The terrible ten year rape/ kidnapping ordeal suffered by three innocent Cleveland women at the hands of Ariel Castro, a registered Democrat (look it up), may yet put the baby killing crowd at NARAL and NOW in a web of their own evil lies.
Their captivity included daily rapes and the predictable pregnancies that followed. The startling evidence shows that Castro’s depravity extended to stomach-punching pregnant victims to cause miscarriages, thereby murdering at least five innocent babies.
That Castro’s crimes are revolting and demand the death penalty is a widely held sentiment; but what will women’s organizations do or say?
Because women’s organizations are by definition liberal, calls for such retribution might not come from the likes of NARAL and NOW. Both organizations could end up either saying nothing about these horrific crimes or potentially joining in a fight to keep Castro from being convicted of murdering those five innocent little babies.
To his great credit, Cleveland Prosecutor Timothy J. McGinty has expressed his intentions to find a way to put Castro to death for the murders of these babies.
This case presents a serious and problematic dilemma for the Baby Killers. On the one hand, to fulfill their self-appointed mission of protectors of women, they have to demand that Castro be charged with and convicted of every conceivable crime McGinty can think of. Nevertheless, on the other hand, to push for the maximum amount of punishment for this beast, they will have to support bringing murder charges against him for killing in-utero infants, thereby conceding defeat in the “personhood” argument and agreeing that the five additional victims were worthy of protection and not just “unviable tissue masses.”
During the Laci Peterson case, a frightened NOW said, “If this is murder, [Peterson killing the baby Laci was carrying] well, then any time a late-term fetus is aborted, they could call it murder.” Yes, indeed they could.
Lying and being on the side of evil catches up to you eventually.
Photo credit: ProgressOhio (Creative Commons)










Zuckerberg And Rubio: Amnesty’s Two Indistinguishable Amigos
Mark Zuckerberg and Marco Rubio have become amnesty’s two indistinguishable amigos. They have morphed into Marco Zuckerberg and Mark Rubio.
You’ve heard the radio spots and seen the television ads featuring Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio talking about the dire need to do something about the “immigration problem” (not “illegal immigration” but immigration.)
During a minute’s worth of huffing and puffing, Rubio tries to bulldoze past any logical objections to erasing our borders with faux tough talk designed to impress us with his credentials as an “insider’ who KNOWS more than we do.
Rubio’s media crusade is funded by liberal Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg.
To impress us, Rubio uses buzz phrases like “conservative immigration reform,” “tough border triggers,” and “no giveaways for lawbreakers.” That putting these words in Rubio’s mouth is not only breathtakingly insulting to true conservatives (but simply not true) shouldn’t resonate with a liberal like Zuckerberg; but Rubio has been “playing a conservative on TV” long enough to know better.
These spots betray a gross underestimation of conservatives. Zuckerberg probably believes conservatives marry their sisters and are far less intelligent than he is, but Rubio apparently thinks conservatives are pining for a way to suck up to Hispanics the way white liberals sucked up to blacks and elected Barack Obama.
A new report from Public Policy Polling (a Democrat firm) shows that Rubio is self-immolating with these insulting spots. Conservatives who once saw him as an acceptable GOP nominee for president in 2016 are running away from him in obvious disgust over his decision to do Chuck Schumer’s bidding by erasing our borders.
During the period from May 6 – 9, when asked about Rubio as the Republicans’ 2016 nominee, “very conservative” and “somewhat conservative” respondents supported him at 17% and 18% respectively. That’s down from 26% and 22% from these groups just a month before.
The supreme irony of Marco Rubio’s foolishness is that Hispanics, who hold themselves aloof from participation in our civic life and wait for the best “goodies” package offer before deciding who to support, are naïve enough to believe Rubio’s tough talk and don’t like it. His support among Hispanics has fallen 5% in the same period.
At this point, only wild-eyed liberals like Zukerberg believe that these spots can erase our borders. Nevertheless, a cunning liberal like Schumer might be using these spots as an opportunity to destroy the foolish Mr. Rubio’s chances of ever running for president.
Blurring the lines between “amnesty amigos” Marco Zuckerberg and Mark Rubio will not end well for the Senator from Florida.
Photo credit: JD Lasica, socialmedia.biz (Creative Commons)