A few days ago, Father Joseph McShane S.J., the president of New York’s Fordham University, called Ann Coulter “too hateful and needlessly provocative” as he ordered that she be disinvited to speak at Fordham. Then he had no trouble approving “ethicist” Peter Singer as a speaker. Singer is a man who promotes the murder of children he would consider “defective” within the first two years of their lives.
According an article in First Things magazine, “Singer has spent a lifetime justifying the unjustifiable. He is the founding father of the animal liberation movement and advocates ending “the present speciesist bias against taking seriously the interests of nonhuman animals.” He is also a defender of killing the aged (if they have dementia), newborns (for almost any reason until they are two years old), necrophilia (assuming it’s consensual), and bestiality (also assuming it’s consensual).”
In other words Singer’s “rap” sheet is as ugly as sin. As the founder of a movement elevating animals to equality with humans he has cheapened human life. He is guilty of promoting the murder of the sick and elderly in the name of convenience. He is guilty of promoting the murder of “defective” children to satisfy of his own definition of who has a right to life. He is guilty of promoting necrophilia which is nothing less than Satanic and he is guilty of promoting bestiality – a sin of the gravest degree that certain makes Satan proud.
Nevertheless, somewhere lodged in his own sick mind, Father McShane has determined that the purely political rhetoric of Ann Coulter would be more harmful to his students than the words of the monster Singer. Coulter is therefore not acceptable as a topic for free discussion at Fordham.
The worst thing about Singer is his endearing nature. He is a perfect earthly representative of Satan. By all accounts he is an unassuming charming man who hides behind the same type of masks captured Nazis did when they were put on trial. Despite being evil incarnate they also looked grandfatherly and harmless.
Shame on you, Father McShane! When I was a Catholic grade school student what you are doing was described to me as placing myself or someone else in the near occasion of sin. The question is as always: Why won’t Jesuits defend Catholic doctrine?
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
Another example of the progressive madness in our schools.
WHERE can our children be properly educated?
He sounds like one of obummers family to me,he would fit right in with that crowd! That’s right where people seem to want to be these days…..again NO CLUE! The world is insane!
What can you expect from any left wing loon. Which is what most University heads are. They have no feeling for the real rights of everyone. Only for those who follow there creed.
Feel free to shout in an e-mail regarding this faux Jesuit Priest’s behavior. How can he sit there and justify Peter Singer’s presence at Fordham University , while proclaiming Ann Coulter unfit to speak there? There’s something really evil afoot when a Catholic priest will countenance a person like Peter Singer who advocates
Infanticide. The man is not just a hypocrite, for as far as I am concerned McShane ( I refuse to call him father) is an evil man. The official contact info is below.
CONTACT Information
Joseph M. McShane, S.J.
President, Fordham University
Room 107, Administration Building
Rose Hill Campus
441 E. Fordham Road
Bronx, NY 10458
(718) 817-3000
President@fordham.edu
I wonder if we can petition the Pope to demand that this low life Priest be excommunicated. He is a disgrace to the Catholic Church he represents. If such a petition can be done I will surely sign it. It would be futile to send any letters of protest to this Apostle of Satin. He must be so arrogant he will only laugh at you. It would be interesting to hear how he explains himself on the day he appears before Christ himself.
As a true Catholic, it is priests and bishops who are degrading our faith by their liberal approach to evil. Coulter at least has moral values and has the innards to speak up. Fordham is now on the same list as Notre Dame – an embarrassment to my faith and to teaching. If nothing else, they could have had both speak so the students (unfortunately, who are so dumbed down these days they cannot discern good from evil and then they are NY students, which means they are even dumber than most) could hear two sides. These so-called schools, priests and bishops are emptying out the Church because we do not want politicking in our schools nor our Church. We wish to practice our faith and worship, not have half-baked pastors/bishops, etc. telling us stupidities. I am a true Catholic and I speak up whether they like or not. My faith is important; they are not!
“Birds of a feather flock together” 2-1/2% of the world’s population is anti-social or suppressive, 17-1/2% are robotic (military, law enforcement) and 80% are very social people who just want to do their jobs, raise their families, and have a good time. The author describes two of these birds in this article, after the fact.
The emotional level of these 2-1/2%’ers is ‘covert hostility’, e.g. the hostility hides behind a smile, and a handshake, just before they stab you in the back. They are the creators of all the insidious evil on this planet. I’m not telling you anything new, we’ve all been betrayed at one time or another.
New discoveries have been developed that would give us the ability to spot these 2-1/2%’ers before we vote for them, i.e. just go down the checklist. We don’t have to live with betrayal. Follow the link, play intro video, and do a free online course called “The Emotional Tone Scale”:..Semper Fi http://www.scientologycourses.org/courses/tone-scale/start.html
It makes me sick to my stomach. I can not help but think about the boys some years back!
It is fairly common knowledge amongst those who have looked into the subject of who’s controlling the world – or attempting to – that the Jesuits are deeply involved in that ‘project’. Thus it should come as no surprise that a high Jesuit would not want a political conservative – i.e., a believer in the rights of the individual vis-a-vis the power of the state – to be given any sort of ‘time’ on his watch to speak her/his mind. (Believers in individualism over collectivism are always portrayed by these power-over-people types as ‘haters’. It’s part of their strategy for denouncing the opposition to their collectivist schemes; using ridicule and ‘cue words’ and so forth.) On the other hand, people who want the state to have all sorts of power over the people…….