Avatar of Joel Valenzuela

About Joel Valenzuela

Joel Valenzuela is the Director of Development of the Western Center for Journalism.

In Defense Of The Entitlement Mentality

depressed 300x300 In Defense of the Entitlement Mentality

What’s wrong with kids these days? Today’s youth are so demanding. They think they’re owed something. They have this insufferable, all-permeating sense of entitlement that sours the very air in their proximity. Why don’t those little ingrates just learn to respect their elders and be thankful for everything they have?

Or so the conventional narrative goes. But I don’t buy it anymore. The young people are right this time. I’m here to defend the entitlement mentality of today’s youth.

The young people of the modern age do have some things to be grateful for. For most of the world, we live in an era of unprecedented safety, high life expectancy, and technological wonder. Never before has it been so easy to be fed, healthy, and able to access the entirety of human knowledge and achievement from virtually anywhere. All that, however, is only the silver lining on the looming stormcloud. All the high living by previous generations was done on credit. That’s debt that will have to be paid down the road. By today’s young people. And it’s happening already.

First and foremost, unemployment. While global unemployment is through the roof across the board, the youth have been hit especially hard, with countries such as Greece reporting rates of over 60% without jobs. Government regulations on business and barriers to entry into the marketplace, voted on by the older generations, have effectively handicapped the youth’s ability to secure gainful employment. This comes at a time when young people are pursuing higher and higher educational achievements in hopes of getting a job. Unfortunately, this strategy just isn’t working as expected, causing the youth to spend years of hard work and accruing a lifetime’s worth of debt for no better future prospects.

And about that debt. We’re talking about in excess of $16 trillion in the U.S., which amounts to about $52,000 for every man, woman, and child. Add that number to existing school debt, which in many cases is upwards of six figures, and we’re looking at a lifetime of debt to pay off. Decades of financial slavery that can’t even begin without first finding a job. If that isn’t a stolen future, I don’t know what is.

Finally, the cherry on top of the bleak-future sundae with extra nuts: currency. The last century of central banking has seen rise to the most wicked and insidious tax of all, that of simply printing more money to cover higher spending, devaluing the people’s hard-earned savings in the process. This approach crushes any hope of saving up for the future if all store of value rapidly bleeds said value. Push the devaluation trend enough, and eventually people will lose confidence in government paper currency altogether, causing money as we know it to become worthless.

So, after all’s said and done, a young person today faces grim prospects of securing a job. A job that would pay wages in severely devalued money. Money that would go towards paying off a debt that the debtor had no choice in accruing. All because the older generations hampered business with senseless regulations. Established onerous taxes to pay for an ever-growing state. Spent untold fortunes on wealth redistribution programs, unnecessary wars, and every kind of waste imaginable. Robbed all savings of its value in order to pay for the here and now.

What’s wrong with kids these days? They have no future. They have no hope. They have been stripped of all opportunity to shape their own destinies, to build a better tomorrow, to live free from indentured servitude. Are young people entitled? You bet they are. They’re entitled to a fighting chance. They’re entitled to a blank slate. They’re entitled to be able to live and die by their own decisions and convictions, not waste their precious short lives as slaves of the older generations. Generations who had their chance, still possessed their liberty, and made their decision to build an empire out of the broken dreams and stolen freedom of those not yet born.

What’s wrong with kids these days? The sins of the father are being visited upon the son. And the son has had enough.

Joel Valenzuela is the editor of The Desert Lynx

Cruz And Paul Betrayed By Own Party

Rand Paul Ted Cruz 300x200 Cruz and Paul Betrayed by Own Party

It’s been a rough last few years for the Grand Old Party. From utter vilification during the Bush years to two consecutive presidential election defeats, the Republican Party could use a little pick-me-up.

That’s why it seems so baffling that the two most prominent and accomplished rising stars of the GOP, Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, have been getting so much hate from their own party.

This dynamic senatorial duo has been doing most of the heavy lifting for their party as of late. Sen. Cruz has really had his chance to shine staring down the Obama Administration on gun control. Now he’s at it again, throwing down the gauntlet to Vice President Joe Biden, challenging him to an hour-long debate on gun control. His fearless efforts have even earned him the praise of his enemies.

Sen. Paul, meanwhile, has served splendidly as the face of the resistance to the current Administration. Whether providing the only solid rebuttal to the State of the Union address, grilling then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the Benghazi debacle and suggesting she be removed from her position, or bringing the whole country to a standstill in a valiant filibuster against drone assassinations of American citizens without due process, Rand Paul has solidified his position as the de facto leader of the Republican Party. He may very well be the foremost GOP contender for a 2016 run for President.

Unfortunately, it seems like there’s no rest for these two weary leaders. Not even from their own party. Cruz has earned ire from fellow Republicans who wish out loud that he would just shut up and stop doing what he does best, never mind that the prevalence of the silent strategy is the reason such bold stands are needed in the first place. Even Paul, the GOP’s unequivocal workhorse, has faced ambushes from his own supposed comrades for standing up for the very principles the whole party is theoretically behind.

The Republican Party purports to stand for limited Constitutional government, personal responsibility, liberty, and a strong family. When said party bites the very hands that lead them into battle for those exact principles, something is clearly wrong. The GOP no longer represents the will of its patriotic American supporters, and is no longer deserving of their support.

Joel Valenzuela is the editor of The Desert Lynx

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore

Obama Lost The Youth To Ron Paul

YAL youth 300x200 Obama Lost the Youth to Ron Paul

Political movements come. Political movements go. Which ones will last? Which ones will fail? How do we identify the principles that will shape our future?

The answer: follow the youth.

Now that might lead us to believe that Barack Obama’s 2008 election campaign was the real deal, the game-changer for the future of the American political landscape. Not so fast. A massive PR con job that lasts one election cycle isn’t quite the same as an organic, lasting, growing youth movement. Young people might be impressionable, but they’re quick to learn. A younger, multi-ethnic frontman with a minimal political record can only hide the same tired old policies for so long. Soon enough, the youth will abandon a false prophet of hope and change and get behind someone who is truly on their side. Someone who sincerely fights for their future.

And that’s exactly what happened. Take another, opposite, unlikely youth leader: Ron Paul.

The political career of Dr. Ron Paul can easily be viewed as a failure. During his generation-long service in Congress, only one out of the 620 pieces of legislation he sponsored ever became law, hardly an encouraging sign of success. Paul ran three times for President of the United States, and all three times fell far short of victory. Earlier this year, he retired from Congress, quietly slipping out of the public sphere.

But Dr. Paul didn’t fall short where it really mattered: inspiring future generations with hope. The firey youth-based movement he rallied refused to die long after his political campaigns came to an end. Organizations like the Campaign for Liberty and Young Americans for Liberty continue to carry out the work of his movement. And they’re not going anywhere. They’re only getting stronger.

While time will be the ultimate judge as to the lasting impact of Ron Paul’s youth movement, the signs are already there. I witnessed one of these signs firsthand this past weekend at a Young Americans for Liberty conference in Fullerton, California. Dr. Paul addressed a room full of youth activists via Skype, some of whom had driven all day to be able to attend. An old man in his office bent over a computer received a standing ovation from a packed auditorium thousands of miles away, full of young people of every ethnicity, gender, and background, most of whom were younger than his own grandchildren. This happened in California, a state known for adopting policies opposite of what Paul spent his life advocating. Proof be damned, this one powerful piece of evidence spoke with the force of a thousand statistics. Make no mistake: Ron Paul has won the youth of America.

The youth are the future. Those who control the youth, therefore, control the future. It really doesn’t get any simpler than that. And, judging from the lasting impact of the movement Dr. Ron Paul inspired, the future has been won for liberty.

Joël Valenzuela is the editor of The Desert Lynx

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore

Internet Caused Gun Grabbers To Fail

gun rights topper Internet Caused Gun Grabbers to Fail

The stars aligned. A mass shooting in a movie theater in Colorado still very fresh in people’s minds, the horrific massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary in Connecticut was the deal-sealing tragedy to usher in a new era of gun control. They had been waiting for a moment like this.

It was the perfect storm of a gun-grab… but it failed. President Obama has admitted to a group of San Francisco donors that he has lost confidence in his ability to get passed any gun control measures of significance. Why? How could such a perfectly-orchestrated effort fall flat? The answer: the information age.

In the weeks following the massacre, the mainstream media reported one major myth regarding the incident: a “military-style assault rifle,” such as an AR-15, was used. Critical analysis quickly uncovered, and spread far and wide across the internet, that not only was an assault rifle not used in the actual killings, but one might not even have been present at all. That proved Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s proposed assault weapons ban to be completely irrelevant to preventing a similar massacre, dooming it from the start.

Next, thanks once more to the internet, information regarding gun violence in America was able to travel around the mainstream media’s filter rather than through it. This illuminated the abject failure of gun restrictions to cause a reduction in violence in places like England, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. itself. Once gun control’s abysmal track record on stopping violence came to light far and wide, the narrative of saving lives simply fell apart.

Finally, the moral case for gun rights, often reserved to the hearts and minds of patriotic Americans, was allowed online public exposure. A photo of Rosa Parks with the tagline “I don’t ‘need’ an AR more than Rosa Parks ‘needed’ to sit in the front of that bus” spread like a virus via Facebook, effectively setting in stone the message that We The People have the right to exercise whatever peaceful behavior we so desire without having to justify it to the government.

Times have changed. Any other decade and this would have been an open-and-shut case of national disarmament. This time, however, they underestimated the power of a free people standing up for their rights. And, most of all, they underestimated the unregulated power of the internet. Next time they try to take away a precious Constitutional right through manipulation and deception they’re going to have to try a little harder than that.

Joel Valenzuela is the editor of The Desert Lynx

From A Teacher Who ‘indoctrinates’ His Students

School From a teacher who indoctrinates his students

Telling them how, not what, to think

How is it that when a person disagrees politically with a teacher, suddenly said teacher is “indoctrinating” students instead of teaching them?

OK, I admit it: I indoctrinated students. I indoctrinated them that their job was being a student. Instead of a check, they got paid every nine weeks with a report card. At the end of four years’ service, they got a “bonus”: a diploma. I indoctrinated them by telling them to consider their “paycheck” an investment account that, once earned, no one could take away from them. I told them a diploma didn’t make them an educated person, but it was evidence of perseverance, and was a step in their lifelong education in Reality 101.

I indoctrinated them to express themselves, both verbally and in their writing, in Standard English, not Ebonics or Spariglish. I indoctrinated them that subjects and verbs must agree, and that double negatives are not acceptable in English, even though they are in Spanish. I insisted that texting shorthand was not acceptable on written assignments, and stressed that! I didn’t give grades, they earned them. (How is it that “I earned an A,” but “the teacher ‘gave’ me an F”?)

I asked them, not necessarily rhetorically, what was going to happen when the Bank of Mom and Dad closes, as it will at some point. They looked at me like I had three heads. All in all, my job was not to tell them what to think, but how to think. Most of the time, I succeeded, and if that is indoctrination, then so be it.

Craig Holland

Bakersfield

NOTE: Some left-brained university in Connecticut referred to Bakersfield as “the most illiterate mid-sized city in the nation.” Nothing dumber than a “progressive” who refuses to understand free enterprise.

Minnesota’s Leftists Want To Raise Spirits Tax By 300%

Taxes SC Minnesota’s leftists want to raise spirits tax by 300%

Photo Credit: 401K 2012 (Creative Commons)

When they get complete control of your life, liberals don’t just sit and smile, they use that power and control to remind you who is in charge. They hunger and thirst for power and control and are restrained only by their imaginations as they plot to run our lives.

Minnesota’s Democrats are good examples of what life is like when liberals are given total control of a government.

Earlier this year, while lamenting how many of his subjects escape to Florida and other warmer places each winter to avoid the cold, Democrat Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton had an idea to recover the tax money they take with them each December.

Dayton proposed a “snowbird tax” and did so proudly. To this liberal tyrant it makes no difference that the subjects he is aiming his greed at leave his fiefdom and legally change their official residence to Florida, Dayton wants pro-rated taxes extracted from Minnesota’s snowbirds for the five months they live in Minnesota. When this measure passes, Dayton’s subjects will have to leave his realm to escape his clutches which of course means nothing to greedy liberals.

In Minnesota the word Democrat doesn’t fit those who rule their subjects. It doesn’t go far enough. They call themselves Democrat Farm Labor (DFL) which could be understood as Democrats Far to the Left.

Not to be outdone, Minnesota’s DFL controlled House of Representatives has decided its subjects should have to pay 300% more tax on alcoholic drinks purchased in Minnesota.

Like all liberals, the DFL gang is logic and dynamic scoring challenged. They understand nothing about human behavior and don’t care about human behavior since THEY will tell us how to behave. They believe, as all liberals believe, that since they are now getting $5.03 per gallon for spirits, raising such taxes to $17.82 a gallon will solve their ever present revenue shortfall problems. They foolishly believe people will continue to buy their spirits at the same rate and happily pay the increased taxes to “Mother State” because it is “for their own good.”

That people will go out of state to buy their alcohol and/or make their own spirits never occurs to people drunk with power. The Democrats Far to the Left tyrants in Minnesota are no different.

Waco A Stark Reminder Of Murderous Dictators

320px SWAT team Waco a stark reminder of murderous dictators

Twenty years ago at this time we were in the midst of the federal government’s 51 day siege on a compound of Bible worshippers who with their 12 children were all snuffed out in a raid. “That’s torturing babies,” a U.S. Representative bemoaned at the Congressional hearings investigating the Waco siege during which CS gas vapor was spewed down a long arm of an armored tank onto the roof, into the rooms, and ultimately wafted down into the windowless tower where some of the women and their children were hiding in the Mount Carmel Church compound of the David Karesh (Vernon Howell) followers! “Gas masks don’t fit on babies,” one investigator in Washington, D.C. observed. So as former Attorney General Janet Reno suffers from Parkinson’s Disease in Stuart, FL, a lengthy, outstanding online video entitled “Waco-The Rules of Engagement (William Gazecki)” reminds us just what can happen when a federal government-gone-wild destroys citizens. Footage of Reno leaving to attend a speech while the Waco outrage was going on is a poignant reminder of the Democrat Presidency of William Jefferson Clinton.

The federal government’s siege on Waco began on February 28, 1993, and ended 51 days later during the orgy of gassing children, women, the elderly, and most of their congregation. “We put massive gas in there,” you can hear one agent acclaiming! “My skin was melting. . . (in) the mass of flames. . .horrible way to die,” says a crying man who lived only by diving at a hole in the otherwise pitch darkness of screaming voices.” Hard to watch toward the end of the long ordeal is the photo of the crisp charred body of a little 12 year old girl who died when the effects of the deadly gas back bowed her muscles and collapsed her entire frame. During negotiations with FBI agents, who got the handoff of the mission from the BATF, David Karesh is heard saying, “only one fire extinguisher in the building.” Former FBI forensic photographer Farris Rookstool calls the attempt to brand the Karesh followers victims of mass suicide “most irresponsible.” “Many of the residents were HOMICIDE victims,” he says. ( at 2:07:56 video time line)

Rookstool’s viewpoint is in stark contrast to that of now Vice President Joe Biden who declared, “There was no improper motive or intent… the Karesh followers set fire to themselves. . .the Government did not do that.” Senator Orin Hatch backed up Biden, saying, “No conspiracy to kill Branch Davidians.” Reno says the information given her was that the fire was set inside the building.

Today, the compound is leveled, the tapes and photos of local and state forensic investigators are missing, and the metal door with bullet holes bending inward from incoming fire is nowhere to be found. The disturbing FLEAR analysis of shots fired from the ramming tank are quite indisputable even to someone not familiar with infra red evidence. The fireball and flash fire from the fresh CS injected as shown by FLEAR remind all Americans of what did happen on April 19, 1993, and what could happen in this country again!

Obama Guts More Military Benefits

gi bill stamp SC Obama Guts More Military Benefits

Suspension of military tuition assistance; Obama’s budget cut retaliation up-close and personal

This week the Air Force joined with the Army and Marines in cutting tuition assistance due to “sweeping” federal budget cuts. When faced with a budget crisis—whether real or imagined like Obama’s sequestration—too many politicians will threaten first responders before they cut their own bloated, nonproductive programs. The Armed forces is one of the few constitutionally mandated functions that exists today. Of course, Obama plans to make budget cuts personal so he and Organizing for America can manufacture sob stories making any opposition to his massive spending programs appear cruel. Big Government will not be denied.

Impact

Education in today’s all-volunteer military is a major factor in considering promotions. An unnamed recruiter stated that “College benefits are the absolute main reason they do it, it’s going to be pretty hard,” he said. “You start wondering what else will be cut.” An education will help the service member find a decent job when he leaves the military. Without higher education many troops will have a difficult time starting out as anything more than a Walmart greeter.

The military education benefit cuts are projected to save $600 million, about what the Obamas spent on their vacations over the last couple of years. The current Commander-in-Chief is not setting a good example. With all of the deployment commitments already borne on the shoulders of this all volunteer force, they are now expected to sacrifice even more so low information voters can have their Obamaphones. The main benefit of tuition assistance is to allow service members to obtain a college degree without incurring debt.

No Leadership

Obama never served in the military and has never been in charge of anything until low information voters and the national media put him in the White House. Needless to say, such a dearth of experience makes for an inept leader. Outside of campaigning what is he good at? Clearly he has no concern for subordinates. The Benghazi fiasco and cover-up make that palpably obvious. One lesson you learn as a front line supervisor…don’t screw or abandon your troops. No Senior Non Commissioned Officer would put up with a junior NCO who behaves the way this President does.

A Look At Health Insurance Exchanges

undo obamacare A Look at Health Insurance Exchanges

An important component of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is the establishment of so-called Health Insurance Exchanges, given the acronym HIX. Driven by the questionable notion that getting everyone insured was the most important problem to be solved in health care, and energized by the earlier concept of managed competition, HIX are intended to help individuals and small businesses purchase health insurance coverage. By January 1, 2014 these exchanges must exist in every state.

Managed competition is a purchasing strategy based on microeconomic principles, whereby maximum value is supposedly obtained for both consumers and employers. At the heart of managed competition is an all-powerful sponsor, whose role is to establish rules of equity, select participating plans, manage the enrollment process, create price-elastic demand, and manage risk selection. Its proponents acknowledge that it will tend to succeed based on the extent of high-quality, cost-effective, organized systems of care already in existence—especially prepaid group practices.

If you find this paradigm to be ironic, you are not alone. What value is added by a parasitic bureaucracy that first requires a well-oiled machine as a host? Not to mention the army of consultants, associated vendors, and other hangers-on, who all stand to profit from HIX implementation. But then, we might also ask why physicians, nurses, and other providers are such a small part of the overall picture—and why almost no one seems to care about this. Indeed, Obamacare is likely the greatest example of “the tail wagging the dog” in history.

Last November, HHS announced that a fee would be imposed on insurance providers for the privilege of selling health insurance in the new online markets run by the federal government. Naturally, these user fees (3.5 percent) can—and will—be passed onto consumers. Throw into the mix the temporarily postponed reduction in Medicare reimbursements and uncertainty over Medicaid coverage, and the prospect of a health care Nirvana appears quite remote.

It should be noted that this sea change in the nature of health insurance has sparked an interest in Defined Contribution (DC) Health Plans. In the DC model, employees are given before-tax dollars, applicable to obtaining coverage on their own, including using the new exchanges. Many experts predict that traditional health insurance (the defined benefits model) will cease to exist by 2020, in favor of the DC model.

Enterprising insurance professionals, and this includes some carriers, have already moved into the DC space. Private health insurance exchanges are those that operate outside of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, but still must meet the requirements of the exchange management. These, too, can be part of the offerings of savvy brokers.

One company doing a fine job in helping employers and brokers alike to enter this new world of health insurance products is Birmingham, AL based Health Partners America. HPA’s website provides plenty of resources, including content by founder and president Josh Hilgers. Don’t miss the videos directed to employers and employees.

Health care in America is changing. Whether for the better or worse remains to be seen.

Utah Fights For 2nd Amendment…Sort Of

world mexguns full 6328 Utah Fights for 2nd Amendment…Sort Of

Can state lawmakers legally fine federal officials, even toss them in jail should they attempt to impose Barack Obama’s agenda of gun bans and confiscation on the American people?

Many remember video of lawless New Orleans police as they traveled door to door in the aftermath of Katrina, throwing law abiding citizens to the ground, confiscating their firearms and rendering individuals defenseless at a time when self-defense was all that would separate honest citizens from roving bands of thugs and looters. Such was the outrage of the American public that one year later, the State of Louisiana joined federal lawmakers in banning the confiscation of firearms during declared “emergencies.”

Today, more than a dozen states have “…proposed legislation to either jail federal officials who violate the second amendment or to nullify federal laws to control guns within state borders.” The list of states joining these efforts continues to grow.

But in Utah of all places, the Republican Chair of the House Judiciary Committee refused to allow such legislation to go forward. HB 114 was twice “dropped from the agenda” by chairman Kay McIff as he expressed concern that the “2nd Amendment Preservation Act” might be unconstitutional.

The preamble of the Act “…provides that any federal action that attempts to impose limitations on firearms contrary to the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, or the Constitution or laws of the State of Utah, is unenforceable in this state.” Seems pretty straightforward—no unconstitutional gun laws will be enforced in Utah! But House legislative staff convinced McIff that the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause must automatically render any such statute unconstitutional.

Had the timid Mclff not thrown in the towel before the battle was engaged he might have understood that only “th[e] Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof… shall be the supreme law of the land.”

In short, only laws which are made consistent with the powers specially granted the government in the Constitution may be considered “supreme” and therefore take precedence over state statute. Federal laws which infringe on the right to keep and bear arms are clearly not “made in pursuance of” a Constitution which states that the right to keep and bear arms shall NOT be infringed! Obviously such legislation is unconstitutional on its face and may play no part in the Supremacy Clause.

Well on Friday, the Republican committee chair at last permitted a vote on HB 114 and to no one’s surprise it passed 49-17. The Act now travels to the state senate where Republican Senate President Wayne Neiderhauser promises “…to be very cautious with the bill.”

Prior to allowing Friday’s House vote, Kay McIff made it clear he was loathe to waste money fighting for the 2nd Amendment rights of Utah residents. After all, a suit by the Obama Regime would make for an expensive battle in court. And now, another Republican leader pledges “caution.”

The people of Utah turned out in droves to offer support for the 2nd Amendment Preservation Act, “…reminding committee members of the right to keep and bear arms and the obligation they have to protect that right from the federal government.” Yet Republican leaders in the Republican controlled Utah State Legislature are frightened to death at the thought of fighting for rights which the Founders considered unalienable; God given; rights “which cannot be given away or taken away.”

Americans are primed and ready for a fight with the Democrat Party and its gun grabbing Mufti, Barack Obama. Squeamish Republican “leaders” must NOT fritter away through cowardice the rights which God gave the American people.