Zuckerberg And Rubio: Amnesty’s Two Indistinguishable Amigos

Zuckerberg SC Zuckerberg and Rubio: Amnesty’s two indistinguishable amigos

Mark Zuckerberg and Marco Rubio have become amnesty’s two indistinguishable amigos. They have morphed into Marco Zuckerberg and Mark Rubio.

You’ve heard the radio spots and seen the television ads featuring Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio talking about the dire need to do something about the “immigration problem” (not “illegal immigration” but immigration.)

During a minute’s worth of huffing and puffing, Rubio tries to bulldoze past any logical objections to erasing our borders with faux tough talk designed to impress us with his credentials as an “insider’ who KNOWS more than we do.

Rubio’s media crusade is funded by liberal Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg.

To impress us, Rubio uses buzz phrases like “conservative immigration reform,” “tough border triggers,” and “no giveaways for lawbreakers.”  That putting these words in Rubio’s mouth is not only breathtakingly insulting to true conservatives (but simply not true) shouldn’t resonate with a liberal like Zuckerberg; but Rubio has been “playing a conservative on TV” long enough to know better.

These spots betray a gross underestimation of conservatives.  Zuckerberg probably believes conservatives marry their sisters and are far less intelligent than he is, but Rubio apparently thinks conservatives are pining for a way to suck up to Hispanics the way white liberals sucked up to blacks and elected Barack Obama.

A new report from Public Policy Polling (a Democrat firm) shows that Rubio is self-immolating with these insulting spots. Conservatives who once saw him as an acceptable GOP nominee for president in 2016 are running away from him in obvious disgust over his decision to do Chuck Schumer’s bidding by erasing our borders.

During the period from May 6 – 9, when asked about Rubio as the Republicans’ 2016 nominee, “very conservative” and “somewhat conservative” respondents supported him at 17% and 18% respectively. That’s down from 26% and 22% from these groups just a month before.

The supreme irony of Marco Rubio’s foolishness is that Hispanics, who hold themselves aloof from participation in our civic life and wait for the best “goodies” package offer before deciding who to support, are naïve enough to believe Rubio’s tough talk and don’t like it.  His support among Hispanics has fallen 5% in the same period.

At this point, only wild-eyed liberals like Zukerberg believe that these spots can erase our borders. Nevertheless, a cunning liberal like Schumer might be using these spots as an opportunity to destroy the foolish Mr. Rubio’s chances of ever running for president.

Blurring the lines between “amnesty amigos” Marco Zuckerberg and Mark Rubio will not end well for the Senator from Florida.

Photo credit: JD Lasica, socialmedia.biz (Creative Commons)

A Web Of Their Own Making

NARAL SC A web of their own making

The terrible ten year rape/ kidnapping ordeal suffered by three innocent  Cleveland women at the hands of Ariel Castro, a registered Democrat (look it up), may yet put the baby killing crowd at NARAL and NOW in a web of their own evil lies.

Their captivity included daily rapes and the predictable pregnancies that followed. The startling evidence shows that Castro’s depravity extended to stomach-punching pregnant victims to cause miscarriages, thereby murdering at least five innocent babies.

That Castro’s crimes are revolting and demand the death penalty is a widely held sentiment; but what will women’s organizations do or say?

Because women’s organizations are by definition liberal, calls for such retribution might not come from the likes of NARAL and NOW. Both organizations could end up either saying nothing about these horrific crimes or potentially joining in a fight to keep Castro from being convicted of murdering those five innocent little babies.

To his great credit, Cleveland Prosecutor Timothy J. McGinty has expressed his intentions to find a way to put Castro to death for the murders of these babies.

This case presents a serious and problematic dilemma for the Baby Killers. On the one hand, to fulfill their self-appointed mission of protectors of women, they have to demand that Castro be charged with and convicted of every conceivable crime McGinty can think of.  Nevertheless, on the other hand, to push for the maximum amount of punishment for this beast, they will have to support bringing murder charges against him for killing in-utero infants, thereby conceding defeat in the “personhood” argument and agreeing that the five additional victims were worthy of protection and not just “unviable tissue masses.”

During the Laci Peterson case, a frightened NOW said, “If this is murder, [Peterson killing the baby Laci was carrying] well, then any time a late-term fetus is aborted, they could call it murder.” Yes, indeed they could.

Lying and being on the side of evil catches up to you eventually.

Photo credit: ProgressOhio (Creative Commons)

Jim DeMint And The Immigrantion IQ Debate

richwineheritage Jim DeMint and The Immigrantion IQ Debate

When South Carolina’s Republican Senator Jim DeMint resigned to head the Heritage Foundation most “outside the Beltway” conservatives were at first apprehensive about the net effect it would cause.  The thinking on DeMint’s move slowly evolved to “Jim can do things outside of the system he can’t do/say while in the Senate.” It sounded reasonable – after all this was Jim DeMint.

Since he took over Heritage DeMint has been an irritant to the Gang of Eight as they fight to destroy America by erasing our borders, but time has shown that alas he is not the “all in” warrior for our safety we assumed he would be.  The abrupt “resignation” of Jason Richwine, a Harvard trained PhD, from his position as a Heritage Foundation analyst/writer tells us a different story about DeMint.

Richwine HAD to be banished from Heritage for committing the heretical outrage of telling the truth about the destructive effect mass waves of Hispanic immigration have had on America’s economy.  Worse still Richwine took the “head on” position that the damage has been caused because of the lower IQ of these immigrants.

Richwine exposed Teddy Kennedy’s lies about the probable results of his Immigration Reform legislation. We know now that it was a clever gambit to replace the Democrat votes being lost in the South. Today we have veritable conga line of new low IQ immigrants eager to reward the Democrat Party for holding the door open for them.

The whines and howls that followed from the Left were of course to be expected. It is simply “not allowed” to point out differences in IQ among various races and ethnic groups unless you are saying a minority group (usually Asian) has a slightly higher IQ than any other.

Nevertheless, other unexpected voices have joined in the attacks on Richwine – those who should be defending him and using the data he presented demonstrate the lower IQ immigrant costs us $6.3 TRILLION.

After the first squeal from the Left about Jason Richwine’s  R-a-c-i-s-m,  within three days Jim DeMint folded and begged for mercy.  Heritage denounced its own White Paper on IQ and race by bleating its findings, “… in no way reflect the positions of The Heritage Foundation.” How we wish they did.

Jim DeMint agreed with the Left that it is better to never mention what wave immigration has done to America because it makes for uncomfortable evenings at DC cocktail parties.

Maybe we are better off with DeMint out of the Senate.

Here is the full Jason Richwine paper:

IQ and Immigration Policy – Jason Richwine

Private Police Forces?

Police SC Private Police Forces?

Since the 1820s, America’s police have protected everyone, whether they were rich or poor. Of course, the wealthy got the best of what their police forces offered; but the poor got reasonable services as well.

Nevertheless, police services are changing, and not in a way everyone will like.

The NRA rejoinder “When seconds count, the police are only minutes away” is becoming more of a reality by the day. Years of being bogged down with ancillary activities and continuing budget cuts are taking their toll on what we think police should be doing.

For the “stretched to the limits” police forces around the country, something has got to change; and that “something” now means withdrawal of services in specified circumstances. When services are withdrawn in earnest, they will not be made in poor neighborhoods (read: minorities) where crime is committed; they will be made in more affluent (read: white) neighborhoods where victims live. Victims are an “accepted” byproduct of managing dwindling police resources.

The supine majority have always just “grinned and accepted” being victims, but this is beginning to change. The purpose of police protection is beginning to turn back to its original, pre-1820s mission, which was protecting and serving the wealthy.

Wealthy people are not going to hide in their basements when their town’s police stop driving by their homes.  They will, and have already started to, hire private police to protect them. This may be just the beginning, but it will undoubtedly come to parallel the gap between the average public school and the average private school.

Eventually, the big cities will not get the best applicants to join their police forces. Becoming a big city cop will mean an entire career of always working in dangerous high crime areas. Every call will be fraught with danger; and eventually, the private police will get and keep the best applicants.

Private police are already patrolling some parts of Houston, Texas and Stockton, California. It won’t be long before other cities see them on their streets as well.

Those who understand how much they have to lose based on how America is changing will not roll over and accept what the system dishes out. When private police become the norm, America’s “civil divorce” will proceed at full speed. Those who can’t/won’t pay for enhanced police protection won’t get it. Those who can pay will get it.

Photo credit: coleyboley (Creative Commons)            

 

The Latest Trick The Media Is Pulling On Dumb Democrat Voters

Obama Golden Calf Liberal Media SC The latest trick the media is pulling on dumb Democrat voters

Give the liberals credit; they know their voters are morons, and they never make the mistake of treating them as anything else.

Democrat elected officials know they don’t ever really have to make sense when they address their half-witted supporters. They only have to say something or do something (anything), and the media will praise them for their “honesty and courage.”  Nobody ever questions what is “courageous” about admitting you have cheated on your income tax, stole campaign contributions, ran a male brothel, or sold a political appointment; the media makes all of that go away for Democrats.

When “the guy on TV” says a Democrat’s explanation is enough to “move on,” that’s it; no further explanation is necessary.

Since the April 15th Boston Marathon Bombing, the media has been in “Def-Con 5” cover up mode, trying to patch the gaping holes in the lies the Obama Administration is telling to make it go away.

The liberals have switched to using “pseudo-stupidity,” an old theory of adolescent behavior formulated by Jean Piaget, a Swiss psychoanalyst.

Pseudo-stupidity is an adolescent’s “tendency to overlook the obvious and inability to make appropriate choices.”  The liberal media is treating their supporters like the adolescents Piaget was talking about by using the “say anything and the dummies will believe it” tactic to explain why the Boston Bombers did what they did.   The idea is to rely on the innate pseudo-stupidity of Democrat voters.

“The older brother was a boxer whose brain was damaged by too many punches to the head causing him to become depressed and aggressive,” or “Not being able to ‘fit into’ American society made them angry, so it’s our fault,” or “They were both brainwashed” are the media’s current favorites excuses for these savages.

In Piaget’s theory, the adolescent is just becoming aware of  the variety of reasons why things around him happen; he is overwhelmed by them and assumes others are as well.

So when mom asks junior to find his math book,  the teenage genius looks in the basement, in the trunk of dad’s car, in the attic crawl space, and in the dog’s house.

All of these could possibly be where the book is, but the obvious answer (“in his backpack”) is overlooked.  Likewise, all of the phony excuses the media creates for these two dirt-bags fools Democrat voters because “after all, it COULD be our fault.”  They are fooled into believing the obvious answer (“they did it because they are evil bastards”) isn’t true.

Adolescents have an excuse: they’re kids. The so-called adults who vote Democrat don’t have an excuse for believing what they believe; they’re just morons.    

Here’s Some Free Advice For The GOP…

GOP SC Heres Some Free Advice For The GOP...

Republicans will never win Hispanic votes. The sooner the Grand Old Party establishment (GOPe) acknowledges this, the better off this country will be.

The gulf between how Republicans think Hispanics see the world and how Hispanics actually do see the world is much too large.

The only areas of general agreement between the GOPe and Hispanics are their shared disapproval of gay “marriage” and abortion. But since these issues are about as important as whether Arbor Day will be celebrated this year, there isn’t much mileage to be gained from these small agreements.

The media-fueled mantra of “faith and Family” as the core of the Hispanic community is as specious as the myth of the “conservative black family.”

Both are false hopes offered by the Left to a Republican establishment eager to find a way to sell illegal alien amnesty and a larger “social safety net” to its base.

A new Public Opinion Strategies (POS) poll crashes into the false propaganda the GOPe dearly loves to use in its efforts to sell the idea of wasting money and time trying to clone its sprinkling of Latino supporters.

The POS survey shows that Latinos see “social and cultural issues” not as Republicans do, but as a road to getting all the free stuff they can from the greater society. In this regard, Hispanics appear to be much more practical than the GOPe.

Republicans have to acknowledge that Mitt Romney’s 47% has grown to more than 50%; so talk of “faith and family”, especially to the two groups that are the largest users of abortion for family planning and whose leaders are four square in favor of gay “marriage”, really don’t want the faith and family morals the GOPe is selling.  They aren’t pretending; it’s “let’s see the money!” if you want their vote.

The POS found Latino sentiment was,“Republicans don’t want us here”; and whatever they say about the economy “will naturally be to the advantage to the wealthy and hurt the working class.”

For the very life of our country, GOPe types have to hear what these people are saying. They are telling you straight out that they will never be on your side. The survey showed that the Latinos’ favorite Republicans are people like Chris Christie, Susana Martinez, and Jeb Bush, who talk the “free stuff” talk they want to hear.

Play make-believe with these remarks if you will, GOPe; but the destruction of America will be on your hands if you don’t let go and rethink this quixotic quest to win the votes of people who will only vote for Republicans who act like Democrats.

It’s your move, GOPe.

 

Photo credit: DonkeyHotey (Creative Commons)

Fox News Darling Attacks Talk Radio Conservatives

Frank Luntz SC Fox News darling attacks talk radio conservatives

A Republican media consultant recently showed us who he really is. In a conversation he thought was “off the record,” Frank “Rat Top” Luntz has tipped his hand and reminded us why we can’t trust him. When he thought only those in front of him would hear his words, he attacked talk radio conservatives for destroying Marco Rubio’s plans to erase our national borders.

A Fox News favorite, Luntz has a big mouth and an awful horse tail brown toupee. (Does it ever occur to people like him that no one on earth has that color hair?) He is a stereotypical caricature of the out-of-touch “country club Republican” liberals and true conservatives both love to mock and hate. One look at him tells you he is not a guy you would want to have next to you in a fox hole. Everything about him says “Please Mr. Liberal Alligator, just eat the guy next to me and we can be friends.”

Foolishly believing that since he was a guest speaker of the University of Pennsylvania Republican Club (his alma mater) he could trust his audience to refrain from recording his duplicitous remarks, Luntz made a mistake and spoke “off the record,” revealing what he really thinks about the struggle to save America.   He blamed conservatives, especially talk radio hosts, for dividing the Republican Party.

Watching him lecture conservatives about the need to essentially be “better Red than dead” tells us that Luntz really doesn’t like conservatives and would rather surrender to liberals than stand for anything. His suggestions for shying away from talking about capitalism and replacing conservative principles with nicer-sounding euphemisms reinforces that conclusion.

Now we have his very troubling attack on talk radio because of its refusal to stand by and let Rubio help Chuck Schumer destroy America.  Rat top’s insistence that recording devices be shut off tells us all we need to know about this parasite’s true colors. He is a man who lives by teaching others the value of white lies, half- truths, and obfuscation, so we really couldn’t have expected anything else.  He has disqualified himself from ever standing with us again.

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore (Creative Commons)

University Of Texas Tower Sniper Killings: More Questions After 46 Years

University of Texas Tower 225x300 University of Texas Tower Sniper Killings: More questions after 46 years

After 46 years the Texas Tower sniper killings still raises important questions.

On August 1, 1966 Charles Whitman a 25 year old former Marine and college student started his day by killing his mother and wife. He then packed up a variety of guns and a large quantity of ammunition and drove to the University of Texas Austin campus took the elevator to the top floor and began to shoot people as they walked by 28 floors below.

When he was finished he had murdered 17 including an unborn child and injured another 32 innocent people.  For 1 hour and 45 minutes Whitman kept killing until he was gunned down by two brave Austin Police officers.

According to reports armed civilians arrived at the scene and helped the police by concentrating suppressing fire at Whitman. This kept his head down and likely saved lives until the police could get up to the observation deck and kill Whitman.

Armed citizens acting in the truest spirit of the Second Amendment helped the police stop a killing rampage in 1966 Austin Texas.  Is there any chance this could happen today?

Can anyone deny that if this were to happen today the police would video tape the civilians and arrest them after “talking” Whitman down?

Whitman did four years in the Marine Corps.  He spent 18 months at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina in the early 1960s. The government has admitted that during the same period those who were stationed at Camp Lejeune were exposed to several very dangerous chemicals in the drinking water provided to them.

Some of those who were exposed to these chemicals are now suffering from fifteen acknowledged maladies including various cancers. Among the dangerous chemicals was vinyl chloride which is linked to cancerous brain tumors. Whitman’s autopsy showed he had a glioblastoma brain tumor the size of a pecan. Was the tumor big enough to alter his behavior?

Did Charles Whitman suffer from brain cancer because he drank the chemicals the Marine Corps fed him? The government says just 30 days exposure is enough for them to cover treatment for fifteen serious illnesses with no questions asked.

Whitman’s suicide notes show he fought a losing battle to control urges to kill he could not understand. He asked for the autopsy. Shouldn’t Whitman’s murders be reexamined or does a possible finding that he killed because he was sick from government water make that impossible? How many other Marines committed unthinkable out-of-character crimes that might be traced back to Camp Lejeune water?

Did the poison water cause Charles Whitman to become a killer?

Sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Whitman

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/sites/lejeune/faq_chemicals.html

http://www.cedars-sinai.edu/Patients/Health-Conditions/Brain-Tumors-and-Brain-Cancer.aspx

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/25/frank-luntz-rush-limbaugh_n_3153614.html

http://www.coachisright.com/the-texas-tower-sniper-killings-still-raising-questions-after-46-years/

Immigration Reform Guarantees Democrat Control Forever

 

Democrat SC Immigration reform guarantees Democrat control forever

Every thinking American, whether conservative or liberal knows that when the feckless Republicans in the Congress fold and stab us in the back by erasing our borders Democrat Party control of our lives will be assured forever.

The sad truth is that we are reduced to hoping that the horrific terror attack on Boston will defeat the Democrats’ plans to swamp our country with ready- made Democrat voters because there seems to be little reason to hope the Republicans will do so.

There are several reasons we should be concerned about the Democrat plan to erase our borders.  Nevertheless, we cannot depend on Senate or Congressional Republicans to come clean and tell us the truth.

The 844 page (“You have to pass to find out what it contains) “comprehensive” immigration reform bill contains at least five dangerous elements.

No matter what Chuck Schumer has ordered McCain, Graham and Rubio to say, this is an amnesty bill. It will immediately create 11 million new Democrats andperhaps another 20 million new Democrats as a result of the “anchor” provisions of our ridiculous immigration laws.  The vast majority of these new Democrats are here in America, not to be Americans but to be Mexicans in America or Jamaicans in America and so on. These people are here for what they can get FROM America NOT what they can add to America.  They will vote themselves every benefit they can.  They will not stop until there is nothing left to carry away.

Even when the Democrats realize that they are now in charge forever and decide to try to stop supporting these freeloaders, built- in entitlement programs already in place will bleed us white. This will cause huge social problems.  This will be a major lose-lose because these people will bring nothing but outstretched palms to our big cities at the expense of lower paid, lower educated minority workers.

Government spending will be huge while the new Democrats settle in but become endlessly expansive once they get the hang of the system.

Border security will disappear and the axiom that a nation that loses control of its borders ceases to be a nation will take hold.

America will become a less free, less attractive choice for the kind of legal immigrants we want. Combined with the devastating effects of Obamacare this could keep skilled doctors from coming here.

Sure, these are dire predictions.   But which dire conservative predictions made by conservatives have not come true, and which rosy liberal predictions about anything have ever come true?

 

Photo Credit: DonkeyHotey (Creative Commons)

Is Obama Following The Communist Blueprint?

Obama Communist SC 300x240 Is Obama following the Communist Blueprint?

On January 10, 1963, Congressman Albert S. Herlong (D. Fla.) read the ACP’s 45 declared goals into the Congressional record (Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963.)

Here are some Communist Party goals. Compare them to Barack Obama’s and you decide if he is trying to destroy America.

Note: some goals have been omitted to save space.

Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind.

Get control of the schools. Use them for socialism and Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

Infiltrate the press. Get control of editorial writing, policy-making positions. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

Continue discrediting American culture.

Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

Break down cultural standards of morality in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion.

Discredit the American Constitution [as] inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs…

Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

Belittle, discourage the teaching of American history.

Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

Discredit the family as an institution.

Herlong eventually became a Republican saying the Democrats had left him - he didn’t leave them.

This is a hard copy blueprint of where Barack Obama is taking us and how he will get us there. His mentor, Saul Alinsky, would be proud of the destructive nature of his political “son”; but this scares me to my bones.

The entire list of the ACP’s 45 goals for destroying America can be found here.

Photo credit: SS&SS (Creative Commons)