If There Is No God – Part II

Flickr Creative Commons Greendyker No Christianity logo If There Is No God   Part II

(Editor’s note: Read Part 1 here.)

Ultimately, if religion is merely a creation of man, and religion itself is evil, what does that say about man? And why has God all of a sudden become expendable? He has always had a prominent place in our hearts and in our society. God wasn’t a problem for two centuries; but now the Democratic Party has gone agnostic, and the Republican party is split.

Let’s say, hypothetically, that the GOP excommunicates God (and the Republican secularists lose their ‘Scapegoat’) – what’s the platform? What makes the GOP a winning ticket?

Whether man wants to hide behind religion, big government, progressivism, or secularism – we’re imploding! As far as ideology goes, no matter what our espoused affiliation, we’ve all contributed to the mess. None of us are innocent – there’s plenty of blame to go around!

In the end, we must blame the depraved, morally bankrupt, self-destructive tendencies of MAN for our demise. Atheists who claim that man is responsible for creating religion are forced to come to the same conclusion.

The Constitution may have proven to be an essential tool in keeping religious tyranny from reigning. But we’re swiftly headed in the other direction towards Communism, which is a religion in and of itself, in which the government is our god (and applies complete control over us).

Religion should not be used as a means of control; it should serve a greater purpose. I never considered Emperor Constantine (or any other political-religious leader for that matter) having pure intentions – but at least he stopped the persecution of Christians.

Absolute power and authority in the hands of men is bad, no matter the ideology/affiliation. The Christians I know don’t want theocracy, despite the obnoxious claims perpetuated by the New Atheists.

In fact, I pointedly asked Dave:

“Why the bias, the law suits, and the hard cultural atheism? This is a new phenomenon!”

To Dave’s credit, he took a sincere stab at addressing the question:

I think the vitriol came initially after the war on terror and the atrocities – largely from Muslims – that occurred . However they (atheists) were uncomfortable associating with Christians who were also appalled by the jihadists. I think you saw people like Richard Dawkins and Bill Maher tending to be more critical of Christians (Christians don’t threaten to cut off your head, at least not anymore) because it was an easier target- other atheists used it as an opportunity to point out the hypocrisy they saw in all religions . Truthfully, many atheists now see religion on the decline and want to speed it’s demise.

In response, I affirmed that demise of religion will not fix the problem! This is not a religion problem but a human nature problem. Take away religion, and you still have the man.

If you look at the atrocities perpetuated in heathen lands and godless, secular societies led by cruel dictators (i.e. Stalin, Hitler, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, etc.) throughout history, the root of the evil is apparent!

Darwinism, in particular, has had a significant influence in minimizing the sanctity of life; and this is why death panels will soon become a reality in this country (as it is just an extension of abortion) for those lives considered unworthy of the cost required to sustain their existence (i.e. elderly, infirm, disabled, terminally ill). It’s the secularists who endorse a death culture, while orthodox Christians are consistently pro-life. Where’s the morality from the secular side? Do they not often endorse the barbaric slaughter of those who are most in need of care, advocacy, and protection? From where does their moral compass stem?

Social stability is a fragile thing. We are witnessing how fast our moral foundations can be undone.
We may want to consider Islam and Communist North Korea before targeting ‘radical Christianity’ (whatever the heck that means!!!)

By the end of our discussion, Dave and I pretty much reached a stalemate. But I believe the take-home message remains:

From where does our faith come? From where does our hope come?

How can all this madness be thwarted and wholly overcome?

Does the answer lie in man or God?

“Choose you this day whom ye will serve…me and my house, we will serve the LORD.”

If There Is No God – Part I

Atheist SC If There Is No God   Part I

“Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.”

The other day, I found myself debating Dave, a conservative-athiest friend of mine. Dave was going on about all the suffering caused by religion (yes, that tired old argument). But after citing a few examples (i.e. Church of England, Middle Eastern theocracies, and the Holy Roman Empire) and finishing me off with a zinger courtesy of the late, great liberal apostate Christopher Hitchens, Dave made his most lucid point:

“It’s the absence of religion that makes our founding documents so compelling and has kept us, largely, distant from tyranny.”

This point was not lost on me as I believe there is much truth to it…

But it was time for me to go on the offensive. If I was going to affirm my worldview as the correct one, I couldn’t hold anything back.

Here’s a summary:

The argument against religion is really an argument against man. MY argument is not one in support of a religion; rather, I make my case for the One True God!

Freedom without God is anarchy. As we lose God, we lose the country. Look at all the evils and miseries the godless actions of both parties have heaped upon us. We need more God, not less. I call for a great awakening – God is the only source of true, radical change.

I have no faith in humanity. Look at the mess we’ve made – just over the last half century. The actions of men, especially those in power, attest to the depravity of the natural man as does Scripture:

Mark 7:21-23: “For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, coveting, wickedness, deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride, foolishness. All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.”

John 3:19: “And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their deeds were evil.”

Romans 3:10-11: “None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God.”

1 Corinthians 2:14: “The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.”

Titus 3:3: “For we ourselves were once foolish, disobedient, led astray, slaves to various passions and pleasures, passing our days in malice and envy, hated by others and hating one another.”

Corruption, pride, control, deceit, dishonesty, etc. has permeated throughout Washington and Wall Street/Corporate America for many decades. Government in particular has steadily become a monster of man’s design, and it’s turning on us.

Government cannot be trusted. The media cannot be trusted. Many corporations cannot be trusted. They all have their own tainted agenda and do not have the best interests of the common man at heart.

Religious hypocrisy will seem a small offense compared to the godless ‘liberty’ that naturally evolves via radical regulatory efforts to control the population (i.e. communism). If these control efforts continue unresisted, we will eventually be completely robbed of our freedom. Ironically, the many who believe they are on the right side of a fight for freedom (and equality) are the ones who are leading us on a fast track to bondage (as a result of their demands for increased government intervention).

We’re all going to be ‘equal’ alright – equally screwed!

Essentially, we (mankind) corrupt everything we touch. Anything positive we achieve – we eventually muck it up. This harsh reality immediately brings to mind something I recently came across online called the ‘Stages of Democracy’ -

{ Bondage to spiritual faith >
Spiritual faith to great courage >
Courage to liberty >
Liberty to abundance >
Abundance to complacency >
Complacency to apathy >
Apathy to dependence >
Dependence back into bondage }

Right now, I reckon we are somewhere between apathy and dependence, with bondage quickly coming around the corner.

Basically, our government is too big and doing more harm than good as it is incestuously linked to Wall Street and banks “too big to fail”. They’re breeding corruption, economic destruction, and ultimately social devastation. We could use more truly God-fearing men in power in our day.

Regardless, Dave and I were in agreement that things are heading in the wrong direction. Where we ultimately disagree is whether God should remain part of the national and political platform.

I admitted that if ‘Christians’ actually walked the walk, maybe society wouldn’t be so government-dependent. There’s an abundance of desperate, broken, and needy people out there. But it’s only fair to acknowledge that our culture (and the current administration) are actually fostering the miseries of ‘we the people.’ Modern social and political trends are not creating solutions; in fact, they are a major part of the problem.

The Constitution was brilliantly constructed by our forefathers, but it cannot work in a slavish society sold on activism and lobby efforts to achieve special interests and/or expansions via a complicit big federal government. It’s Big Government that’s taking us over the cliff. A reckless and powerful governing minority guilty of playing games militarily, economically, and politically are selling their souls and ruining the country for the sake of votes. In the process, their calculated moves continue to fundamentally transform the nation. Ever consider what we’re going to look like three years from now? I shutter the thought!

Today’s young, faithless generation remains blind to these realities, as government is their god. Rather, they will remain forever loyal to their reigning presidential messiah. They also reserve themselves the right to worship their own godless, enlightened superiority – so they may glory in themselves and their own wisdom.

Photo credit: reuvenim (Creative Commons)

If I Were A Killer

abortion is not health care1 If I Were A Killer

This is just a hypothetical story
Of someone, let’s just say it’s me
I’d gain acceptance for my murderous ways
By stalking a defenseless prey

I’ve been reading some horrific accounts about the demonic medical practice of Abortion. I’m going to spare everyone the gory details because I can’t bear to even get through a few sentences without wanting to fall to the ground in shame and disgust. I just want to know – how in the world did we let this happen? How is it that the miracle of life has been so thoughtlessly and so brutally interrupted (often merely for the sake of convenience)?

What a wretched society we’ve become – the blood of the pre-born innocents is on our hands!

Lets consider some of the statistics:

* According to their official report, Planned Parenthood performed 334,000 abortions in 2011. They also received a record level of taxpayer support: $542 million in fiscal 2012. Planned Parenthood is the nation’s largest abortion provider, with 995,687 abortions performed in the past three years.

Other telling statistics as reported by the Guttmacher Institute in August 2011 are as follows -

* Nearly half of pregnancies among American women are unintended, and about four in 10 of these are terminated by abortion. Twenty-two percent of all pregnancies (excluding miscarriages) end in abortion.

* Eighteen percent of U.S. women obtaining abortions are teenagers; those aged 15–17 obtain 6% of all abortions, teens aged 18–19 obtain 11%, and teens younger than age 15 obtain 0.4%.

* Women in their 20s account for more than half of all abortions; women aged 20–24 obtain 33% of all abortions, and women aged 25–29 obtain 24%.

* Thirty-seven percent of women obtaining abortions identify as Protestant and 28% as Catholic.

* Women who have never married and are not cohabiting account for 45% of all abortions

* The reasons women give for having an abortion underscore their understanding of the responsibilities of parenthood and family life. Three-fourths of women cite concern for or responsibility to other individuals; three-fourths say they cannot afford a child; three-fourths say that having a baby would interfere with work, school, or the ability to care for dependents; and half say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner.

A majority of individuals, both within the church and on the outside, have completely disregarded the Biblical, traditional belief that the act of sexual intercourse is a special, sacred union between husband and wife. Such a standard is now mocked and ridiculed as outdated, old-fashioned, and unrealistic. There once was a time when prudence and piety were two of the most virtuous characteristics one could exhibit. Such noble and practical attributes are basically non-existent in today’s edgy and ‘advanced’ world.

We are currently living in a highly sexualized society. Our modern culture has little regard for modesty, chastity, and purity.

Regardless of these realities, as parents, don’t we want our children to conduct themselves in a respectable and honorable manner? Shouldn’t they learn the importance of self-respect? If we really possess a mutual concern for humanity, shouldn’t our children be taught to soberly view and respect the opposite sex?

May the young man behave honorably towards the young lady. These are our sons and our daughters – the future of America, precious souls with fragile emotions. How easily damaged they can become.

When raised properly (with a correct understanding of the precious gifts bestowed by our Creator), sexual intimacy and the sanctity of a life formed out of a loving conception will be held in the highest regard as life’s most essential, experiential realities. Ultimately, abortion is the emotionally damaging and spiritually damning consequence of a demonic social standard intent on devouring our youth!

Supreme Court would agree to hear my case
And find me innocent of crime
Holding public rallies to incite sympathy
Creative actuality

In 1973, the tragic verdict was reached in the Roe vs. Wade case, which established the legality of pregnancy termination via medical procedure (abortion). This was a devastating verdict that set a sweeping death precedent. The ‘wisdom’ applied by a few court justices would seal the tragic fate of thousands of unborn lives ultimately deemed disposable.

Supporters for the sanctity of life lamented the shocking decision:

The sweeping judgment of the U.S. Supreme Court…is a flagrant rejection of the unborn child’s right to life. The Court has chosen to ignore the scientific evidence regarding the unborn child’s human growth and development during the first six months of life…the Court has failed to justify its opinion on theological, historical or scientific grounds. Nonetheless, during the first six month of the child’s life, the Court has made the doctor the final judge as to who will live and who will die. This seems to reverse the history of American jurisprudence that prohibits the deprivation of the right to life without due process of law…

…no Court opinion can change the law of God prohibiting the taking of innocent human life.

-Statement of the Committee for Pro-Life Affairs (NCBB) January 24, 1973

If I were a killer
I’d smile just like the boy next door
If I were a killer
I’d say I do it for the poor
If I were a killer
You’d bring me victims more and more

One of the most appalling developments related to this shameless abortion horror are advocacy efforts that promote carrying out this dreadful procedure on a live baby outside the womb. According to recent news reports, a Florida Planned Parenthood lobbyist has spoken out in favor of ‘infanticide’ for cases in which babies are born alive after botched abortions.

If I were a killer
I’d hide behind a doctor’s door
If I were a killer
I’d scrape you off my office floor

On the heels of the Kermit Gosnell (the doctor who stands accused of murdering seven babies born alive in Philadelphia) trial, Alisa LaPolt Snow, who lobbies for the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified against proposed legislation that would grant abortion survivors the same legal rights and protections as other children. The proposed bill ‘inserts politics where it doesn’t belong’ and ‘attempts to interfere with a woman’s ability to make her own personal medical decisions,’ claims Snow, in defense of her inconceivable opposition to H.B. 1129, the Infants Born Alive Act.

When the life of a defenseless newborn hangs in the balance – should a physician have the freedom to play judge, jury, and executioner?

More importantly, why are we even asking such a question???

These disturbing developments are prime examples of why compromise is not an option! The envelope continues to be pushed while the rational conservative, as well as society as a whole, repeatedly comes up on the losing end!

Silence is not an option!

Take back! Choose life!

* Words in italics by Ben Huggins of Galactic Cowboys, as featured in the song, “If I Were A Killer”, which was released in 1993.

Photo Credit: Planetrussell (Creative Commons)

Building On The Secular Case For Traditional Marriage

Marriage SC Building on the Secular Case for Traditional Marriage

Is there a strong secular case to be made for the state’s exclusive recognition of traditional marriage? If so, any arguments for a deviation from this accepted, well-established standard should be equally as compelling.

Please consider this brief introductory summary in support of traditional marriage. The case made is purely a secular one. [Note: Featured quotes are that of Iowa Congressman Steve King, whose sentiments were recently featured in National Review Online].

First, there was never a need to officially or explicitly define marriage as an exclusive institution between man and woman. It was understood. As it stands, “To marry, two people must prove they are of opposite sex, not related, of age, and not married to anyone else.”

It is vital that we fully understand the historical precedent behind government’s recognition of such a uniquely designed and specifically defined category/status/classification (i.e. marital). Ultimately, there must be a widespread societal benefit, based on ‘credible and relevant empirical evidence,’ to justify governmental support and/or recognition (which is specifically what Chief Justice John Roberts has requested as the matter comes before the Supreme Court).

Demands for specials exceptions based on personal perceptions of entitlement should not be the primary driver of public policy. It’s these personal demands that have enabled the legalized slaughter better known as abortion. Where is the equality in such barbarism? If advocates of same sex marriages truly seek ‘equality,’ they may want to make the rights of defenseless infants part of their social/political platform and agendas. Regardless, the established reality remains: “There is no requirement for proof of enduring love, comingling of finances, or even intent to cohabitate. To ask the government to certify any of those things would offend all Americans who jealously guard their individual autonomy.”

There’s a reason why the government has never permitted relatives to marry, nor upheld the legality of polygamy. However, baseless propaganda efforts are tactically deeming those who remain exclusively committed to traditional marriage “phobes.” Their efforts are breeding an atmosphere by which even the most reasoned restrictions will not go unchallenged.

Before we enable calculated slander to shape public opinion and force the hand of government, we must carefully examine the health statistics, in particular the high incidences of STDs among the gay community (as verified by the CDC). We are living in a day where government is being forced to comply to the special interests of fringe minority groups at the expense of a time-honored, clinically proven gold standard.

Traditional marriage is the naturally and scientifically verifiable familial foundation (defined gender roles: woman/wife/mother-man/husband/father). On what grounds is THIS essential biological/foundational model overridden? Ultimately, ”government has a compelling interest in a legal record of procreation (this is further indicated by the doctrine of presumed paternity), and in creating a lasting environment where children will thrive. The fact that one must obtain a court order to divorce and the existence of tax-based incentives for marriage are other effects of the government’s interest in marriage.”

What is the justification for dismissing these realities? And why would polygamy and incestuous marriages remain exempt under this new model?

These are questions that must be definitively answered before this is taken any further.

Marriage cannot be redefined without recklessly dismissing the essential natural realities that have shaped our culture for centuries. Sound decision-makers must apply reasoned analysis to reaffirm that “Marriage is the stable platform from which families are launched.” Just as important is the clarity achieved with the realization that “Government surely has a compelling interest in ensuring the stability of that platform…”

A stable and successful nuclear family dynamic has always been the central barometer indicative of a thriving America. That dynamic is in danger of being methodically and irresponsibly dismantled.

But lets not stop here. We need to follow the demands for same sex marriage to its ‘illogical’ conclusion.

It seems we are headed down a disturbing path in which ‘equal’ = ‘same’. It’s as if we are being pressured to relinquish any adherence to or acceptance of defined gender roles altogether. Gender distinctions are becoming obsolete as the roles become more and more interchangeable.

We are beginning to be confronted with a variety of unforseen and pecuiliar scenarios. Calls for equality are coming from multitple directions and threaten to shake our foundations. Actually, our foundations are being tested to see if they are sound as the opposition seeks cracks or weaknesses they can exploit.

We are swiftly entering a realm where the question will be asked: Should there be any limits or restrictions in any area of life based on gender? As the quest for full equality advances, will we be forced to dismiss the idea of gender roles altogether? And if a genderless society becomes the ‘new normal,’ will all boundaries and distinctions be removed? Will gender-based expectations become a mere reminder of a ‘repressive’ social standard held in former days?

As gender-based barriers and restrictions evaporate, we will be ‘free’ to raise our sons to play with dolls and wear dresses, while a man who perceives himself a female will be able to freely take part in all aspects of female-oriented activities – and vice versa.

In a ‘genderless’ society, the marriage institution must remain open and available to all forms of alternative arrangement. Once a nontraditional precedent is set, we may no longer logically place any restrictions on a marriage arrangement, since to do so would be discrimination. No longer will there be a reasonable way for a line to be drawn.

The recognition of same sex marriage ultimately sets a precedent in which gender roles and human desires are relative and accessible, based on a form of equality that removes naturally defining qualifications as needed. A greater ‘good’ is being promoted in the name of ‘sameness’ via state-sanctioned opportunities that neutralize defining characteristics for the sake of fairness.

Are we sure we want to go down this road?

* I dedicate ‘Building on the Secular Case’ to Mr. Bill O’Reilly, on behalf of “Bible Thumpers” everywhere.

Photo credit: loungerie (Creative Commons)

Obama’s Vision Coming To Fruition?

2016 Obama SC Obamas Vision Coming To Fruition?

I finally had an opportunity to watch Dinesh D’Souza’s “2016: Obama’s America.” And I must say that I was completely blown away!

It’s not that I was surprised by the information put forth by D’Souza to support the idea that President Obama is an anti-American, anti-colonial, pseudo-Communist. The evidences supporting these realities had been uncovered well before his first presidential nomination. But to witness how thoroughly and methodically Obama had been groomed to become the divisive and transformative leader he has become was utterly fascinating and completely demoralizing.

After viewing ‘Obama’s America,’ I feel like every question has been definitively put to rest. The question that remains is: how in the world did a guy who was raised solely on fanatical anti-American ideology become our commander-in-chief? Clearly, he wants to weaken us (and our allies) as he undermines our foundations by any means possible. It is also obvious that he seeks to raise up those who despise us (since he also despises our long standing principles, values, and ideals). D’Souza’s predictions for a second Obama term are dramatically unfolding before our eyes, including Obama’s indifference to Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons, his efforts to weaken our own military (increasing our national security vulnerabilities), and his vehement promotion of reckless economic policies. If our president’s goal is to economically destroy us, he’s swiftly succeeding.

One of the surprisingly poignant moments was D’Souza’s open exchange with the poverty stricken, ‘colonialist’ George Obama, a vulnerable, soft-spoken man who has been forsaken by his half-brother due to the president’s disdain for George’s politically right-leaning perspectives. After viewing this, I wished THIS Obama was the one currently occupying the White House.

It seems Obama prefers to even the international playing field at the expense of the nation he governs – talk about your ultimate conflict of interest (as well as the interests of those he’s been elected to represent). I’m left to wonder, where have all the reasonable Democrats gone? Are they so blinded by the media hype that they cannot see the long (and even short) term consequences of our President’s destructive governing philosophy?

I don’t look to disparage our president, I wish it were otherwise. But I refuse to turn a blind eye to what has been set before us. I pray that The Lord above may take hold of his soul and alter his course. Regardless, the future is in His hands.

Whatever the ultimate outcome, everyone needs to watch this! Buy it, for that matter, and make sure you share it with your friends and neighbors before complete and irreconcilable damage has been permanently inflicted upon our great nation!

“Bankrupt Starbucks”: An Original Poem

Starbucks SC Bankrupt Starbucks: An Original Poem

In light of the well publicized hostility expressed by the radically depraved activists who run Starbucks, allow me to share my brief ode to Starbucks fittingly titled “Bankrupt Starbucks!!!

 

Your politics truly make us sick

Watch helplessly as this boycott sticks

 

Burnt coffee grossly overpriced

Your profits to be put on ice

 

Away with your Tall, your Grande, your Venti

Stupid green siren is no longer trendy

 

Feel free to go stuff your Caramel Macchiato

CEO Howard Schultz soon to be terminado

 

We’re dumping the Starbucks and making some noize

As dimwit Sean Penn whines ‘wonderful choice’

 

It’s time we finally take a stand

Traditional marriage, woman and man!

 

Go to: DumpStarbucks.com

Photo credit: kevinix (Creative Commons)

Liberalism – The Religion Of The Natural Man

Jesus Coming Soon SC Liberalism   The Religion of The Natural Man

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,  Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. *

We are all liberals by nature. We are ‘me-first’ people and are most comfortable with others who also condone such a ‘me-first’ perspective (as long as their ‘me-first’ agenda doesn’t interfere with our ‘me-first’ agenda).

Liberalism comes so easy to the average person. It’s totally instinctive. It’s not something that needs to be taught. It’s our natrual disposition.

Liberals tend to think of themselves as more accepting and compassionate. There are even some who suggest that they are the most Christ-like in their ideology. This is incorrect, however. Jesus did not promote total acceptance. Jesus promoted radical change – a complete denial of self. His invitation was completely inclusive, but the final ‘condition’ was one that was impossible to embrace,

“And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.” -Luke 9:23

There’s the rub.

The liberals will hear none of it! They’ll accept Jesus, but only on their terms! Jesus must be conformed to their image. They don’t want to acknowledge that a complete self-denial is the most essential spiritual consequence of giving yourself over to The Higher Power. They insist Jesus be incorporated into their way of living.

Left to ourselves, we (natural man) would rather have our riches above Jesus; or maybe we have some secret vice that prevents us from coming to a place of total submission.

We eventually do the complete opposite. Our own ‘needs’ take precedent, and we reach a point of total rejection. We naturally place our own wants and desires before all else, even before a saving Diety.

Liberals tend to fancy themselves as the epitome of rational wisdom. They view themselves as an ‘enlightened’ people. They firmly believe that a complete submission to their methodology will enable a fairly distributed, person-centered, needs-driven standard of living to flourish. Underneath it all, however, is an elitist, radically-motivated power-grab reflective of a greater global political-social agenda.

(Note: Charity, not socialism, was endorsed in the Bible within the body of believers and was secondary to the Gospel. The Marxist ideologue of our day is promoting tyranny under the guise of empathy. But what they really seek is totalitarianism).

The mentality behind the madness is quite primitive, almost infantile. Whereas conservative principles and foundations must be taught, enforced, then experientially reinforced, liberal attitudes and propensities are part of our makeup. All of humanity comes into this world as full-blown liberals from the womb. These liberal traits must be methodically broken down as we are raised to become God-honoring individuals, with respect for authority and a willingness to extend peace and goodwill to our fellow man. The unfortunate reality, however, is that we naturally fight against conservatism, a belief system that requires discipline and self-control.

We naturally want to do what’s wrong, and we want to get away with it. Then we want to do it over again. Then we want to make sure everyone else has the opportunity to get away with it because ‘those’ who do right make us feel guilty. We hate ‘those’ people. We want to tear them down and cast them away! Then we will all be the same! We get to do what we want without fear or regret. There will be nobody to answer to, and nobody can tell us what we are doing is wrong. We answer to nobody but ourselves.

Once this ‘humanistic vision’ becomes completely realized, we can become fully-recognized, state-certified ‘earthly gods.’ We will be granted the rights to get what we want, do what we want, and have what we want, when we want it! We then become more emboldened, more arrogant, and more indignant….we eventually morph into full-blown narcissists. We’ve gained the world but lost our soul.

As we proceed down this slippery slope, we are never fully satisfied. Quite the opposite, happiness and contentment cannot be realized, no matter how hard we try! We will always crave more. We begin to lie, cheat, and steal….we’ll do anything to continue to gain an advantage, to feed an addiction that can never be achieved via temporal earthly conquest!

We want to be admired and adored. We crave the power and attention. We desire full affirmation that we matter, that we’re important, that we’re special, and that nothing is going to get in our way. If we are rejected, we will use force to ensure we ultimately have our way, no matter how absurd the scheme!

Our message to the idealistic obstructionist is one of contempt and dismissal. Our liberal self declares, ‘away with your rules! away with your morals! away with your absolute standards! I am beyond your reproach, as I don’t believe as you do. I have the power to hide my mistakes and defer my accountability. I am entitled to satisfy my own urges and desires with little or no consequence. The greater good is of no concern as long as I get mine.’

When restrained by the culture, our liberal self realizes the need to turn it upside down until it suits us. If well-rooted and time-proven stability does not conform to our personal desires, we will unapologetically change the reality. Right will be wrong, up will be down, and left will be right!

If the course we’ve charted for ourselves (and zealously advocated for on behalf of our like-minded brethren) is not adhered to, we won’t need to debate the natural realities or the facts; we can simply rely on emotional outcries and hysterics. We’ll use the media to promote our hot-button charges against our enemies. We’ll cry slander, bigotry, and injustice, whatever achieves the desired effect! We won’t even have to discuss the widespread merits of our way…….Our harsh accusations will rule the day!

There’s nothing we can’t achieve! We can do what we feel is right and feel good about our efforts, while those heavenly-minded absolutists flounder haplessly, as they are deemed ignorant fanatics with irrational views not worthy of public consideration. The arguments and perspectives of these religious conservatives are swiftly declared ‘out of bounds,’ not fit for rational discussion.

This is the proven, winning formula. This is how the natural inclinations of man and their sinfully-driven, liberal faith maintain power and authority.

Ultimately, they will advance (often due to their own short-sighted ignorance) a complete global destruction in the process….if and when they are awakened, it will be too late!

“Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived. But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them; And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.” **

* 2 Timothy 3:1-5
** 2 Timothy 3:12-17
(King James Version)

Photo credit: tkw954 (Creative Commons)

The Audacity Of Incompetency, Insecurity, And Non-Transparency

Obama Illegal Assault Weapon Executive Order SC The Audacity of Incompetency, Insecurity, and Non Transparency

There is a reason the American people don’t want to relinquish their guns.

There is a reason why the American people fear their constitutional rights are in jeopardy.

There is a reason why the American people fear their quality of life and the future of their country is at risk.

The reasons are numerous, but it all comes down to one dismal reality: The American people do not trust this administration!

An administration immune to criticism and accountability (in conjunction with a complicit mainstream media that refuses to objectively and critically cover events and developments that may place this president in a bad light) is producing a climate of fear and paranoia across the nation. Unfortunately, at least half the population is either too indifferent or too enamored with the current administration to care.

Tragically, the lies, the scandals, the controversies, and the incompetencies are occurring at an alarming rate. The official response following the terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi is a prime example of the politically motivated lies and deceptions promulgated by this administration (and recited verbatim by a biased media that may as well be on the government payroll).

The Obama administration repeatedly told the American people that the Benghazi attack was a spontaneous response to an offensive video posted on You Tube. Now we know this was a planned terrorist attack on ’9-11-12′ against our embassy in Libya. Increased security requests made by U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens (who was killed in the attack) fell on deaf ears, and
the identities of the survivors have yet to be disclosed. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham was finally granted permission to meet with a few of the survivors, and he reports that these survivors are fearful of speaking out (as they were told by the government to keep silent) regarding the events of that tragic day.

This administration recklessly placed politics before responsible leadership as they strategically fostered and enabled a failed foreign policy to become just another critical public exemption leading into the most important presidential election of our lifetime.

Many other disconcerting examples of ‘truth spinning’ abound that support the utter lack of transparency by which this administration operates. Some of the most troubling fabrications offered by our Commander in Chief include: the costs and conditions of government-sponsored healthcare, the administration’s hand in the sequester, the promotion of decreases in government spending and debt reduction, and the extent of government-funded health services provided by Planned Parenthood (specifically the lie that PP provides mammograms).

More troubling are the recent special reports detailing the curious decisions (a few via executive order) that seem to pit the government against its own people, including:

• The creation of a civilian ‘national security’ force.
• A drone program with the authority to strike down U.S. citizens.
• Proposed expansions to domestic spying in the form of personal bank account accessibility granted to multiple intelligence agencies without just cause.
• The purchase of unprecedented amounts of ammunition (and armored vehicles) by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and various other federal agencies.
• A call for a national gun registry and increased gun restrictions.
• The authorization of peacetime martial law.
• The establishment of U.S. detention centers for ‘political dissidents’ as revealed in official government documents.

Throw in the fact that our president has used the sequester as an unconscionable excuse to authorize the release of hundreds of illegal aliens (some detained for violent crimes as per an anonymous ICE source), and the alarming concern expressed by the loyal, proud, and passionate citizens of this great nation is more than justified.

Ironically, recent reports also reveal how this current White House has used intimidation in an attempt to control the media (as experienced by left-leaning journalists no less).

Veteran Washington Times reporter and Obama supporter Bob Woodward, one of the journalists threatened by the White House after he factually reported that the sequester was Obama’s idea, has quickly become one of the president’s most aggressive critics. Commenting on the President’s decision to not deploy the USS Harry Truman to the Persian Gulf due to budget concerns related to the looming sequester cuts, Woodward pined for the days of presidentially sound decision-making and reliability:

Can you imagine Ronald Reagan sitting there and saying, ‘Oh, by the way, I can’t do this because of some budget document?’ or George W. Bush saying, ‘You know, I’m not going to invade Iraq because I can’t get the aircraft carriers I need’ or even Bill Clinton saying, ‘You know, I’m not going to attack Saddam Hussein’s intelligence headquarters,’ as he did when Clinton was president because of some budget document?…Under the Constitution, the president is commander-in-chief and employs the force. And so we now have the president going out because of this piece of paper and this agreement. ‘I can’t do what I need to do to protect the country.’ That’s a kind of madness that I haven’t seen in a long time.

It seems the president himself is not immune from the paranoia perpetrated by his own administration, based on the recent revelation that Obama has his own personal ‘food taster.’ It seems the president fears that the same type of deceptive tactics applied by his own administration will be directed back at him.

What have we become? Is our president for us or against us? Despite ideological differences, I never thought we would reach a point in which such a question would have to be asked.

This is America 2013 – The Audacity of Reality.

A Christian’s Response To Cries Of “Discrimination”

Christian cross SC A Christians Response to Cries of Discrimination

What is compassion? What is tough love offered out of good will to a fellow sinner? One who also struggles with urges and desires that, although of a different variety, run contrary to God’s sanctioned, intended purpose?

Here’s my response to Phil, a self-declared homosexual, who openly expressed his frustration with ‘intolerant’ Christians.

“Brother Phil,

If a Christian acts morally, spiritually, or naturally superior in any way to another, they are not coming from a place of genuine, spirit-led humility.

However, if the God of the Bible is true, then so is Original Sin. Hence, we all struggle with dispositions and tendencies that run counter to God’s natural, desired, and created order.

If you don’t keep that in mind, in your discussions with Orthodox Christians, you will be frustrated.
But we are not Islamic. We desire you peace and the salvation of your souls! We just can’t embrace the lifestyle. We don’t believe this to be a state issue, but a personal one.

However, all sinners need grace that their spiritual eyes be opened. Then the issue of sexual predisposition no longer matters. I am not saying that there is no struggle, but a much greater good takes precedence.”

I am left to wonder if my words are that of a bigot or of a concerned, sober-minded Christian. If what we believe is true, we must hold fast to truth in a charitable, honest, and loving manner.

As WE remain consistently honest about these truths, WHO are the ones with blood on their hands?

Think about it….

Unfortunately we are living in a time where science is now replacing accountability. I don’t believe we need to be defined by our sexual predispositions. Fornication, infidelity, divorce, sodomy, etc. are all sins (in fact, infidelity and sodomy are still on the books as criminal offenses in many states).

The fact that openly gay individuals want to embrace their same-sex desires and marry proves they have no concept (or are simply in denial) of essential spiritual realities. We wind up simply talking past each other. That’s why apologetics is so important, that we may declare the historical veracity and fantastic, absolute claims of the Triune God of the Bible. Without this understanding, all kinds of madness will prevail. What we have today is a complete denial of the sin and depravity of man, despite the fact that we are living in a day when the evidence abounds like never before.

Christianity provides the most historically reliable and reasonable explanation of our natural order, the existence of all things, and our ultimate purpose in this life. Unlike those nations that encourage the discrimination and persecution of gays in their midst, we are merely making our case for a healthy, well-ordered, civil society. However, we remain supportive of those with same-sex desires, and they’ve remained free to do whatever they will in their personal lives. But you can’t tell us that we have to support or even accept gay marriage as good for society…because we don’t.

We are not going to just casually adhere to those who aggressively demand a complete submission to this worldview. Gay marriage is just the beginning of the agenda, an agenda that is poised to intersect with all facets of society:

* The gay agenda will fully and shamelessly infiltrate our schools with the expansion of sex education to accommodate homosexual normalization. (See Kevin Jennings, the safe school czar chosen by President Obama, who resigned in disgrace in 2011)

* The Boy Scouts of America have been a recent target and will eventually be forced to submit to the ruthless demands and self-interests of those who seek full compliance on their terms. If complete submission to their agenda is not realized, they will be more than happy to tear down and completely destroy this organization.

* Business owners and religious institutions also will be forced to sacrifice their ‘rights of conscience’ or face the wrathful legislative and litigative tactics of the powerful progressive machine. We are already seeing evidences of these realities, and it will only get worse!

Gay activism wholly supports pushing complete indoctrination over mere tolerance. The envelope will keep getting pushed, and the boundaries of tolerance will continuously be expanded, as a form of forced compliance reigns supreme. We’ve already seen what has happened to the military, while numerous other entities are being bullied, ultimately forced into submission by this radical cause.

We must ask, exactly what’s the purpose of embracing the lifestyle that is homosexuality? What noble purpose does it serve? What purpose does it serve society?

People have all kinds of tendencies and desires; that does not mean it must me be officially recognized or celebrated. Sodomy is not a natural, God given act of love….it’s sexual perversion.

But we are all the same. We are all depraved. Homosexuals have a unique sinful disposition (lusting after same-sex individuals – but we all struggle with lust). We are commanded to love individuals with same-sex desires, and we should endorse outreach efforts to those in bondage to sin.

The message to sinners is universal, that we may deny ourselves, hold fast onto Jesus, and be reconciled. This is not a popular message these days, and many are completely blind to it; but it doesn’t make it any less necessary or true.

I’d like to end by sharing a quote, featuring some heartfelt words of candid encouragement,

“Claiming the label “celibate gay Christian” means, for me, recognizing my homosexual orientation as a kind of “thorn in the flesh.” When the apostle Paul used that phrase in his correspondence with the Corinthian church, he made clear that his “thorn” was indeed an unwelcome source of pain (2 Corinthians 12:7). But he also made clear that it had become the very occasion for his experience of the power of the risen Christ and, therefore, a paradoxical site of grace (2 Corinthians 12:8). Paul, I think, would have had no qualms about labeling himself a “thorn-pricked Christian”—not because he recognized his thorn as a good thing, in and of itself, but because it had become for him the means by which he encountered the power of Christ. Likewise, living with an unchanged homosexual orientation may be for many of us the means by which we discover new depths of grace, as well as new vocations of service to others.” -Wesley Hill (SpiritualFriendship.org)

10 Tenets Of Biblical Christianity

Bible 10 Tenets of Biblical Christianity

“While our country remains untainted with the principles and manners which are now producing desolation in so many parts of the world; while she continues sincere, and incapable of insidious and impious policy, we shall have the strongest reason to rejoice in the local destination assigned us by Providence. But should the people of America once become capable of that deep simulation towards one another, and towards foreign nations, which assumes the language of justice and moderation, while it is practising iniquity and extravagance, and displays in the most captivating manner the charming pictures of candour, frankness, and sincerity, while it is rioting in rapine and insolence, this country will be the most miserable habitation in the world. Because we have no government, armed with power, capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. Oaths in this country are as yet universally considered as sacred obligations. That which you have taken, and so solemnly repeated on that venerable ground, is an ample pledge of your sincerity and devotion to your country and its government.” -John Adams (Letter to the Officers of the First Brigade of the Third Division of the Militia of Massachusetts, 11 October 1798)

1. God’s Creation – God created all things; the Biblical account of creation is completely trustworthy.

(Genesis 1-9, Deuteronomy 4, Job 4, 10, 14, 28,35-37, Exodus 3, 10,19, Ecclesiastes 1, Psalm 19,94,102,104,107,115,119,121,135, Jeremiah 27,51, Amos 4, Acts 14, Proverbs 20, Matthew 19, Nehemiah 9, Isaiah 40,42,44, Zechariah 12, Jonah 1, John 1, Acts 14,17, Romans 1, Corinthians 15, Ephesians 3, Colossians 1, Hebrews 1,16, Revelation 14)

2. Sovereignty of God – He has created us for Himself of His good pleasure. We are restless until we are reconciled unto God and ultimately restored by the blood of the Savior, Jesus Christ!

(Psalm 22,103, Deuteronomy 8, Daniel 4, 1 Chronicles 26,29, John 3, 1 Timothy 6, 2 Timothy 1, Acts 2, Revelation 4, 1 Corinthians 8)

3. Original Sin – The fall of man has left everything broken and bruised. Nobody is sparred from the effects of sin internally or externally, spiritually or physically. We are all created in God’s image, but all of creation has been deeply wounded from the effects of sin. Although there are moments of prosperity, peace, and tranquility, this life is often a vale of tears…we must live for something more, something better.

(Romans 3,5,7, 1 Corinthians 15, Genesis 3,8, Psalm 14,51, Mark 7, Ephesians 2, Proverbs 22, Job 15, Jeremiah 17, Ecclesiastes 9, 1 John 3)

4. Moral law – The commands of God are still binding, although they cannot be kept perfectly. Once made alive through Jesus Christ, who paid the price on our behalf, we are now dead to sin and will no longer desire to have it live in our hearts.

(Matthew 5, Romans 6, 2 Timothy 3, Exodus 20, Deuteronomy 5, Leviticus 19, Proverbs 6)

5. Regeneration – We are spiritually dead in our natural state and have to be made alive by the Holy Spirit who applies the truths of Scripture to our hearts.

(John 1,3,6, Titus 3, Matthew 19, 2 Peter 1, Ephesians 2, Acts 3, 2 Corinthians 5, Romans 8)

6. Redemption – All the pain, all the tears, all the adversities, all the heartache, and all the suffering we experience in this life will be washed away for those who have given their lives to Jesus in faith, with fear and trembling, hope and love, and a true desire for righteousness.

(Revelation 21, Ephesians 1, Galatians 3, Romans 3, Colossians 1, 1 Corinthians 6,7)

7. Inerrancy of Scriptures – Filled with God-inspired wisdom, scripture is trustworthy and speaks to all essential matters of spiritual and earthly living. Jesus Himself and His disciples referenced scripture as trustworthy and authoritative

(Revelation 22, John 1,6, Proverbs 30, Deuteronomy 4, Matthew 5,7,19,22, Mark 9, 2 Timothy 3)

8. Evangelism – God’s followers are on fire for The Lord and will become ‘fishers of men’.

(Hebrews 10, 1 John 5, Matthew 9,28, Luke 9, John 1,10,14, Acts 2,3,4,13,16,22, Romans 10,12, Mark 1, Isaiah 49, )

9. Traditional Family – The nuclear family (father, mother, children) is ordained by God. God is the Ultimate Authority in all matters, and we are to live in service to The Lord with love and goodwill to our fellow man.

(Matthew 19, Genesis 2,9, 1 Timothy 3, Exodus 20, Proverbs 1, Ephesians 6, Colossians 3, Psalm 103, Joshua 24, Proverbs 11,31)

10. Personal Responsibility, Accountability, and Charity – We should diligently provide for our families and glorify God in all that we do (including our vocations) by maintaining a strong sense of moral responsibility in thought, word, and deed. We should bear each others burdens, provide for the needs of the poor and the needy, and love our neighbors as ourselves. The believer is sanctified and seeks to walk in humility, righteousness, and holiness through Christ, who strengthens us!

(1 Timothy 5, 2 Timothy 1, Galatians 6,2 Corinthians 5, Philippians 4, Proverbs 28, 2 Peter 1, Luke 10,11,12, 1 Corinthians 5,6,13, Ezekiel 18, Genesis 4, Colossians 3, 2 Thessalonians 3, Deuteronomy 15, 16, Proverbs 3,11,21,22,28, Matthew 6, Mark 12, Luke 3,6, Acts 20, Romans 12, James 2,4, 2 Corinthians 9, Matthew 5, Ephesians 4, 1 Peter 2,4, 1 John 2)

If this Country is going to go down, it should not be a result of apathy and indifference…if this administration is going to continue to endorse the destruction of the body AND the soul, faithful Christians throughout this great nation must ask The Lord to use them to win some (the deceived) back…

Photo Credit: knowhimonline (Creative Commons)