of Mubarak’s explicit wishes, Obama insisted on inviting members of the Muslim Brotherhood to attend his speech. In acting as he did, Obama signaled that under his leadership, the US was abandoning its support for Mubarak and transferring its sympathies to the Muslim Brotherhood.

…By addressing his remarks to the Muslim nation, Obama was perceived as openly rejecting Egyptian nationalism, and indeed the concept of unique national identities among the various Arab states. In so doing, Obama undercut the legitimacy of the Egyptian regime while legitimizing the pan-Islamic Muslim Brotherhood which rejects nationalism in favor of a call for the establishment of a global caliphate.

As subsequent events showed, the conditions for the Egyptian revolution that brought the Muslim Brotherhood to power were prepared during Obama’s speech at al-Azhar.

Is Barack Obama really aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood? Is Barack Obama in bed with an organization that has vowed our annihilation, to “destroy…Western civilization from within…”?

Shockingly, the answer is yes.

We all remember Doctor Benjamin Carson speaking at the National Prayer Breakfast, speaking truth to power about the destructive aspects of ObamaCare, an overreaching and intrusive government, and a government that constantly tramples on the Constitution.

One could almost feel the loathng that Obama experienced as he sat next to Doctor Carson, seeing the look of rage on his face.

Another invitee and speaker, Sayyid Syeed, founder of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a Muslim Brotherhood front group, was also not pleased.

This is the same Syeed who has vowed that ISNA’s primary job is to alter the Constitution.

Yes, the same ISNA that has been aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood since 1988, as a recently declassified FBI memo states.

Yes, the same ISNA that was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008/2009 Holy Land Foundation terrorist-funding trial.

Yes, the same ISNA where Valerie Jarrett was a keynote speaker at their annual convention in 2009.

Yes, the same ISNA where George Selim, the White House Director for Community Partnerships, has been an annual speaker at their conventions for years.

And as recently as March 8, Obama himself met with ISNA President Mohamed Magid along with other so-called “religious leaders” to discuss immigration reform.

And the Council on American-Islamic Relations—CAIR, a sister group to ISNA—also named in the Holy Land Foundation trial as an unindicted co-conspirator, has had literally hundreds of meetings with the Obama administration.

And these are just the meetings we know about.

Is Barack Obama aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood (or worse, is he a Muslim Brotherhood plant?)

Shockingly and unbelievably, the answer must be a resounding Yes.

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports, Videos Tagged With: , ,

Will Obama Seize Americans’ Savings?

March 22, 2013 by 47 Comments

Supposedly in order to stave off an “economic apocalypse”—reminiscent of the banshee Barack Obama’s recent sequestration road show—Cyprus called for a “tax”—that is, confiscation—of between six and ten percent of its citizens’ bank accounts.

Yesterday, they floated the idea of nationalizing—that is, confiscating—pensions.

Today, the European Union is pushing to “freeze”—that is confiscate— bank accounts of the “bad” banks—forget about six and ten percent; they’re talking about forty percent!

They use terms like “tax,” “freeze,” or “nationalize”; but the operative word here is “confiscation.”

Obama would call it “paying their fair share.”

Although “theft” would be the word most would use.

The whole fiasco matters little as far as Cyprus is concerned. We’re talking about the EU wanting to “freeze” $13 billion. America spends that much funding Obama’s endless golf outings.

But when Americans heard that the European Union could force a sovereign nation to confiscate private citizens’ bank accounts, there was a collective gasp. Our economy is intimately tied with the European Union; and in fact, Americans have largely funded the endless bailouts through our having to pony up funds for the IMF. So when it was heard that the EU could confiscate private citizens’ bank accounts or pensions, we knew they could do it to virtually any country in the EU—and in fact, many now are talking about a “tax” of 15% on Italians’ savings.  What country is next? Germany? The UK?

What about the United States?

Far fetched?

Not at all. Obama and his gaggle of leftists were actually floating the idea of nationalizing 401Ks and IRAs in 2010—and only were stopped in their tracks when they lost the House in the 2010 midterms.

Under the auspices of a “bailout” for Big Labor’s bankrupt pensions—the same Big Labor that has donated half a billion dollars  to Obama’s endless campaign—Democrats were planning on confiscating Americans’ retirement accounts and funneling the money to their Big Labor backers.  The cover was the creation of what they called a Guaranteed Retirement Account—GRA—another government takeover that dwarves ObamaCare’s takeover of the healthcare industry.

Is this something a radicalized Obama administration floated, then rejected, in 2010?

Not at all. Obama’s just doing it, as always, via a Trojan Horse. Called “Automatic IRAs,” Obama’s budget proposals for 2013 include a preliminary government takeover of Americans’ retirement accounts by mandating employers contribute a certain amount to their employees’ retirement.

Of course, this employer mandate sounds oddly similar to ObamaCare’s mandate to buy health insurance, which is nothing more than a Trojan Horse for single-payer—that is, socialized healthcare.

And the “Automatic IRA” will be a Trojan Horse for nationalizing retirement accounts.

But this is only the beginning. Barack Obama and his gaggle of leftists are out for the motherlode: full-blown socialism.

Behind the scenes, the Obama administration is waiting for the European Union to collapse; waiting for the U.S. stock market to crash; and, like a vulture waiting for his prey to die, waiting for the U.S. economy itself to collapse.

Enter George Soros,  dubbed “The Man Who Broke the Bank of England,” who funneled hundreds of millions of dollars out of the British economy with the collapse of the British pound and is now about to gut the European Union with the impending collapse of the Euro.

And now he’s out for blood when the U.S. stock market collapses.

The stock market in recent weeks has been at record levels. Many have predicted a stock market crash—losing up to 90% of its value—although those on the hard Left, especially our friend George Soros, won’t say it openly.

Soros, along with a gaggle of other banksters, have dumped most of their stock in the banking industry and are stockpiling a massive amount of gold.

And Obama and Soros have a secret that they’re keeping wraps on: If the stock market crashes, the economy itself will collapse.

Presto Chango!—or in Obama speak, “Change you can believe in!”

When the stock market and economy collapse, Obama—with Soros no doubt at the helm—will call for “nationalizing” Americans’ retirement accounts—“coincidentally” estimated to be close to the amount of the current national debt—$18 trillion—in order to, in Obama’s words, “Get our fiscal house in order.”

And if retirement accounts are “nationalized”—that is, stolen—why not nationalize everything—that is, why not have full blown Marxism?

Why not, indeed?

Of course, the American people won’t go willingly. Those who “cling to their guns and religion” will fight Barack Obama tooth and nail.

Is this why the Obama administration has been on the war path trying to gut the Second Amendment?

Is this why the Obama administration has stockpiled two billion rounds of ammunition?

Is this why the Obama administration has been stockpiling light armored tanks, preparing for a literal civil war on the streets of America?

A civil war in America?

You betcha!

When the manufactured “economic crisis” is over, Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America will be complete, with a Marxist utopia safely in place.

Is this all a wild conspiracy theory?

Perhaps. Perhaps not.

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports, Videos Tagged With: , ,

The Manchurian President

March 21, 2013 by 29 Comments

Conservatives are constantly bombarded with being referred to as conspiracy theorists: everything from a belief that Eric Holder was shipping guns to Mexican drug cartels in order to curtail the Second Amendment, to probably the most serious, if true, that Barack Hussein Obama is a foreign plant—that is, a Manchurian President.

The latter is the stuff of spy novels and Hollywood make-believe, not real life, right?

Perhaps. Perhaps not.

For those of us who did even a modicum of research prior to Obama’s election in 2008, we knew that his ties to radicals ran deep—not the obvious, like domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn or anti-Semites like Edward Said or Rashid Khalidi. But an extremely close relationship with such groups as the DSA—the Democratic Socialists of America—that lasted for years, if not decades.

In 1996, the DSA backed Obama for Illinois State Senate.

In 2000, the DSA continued to support Obama, this time when he was running for Congress.  In their endorsement, they mention Obama frequently attended socialist events, specifically naming a YDS (Young Democratic Socialist) event he attended in 1996.

Obama had been a dues-paying member of the DSA’s political party, the openly Marxist New Party. In fact, we know through New Party minutes the exact day Obama joined—January 11, 1996.

The New Party News, a publication of the New Party, in 1996 had identified Obama as a New Party member, along with Danny Davis, who at the time was a card-carrying member of the CPUSA, the U.S. branch of the Communist Party.

Obama, as reported in the socialist-linked journal Social Policy Winter 2003 edition, had trained the socialist front group ACORN’s activists for years. (This of course directly contradicted Obama’s lie in 2008 that the only contact he had with ACORN was as their attorney for the so-called “Motor Voter” lawsuit).

Obama more than likely also had contact with Marxist sociologists Francis Fox Piven and Richard Cloward.  With deep ties to ACORN, they advocated collapsing the American economy in order to usher in a socialist utopia.

Of course, Obama’s presidency is following what is called the Cloward-Piven plan to a tee—that is, creating a crisis where the welfare state, through an unsustainable debt, collapses the economy, creating an economic apocalypse whereby the central planners can then easily usher in a totalitarian Marxist state.

If Barack Obama is in fact a Marxist plant, then his actions since coming to power make complete sense.

Pushing for massive spending, creating a massive welfare state, pushing the national debt towards what many estimate is the economy’s tipping point—$20 trillion by the end of Obama’s second term.

Shoving socialized healthcare down the throat of America.

Calling for the disarming of the American public through a phony “assault weapons” ban.

Pushing for a “universal background check” to purchase guns, which is really nothing more than a Trojan horse for a national gun registry—something the communist Russian government did in October of 1918, six months before they confiscated all guns.

Amassing a staggering amount of ammunition, over two billion rounds by last count, most of it the hollow point, armor piercing variety (enough to kill every American man, woman, and child five times.)

Stockpiling thousands of light armored tanks to roam the streets of America.

Ordering a fleet of “public safety” drones, with the ability to vaporize an American citizen in the blink of an eye—expected to number in the tens of thousands by the end of Obama’s second term.

Taking George W. Bush’s Patriot Act to an unimaginable, Orwellian level, by building a one million square foot  mega-database facility, located in Bluffdale, Utah, to spy on Americans. The Utah Data Center will collect literally everything that is transmitted over wires, fiber optic cables, cell phone towers, and satellites: Landline and cell phone traffic. Email. Texting. Facebook posts. Tweets. Skype. Travel records.  Credit card transactions. Banking records. Stock market trades. Google searches. Your smartphone’s GPS will even beam your exact location to Big Brother Obama.

All without a warrant.

Is Barack Obama then a Marxist plant?

It would be a conspiracy theory not to think Obama is a Manchurian President.

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports, Videos Tagged With: , , , ,

Barack Obama’s Surveillance Society

March 19, 2013 by 8 Comments

After 9/11, Barack Obama and his leftist base were livid that George W. Bush under the Patriot Act was engaged in warrantless wiretapping of Americans’ phone calls and email. We all remember them foaming at the mouth, marching in the streets with their idiotic swastikas and photos of Bush as Hitler.

The Left, proclaiming Barack Obama lord and savior, are eerily quiet now that Obama has taken Bush’s Patriot Act to an unimaginable, Orwellian level.

Obama has embraced Total Information Awareness—TIA for short—which refers to the government’s ability to compile a massive, searchable database, comprised of every type of electronic communication and information imaginable. We’re not just talking about phone calls and emails anymore. Barry Obama has already been compiling literally billions of phone and email records since ascending the throne. Now he’s out for bigger fish.

In September, the National Security Agency will open a one million square foot mega-database facility, built by an army of ten thousand construction workers.  Located in Bluffdale, Utah—an area known more for polygamists than Orwellian databases—the Utah Data Center will store information in the yottabytes. A yottabyte—10 with 24 zeros after it—makes a terabyte look like small potatoes. It will take 200 megawatts—enough to power 200,000 homes—to feed this behemoth and will use an air conditioning system larger than what was used for the World Trade Centers—combined. So much for “Green” energy.

What kind of data is Big Brother Obama gathering?

Landline and cell phone traffic. Email. Texting. Facebook posts. Tweets. Skype. Discussion boards. Web pages. Travel records.  Banking records. Credit card transactions. Stock market trades. Google searches. If it travels through wires or the air, you can bank on it that Big Brother Obama is routing it to the Utah Data Center. Your smart phone’s GPS will even beam your exact location so Big Brother Barack Obama will know whether you’ve joined one of those “domestic terrorist” groups like the Tea Party.

This massive database will be available to the FBI, CIA, the Department of Defense, and of course the White House, gorging Obama’s gaggle of leftist czars with private information on every single American.

The Fourth Amendment, protecting us against unreasonable search and seizure? Barry Obama can’t be bothered with little things like the Constitution.

But snooping on Americans electronically isn’t enough for Obama. He’s ordered a fleet of  “public safety” drones, estimated to reach 30,000, that are able to make sure all the conservative “domestic terrorists” are behaving themselves. All outfitted with the ability to intercept virtually any wireless electronic communication. All able to determine whether Americans are armed or not. All with the ability to vaporize American citizens in the blink of an eye.

Want a look into the future for conservative Americans, who don’t want to be a part of Obama’s Orwellian database?

In June of 2011, a rogue North Dakota sheriff out for blood against a family of government separatists trampled the nine-member Brossart family’s 3000 acre ranch supposedly looking for stolen cows. When the sheriff, Kelly Janke, demanded they give up the “stolen” cows, he was rebuffed. The Sheriff came back armed to the teeth, hoping for another Ruby Ridge massacre, bringing a SWAT team, a bomb squad, and an MQ-9 Predator drone, borrowed from the Border Patrol.

The eye in the sky determined the potential domestic terrorists weren’t armed, and the family was summarily arrested.

Welcome to Barack Hussein Obama’s fundamental transformation of America.

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports, Videos Tagged With: ,

Will Obama Be An Accessory To Murder?

March 16, 2013 by 49 Comments

Obama went on his apocalyptic sequester “road show” proclaiming the sky would be falling if Congress wouldn’t cancel the “draconian” cuts to the budget.

Everyone except the “low information voters,” as Rush Limbaugh calls them, knew the “draconian” cuts amounted to about one percent of the budget for 2013 and was actually an increase in spending from the year before.

Everyone knew the sequestration was Obama’s idea.

Everyone knew that it was another one of Obama’s manufactured crises to get Congress to cave to his demands—this time for another tax hike on the “fat cat millionaires and billionaires.”

But Congress wasn’t listening.

Obama, as expected, pulled out the big guns:

Big Sis Janet Napolitano was dispatched to tell America we would be waiting in long lines at the airport.

That our border would be less safe.

That we’d be less safe against terrorists.

Obama even pulled the aircraft carrier U.S.S. Truman out of commission, citing his phony sequestration cuts. The U.S.S. Harry S. Truman was scheduled to deploy to the Persian Gulf, probably the most unstable area on the planet, and no doubt is contributing to emboldening our enemies.

If this isn’t grounds for treason, I don’t know what is.

But Congress wasn’t going to cave to Obama’s phony prediction of doom and gloom, so Obama did what he does best—manufacture a crisis.

Two weeks before the sequestration cuts went into effect, Obama released hundreds of jailed illegal aliens—criminals—citing the “draconian” cuts that would go into effect on March 1.

Barack Hussein Obama opened the jail cells of the criminals, letting them roam the streets to rape and maim and kill.

But this was only the beginning. Obama is scheduled to release ten thousand jailed illegal aliens before he’s done.

Whistleblowers have indicated a significant number have been identified as having committed felonies, including child abuse, robbery, aggravated assault on a police officer, weapons violations, and manslaughter.

Nixon despatched his Plumbers to the Watergate Democratic Headquarters to do his dirty work. But Obama, as payback for not playing along with his manufactured sequestration crisis, has dispatched a legion of illegal alien criminals to wreak havoc in this country.

When one of these illegal aliens commits murder—and make no bones about it, they will—the blood will be on Obama’s hands.

And Barack Hussein Obama will be an accessory to murder.

Impeachment should not be discussed. It should begin today. Now. Immediately.

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports, Videos Tagged With: ,

Drones Will Target Conservative Americans

March 13, 2013 by 28 Comments

For many of us, Rand Paul’s filibuster was a surreal moment in time, beckoning back to better days when Mr. Smith Goes to Washington was considered a masterpiece of film because it embodied the values of our nation. Today, “violence porn” films like Django Unchained are considered the top of the heap because they, sadly, embody our corrupt and violent society.

“Old Bull” Republicans like John McCain and Lindsey Graham thought Rand Paul’s filibuster was stupid and irrelevant.  That it was ridiculous to think that Barack Hussein Obama, who has from almost Day One of his presidency spurned the rule of law—often blathering about “if Congress won’t act, I will”—would drop a hellfire missile on an American sitting in a cafe.

But this wasn’t some manufactured issue, as the Left is famous for. Michael Isakoff uncovered a secret DOJ memo last month that gave the Obama administration the authority to kill any U.S. citizen, at any time, anywhere, without proof, without due process, accountable to no one.

And in fact, Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen, was taken out by a drone for basically being a propagandist for Al-Qaeda. Whether, being an American citizen, he should have been given due process is debatable. But two weeks after al-Awlaki was killed, his sixteen year old son, Abdulrahman, also an American citizen, was killed with a drone. His crime was being related to an identified terrorist. And in fact, then-Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs blamed al-Awlaki’s son for “not having a more responsible father” for his being vaporized by a missile.

And then there was the news that the Obama administration had ordered a fleet of “public safety” drones, able to pick up cell phone traffic, able to identify whether the target—that is, an American citizen—is armed or not—with the ability to be easily outfitted with missiles.  Experts estimate this fleet of “public safety” drones to reach 30,000 by the end of Obama’s “third term.”

This in itself would have remained innocuous enough, but there was this odd “War on Domestic Terrorism” that the Obama administration was waging against conservatives.

For example, the Department of Homeland Security published a study titled “Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, which identified potential domestic terrorists as those who are “reverent of individual liberty.” Those who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority.” Those who believe there is a “grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.”

This of course sounds very much like beliefs espoused by conservatives, specifically the Tea Party, so it was valid for conservatives to be concerned.

Rand Paul, more pointedly, cited in his filibuster further ludicrous “behaviors” of potential domestic terrorists: Those who have guns with high capacity magazines and weatherized ammunition. Those who have more than a seven day supply of food. Those who pay in cash. And probably the most ludicrous: Those who are missing fingers.

It took almost two months for the American people to get a straight answer from the Obama administration as to whether an American citizen can be killed on American soil with a drone for being a potential terrorist.

Obama refused to answer the question. CIA appointee John Brennan, prompted by the Senate Judiciary Committee, refused to answer. Attorney General Eric Holder initially stated that it was constitutional in a letter to Senator Rand Paul. But when pressed by Senator Cruz, after equivocating for several minutes, Holder finally admitted that no, the Obama administration could not constitutionally kill an American citizen on American soil with a drone—though he never states this directly.

This was the impetus for Rand Paul’s thirteen hour filibuster of the John Brennan nomination, which finally resulted in the Obama administration sending a terse and extremely vague letter to Rand Paul, supposedly clarifying its position.

The letter states:

It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: “Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?” The answer to that question is no.

Of course, the question is, what does the Obama administration consider “combat”? This was not addressed; and more than likely, Obama, like everything else surrounding his drone program, will keep this under wraps.

John Brennan, who is in charge of the Obama administration’s drone program abroad, will no doubt become the de facto head of the domestic “public safety” drone program. All able to nullify the Fourth Amendment and spy on Americans. All able to determine whether a potential “domestic terrorist” is armed. All able to fire a missile, vaporizing an American sitting in a cafe, minding his own business, deemed by Barack Hussein Obama to be engaged in “combat.”

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports, Videos Tagged With: , , ,

Obama Lets China Steal Top Secret NASA Technology

March 12, 2013 by 39 Comments

At 2 a.m, on June 17, 1972, five men dressed in business suits and wearing surgical gloves were in the process of bugging the Democratic headquarters at the Watergate office complex. Caught in the act, they were later identified as Nixon’s “Plumbers,” part of a nationwide operation to ensure Nixon’s reelection that included wiretapping, burglary, private investigators, and mafia-like shakedowns.

Nixon put a halt to the Watergate investigation, giving marching orders to the Plumbers to keep quiet and told his cronies in the CIA and Department of Justice to stall the FBI investigation.

Last month, we found out that two NASA facilities—Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, and Ames Research Center near San Francisco, California-were gorged with Chinese national engineers, who had access to top secret defense technology, who then took this information back to their handlers in communist China.

Congressman Frank R. Wolf, through information gathered from whistleblowers, not only found that secret defense information was stolen, but that the Obama administration, including DOJ, may have shut down the investigation.

According to a whistleblower speaking to Aviation Week, the Chinese nationals obtained high-level, cutting edge technology, including:

… Missile defense technology…High-performance rocket engines, fuel and oxidizer tanks from an “ASAT” (anti-satellite weapon), guidance and terrain-mapping systems from the Tomahawk cruise missile and a radar altimeter from the F-35…

Upon allegations that defense secrets at the Ames facility were breached, an FBI investigation was launched and completed, the information then being turned over to Assistant U.S. Attorney Gary Fry. Fry began to prepare indictments and convened a secret grand jury. However, literally minutes before Fry was to begin the proceedings, and without explanation, he was replaced by Assistant U.S. Attorney Elise Becker, and the investigation suddenly stalled.

According to Congressman Wolf, Department of Justice and White House officials intervened in the investigation to shut it down.

Congressman Wolf and other members of Congress put together a confidential report, Destruction of NASA from the Inside: A Summary Report of Criminal and Political Activity, delivered to the Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, which states that NASA has been hemorrhaging top secret technology not only China, but Saudi Arabia as well.

Eric Holder has of course denied that they quashed the investigation, but Congressman Wolf’s probe puts the DOJ right in the middle of what could be the biggest loss of U.S. technology since the Rosenbergs funneled information about the atomic bomb to the Soviet Union.

Nixon shut down the Watergate investigation to ensure his reelection. The Obama administration is alleged to have shut down the NASA investigation to ensure that the funneling of top secret defense technology to communist China continues.

Impeachment for “high crimes and misdemeanors” would be only the beginning…

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports, Videos Tagged With: , ,

Is Martial Law Coming?

March 7, 2013 by 31 Comments

When the Obama administration during its “War on Women” propaganda campaign was parading Sandra Fluke—the so-called “contraception girl”—on the red carpet leading to the White House, the Leftist blog Think Progress was leading the charge to take Obama’s Public Enemy Number One Rush Limbaugh off the air because of his Sandra Fluke “whore” comments.

Obama’s attack dog Media Matters then began literally feeding the mainstream media its talking points, all to ensure Obamacare would not be derailed by the “noise” of federal funding of contraception and abortifacients.

And of course, the third part of the unholy leftist trinity, the Center for American Progress, run by Bill Clinton’s former chief of staff John Podesta—considered the “brain” of the radical Left—was running the whole “War on Women” marionette show.

But behind the scenes of his marionette show, Podesta had bigger fish to fry.

Just off the heels of the debt ceiling crisis—part of the so-called sequestration debacle the Obama administration has been wringing their hands about lately—John Podesta was jumping for joy in the one hundred page position paper Rebalancing Our National Security. Written following the Obama-manufactured debt ceiling crisis, the paper touted the Budget Control Act of 2011’s gutting of the military to the tune of almost five hundred billion dollars over the next ten years, not the measly $86 billion sequestration cuts Obama has been wringing his hands about.

You can almost hear Podesta giggling in the background as he discusses how the military was being gutted:

The debate in Washington over security spending this year is being driven mostly by the Budget Control Act of 2011, the debt reduction deal that averted a government shutdown last summer. The law mandates about $1 trillion in cuts to federal government discretionary spending over 10 years beginning in fiscal year 2012, including $487 billion in Pentagon cuts…

…The “sequester” came in to play after Congress failed to reach an agreement on how to legislate the deficit reduction at the end of last year…The members of our Task Force agree with the near-universal consensus that sequestration is more about political maneuvering than sound budgeting practice. But we argue that the amount of cuts to the Pentagon budget mandated by both parts of the debt deal is readily achievable with no sacrifice to our security—if the cuts are done in a thoughtful manner over the next decade. We also agree that some of those savings in the U.S. defense budget should be redeployed to other parts of the federal government, specifically to those non-military programs that help our nation defend the homeland and prevent global crises from escalating into military confrontations…

Where should the gutted defense budget be “redeployed” to per Podesta? Not the $500 billion as proposed, but his call for one trillion dollars in cuts? Being a globalist, as expected, redistribution of wealth to the global community, with the United Nations no doubt holding the purse strings:

Our Task Force plan outlines an alternative trajectory for spending on offense and prevention that would achieve the benchmark of $1 trillion in military cuts over 10 years. This framework provides $123 billion for international affairs over 10 years. It would increase spending on diplomacy during this period by 28 percent more than the president’s request, and increase spending on development and humanitarian assistance by 40 percent.

It is clear then, looking at the one trillion dollars in cuts over the next ten years, that these so-called “draconian” $86 billion sequestration cuts are simply a sham.

There are four things that are apparent from the Obama administration’s antics and its partner in crime, Center for American Progress:

1. During the debt ceiling crisis, Obama knew the “super committee” would fail and the sequestration deal would go forward.

2. Obama knew the $86 billion sequestration cuts were just a drop in the bucket to the real cuts that were mandated by the Budget Control Act of 2011.

3.Obama knew that the Republican Congress would not table the sequestration, and it would go forward.

4. Obama planned on hyping up the sequestration cuts, blaming the Republicans with his allies in the mainstream media, with the goal of retaking the House of Representatives in 2014.

With Obama controlling both the House and Senate in 2014, this would allow the gutting of the military to go through. This would allow Obama to push any agenda through Congress, no matter how radical—including gutting the Second Amendment—thus allowing him to complete his “fundamental transformation” of America—that is, a Marxist utopia.

But America won’t go willingly. Obama would have to orchestrate the mother of all of his orchestrated crises.

Enter George Soros, who just happens to fund the leftist unholy trinity Think Progress, Media Matters, and Center for American Progress.

Soros also just happens to be a felon, convicted of insider trading. Soros, dubbed “The Man Who Broke the Bank of England,” funneled hundreds of millions of dollars out of the British economy with the collapse of the British pound and is now trying make money with the collapse the Euro.

And of course, Soros is a fixture at the White House.

But Obama and George Soros are after bigger fish than collapsing currencies.

The stock market in recent days has been at record levels. Many have predicted a stock market crash—losing up to 90% of its value—although those on the hard Left, especially our friend George Soros, won’t say it openly.

Soros has dumped most of his stock in the banking industry and is stockpiling a massive amount of gold. Soros has a secret that he is keeping wraps on: If the stock market crashes, the economy itself will collapse.

With unemployment at high levels, with an unsustainable welfare state pushed to its limits, and with our national debt approaching seventeen trillion, a stock market crash would make the crash of 1929 look like child’s play.

It would collapse our economy in a matter of days, if not hours.

What would occur if the economy collapses?

Food and water shortages. Civil disorder. Riots.

And of course, a call for martial law.

And the Obama administration knows this—“coincidentally” signing an executive order last year that gives Obama dictatorial power in the event of a “national emergency.”

Is this why the Obama administration has stockpiled two billion rounds of ammunition?

Is this why the Obama administration has been frantically trying to ban assault weapons while quietly stockpiling the same weapons?

Is this why the Obama administration has been stockpiling light armored tanks?

Is this why the Obama administration has ordered a fleet of “public safety” drones, able to pick up cell phone traffic, able to identify whether the target—that is, an American citizen—is armed or not—with the ability to be easily outfitted with missiles?

Is this why the Obama administration has drafted a secret memo that gives Obama the authority to execute a drone strike on any U.S. citizen, at any time, anywhere, without proof, without due process, accountable to no one?

And of course, Eric Holder this week finally admitted that yes, Obama can murder an American citizen on American soil with a drone—in “extraordinary circumstances.”

“Extraordinary circumstances” would be American citizens who are against Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America.

Here’s the possible worst case scenario: Obama successfully spins the sequestration “draconian” cuts as being the fault of the Republicans and takes back the House of Representatives in 2014. This allows him to push anything through, including gutting the military, expanding the welfare state, placing America under an increased surveillance nanny state with drones keeping track of everyone’s movements, and ticking up the national debt to an unsustainable level—nearing $20 trillion.

Then Obama, Soros, and the gaggle of leftist globalist pull some type of monetary switch to crash the U.S. stock market. Our economy then implodes in a matter of days, if not hours; and Obama, with his martial law executive order in hand steps up to his teleprompter and beams to every home in America his call for “temporary” martial law.

During this period of martial law, Obama would specifically target those “clinging to their guns and religion”—that is, conservatives—confiscating guns and using drones to spy on and kill the “domestic terrorists.”

When the “national emergency” was over, Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America would be complete, with a Marxist utopia safely in place.

Is this all a conspiracy theory? Perhaps. Perhaps not.

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports, Videos Tagged With: , , , , , , ,

Is A Civil War Coming?

March 5, 2013 by 133 Comments

For anyone who has done even a cursory study of Barack Obama’s life, they know that his radical Marxist views are not a recent phenomenon.

During his New York years, he was a frequent participant in the annual Socialist Scholars Conference held in Manhattan.

In the 1990s, he was affiliated with the Marxist New Party.

He called for an outright ban on guns in 1996.

Through the 1990s and 2000s, he funneled millions of dollars to socialist front groups like ACORN, via the Woods Fund and the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. His buddy, domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, helped stuff the money in the pockets of these “public welfare” groups, often taking money from wealthy donors who believed the funds were being used to further education or stamp out poverty. This was Barack Obama’s first foray into “spreading the wealth around.”

The dirty little secret about Marxists is that the moral outrage they have about the poor, about gun violence, about war, and even about the environment (so-called “global warming,” now rebranded as “climate change”) is that these are all simply tools to set up a totalitarian government. A so-called utopia where “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” is not determined by the individual, but according to an elite bureaucracy.

Except totalitarian governments don’t work very well unless you have a dependent and defenseless rabble. Obama has successfully created a welfare state, with food stamp and welfare rolls soaring.  And, with Obamacare, he will put virtually the entire citizenry on the public dole.

But creating a defenseless rabble is a little more difficult in America, with the majority of Americans holding the Second Amendment as sacred.

It was easy in Russia. In October 1918, the Communist government mandated that all of its citizens register their weapons. Then it conveniently confiscated all of these “registered” weapons. (It kind of sounds like Obama’s “common sense” call for universal background checks—really a Trojan horse for a national gun registry).

But this is all a conspiracy theory, right? America could never become like Communist Russia, could it?

In 2007 and 2008 when Obama researchers such as Stanley Kurtz and Trevor Loudon unearthed Obama’s extensive radical background and warned us from the highest mountaintops to beware, most of us handed these guys tinfoil hats, figuring that if a Marxist did get into office, we had a little document called the Constitution to keep him in check and/or impeach him.

Because of a dumbed down public and two weak RINO Republicans (first McCain, then Romney), Obama was able to garner enough votes to gain the presidency twice.

We’ve had a radical Marxist sitting in the Oval Office for over four years now.

But the Constitution was still there, including the Second Amendment and the separation of powers.

And the radical connections that were unearthed in 2007 and 2008 paled in comparison to what we learned in an almost month-by-month basis in the following years.

But the Constitution was still there, including the Second Amendment and the separation of powers.

Except what if the Obama administration could disarm a large portion of the population—the so-called “progressives” who believe that guns are evil, and the dumbed down population who didn’t know any better?

And what if the only ones left who refused to give up their guns, who demanded that the Constitution be followed, and who demanded that the separation of powers doctrine be upheld (against Obama’s “I can’t wait for Congress to act!” meme)—what if the only ones left were conservatives?

And what if the Obama administration declared conservatives domestic terrorists, as they have basically done with a so-called “study,” Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States?: Those who are “reverent of individual liberty.” Those who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority.” Those who believe there is a “grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.”

And what if the Obama administration could outgun their conservative enemies?

The Obama administration has amassed a staggering amount of bullets (over two billion rounds), most of it the hollow point, armor piercing variety, enough to kill every American, man, woman, and child five times.

And what if the Obama administration successfully banned “assault weapons” but was able to keep assault weapons for themselves (as they have already done) calling the use of AR-15s “personal defense weapons”?

And what if the Obama administration could nullify the Second Amendment from the portion of the public that were the most extensively trained, who were traditionally the most conservative—that is, veterans?

The Obama administration has sent out thousands of letters to veterans with the following:

 A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both…

And what if the Obama administration was purchasing thousands of light armored tanks to be used against its own citizens? This, we learned over the weekend.

And what if the Obama administration ordered a fleet of “public safety” drones, able to pick up cell phone traffic, able to identify whether the target—that is, an American citizen—is armed or not with the ability to be easily outfitted with missiles?

This is something we discovered is not out of a dystopian novel but hatched by our own government, with a fleet of 30,000 drones expected by the end of Obama’s “third term.”

And what if there was a secret memo that gave the Obama administration the authority to kill any U.S. citizen at any time, anywhere, without proof, without due process, accountable to no one? Investigative journalist Michael Isikoff uncovered this last month.

So what if, unlike the Communists in Russia, the Obama administration wasn’t able to disarm its enemy—conservatives—but were able to easily outgun them, with hundreds of thousands of “personal defense weapons,” billions of rounds, tanks, and “public safety” drones?

Is a civil war coming between a totalitarian Obama administration and conservatives?

Is this some wild-eyed conspiracy theory?

Perhaps. Perhaps not.

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports, Videos Tagged With: , , , , ,