On December 31st, 2011, in the dead of night, President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law. On that day, the Bill of Rights was shattered in the interest of the “War on Terror.” He also wrote a signing statement saying that “my administration will not detain American Citizens” and was very hesitant to sign the bill into law.
A few days ago, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals placed Section 1021 of the NDAA back into effect.
The NDAA is typically a mundane bill that appropriates funding for the military for the current year. However, Section 1021 (b) (2) in the 2012 NDAA allows anyone, including American citizens, to be detained indefinitely by the military…no trial, no charges, no day in court.
When the NDAA was signed into law, I, along with many others, took notice and took action. Tangerine Bolen (founder of Revolution Truth), Journalist Chris Hedges, Birgitta Jónsdóttir, Professor Noam Chomsky, Daniel Ellsberg, Kai Wargalla, and Alexa O’Brien filed a lawsuit against the NDAA within 30 days of its signing. They would become known as the “Freedom 7” and were immediately launched into the spotlight.
In May, Federal Judge Katherine Forrest, in the strongest ruling for civil liberties since 9-11, agreed with the plaintiffs and declared the NDAA unconstitutional placing an temporary injunction on the law. In her ruling, she specifically stated: “This measure has a chilling impact on First Amendment rights.” In that same ruling, she specifically stated that her ruling applied to and protected the general public:
As set forth above, this Court has found that plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on the merits regarding their constitutional claim and it therefore has a responsibility to insure that the public’s constitutional rights are protected.
Accordingly, this Court finds that the public interest is best served by the issuance of the preliminary relief recited herein.
As I wrote in “Government Defies Federal Judge on NDAA,” the government response was swift. In a 10 page Motion for Reconsideration, the government stated:
The government construes this Court’s Order as applying only as to the named plaintiffs in this suit.
This Motion directly defied Judge Forrest’s ruling, which clearly applied to the public, and her response was just as swift. She told the government lawyers “to put it bluntly” her order most definitely applied to the public. This should have been the end of it, but the government appealed the ruling…setting the stage for what was to come.
On Wednesday, September 12th, Judge Forrest once again took a stand for civil liberties by ruling that the temporary injunction against the enforcement of the NDAA’s detention provisions is now permanent. Much like after her preliminary injunction, the internet rejoiced. That evening, “People Against the NDAA” put out a press release stating:
Based on her earlier temporary injunction, this ruling was expected. However, it is not time to celebrate. Based on the Obama Administration’s previous action an Appeal or a Motion for Reconsideration will likely be filed. The administration has also not said whether or not it is enforcing the NDAA, according to a letter from lawsuit organizer Tangerine Bolen. The case will then go to an appeals court.
Sure enough, within 24 hours, the Obama Administration appealed the ruling. The Administration’s lawyers said that this injunction could cause “irreparable harm” to the national security of the United States and the war on terrorism. This appeal flies in the face of the President’s signing statement, his statements to reporters, and the Constitution.
On top of the appeal, on Monday, Judge Raymond Lohier of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals granted a temporary stay of Judge Katherine Forrest’s injunction against the NDAA. On the 28th of September, the Court will hear arguments on whether to make that stay permanent or not.
Since May, Judge Forrest had prevented the NDAA from being used anywhere in the world. Now, the NDAA is back in full effect, and you can be indefinitely detained without a trial or a day in court. Thanks to the Obama Administration, America is again the battlefield.
Happy Constitution Week!
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
OH GEE. OBummer at it again how surprising! Hitler II
Some have said that they were not worried about obama being a dictator. I do. Everything he does points in that direction. He takes all of our civil rights that he can, as in this NDAA. Really pushing to be able to detain citizens with no warrant, no lawyer, or hearing. We certainly cannot let him start on the 2 nd amendment, then there would be no stopping him.
Know who co-authored that un-constitutional document, none other than RINO Senator John McCain. He calls himself a Republican but his actions for quite sometime prove otherwise. Hopefully after the election there will be a re-call drive in Arizona to have him removed from office in disgrace.
The court has ruled it unconstitutional….not appealed by his DOJ…..as usual he will go around the rule of law and makes him more of a traitor……he really hates this country….can’t wait until he moves to his new 35 million dollar digs in Hawaii, which one of his buddies is paying half of…..he must be thinking he will lose the election, because the offer will not be available in 2016.
Gabe,
I’ve never participates in a recall, but this time I’m ready. Are you?
AZ-ike: I will sing that recall, Hell i will sing it like an illegal Mexican x 5.
Oh you mean democrat-republican Mc Cain. When any judge anywhere refuses to up hold the rule of law it would be up to the citizens to show said judge the error of his way`s. Just explain the them that this is a country of laws and that the laws need to be upheld and not rule from the bench.
We’ve been told that the only way that our America can be brought down is from within – now we know who is within……hmm…with his own flag yet.
Here is a real Zinger for ya. What do you want to Bet that if for some reason, Mitt Romney gets ellected, that HE (Mitt Romney) WILL NOT Reverse The Obama Administrations NDAA Rullings or Orders?
I have been saying all along that there is not a Dimes worth of difference between them and their policies. They were Both Hand Picked for the Job, and they are playing a Big Game on the People of this country. Either way, WE LOOSE. Time to start gathering your supplies for the Second Civil War.
I would be surprised if we even have an election… If there is an election I certainly wouldn’t be surprised if Obama wins… Remember how Chez was behind in his election by 5 points and all of a sudden there was a power outage and when the power was brought back up Chez was 5 points ahead.. The dead will rises to vote this Nov. and most likely Pres. Obama will steal the election again.
All you have to do is check the vote count to see who voted for and against the bill. You will find that quite a few republicans voted for it. It’s enough to make you wonder who you can really trust. Reelect no one. Fire them all.
The NDAA is unconstitutional on it’s face.
The one thing I do know…this BS autocratic, dictatorial power, as reported along with the US Army Field Manual for Civil Unrest has awakened a lot of the sheeple that I’ve been trying to reach, that otherwise thought I was an alarmist for all the warnings I’ve issued over the last few years.
Great chances for an unruly bunch and ugly circumstances of confrontation definitedly exisit. WHEN??? That’s the $64 question.