Democrat Storm Troopers Find Gadsden Flag “offensive”

Dont Tread on Me1 Democrat storm troopers find Gadsden flag “offensive”

Democrats love to flex their political muscles in the faces of anyone, but they take special pleasure in rubbing the noses of conservatives in the dirt. They are nasty lowlifes, after all.

Recently, the Democrats of the City Council of New Rochelle, New York, a Big Apple bedroom community, decided that the United Veterans Memorial & Patriotic Association could not fly a Gadsden flag (known more widely as the “Don’t Tread On Me” flag) in front of the town’s armory. One of the five skunks who voted to take this action cried that the flag, which is a symbol of pride to actual patriotic Americans, was “offensive” to him.

In a surprisingly hateful and stupid display, even for a liberal Democrat, Council member Barry Fertel likened the Gadsden flag to the Confederate “Stars and Bars” battle flag and a Gay pride flag.  When veterans at the Council’s public hearing  said American patriots died fighting under the Don’t Tread On Me flag during the Revolution (and more recently during battles in Iraq and Afghanistan), Fertel replied, “People died fighting under the Confederate flag too.”

When liberals are given power, laws they don’t like such as “theft under color of law” mean nothing.  Gleefully adding insult and illegality to their fiat, the Council not only ordered the flag be taken down; it ordered that it be confiscated.

Before voting to order the flag be taken down, each of the five liberal Democrats took a turn attacking the flag as a “symbol of the TEA Party.”

Drunk with the power of their 5 to 2 majority, the abuse of logic and patriotism continued with member Brian Sussman, a local Democrat Party District Leader who likened the flag to the Nazi’s swastika, a Mickey Mouse flag, and finally to simple graffiti.  Words cannot accurately describe the level of contempt people like this guy deserve. It is truly a disturbing example of what America has become under the psychopathic rule of the vicious Left.

If there is any good news in this story, it is that the Thomas More Law Center, which is representing the veterans, is confident it can beat these thugs in court and get this ruling overturned.

Photo Credit: marsmet 541 (Creative Commons)

Let The Left Keep Talking…

Chris Matthews SC Let the Left keep talking...

The hysterical screeching has already started. The Left is drawn to blame a terrorist attack on American soil on conservatives like a moth is drawn to a flame. They’re psychopaths who only care about moving their destructive agenda forward. Liberals will say anything; they can’t do otherwise. They’re not bound by any restrictions of common human decency because they have none.

Despicable cancers such as Chris Matthews, Michael Moore, and lunatic Cynthia McKinney have already started accusing conservatives of this ugly attack.  Let them keep talking.

Either the Boston Police or the media are lying about whether or not a suspect is in custody. Betting on the media seems to be the smart move here. The Left’s problem is that it doesn’t know what lie to tell, so let them keep talking.

The police/media contradiction puts the Left in a no-win situation. If the police stick to their story, at some point the Left will lose control of the news narrative because either they will or will not have a suspect. If they do have a suspect, questions about why they denied it will come up; if they never did have one, the media branch of the Left will lose its ability to manage the story because Americans will demand to know why there is no suspect.

Justifiable cries about a “conspiracy of lies” will pop up all over.

That will give rise to questions of whether or not the establishment can actually protect us if they were even interested in trying. Let them keep talking about that in the face of what has happened.

The linkage between the cover-up of Benghazi and Boston (the alliteration won’t help the Left either) will be unavoidable.  If there is a suspect, questions about whether or not he will be treated as a common criminal or an unlawful enemy combatant will be asked. If he is “just a criminal,” will he be put on trial like the jihadist who shot up Fort Hood? Will the ACLU represent him and drag the case out forever?  The Left will try to hide behind “I can’t comment on an ongoing investigation,” but that won’t help.  Because of Fort Hood, people know the plan is to have their “ongoing investigation” continue until we stop asking questions; but every indication is that Boston won’t “just go away” as they hope.

None of this will be good for Barack Obama’s dreams of making America a European country. Nor will it help the Left erase our borders and take our guns. If we just stand back and let the Left talk, we can win both fights.        

The Left Would Hate Jackie Robinson Today…

Jackie Robinson SC The Left Would Hate Jackie Robinson Today...

Democrats don’t ever tell the truth about their shared history with African Americans. They will never admit that the Confederacy was formed by Democrats intent on keeping their ancestors locked on plantations as slaves. They will never admit that the Klu Klux Klan was formed and populated by Democrats who had been members of the Confederate Army.  They have lied about which Party was home to some of the worst bigots in American history.

Black conservative writer K. Carl Smith summed these lies up with: “When I grew up in Alabama, I thought George Wallace was a Republican. I thought Bull Connor was a Republican. I believed the people that bombed the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Ala., were part of the Republican Party…..  all of the things I believed to be true I found it was a lie.”

Last Friday, the new movie “42” referring to Jackie Robinson’s uniform number was released. It is apparently a stirring tale of how a black American named Jack Roosevelt Robinson, who had the skill and courage necessary to pull it off, broke the color barrier and played baseball for the Brooklyn Dodgers.

What is certain is that the Hollywood version of the Jackie Robinson story will not tell us about his life as a Republican activist after baseball. It will not touch on the strongly-held  Republican beliefs of Branch Rickey, the man who signed Robinson to play baseball for the  Dodgers, ironically played by leading Hollywood liberal Harrison Ford.  Nor will it mention that it was not until in 1959,  twelve years after Robinson was first at bat, that Boston (a bastion of phony liberalism) became the very last city to put a black man (Pumpsie Green) on its baseball field.

Jackie Robinson’s post-baseball years are just another story about black people the Democrats and their lap dog media ignore because it doesn’t fit the tapestry of lies they need their plantation hands to hear and believe.

The Democrats want the “truth” to be: “Yes Robinson had these wired un-politically correct conservative thoughts, but in 1960 when he saw Richard Nixon refuse to campaign in Harlem he was cleansed of them.” Nevertheless, Robinson’s autobiography strongly suggests otherwise. He was impressed with the enormous sums of money that white Republican Nelson Rockefeller’s family had given to support black colleges (Spellman College, which is today a leading anti-Republican nest, was founded by John D. Rockefeller and named for his mother.) Robinson liked a certain brand of Republicanism. He was a Rockefeller Republican, but a Republican nonetheless.

In order to campaign for Nelson Rockefeller in 1964, Robinson gave up a well- paying, very secure  job as a spokesman for Chock Full O’Nuts coffee company. Yet who could deny that if Jackie Robinson was alive today he would be mocked and reviled by the creeps at MSNBC because his political beliefs would not fit the plantation field-hand mentality they demand from blacks?  Number 42 would be just another Uncle Tom to them.

To read more about the Democrats’ lies to Blacks and others over their two hundred year history go to crooksthugsandbigots.com

N.B. The hard copy is no longer in print and cannot be ordered.

Photo credit: Baseball Collection (Creative Commons)

Unions Dying In Wisconsin!

Scott Walker Unions Dying In Wisconsin!

There is some very good news from Wisconsin. Republican Governor Scott Walker is winning his war with the state’s public employee unions.

When Walker stepped into the political ring to battle his state’s powerful government workers’ unions, no one gave him much chance of surviving, let alone winning.  Walker’s efforts have been startling. He has succeeded beyond what anyone could have foreseen.

Wisconsin’s American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Council 40, has seen its members steadily jump over its plantation walls since Walker, backed by a thin but courageous Republican majority in the state’s legislature, voted to give workers the right to opt out of union membership.

When the law took effect, 31,730 union members were imprisoned in AFSCME’s clutches. They were being extorted for dues, which kept union thugs in a comfortable life style. At first, the newly freed slaves were a bit hesitant to run away even with the gates wide open; so only about 2,000 opted out.

Those was the “good old days” for the union because at the end of last year, its rolls had fallen to just 20,488. Since the first day of Walker’s law, 11,242 union victims have chosen to stop paying their extortionists.

Happily, this is nowhere near the best news from Wisconsin. A Wall Street Journal study confirmed that AFSCME’s  statewide Badger State membership has fallen by an eye popping 34,073  in just two years. More than 46 % of AFSCME’s slaves have run off, taking their union dues with them!

Not surprisingly, Council 40’s expenditures have not been posted since February 2011 when it lost its fight with Walker and its members were freed of their chains. In true Marxist style, Council 40 has not bothered to update its official membership count either and still lists the same 29,777 members it had at the end of 2011.

What else can we expect? With rare exception, unions are run by either the Mafia or devout Marxists. Both lie and hide their true intentions. This union is no different except that it is melting away.  They can lie and deny, but they can’t change the truth.

Democrats: We Are Psychopaths

Democrat SC Democrats: We Are psychopaths

During a recent Nevada Assembly Education Committee hearing, a liberal Democrat woman proudly announced she had an abortion when she was 16.  In doing so, she reminded us that liberals are basically anti-social psychopaths.

A review of available literature shows that, as a group, liberal Democrats display a large number of personality traits found among those who have been clinically diagnosed as psychopaths.

While there are approximately 21 identified traits of a psychopath (and she might display even more of these benchmarks), Nevada Democrat Lucy Flores, who made that proclamation, is proudly devoid of regret over having murdered her baby through an induced abortion.

Flores’ actions and words suggest her personality includes the following dangerous traits as well.

Selfishness callous and remorseless:

Her recitation of the circumstances of her abortion make it clear that she cared nothing about the child she was carrying – the phrase liberals use of “unviable tissue mass” comes to mind.

Grandiose sense of self-worth:

Assemblywoman Flores apparently sees herself as an abortionist Joan of Arc encouraging other young women to murder their unplanned children as long as it furthers their own career goals.

Emotional poverty:

Clearly, Ms. Flores, who is an attorney today (no surprise), has learned nothing about appropriate human emotions over the years. She is using her abortion history as a weapon to carve her way to the top in the very deep pool of liberal psychopaths in her party.

Give Flores credit; she does not hide behind a “youthful indiscretion” as the reason for her abortion. In her remarks, Flores said, “I had six other sisters, all of them became pregnant in their teens – all of them. One was 14 years old when she got pregnant with twins. That is what I had to learn from. I didn’t want to be like that (teen mom). I wanted to do better and I knew I couldn’t do that if I had a baby, just like everyone else [in my family]. My dad gave me the money and I went with a friend of mine [to have the abortion] and I will never forget that, having that done.”

She went on to say: “I don’t regret it. I don’t regret it because I am here (at the Legislature), making a difference, at least in my mind, (how self- important of her!) for the young ladies and letting them know their options. They can do things not to be in the situation I was in, to prevent it.”

Democrats keep telling us they are basically selfish low-life psychopaths; we just need to listen to them.

Photo Credit: DonkeyHotey (Creative Commons)

Cop Hating NAACP Nominates Cop Killer Mumia Abu-Jamal As An “un-sung Hero”

 Cop hating NAACP nominates cop killer Mumia Abu Jamal as an “un sung hero”

It is very sad, but unfortunately not surprising, to see the depth to which the once proud and heroic National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) has sunk. The NAACP which was established in 1909 as a direct counter to the Klu Klux Klan has steadily searched for a raison d’etre in view of its increasing irrelevance as a victim of its own success. The once respectable organization has gone from a reliable Republican voting group to one that is now home to radical anti-Americans longing for socialism.

Politically the NAACP is as totally owned today as their slave ancestors where owned by THEIR masters. Just as the plantation owners of the old South, the owners of today’s NAACP demand total and unwavering obedience. This fact of political life for the NAACP is the only possible explanation for its latest and most disgusting public position.

The NAACP has nominated Mumia Abu-Jamal a convicted murderer who killed Philadelphia Police Officer Daniel Faulkner in 1981 as an “Un-Sung Hero!” The circumstances of the murder are exceptionally unambiguous. The murderer in this case has had his conviction reviewed and affirmed more than two dozen times over the past thirty years. He has not won a single appeal. He should have been executed a long time ago. His cause has been a rallying point for America hating swine like Ed Asner and Mike Farrell and the City Council of Paris which has named a street after him.

The murderer who was born Wesley Cook took a made up Muslim name to make certain the world knows how much he hates America and all it stands for. Taking a Muslim name signifies that he stands with the Muslim world which even to this day takes slaves and was a major part of the slave trade that victimized the ancestors of his supporters at the NAACP.

Of course none of this counts for anything when NAACP types are falling all over themselves to suck up to the White liberal world. ANYTHING that offends mainstream Americans is something people like this will gladly commit.

Nominating a cop killer as a un-sung hero is just the latest shameful act from a now very shameful NAACP. Disgusting is the word that comes to mind.

The Ultimate Aim Of The Gay “marriage” Plot

Gay Marriage SC The Ultimate aim of the Gay “marriage” plot

The gay marriage plot is not hard to see. It goes as follows:  First, legalize gay “marriage.” Next, use tax law to force churches to commit to gay “marriages” with an either/or choice. Finally, close those that refuse to commit to gay “marriages.”

The forced choice will be: gay “marriage,” or lose tax exempt status.

The real target of all of this is the Catholic Church. For all of her faults, the Catholic Church has steadfastly refused to change her position against same-gender marriage. The elevation of Pope Francis has done nothing to make anyone think this position will be changed.

The Left knows that a Supreme Court victory will never give gays what they really want, which is a totally unfettered lifestyle and “freedom” to live not only as they wish, but to be accepted as equals in everyday life. With the Catholic Church standing in the way, that is a door gays will never be able to open.

Defeating a Church as strongly opposed to gay “marriage” as the Catholic Church is her gay enemy’s goal. Nevertheless, those who believe the approximately 28 million Catholics – actual Catholics who actually attend Mass each week – will roll over and accept gay “marriage” in their churches are terribly wrong.

The media can poll people who once walked past St. Patrick’s Cathedral and count them as Catholics to show “Catholics” voted for Barack Obama and love gay “marriage”; but real Catholics know the truth.

The plan will be carried out in an insidious and low-keyed manner. A pastor of a small unaffiliated white Protestant church will have a gay couple ask him to marry them, knowing he will say no. Since the pastor is unaffiliated with a larger structure, he will be faced with a lawsuit putting him in an “either/or” trap: Commit gay “marriages,”  violate Scripture, and stay open; or refuse and be taxed out of existence.  At first, many will resist; but eventually, some, then more and more, will be forced to cave in.

When the first legal case is won by gay “marriage” supporters, a legal precedent will be established.  Larger churches such as Evangelical Assembly’s will be next – mosques and Orthodox Jewish synagogues will NOT be approached as it would not be worth the distraction.

Eventually, a prominent gay Catholic will demand to “marry” a gay partner in St. Patrick’s Cathedral. When that day comes, the gay enemies of Catholicism will see their long-held dream of putting the Catholic Church in an “either/or” trap become reality.

Photo credit: Dave Schumaker (Creative Commons)    

Should These Administrators And Teachers Be Fired?

Classroom SC1 Should These Administrators and Teachers Be Fired?

There is a scene in the movie “A Bronx Tale” where the father of a young man counsels his son not to attack another young man over a $20.00 debt that has gone unpaid for too long. The father explains this is a small price to discover that someone is not trustworthy. He tells his son to be glad he has been shown how untrustworthy the other man is in this minor matter. “Now you know not to trust him in the future in bigger things,” he says.

This small lesson begs the question: Why would we trust school administrators who cannot tell the difference between an imaginary “weapon” fashioned out of a cupcake and something that is genuinely dangerous?

The stories of idiots suspending second graders for pointing a finger at a playmate and saying “Bang!” were funny the first dozen times we heard them, but not anymore.

“Imagine that; this fool thinks a child chewing a piece of his lunch into what a teacher THINKS looks like a gun actually suspended the kid!” is the type of comment that gets late-night comics big laughs.

But what is funny about a person we trust our children’s lives with displaying such a gross lack of discernment and judgment? If these people are not able to understand that schools are not attacked by “savage” six year olds but rather by adults with real weapons (not cupcakes), why shouldn’t they be immediately fired and replaced with someone who can make sound judgments?

Who would want a teacher or administrator, who is unable to recognize real and present danger, to freeze in puzzled inaction at the sight of a genuine gunman marauding through the halls of our children’s schools? Why should we allow these people to keep these positions of high trust? Isn’t it always the schools that proudly proclaim they are “gun free” that seem to be the targets of cowards with guns (real guns, not water pistols)?

Why can’t we take a cue from “A Bronx Tale” and see the poor decisions made by these people as a free look into the future and actually a judgment test they have failed? How long will it be before we see a real shooting at a school run by an idiot who thinks a drawing of a gun is as dangerous as a real gun?

When children are exposed to such nonsense, what is to keep them from concluding that other regulations make no sense and are not worth obeying? Should that become the case, then where will we be?

How To Deal With Fake “Catholic” Politicians…

Pope Francis SC How to deal with fake “Catholic” politicians...

First, the good news: the Catholic Church has a new pope. Now the better news: Pope Francis is a strong conservative who has expressed strong opinions about what constitutes adherence to Catholic doctrine.

The elevation of Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Argentina as the new Pope, who is now known as Pope Francis (not Francis I because there has  never been another Pope Francis)  is a clear signal that the Roman Catholic Church has taken a decided turn to the right. Pope Francis will redefine the roll of priests to one that is more inclusive of evangelizing in an increasingly secular world and much more.

While Pope Francis is the first Jesuit Pope and first non-European Pope in more than a thousand years, the importance of his elevation is that he is exactly the right man to step forward and protect orthodox Catholic doctrines. The doctrine of marriage as a sacred union between a man and a woman, the doctrine of only male priests, and the doctrine of life’s beginning at conception will be fiercely protected by Francis. He has told us this in his pronouncements and writings throughout his priesthood.

Francis has also written about the necessary requirements to receive Holy Communion. This is where things get difficult for the C.I.N.O.s (Catholics In Name Only) who flourish in American politics. Francis has opined that public support for abortion and gay marriage represent impediments to the individual seeking to receive Holy Communion. He has said “we should commit ourselves to ‘Eucharistic coherence’, that is, we should be conscious that people cannot receive Holy Communion and at the same time act or speak against the commandments, in particular when abortion, euthanasia, and other serious crimes against life and family are facilitated. This responsibility applies particularly to legislators, governors, and health professionals.”

Words like this should cause the Obama Administration to take note, but they haven’t. Barack Obama is sending Joe Biden, a man the secular world refers to as a “devout Catholic”, to Francis’ installation next week.  Biden has been barred from receiving Communion by several Catholics dioceses, including Delaware (where he is from) and Scranton (where he grew up.)

The stage is already set for a confrontation with America’s CINO politicians. It will come sooner than most of them believe. When Obamacare’s “contraception/abortion” mandate comes into effect in August, things will heat up for them.

Photo credit: Catholic Church (England and Wales) (Creative Commons)

Is The Democrat Tower Of Babble Crumbling In California?

California Is the Democrat tower of Babble crumbling in California?

How was it possible that Scott Walker was able to beat back so many challenges and build his reputation as a “union killer” in a state like Wisconsin, yet Mitt Romney still lost there, even with a popular Paul Ryan as his running mate?   It happened because while the Democrats in Wisconsin and other states are turning on each other, they will stop fighting long enough to re-elect Democrat Barack Obama. This political reality has developed because the rank and file Democrats, who are being forced to work harder to fund the pensions of their “union brothers and sisters” have said “Enough!” They don’t care about Democrat union members now that THEY have learned THEY are funding the pay and benefits packages they THOUGHT were paid for with money picked off a tree (some Democrats are THAT dumb).

This phenomenon is now taking shape in California. The current epicenter of the showdown between the makers and the takers is in San Diego, where voters last year supported reforms (read: reductions) of civil servants’ pension benefits. This, of course, has angered union members.

The cost of paying for the cushy retirements of these people has quintupled over the last dozen years; and at long last, the suckers don’t want to fund them anymore.

Naturally, the unions are fighting back. They’re claiming a lack of “go faith” on the part of the suckers in San Diego.  The union thugs actually believe THEY have the power of “yes or no” in this matter. Why shouldn’t they feel this way? After all, the unions own California, and the suckers work FOR them.

The San Diego City Attorney Jan Goldsmith, who can count voters, has come out fighting on this issue saying “We’re not gonna back down one iota, I can tell you that; Because the people do have a right under direct democracy to bypass the city council, to bypass the state legislature, to bypass the labor unions, and to bypass PERB. This is a constitutional right, no different than the first amendment.”

Based on what has happened around the state when other suckers have revolted, Goldsmith looks to be on the winning side. Other local governments are fighting their unions and winning. Surprisingly, even Governor Jerry Brown has joined the fight against the unions in spite of his having been a prime mover in creating this pension mess when he was governor the first time between 1975 and 1983.

What will come of this? Who knows? But any trouble in our enemy’s tent is a good thing.

Photo credit: photologue_np (Creative Commons)