Let me begin by saying that I know Orly Taitz personally. I have interviewed her on my radio program on several occasions. She has even contacted me a couple of times asking to appear on my radio program. I have been in conference with her before – we were guest speakers at the Dallas Constitutional Elections Conference some time back. We had a lengthy personal conversation at that meeting. I have lifted her up and supported her publicly in many different venues. I have, in the past, defended her cause using my good name and reputation.

She sought me out in the crowd at CPAC 2013 on three different occasions for the purpose of talking with me. She even invited me to eat lunch with her and her other guests. Practically every time we spoke she leveled negative charges against Mike Zullo and Sheriff Arpaio and their investigation as compared to hers. I even arranged a sit-down meeting with Taitz and Zullo at CPAC so that Mike Zullo could answer her concerns. Mike Zullo was the consummate professional and gentleman in that meeting. I witnessed the meeting and heard every word of it. He was patient with her, kind, respectful, and thorough in his answers to her.

She seemed to “get it” at that meeting. But, obviously she did not – as is now apparent by her continued mantras – some of them the same as at CPAC. I truly have no desire to disparage her, although she certainly seems to have no hesitation in disparaging me or Mike Zullo and Sheriff Arpaio. She continually unleashes a barrage of misinformation and accusations against us on her website. She proclaims that her website is the “World’s Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site.”

Taitz’ sometimes false and often misleading allegations only serve to “muddy the water” in the eyes of the world and the legal community concerning the whole issue of the highly suspicious nature of the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama. She is making a mockery of the issue. She has now become the biggest detractor of Arpaio and Zullo on the net. This fact seems suspicious to me. Is this “muddying of the water” a purposed act on her part? Is she really an Obama operative in disguise? I do know that since Mike Zullo and I have brought up that possibility on the radio and in print – Orly has yet, to date, to deny our speculation. That fact, in and of itself, seems odd to me. I have no concrete evidence that she is an Obama operative, only anecdotal evidence that leads me to wonder and to ask the question. The same questions, the same attacks, the same misinformation tactics are used by the Obama operatives on a continual basis.