Here’s The Good News…

Republican Elephant 2 SC Heres The Good News...

It appeared last night that even Obama was shocked that he won a second term. Today, much of the mainstream media has little to say. It seems that they were more prepared for a Romney win. So out the window went their moaning, whining, blame-game prepared scripts. And in came the ad-lib, try-to-look humble, do-not giggle analysis.

In the meantime, the Republican Party is looking around for someone to blame. But like when you stub your toe at home alone and look around for someone to blame and find that there is no one to blame but yourself, the Republican Party can only blame itself.

The Republican Party was not looking where it was going. Its eyes were so set on getting into the White House that it did not care how it got there. And as a result, it walked right into something obstructing its path, a thing called “liberalism.”

The Republican Party chose a liberal candidate and tried to pass him off as a Ronald Reagan to conservatives and a Bill Clinton to Liberals. But the fact is, a rhino cannot be passed off as an elephant, and neither can it be passed off as a donkey, no matter how hard one tries. As a result, not enough conservatives bought into the sham of Romney being a true conservative, while not enough liberals saw him to be liberal enough.

But here is the good news

The good news is that it is quite possible that the Republican Party will have learned its lesson come 2016. Perhaps the Republican Party will leave the running of a liberal candidate to the Democrat Party and instead give the people of America a real choice in 2016 by running a real conservative in that election. Perhaps it will run a conservative candidate who will defend the U.S. Constitution and has a history of such, one who has the truth in him and dares to speak it, one who could win people over because he has something truly better to offer to this great nation.

Let us hope that the Republican Party has learned from this. Let us hope.

 

Debra, a home school mom turned right wing Christian journalist and activist, runs her own website at: www.InformingChristians.com

Photo Credit: Donkey Hotey (Creative Commons)

Pastor David Jeremiah Should Know Better

An Email Response To A Bad Message

Though I can certainly understand a Christian pastor slipping and casting a vote out of fear, I cannot understand a Christian pastor persecuting Christians that are not slipping along with him.

Pastor David Jeremiah,

For the first time in this 2012 election season, I can honestly say that I hope Mitt Romney wins. This has come as a result of having viewed the video of your church message on this upcoming election:

You see, Pastor Jeremiah, I now see the need for Christians such as yourself to see that fear is not of the Lord and neither is the persecution of God’s children. Though I can certainly understand a Christian pastor slipping and casting a vote out of fear, I cannot understand a Christian pastor persecuting Christians who are not slipping along with him.

Like so many fellow believers in Jesus Christ, you have chosen to ignore Mitt Romney’s Mormonism and encourage voting for him, while making the claim that America needs to turn back to God. Which one, Pastor? Our God? Or the Mormon god?

You say that a president should have reverence for God, while encouraging people to vote for Mitt Romney. Again, Pastor, which one? Our God? Or the Mormon god? Do you really believe that our God is suddenly okay with sharing His glory? Scripture says that God will share His glory with no other.

In the same message that you say a president must reverence God, you admit that Romney is not a Christian; and yet you are encouraging people to vote for him. That is talking out of both sides of your mouth, Pastor Jeremiah.

You say that a president should respect the life of the unborn while encouraging people to vote for Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney has gone on record several times throughout his political career as being pro-choice for abortion (and only when he decided to run for the presidency suddenly became pro-life.) Do you not know this?

You say that a president should have family values while encouraging people to vote for Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney declared homosexual marriage legal in the first state to “legalize” homosexual marriage as the governor of Massachusetts. He did not have the power to do so, and he certainly did not fight it.

God says my people perish for lack of knowledge. Yes, they sure do. And pretending that which is isn’t does not make that which is anything different than it is. And being the mouth piece for Mitt Romney with Christians, to tickle their ears for him, is simply wrong.

You implied that “a thinking Christian” would vote for Romney. You said that those of us who are not voting for either candidate are “morally lazy,” “evil,” “sinful,” and that we are “protecting our holiness.” Considering your generalization of judgement on the whole of us, please consider the following:

By not voting for either of the wicked men running for the presidency, I am waiting on the Lord and trusting in Him.

Psalms 37:

1 Fret not thyself because of evildoers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity.

2 For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb.

3 Trust in the LORD, and do good; so shalt thou dwell in the land, and verily thou shalt be fed.

4 Delight thyself also in the LORD: and he shall give thee the desires of thine heart.

5 Commit thy way unto the LORD; trust also in him; and he shall bring it to pass.

 

I will not in one breath pray that God will heal our land and in the next breath cast a vote for a known wicked man to run that land.

There is nothing morally lazy, evil, or sinful about trusting in the Lord and not trusting in a Godless man whose only consistency is his inconsistency. And since God is my holiness, I have no need to protect it, as He is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Amen!

It is written that in the end, evil will be called good and good will be called evil. And it is also written, “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!” …Isaiah 5:20-21

You finished your message by claiming that before God, you have done what you believe “He’s asked” you to do. No, Pastor Jeremiah. Your fear-driven message was not of the Lord, as fear is not of the Lord.

Debra, a home school mom turned right-wing Christian journalist and activist, runs her own website at: www.InformingChristians.com

I’m Simply Not Scared About The Election

Obama Romney SC Im Simply Not Scared About the Election

Photo credit: Cain and Todd Benson (Creative Commons)

He knows the number of the stars and calls them all by name.
By Debra J.M. Smith

I have a confession to make. Last presidential election I was a freak case. I totally freaked out and thought it was the end of the world when Obama got into office. Letting all the fear tactics of the evil one get to me, I lost focus and took my eyes off of Jesus, in the moment.

And that is exactly what the devil wants us to do, loose focus and not see so clearly, to be blinded by our own fear and rendered useless for the time. Well, this time is different. This presidential election, I will not be moved. I will hold onto the promises of God and know that He is more than able to deliver His people from what ever comes our way.

There are two ways that Satan can render a believer pretty much useless, and that is pride and fear. Both of which require a strong focus on the Lord, in order to not fall into temptation of.

The bible tells us that fear is not of the Lord. Therefore allowing ourselves to cast a vote for even the lesser of two evils out of fear, we can most assuredly know is not of the Lord. I am not going to tell you who to vote for or who not to vote for. I am not even going to tell you not to vote. I am just suggestion to not allow fear to be the reason you do whatever it is you do with your vote.

No matter what happens as a result of the 2012 presidential election, God will still be in control. Nothing will come as a shock to Him.

Scripture says that God knows the number of all the stars, billions of trillions of stars; He has even named them all. Scripture also says that he has numbered every hair on our heads. The way I figure it is if God takes the time to name billions of trillions of stars and number all of the hairs on all of our heads, He surely takes the time to deliver those of us who are His out of any and all evil that comes our way. Whether it be in life or in death.

Psalms 147:4 He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.

Debra, a home school mom turned right wing Christian journalist and activist, runs her own website at: www.InformingChristians.com

Call Me Crazy, But I Thought Romney Won This Final One

Mitt Romney with supporters 2 SC Call Me Crazy, But I Thought Romney Won This Final One

The Third 2012 Presidential Debate

I am not a Romney fan (I am not an Obama fan either), but I thought Romney actually won this third presidential debate.

Yes, he agreed with a lot of what Obama has done with foreign affairs. However, in areas where he should not have agreed, he didn’t.

He spoke up for Israel and nailed Obama for having not visited there on his apologetic Middle East presidential trip early on. He also spoke up about Russia and mentioned Obama’s “oops” moment with the microphone on. He made clear that Iran is the biggest foreign threat. And he could not have been more thorough about China’s inability to play fair and what he would do there.

He did these things while certainly holding his own in the exchange and not letting Obama get the better of him. And actually, I felt that Obama again often looked like one of those bouncy doggy heads in the back window of a 1960s Chevy. So why is the mainstream media saying Obama won? I guess we all know why.

Debra J.M. Smith 10-22-12
www.InformingChristians.com

 

Photo Credit : Gage Skidmore (Creative Commons)

An Independent Take On Last Night’s Debate

Romney Obama SC An Independent Take On Last Nights Debate

An Impartial View By An Independent

With the timer-keeping track on the bottom-right part of the screen, I could not help but notice where Obama’s lead was throughout the majority of the debate. Though Romney was the first to answer a question, Obama managed to get and keep the lead in the time spent talking. The debate ended with Obama having spoken for 44.04 minutes, as opposed to Romney’s 40.50. That’s a lot of extra time when one realizes just how much can be said by a well-rehearsed candidate in three minutes.

And Obama was just that, well-rehearsed. While Romney began the debate smoothly, directly responding to the person asking the first question, Obama pulled out a typical campaign speech from his bag of things-to-say if this-or-that is asked. It was clear who was relaxed and who wasn’t.

The debate moderator, Candy Crowley, appeared and sounded a bit frazzled throughout most of the debate, several times seeming to have lost control of things. However, I would not be able to say if she favored one candidate over the other, if you paid me for my thoughts on it.

Each candidate had his lowest moment. Romney’s lowest point of the night was when he spoke down to Obama in a disciplinary manner, saying, “You’ll get your chance in a moment. I’m still speaking.” Obama had his lowest point when he played the wounded thin-skinned, you-hurt-my-feelings card, saying, “And the suggestion that anybody in my team, whether the Secretary of State, our U.N. Ambassador, anybody on my team would play politics or mislead when we’ve lost four of our own, Governor, is offensive.” While disrespecting an opponent during a debate only served to make Romney look rude and mean, aiming for sympathy votes made Obama look pathetic.

The highs were there, as well. Romney read off his economic plan to create such a business-friendly environment in this country that it would make American companies grow beyond our wildest dreams and even attract companies from other countries to come here and set up shop. Obama beamed with pride when he read off what he had done in these four years, claiming to have reined in Wall Street, created millions of jobs, and saved an auto industry. Basically, Romney wants us to believe that he will turn this country into an American business utopia, while Obama wants us to believe he has already achieved that goal.

The question both men answered very much alike was on immigration. They gave the usual politician’s answer: secure the boarders, stop the illegals from coming because many other people are waiting to come here legally, and do something to help the children stay.

Both men failed miserably with the ”equal pay for women” question. Obama still believes that equal pay can be legislated. And Romney will most likely never live down having pointed out the obvious, that often women need more flexible hours.

Then there were the zingers. Each candidate only had to bring up the other candidate’s past record to get the zingers in, which they both did quite well. Perhaps the zingers were the only times during the debate that we heard what they both have in common, as well as any truth. With that said, I have to call this debate a draw and wish everyone happy voting, whether you cast a vote for Obama, for Romney, a write-in, or not at all.

Debra J.M. Smith 10-16-12
www.InformingChristians.com

Photo credit: DonkeyHotey (Creative Commons)

The Main Reason Obama-Care Is Unconstitutional Is Being Missed

Obama Obamacare Obamalaw SC The Main Reason Obama Care Is Unconstitutional Is Being Missed

They are missing the main point of it all.

If someone broke into your home, would you stand there arguing with him as to what is okay for him to take and what is not? Of course you wouldn’t. And yet that is what is happening with the health care law. People are arguing about what is in the law instead of the fact that the law is there to begin with and shouldn’t be.

There is no power given to Congress that allows them to take over the privately-owned health insurance industry and turn it into a government-run health care system. The health care law is basically saying that there is no longer any such thing as health insurance. ObamaCare is a health “care” act, not a health “insurance” act. Hence the reason that no one can be turned down. It is not insurance. Insurance insures us in case something happens, not after it happens. We don’t get house insurance after our kitchen burns down.

It is now health care, a government-run entity, in which everyone has to put into the pot. And it is beyond socialism. It is out-and-out communism because of the government’s takeover of an industry, the dissolving of it, and the forcing of those who were in that industry to now work for a government-run entity. It is like this: You own a clothing store. The government says that you can no longer run it as a store; you now must run it as a place where people can come and just get whatever it is that they need to wear within the government’s standards; and everyone who gets their clothing from you must pay a yearly amount to you that does not go over a government-set amount of cost to them. You no longer own a store. You now work for the government in a government-run clothing distribution place. And you are no longer allowed to own and operate a true store again. You are not allowed to make a profit above what the government allows you to get paid yearly from each person who comes into the government-run clothing distribution place. The government’s claim is that it has a right to regulate what you do for the good of commerce (trade) in this country.

So how can the federal government do this? Legally, it cannot. It can only do it illegally. And this is how it is doing it, illegally. Congress is claiming that it has the power to regulate commerce under the commerce clause when in fact it does not have a flat out-and-out power to regulate commerce under the clause. It has a right “To regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several states and with the Indian tribes.” Its power is only to regulate the actual trade (the actual commerce) “among” (as in “between”) these entities, not within. If the interpretation was really what Congress is claiming, then that would mean that Congress can take over and run every American business, Indian business, and even every business in any other nation, too. That which is true for one part of the clause has to be true for the rest of it. But the fact is, the interpretation is not right. It is flat-out wrong. So where did this come from?

Okay, follow me here: In 1938, a law (The Agricultural Adjustment Act) was passed by Congress. The act actually put limits on how much wheat American farmers could grow on their land. Congress wanted to stabilize the price of wheat in the national market, so Congress sought to control the amount of wheat produced. Congress actually wanted the wheat prices to go up to help the economy. One farmer, Roscoe Filburn, grew more wheat than the law allowed him to, but he was growing it for his own use (for his own animals.) This resulted in the 1942 Supreme Court case, Wickard v. Filburn, in which the Supreme Court said that he could not grow more than what the law permitted him to grow. Because while he was growing his own wheat for his own animals, he was then not purchasing food for his animals from somewhere else. Hence, they said he was hurting the national market by growing his own, instead of buying the extra that he needed.

Does this sound crazy to you? That’s because it is crazy! This is like saying that you cannot sew your own clothes because when you sew your own clothes, you are hurting the national economy by not purchasing your clothes.

Clearly in the case of Wickard v. Filburn, the Supreme Court made a bad ruling. And yet, today’s Congress used that ruling in the case that was before the Supreme Court on ObamaCare. And both sides of the case acted as if the Wickard v. Filburn case was just fine. The argument against ObamaCare was simply saying that people cannot be forced into purchasing something. The media reported this as “forced into commerce.” However, this was like saying it was okay to tell Roscoe Filburn that he could not grow the extra wheat as long as he was not forced to buy it from someone else. Not only was that wrong because we have a right to grow what we need, but also because stopping him from growing what he needed did in fact force him to buy it from someone else. And this is not to mention the fact that the 1938 Agricultural Adjustment Act was unconstitutional, in and of itself, because Congress only has the power to regulate what is sold to an entity in another state, nation, or Indian tribe, not within a state.

So here we are, in 2012, fighting a health care law that came to be on the back of a wrong interpretation of the Commerce Clause, supported by a bad 1938 law and a bad 1942 Supreme Court judgment. And the people who argued against the health care law in court just fought something within the law, instead of the law itself.

Debra J.M. Smith 10-08-12
www.InformingChristians.com

Photo credit: terrellaftermath.com

California Law Bans Homosexual Conversion Therapy Of Minors

Californiamap SC California Law Bans Homosexual Conversion Therapy of Minors

Are homosexual children irredeemable, lost forever?

According to a new law in the state of California, homosexual children are unable to be redeemed. They are forever lost in the sin of homosexuality. Christian parents of homosexual children might as well just hand their children over to the state and forget about them, as they are now the property of the state.

Better yet, just hand them over the local lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community. They will love the homosexual children better than any parent would, and they know how to better care for the children. After all, they are who got at the children in the first place; they certainly can take things from here. It is not as if they don’t know what they are doing.

The LGBT community first gets at the children in the public schools, teaching that homosexuality is normal, something to be explored. If one does not explore the possibility, how would one know that one is or isn’t? It is simply the logical thing to do, to get children to dabble in the “alternative lifestyle.” And it is cool to be gay today. Just look at all of the television shows that have the happy homosexuals being embraced and loved on, while the homophobe characters are bad, evil, and just not right. It makes sense to protect their investments with a law that bans any conversion therapy of children who turn to homosexuality. So they did.

California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law SB-1172, authored by California State Senator Ted Lieu. The bill that makes the claim that being lesbian, gay, or bisexual “is not a disease, disorder, illness, deficiency, or shortcoming” states the following:

This bill would prohibit a mental health provider, as defined, from engaging in sexual orientation change efforts, as defined, with a patient under 18 years of age. The bill would provide that any sexual orientation change efforts attempted on a patient under 18 years of age by a mental health provider shall be considered unprofessional conduct and shall subject the provider to discipline by the provider’s licensing entity.

Christian mental health providers will now find themselves in trouble with the state for counseling children who are brought to them by parents seeking help for their sexually confused children who are having homosexual tendencies and by all accounts could be branded such. This attack on the U.S. Constitutional freedoms of California parents should not hold up in a court of law. It is a blatant attack on the children of California, an attack that was clearly a preemptive strike and planned for a very long time and not something to be ignored.

Debra J.M. Smith 10-01-12
www.InformingChristians.com

There’s More To Women Than Reproductive Organs

National Organization for Women SC1 Theres More To Women Than Reproductive Organs

We are more than baby-makers.

The beating down of women is very much alive in Congress today, but not by the Republicans, as the Democrats would have you think. I say that the modern-day oppression of women in this country is by Congressional Democrats.

Democrats in Washington made it very clear during the health care debate. While fighting for women to have control over our own reproductive organs (as if we did not already), they had no problem with handing over mega- control of our entire health care to the federal government.

They do not really care about the health care rights of the average American woman. If they did, they would care about more than just her rights to control her own reproductive organs.

We are more than baby-makers. And I would thank the liberals in D.C. if they stopped behaving as if the only parts of women’s bodies that matter are our reproductive organs.

Debra J.M. Smith 09-27-12
www.InformingChristians.com

Photo Credit: roniweb (Creative Commons)

The Necessity Of American Perseverance

US Flag 3 SC The Necessity Of American Perseverance

“We must never despair; our situation has been compromising before, and it has changed for the better; so I trust it will again. If difficulties arise, we must put forth new exertion and proportion our efforts to the exigencies of the times.” — George Washington

While on the phone with the IRS trying to learn the tax rules for small businesses, I realized just how much of a percentage of every dollar of my earnings would go to taxes. I was stunned.

Self-employed people pay double Social Security and double Medicare taxes, which is on top of federal income taxes. Then there are state income taxes that many have. And when a small business is a second income, the entire small business income will be taxed at a higher income tax rate because it is at the top of the yearly earnings.

I remember pointing out to the IRS person on the phone how little would be left after taxes and business costs. And I will never forget his response. He said to me, ”It’s better than nothing.”

The arrogance of that IRS employee made me so upset. As long as he receives his high government pay and great benefits on the dime of millions of Americans who work so hard, that’s all that mattered to him. He did not care about the number of people who work just as hard as he works and/or harder, who earn far less while paying him. I felt the wind-of-hope draining from my body.

It is true that when hope is taken away that the average person is not going to work as hard at getting financially ahead. That harms people personally, and it harms the economy on a whole. And though I don’t agree with the people who go overboard trying to get ahead to the point of ignoring all else in life, there is good in hard work and good in working towards a better financial situation.

As a people, we can help America’s bad financial situation, while we help our own.

Just as our household finances are not going to get better if we don’t suck it up and do what we can do to make things better, even if that means working hard for far less than we should get, our country’s financial situation is not going to get better either. This might sound crazy, but I have actually come to realize that though that IRS man was arrogant to say what he said, he was actually right. As Americans, we have to do what we can do, even if that means doing it for less.

We need to adopt a “Work is Great, Even for Less” attitude. And in our free time, we need to educate ourselves and then others on our country, on our government, and on politics. And we need to get involved and do our best to change things for the better so that some day, things will be better in this country. Losing hope and giving up will never get us there. We have to persevere.

Debra J.M. Smith 09-20-12
www.InformingChristians.com

Flight 93 – Heroes Soon Forgotten

Flight 93 SC Flight 93   Heroes Soon Forgotten

It was the heroes of Flight 93 that stopped a plane from going into a fourth building on that horrific 9/11/01 morning that is forever etched in the minds of every American old enough to remember. It was said that the plane would have flown into the U.S. Capitol, had it not been for them.

There were forty victims on that flight. It is not a surprise that there are a variety of personalities and opinions within the many family members. With that, it just seems so odd that only half a dozen family members would be involved in the voting process that was said to have voted to use a design that has many attributes to an Islamic Mosque.

To listen to people who work for the North East National Park Service, one might actually believe that the voting was all-inclusive. But one would be wrong. The park service website shows the count to be half a dozen family members, along with seven other people. A person had to qualify in order to even be in the meetings. Being a family member was not enough. While the father of Tom Burnett Jr., Mr. Burnett, was allowed in the meetings, Mrs. Burnett was not. (Tom Burnett Jr. was one of the two men that headed up the forty Flight 93 heroes.)

The park service has a page designed to convince people of support for the memorial design, complete with a video of family members supporting it. Problem is that only three victims are represented in the video that lies about family members who are not on the video and are against the design. One person goes as far as to say that sources speaking against the design are “unrelated to the memorial partnership.” Mr. and Mrs. Tom Burnett Sr. are absolutely related, as are others. There were other family members who did not want the design. The park service speaks of everyone having agreed that the design that won the vote would ultimately get built. However, the Burnetts never dreamed that an Islamic-shaped design would be involved. And the voting was done in secret.

One man on the video said a person would have to be looking in order to find Islamic crescents in the design. That is odd, considering that the original name for the design was Crescent of Embrace. The design is now called The Circle of Embrace, while it still has the entire crescent design within it.

The design includes a “Tower of Voices” that is not only a morbid reminder of the forty victims’ voices calling out to loved ones on their cell phones, but is a perfect Islamic Minaret that would call Muslims to prayer. Actually, the entire design fits the requirements of a giant Islamic Mosque.

Mr. Burnett picked up on the Crescent Design of the tower right away. One of the family members that was in support of the design said she liked it because she saw it as ”reaching out.” Another parent got very upset at just the thought of her child’s murderers being thought of in this process and said that she did not want to reach out to those who murdered her child.

A couple years later, Mr. and Mrs. Burnett found out about a book that points out all of the Islamic references in the design and met the author, Alec Rawls. Along with other family members, many Americans have signed a petition to stop the design from being built.

The newest shame-buzz phrase has already been tossed into this arena – “conspiracy theorists.” Which of course is supposed to make all those who oppose the design pull back in shame. It might do so with weak people. But the Burnetts are not weak. One can truly see where their son got his strength.

Mrs. Burnett got involved for two main reasons: 1) to secure the crash site and 2) to bury the rest of the remains. Though the site has been secured, the rest of the remains have still not been buried. It is believed that there are still remains scattered across a seven-mile area. As Mrs. Burnett calls it, it is an “open burial ground.” Mrs. Burnett has also said that many people would like to keep it as it is now, simple and respectful to all of the victims. But it seems that some want to make a freak show out of the crash site, even going as far as stating in one report that they want people to “feel the spirits of the forty heroes in the whisper of the trees.” That is pagan and sick. The Lord’s children are in heaven, not floating around some trees.

It is interesting what great lengths the park service is going to in order to defend the Islamic- shaped memorial. They could simply put it in the shape of a four-sided design and get rid of that awful tower. Problem solved. However, when I spoke with the park’s person-of-choice to handle the media, I was told that the next person may want a rose bush changed and asked where do they stop. He said that they need to get this built and cannot have things backing it up. This was the same gentleman who told me that the Burnetts were the only people against the design. If he really believes that the Burnetts are the only people unhappy with it, and two simple changes would please them, then it stands to reason to do it, and there would be no people wanting to move a rose bush. Instead, the park service is going way overboard defending this design. And of course, the Burnetts are not the only family members. It is also said that not all the victims’ families even know of the design.

Teresa Heinz, the wife of Senator John Kerry and widow of the late U.S. Senator H. John Heinz III, funded the contest that was to find a design for the flight 93 memorial, via The Heinz Endowments.

The Heinz Endowments, which Teresa is the chairperson of, has also given money to the Tides Foundation, a foundation that gives money to the Islamic group CAIR. And although the Heinz Endowments claims any money it has donated to the Tides Foundation was for specific things, it does not say all of those specific things. The Heinz Endowments implies that it would not give money to an extremist agenda but never states if the Islamic group would be viewed as one.

In speaking with those related to the North East National Park Service and the Heinz Endowments, the Burnetts were made to sound like troublemakers, while I was being told that what I was seeing in the design was not really what I was seeing. And “conspiracy theorists” was tossed in, as well. I reminded one person that 9/11 was a “conspiracy” and that it is not a far cry to think that someone may be pushing for this to be, oh, I don’t know, a “healing with Islam” memorial. It is not as if we have not seen this angle before. Nonetheless, I came away from call after call, thinking, “Wow, they are going too far to defend this design.” And the ironic thing about this is that it was a privately-paid for contest and chosen design, according to the park service’s spokesperson, one that will be built with money that includes millions of taxpayer dollars. And there is even a bigger twist on this. The notes that were taken by recorders in the contest meetings were all destroyed after reports were written. I was told that they could do this due to the meetings being private and the contest being paid for with private funds, the funds that Teresa Heinz’s organization provided.

So, why is a privately-paid for contest resulting in a design that is so controversial, being paid for in any part by American citizens? Why is the national park service going along with it? Where is the proof that the meetings even went the way that the reports said they went? With all of the recorded notes destroyed and a secret voting, how do we really know the true outcome of those meetings? Where’s the proof?

The park is asking for donations for the remainder of the cost to build the memorial. I wonder how many people who donate know about the controversial design. It is not as if it would remain a secret once the huge design is built, if not stopped.

I also wonder how many people know about the harm that has been done to the main landowner in this. Is this what America is about, being thugs and trying to ruin people?

As for the Burnetts, they have said that they are willing to simply have their son’s name removed from the memorial. The park service has declined even that request. That should make anyone of a reasonable mind see who the real troublemakers are.

Click Here to see in detail what exactly all of the controversy is about.

Debra J.M. Smith
www.InformingChristians.com

Special thanks to: Mr. and Mrs. Burnett – Parents of Tom Burnett Jr.
                                  Alec Ralws – Author of Crescent of Betrayal 
                                  Diane Gramley - From American Family Association of Pennsylvania

Photo credit: deltaMike (Creative Commons)