Barack Obama speech 7 SC

A lawyer who has fought government attorneys in courthouses across the nation over the issue of President Barack Obama’s eligibility to occupy the White House now wants the dispute moved to the nation’s capital, since that’s where government lawyers have said there would be proper jurisdiction.


Advertisement-content continues below


Orly Taitz is asking the California judge who earlier dismissed her clients’ claims on jurisdictional issues, noting that the proper venue would be Washington, to simply move the case there.

“During the October 5 motion hearing pursuant to the motion to dismiss due to lack of jurisdiction, the moving parties, the assistant U.S. attorneys David DeJutte and Roger West have argued that they believe that the proper jurisdiction for this case is the District of Columbia,” Taitz argues in a new court filing before Judge David Carter.

“On October 29 this case was dismissed for want of jurisdiction only and was never heard on the merits, as this court noted in the above order that the proper jurisdiction is the District of Columbia court,” she wrote.

Taitz told WND today that there could be no opposition from the U.S. attorneys since they had argued for the jurisdiction in Washington, D.C., and the case then could be heard on its merits.


Advertisement-content continues below


Read More: By Bob Unruh, WorldNetDaily


Don't Miss Out. Subscribe By Email Or Facebook

Email

Facebook