First, on a personal note: Thank you, thank you and thank you, Mary Elizabeth Williams! What a glorious service you’ve done the pro-life cause. I know, that’s not what you intended. But that’s precisely what you’ve accomplished.
Did I say thank you?
In her jaw-dropping article “So what if abortion ends life?”, Williams – a mainstream, though uncharacteristically honest pro-abort scribe for Salon.com – has inexplicably broken from the Orwellian left’s ministerial script. In so doing, she’s severely undermined the very cause for which she would gladly “sacrifice” (dismember alive, that is) her very own daughter. A daughter, mind you, whom she coldly acknowledges to be “a human life.”
But enough with the pleasantries.
In his 1925 manifesto “Mein Kampf,” Adolf Hitler wrote: “Here’s the complicated reality in which we live: All life is not equal.” Though technically a human life, “the parasitic Jew is a human life without having the same rights as the Aryan.”
“Mother Germany is the boss,” he declared. “Her life and what is right for her circumstances and her health should automatically trump the rights of the non-autonomous Jew. Always.”
Ha! Just kidding. Actually, Ms. Williams wrote those things. She wrote them, not from Nazi Germany in 1925, but rather from America. Wednesday.
She wrote them, not about the Jewish people, but instead about the most vulnerable of all people: the child in her mother’s womb. (A holocaust by any other name …)
Yes, welcome to Feminist Funland, where the women are randy and the children are dead. In “So what if abortion ends life?” (I just love writing that), Williams, like some unintentionally creepy clown, guides us through the “pro-choice” house of mirrors, revealing with crystal clarity the true horror behind the left’s distorted reflections.
“While opponents of abortion eagerly describe themselves as ‘pro-life,’” she writes, “the rest of us have had to scramble around with not nearly as big-ticket words like ‘choice’ and ‘reproductive freedom.’”
Here, Ms. Williams essentially admits what the life community has said for decades – that the euphemistic language of “choice” and “reproductive freedom” long employed by the multi-billion-dollar abortion industry is exactly that; euphemism – propaganda.
In so many words, she goes on to acknowledge that, rather than “pro-choice,” “pro-death” is indeed the appropriate moniker for her movement. “Yet I know that throughout my own pregnancies, I never wavered for a moment in the belief that I was carrying a human life inside of me. I believe that’s what a fetus is: a human life. And that doesn’t make me one iota less solidly pro-choice,” she proclaims.
Nice. Wonder how many of the little Williams babies made the cut.
But the money line? “Here’s the complicated reality in which we live,” she declares. “All life is not equal.”
Get that, Thomas Jefferson? “All life is not equal.” Put that in your self-evident-truth-pipe and smoke it. We clear, MLK? Wrap that “I have a dream” up in a big wad of “All life is not equal” and get to the back of the Birmingham bus.
Indeed, Ms. Williams is a militant feminist, and that’s adorable; but her line of reasoning here is anything but fresh and cute. It stems from the utilitarian rotgut Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger poured down the gullet of her power-drunk eugenicist fans – foremost of whom was the hypertensive fuhrer himself.
Still, to be fair, I’ll let Ms. Williams speak for herself: “Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides,” she finds. “She’s the boss. Her life and what is right for her circumstances and her health should automatically trump the rights of the non-autonomous entity inside of her. Always.”
In other words: “Me no likey? You die.” Or, as Hitler really did say: “We shall regain our health only by eliminating the Jew.” Old Adolf, of course, defined “health” to mean exactly what feminists mean by it. “Health: Any reason at all.”
Maybe I’ve been at this too long, but I love it when liberals mistake sociopathy for conviction – candor for courage. I revel in those rare moments when left-wing extremists, nestled warm inside the foul bowels of their “progressive” echo chamber, pull back the wizard’s curtain just far enough to expose, if only for an instant, the wicked sty in which they roll, splash, and play.
Like this gem: “If by some random fluke I learned today I was pregnant,” Williams boasts, “you bet you’re a-s I’d have an abortion. I’d have the World’s Greatest Abortion. … I still need to acknowledge my conviction that the fetus is indeed a life. A life worth sacrificing.”
“The World’s Greatest Abortion.”
“A life worth sacrificing.”
Submitted without comment.
Matt Barber (@jmattbarber on Twitter) is an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. He serves as Vice President of Liberty Counsel Action.
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
Abortion is a disease on the American society pushed by a Supreme Court in 1973 that has caused the slaughter of 56 million babies.That’s enough to populate many,many large States in the U.S. While you read this ; every 23 seconds a beautiful live baby will die.
Can you imagine if George Washington,Salk, MLK, The doctor who invented open heart surgury ,Gen. Robert E Lee or Gen. & President U.S. Grant had been aborted.? How many of those dead babies possibly could have found a cure for cancer,heart attacks.diabetes ,or a meriod of other killing diseases ? What could have been the lives and acomplishments of many others IF they had been allowed to live. Look back at 1973. How many new accomplishments have we been presented with . How many tax dollers would they have paid by working and helping our current disaster .. Our young people will never see social security and medicare ;Forget that.We are allowing the slaughter of our futures.Who will defend our Nation if we have 56 million babies who can never stop a rouge nation from replacing our current military. Does Obama and his cohorts plan on this ?
Dispite what some claim ; They are real human beings at conception . What will God do to us for destroying a live viable life ? These ,so called , doctors rip the babies apart tearing off arms and legs and if the baby comes out alive they push them aside and wait for these tiny blessings from God to die.This is what they took an oath to do ;cause no harm. It’s sick and horrendous and those that perform this dasterdly deed should feel the pain the poor child does.
American families who want American babies thru adoption are forced to go overseas to adopt .Somethings wrong with the compassion of those who pretend to be pro-choice;Whose choice. ?
We have gone from a nation that held life in the greatness and wonder of love and kindness that our God has allowed us to witness and we snuff it out and dispose them as garbage . They are REAL BABIES and they are alive .Chief Justice Roberts where is YOUR humanity.
How long will God allow us to spit in His face ?
How long will we not stand up for this useless slaughter of the innocents ?
President Obama supports this ongoing murder of real citizens. What if his mother decided to just dump him in a garbage can ?
This Supreme Court neglects humanity by just going along with the flow . They have the power to stop it thru a lawful ruling that “LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION”. GOD KNOWS THIS. WHY DON’T YOU.
“How long will we not stand up for this useless slaughter of the innocents?” Answer: As long as Christian pastors/clergy allow the government to muzzle them by their tax exempt status in every election. They will not name names, on the pulpit, during elections because they may lose their tax exempt status. So, in other words, these Christian clergy are serving Ceasar instead of Jesus Christ. This IS treachery. And God IS NOT mocked. The DIVINE CHASTISEMENT IS NOT FAR OFF.
From the article: Still, to be fair, I’ll let Ms. Williams speak for herself: “Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides,” she finds. “She’s the boss. Her life and what is right for her circumstances and her health should automatically trump the rights of the non-autonomous entity inside of her. Always.”
And yet, there’s the other side of that same coin…When upholding the unborn child’s Rights, is it any better when the mother’s Rights are violated? IMO, many people in the Pro-Life movement are just as adamant on the opposite end of the same spectrum as the Pro-Choice side. The mother DOES have Rights over her own body AND the sanctity of life must be upheld also.
Everybody on the extreme ends are only advocating for statist control in favor of their own views…The real question hear still remains…Should the taxpayer be forced to subsidize EITHER side of these extremes? Should I be forced (by payment of my taxes) conform to either extreme? To be fair, there is no Law of Nature that guarantees that an expectant mother (of ANY species of creature) will be capable of delivering a birth: merely the strains & stresses of attempting a birthing can kill the mother, the infant or both! Some infants don’t even make it as far as the time of delivery…Sometimes the mother dies before that time. At what point does an unborn actually have Rights under Nature? Where does the Rights of the Mother end & those of the unborn begin? At what point must the Rights of BOTH be upheld? Disparaging the Rights of either mother or child is not “ok.”
No matter what the ultimate answer may be to these questions, I just don’t think the government has any delegated Power from the Constitution to force me to pay for someone else’s abortion. Keep government fingers out of the decision…This is a social & moral decision to be made by the People, outside the power of the government to decide!
I am so tired of hearing about all these murders and then to hear in another article that some women have had several abortions. I think if you want to get an abortion ,then the doctor should just do a tubal ligation while he is at it, then the women can go out an whore around and do what she wants without the chance of another abortion happening, think about it so many less murders of tiny lives
[[ “So what if abortion ends life?” ]]
Did anyone ever think of NOT shacking around? … Did anyone ever consider having some morals? I suppose not …. ! What are we teaching the kids of tomorrow…. ? Guess nothing !!