The sheer number of voter fraud stories in the 2012 elections the media refuses to investigate is staggering. Hundreds of legitimate concerns potentially impacting thousands of votes have been both raised and ignored. There are, however, many examples proven and confirmed by Mainstream Media sources. They are well-documented examples such as:
-160 counties across the U.S. have more voters on their voter registration rolls than live voters living in their district.
-Well over 100 % of registered voters casting votes, and statistical “miracles” of 100% of 59 precincts (known as divisions in Philadelphia) voting unanimously for only one candidate.
Please note that while these statistics may seem like a small percentage of the vote, they are in the crucial swing states. These “small” issues can decide the election outcome when they occur in such states that carry critical electoral votes.
Currently, only three states require proof of U.S. citizenship to vote: Georgia, Alabama, and Kansas. Arizona’s attempt to enact citizenship proof was invalidated by the U.S appeals court in San Francisco prior to the 2012 election. The invalidation came after the people of Arizona approved the requirement in a 2004 vote. The U.S. Supreme Court is to hear arguments early in 2013 and make it’s ruling in June 2013 on the issue of all States’ ability to enact such laws. That same 9th Circuit Court stated that a 1993 law bars the Arizona registration requirement. The federal measure establishes a national voter application and requires every state to “accept and use” it. The law “does not give states room to add their own requirements” to the federal application. The 1993 law was known as the Motor Voter Law, a separate provision that requires states to let residents register to vote when applying for a driver’s license. County Supervisors of elections in Florida claim these Motor Voter laws prevent them from verifying citizenship. The only way for them to investigate is if they receive a tip, according to an NBC-2 investigative report.
Additionally, only fifteen states require photo ID; and thirty five states have no photo requirements. Again, no proof of citizenship is required in the combined total of forty seven of the states.
The refusal of activist judges and certain states to require ID to vote is disenfranchising to all US citizens who vote legally. Fraudulent votes cancel out real votes.
Americans from all political parties have spoken in an overwhelming majority for the need of proof of identity when voting.
A poll by the Washington Post in 2012 indicates that “Almost three-quarters of all Americans support the idea that people should have to show photo identification to vote, even though they are nearly as concerned about voter suppression as they are about fraud in presidential elections, according to a new Washington Post poll.”
“Q: In your view, should voters in the United States be required to show official, government-issued photo identification — such as a drivers license — when they cast ballots on Election Day, or shouldn’t they have to do this? 74% – Should be required vs. 23% Should not be required.”
If the Democrat Party leaders were truly interested in a legitimate election, they would have advocated to give out free ID to all those who they claim would be “disenfranchised” if forced to prove their identity to vote. The UN election observers/poll watchers in 2012 made comments about how surprised they were that the U.S. voting system is purely based on trust and that voters are not required to prove their identity.
The fact is, the Dems are not interested in a “true vote.” What exists today is an organized strategy edge they are not willing to give up; it gives them just enough edge to win elections. Why is there a propensity and advocacy by some to give away almost everything for free, except for legitimate ID’s? In our society, a valid ID is a necessity to function; it is a basic need of every citizen.
Conservatives are not typically the party of free handouts. However, in this case, I recommend a national program of free Photo ID for anyone who claims they can’t afford one. This would be a program funded by the federal government to all states.
This program would end the debate over a “poll tax.”
1) The program would have guidelines to meet and restrict standards of proof of citizenship prior to issuing the ID. The ID’s must be issued at least 100 days prior to any election in order to be used in an election to vote. This is to allow a bi-partisan team to complete an examination of all ID’s issued before elections. This bi-partisan team will consist of certified “ID watchers” from both political parties; this program would work much the same as poll watchers. The “ID watchers” would be given complete access to all documents used to issue ID’s, including the photos to match the age of the ID holder.
2) Each respective political party could promote new government-issued IDs the same way they drive voter registrations. They would be responsible for ensuring their constituents become legally able to vote in elections. There would no longer be claims of disenfranchisement of anyone.
3) If any ID is found to be issued fraudulently, the individual in question would be flagged at their precinct and removed from the voter rolls; and criminal charges would be filed. If any ID issuer in the state’s ID center is found to be issuing ID’s that are not accompanied by legitimate proof of citizenship, serious federal criminal penalties would be charged.
4) The department that would address these criminal sanctions would be be run by a bipartisan team, not the DOJ, and have 100% transparency. This transparency would be available to the public via a website. All discrepancies would be reported on the website for anyone to review. All questionable documents would be scanned and available on the website; with the individual ID applicant name redacted, protocols would be developed to create a check and balance system.
These would be federal dollars well spent. The program would cost virtually nothing, as there is almost no legal citizen in this country who does not already have a government-issued state ID. However, the number of legitimate voters who are being disenfranchised by fraud canceling their vote is likely beyond our belief. We have only scratched the surface of the fraud reports.
5) All states should be required to end all ID-issuing to non-citizens without labeling them as such.
A driver’s license is all it takes to vote. Some states are issuing drivers’ licenses to non-citizens, which enables them to go to the polls and cast votes. I suggest that drivers’ licenses issued to non- citizens must be stamped on the front with any politically correct name the left finds to be inoffensive. Of course, they will find the stamp offensive in and of itself. However, we must find a way to allow only US citizens to vote. Many states currently issue a non-standard ID for those under the legal drinking age. We propose the same for non-U.S. citizens.
Any state issuing ID’s to non-citizens within a margin of more than .5% without marking those ID’s appropriately would lose its ability to cast electoral votes in a general election. It would also lose its ability to send representatives from their state to participate in the federal government for a minimum of 1 year.
6) The double vote: Prior to the elections and after elections, a cross-reference list is to be compiled of all who are registered or have voted in all of the states. Currently, there is no such requirement. If anyone was found to have voted more than once, within or outside of their state, severe criminal charges would be imposed, to include mandatory jail time. Anyone who is registered in more than one state or county or precinct will be sent a notification to choose their precinct; if there is no response, they will be removed from all rolls other than their last identifiable and known address. Conspiracy to commit voter fraud by any party official advocating or directing others on how to circumvent the system would also be prosecuted in a similar manner to the full extent of the law.
7) Absentee ballots: Choosing to vote absentee is a right that is imperative to retain. This right also creates concern, as it is the ripest for fraud. A photocopy of the voter’s ID would have to accompany the absentee ballot. That ID information would be crosschecked upon receipt for legitimacy, including death records. Should the ID raise any red flags, the bipartisan team would contact the voter to ensure legitimacy. A protocol for disputes would be put in place for deciding any questionable ballots.
8) Provisional Ballots: All standard ID requirements would apply. No affidavits would be accepted for sole proof of eligibility.
9) The dead vote: Any person on the voter rolls over 80 years of age would be verified for legitimacy by the “ID Watchers”, by home visit if necessary. Absentee ballots would be matched to live individuals and cross-referenced to death records. All suspect registrations and/or ballots would be investigated by the nonpartisan committee.
10) Military vote: All ballots would be sent out to military personal far in advance of elections, within one week of the official ballot being established. Any state that does not monitor their own counties for this standard would be denied representation in DC for a one year.
11) The mentally challenged or criminally insane vote: Any setting where votes are cast without consent from the family or legal guardian from institutional settings housing the mentally challenged would be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Convicted criminals (where the law applies) would have their vote tossed out, cross-checking all relevant criminal records to ballots. All participating staff would be charged criminally if found to be helping those individuals to the polls or requesting absentee ballots on their behalf.
12) Technology vs. Paper Ballots: Technology and software have the ability to be manipulated by programmers without the ability to verify results or fraud. If states choose to use electronic voting machines, those votes must accompany paper ballots for verification. Similar to random drug tests, precincts and counties with known past issues, recent concerns raised by reports from individuals, and random sampling of others would be used to monitor the integrity of the system. Any state opting out of this system would be ineligible for representation in the federal government. Those states not in compliance may continue to have local elections in their desired manner.
13) All software programs utilized to tabulate votes at the state and county levels are to be checked by the bi-artisan team. This will take place before elections, spot-checked during and after elections. If any program is found to be intentionally written to change outcomes, those involved will be prosecuted; and that company and all individuals involved would be barred from any further software production or participating in any election process. All bids for voting machine upkeep and programming would be put out for bids. No contracts would be awarded at any gov’t level without a fair bidding process to be overseen by the bipartisan teams.
Only U.S. companies would be allowed to participate in voting tabulation or software used in any of the operations in this system. This is to ensure all standards are met and to ensure U.S. laws prevail and will be enforced if any irregularities occur.
14) Lastly, any state, county, or precinct that does not allow certified poll watchers to actively observe the voting process and ballot counting would be denied the ability to submit their results to be counted.
The 2012 election debacle should be the last time we as citizens of the USA see this type of alleged fraud perpetrated on our great country. There should never be a question in any U.S. citizen’s mind that an election was fair or legitimate. Even the perception of fraud is unacceptable. While there is no claim that the 2012 election would have turned out differently, it is imperative that the U.S. maintains the utmost concern for voter integrity from here forward. There is no justifiable excuse for any concerns over the legitimacy of the elections in the U.S.A.
The goal is to ensure that all citizens feel their vote counts; this will also drive greater participation in the voting process.
If you want to see this plan set in motion, forward this information to all your representatives and governors. Email it to all your friends and family. And don’t forget to post it on social media sites or blogs. Please help to get the word out. We demand our votes be counted!
http://pleasecountmyvote.com
(Edited by Jim Griffin.)
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
Why isn’t our government letting us vote again ? They know what went on ? Hell they knew it was going on before !?!?!? This is worst than the mafia !?!?!?!? They need to be put in prison !!! No wonder they want my gun !!!!
Remember when Obama and Holder said there was no voter fraud in the elections but the states that required ID Obama lost in and the States in which no ID was required he won. Does that not tell the people something. The only way he won is by stealing the election and what he is doing out of jail is beyond questioning. He has lied, stole the elections, (2008 and 2012) Everything that comes out of his mouth is a lie. He has had 17 vacations in 3 years and they have cost over 1 billion dollars to the tax payer and he is a millionaire or so they said a couple weeks ago. With most of the people out of work, with them having to live on a budget with the food stamps he provides and make phone calls on the phones he lets the tax payers pay for, with the force of his garbage called Obama care and the list goes on Obama and his whole mob deserve to be in prison or send them all back to Africa. What I have asked over and over but never got an answer to is “( If he was born here, if he is a citizen of this country then how the hell did he go to college on grants etc given to people born in another country or a citizen of another country)
Only four states require photo ids.
It’d be the end of the Democrat party’s domination.
Nothing is going to change. We need to vote out all the “elite ones”
What good would it do to vote again when its loaded with deception. Good votes wont count. Only the forged ones will..
The plan is as close to flawless as anthing man made can be. I would be comfortable with it if the absolute bi-partisanship of the responcible group could be verified. I want to know how well known and reasonably obvious voter fraud cases that happened inthe 2012 cycle can be found, proven or discounted, and remedied. If these are known or reasonably suspect then action has to be taken or that in and of itself is ilegal. Accessory after the fact at minimum, and could go on to suborning perjury, falsifying an oath an others.
Thanks!! I welcome suggestions to add or better the plan.
If you want to know why the GOP does not challenge voter fraud, go to the link and you’ll realize we are hamstrung and it was our own doing. Talk about lambs to slaughter!
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/
With all this proven fraud, ask yourself, why is it, that absolutely no Republicans seem to be the least concerned. I know I’m mad as hell, but we hear absolutely nothing from Romney/ Ryan or any other Republicans. Just makes me sick.
just posted this above. If you want to know why the GOP does not challenge voter fraud, go to the link and you’ll realize we are hamstrung and it was our own doing. Talk about lambs to slaughter!
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/
Re Electronic Voting Machines.
My county uses electronic machines but they are controlled and maintained by the SEIU. I have my doubts about the validity of this operation. My County usually votes strongly Republican and my state is not one of the big one that usually determine Electoral College votes so there may not be much demand to ‘fix’ our vote but I still suspect the whole operation.
There is no one who can go against the Obama machine. If there was things would be different, He has the money and power backing him so all controversies will be handled and supressed like it has been since he came to office. Wait until after he is inaugurated. We are his subjects being he is now our supreme ruler and dicktator. Maybe the politicians who want to go against this unqualified, illegal, phony, lying, racist, bigot, half breed, bi-sexual, foreign national, Muslim POTUS are approached, patted on the back and told. BTW, you can cooperate, mind your P&Qs and all be will OK. Remember we know where your loved one shop, go to school who your friends are etc. Understand? I am sure when his big money, string pulling, puppet masters attain their goal and are finished with him he will be eliminated somehow.
As much as I hate to admit it I am sure it is too late to do anything. Look at all that he has done and nothing has or will be done.
This all makes me so sick…….I feel dead inside…..my heart is heavy !
For your country to let you down like this…..and not one of those bastards in Washington to do anything ! Our military should turn on them ……….
Many of the Congress are ignorant of what is really going on. They are either traveling to and fro or getting the mail their assistants want them to see. Many of these assistants are there because they have a special relationship going with the Congressmen, so it would be easy to get Obama people inside working and sorting memos, etc. for Congressmen who are depending upon the clerical help and assistants for their schedules and important documents. The Congressmen are not doing their own work for the most part, just showing up. The government is at the mercy of those who are much lower level where the offices of Congress depend upon. There needs to be housecleanings from the bottom up. The bottom is helping Obama destroy the top. He intends for the top to go down and it will crush the bottom. As I said; it has been planned well and for a long time. When they did away with civil service tests to get the best workers and this was likely part of the plan as well in order to migrate the leftist policies into place through people less likely to be noticed from the bottom. Their damage is immeasurable when the overall aspect is counted as to what the lower paid clerks who are working to insure an agenda for someone like Obama.
Perhaps, but we should make sure his future is JAIL for he should never, nor should his family, or the family of his cohorts benefit for attempting to destroy this country.
Exactly who is going to ‘set guidelines to meet and ‘restrict’ standards of proof of citizenship?
So, a bi-partisan team from BOTH political parties will examine ALL ID’s and be given access to ALL documents used to issue the ID’s. And, I guess that is because BOTH political parties have proven to be so TRUSTWORTHY?
The political parties would be responsible for registering voters. Again, because they are so TRUSTWORTHY and have absolutely NO axe to grind!
The department that would address criminal sanctions for fraudulent ID’s would be run by a bipartisan team (again,) not the DOJ, and have 100% transparency. And exactly WHY should I trust BOTH political parties for 100% transparency? It is because they have proven to be so active in supporting and defending the Constitution?
All of this would be funded by federal dollars. Of Course, we KNOW the feds will be happy to turn over $$ without interference in the process or using the information for their own purposes–because the federal government is absolutely TRUSTWORTHY and unequivocally SUPPORTS and DEFENDS the Constitution and the sovereign rights of every state and citizen.
And I just love the federal cross-reference list to be compiled of all who are registered or have voted in all of the states because I just know that the government will never use it for anything other than determining voter fraud.
Thank you so much for seeing to it that my absentee ballot counts by requiring a photocopy of my voter ID with the ballot. I never wanted privacy for my vote. It is so passé to cast a secret ballot. It is absolutely certain that the bi-partisan team from BOTH political parties will see to it that my vote is cast for the candidate of ?? choice.
And it is wonderful that as I reach the age of 80 or above, I will get be investigated by a bi-partisan team from BOTH political parties to insure I am not dead. And, if I become mentally challenged, especially as I age, I am delighted that someone else will be able to decide my vote for me.
And again we have that very busy bi-partisan team from BOTH political parties checking all technology for accuracy in voting. Naturally THEY can be trusted, and THEY weren’t the ones that engineered Obama votes when a number of us actually voted for Romney.
Of course, if there is a mistake or, unthinkable!, any sabotage, ALL electoral votes from the State will not be counted. It is so much better to eliminate ALL votes from a State rather than tworrying about he percentage that may be nullified by current voter fraud.
And don’t forget, we won’t have to bother with representation to government for the next year because — we won’t have that either. Really, who needs the Constitution or right of a citizen to vote.
So let’s set this plan in motion right away. Who could ask for anything better than federal $$, federal oversight, federal registration, federal lists and federal control? And, who wouldn’t be pleased with the examination, oversight and policing authority of the bi-partisan teams of BOTH political parties. We would no longer have to wonder WHY our elected representatives no longer listen to us because that representation will have been eliminated!
14 point plan are very good. If we could use it for 2012 I’m sure Romney would win big. DemocRAT party could never win without voter fraud.
This 14 point plan is a noble effort, but easily bypassed. Remember, anytime a system can be ‘gamed’ – it will be gamed. These precautions are very easily bypassed. Let me address one simple one… paper vs. electronic ballots. I would support 100% the following use of electronic ballots… if they were used to produce actual paper ballots that can be tabulated. This would provide a “paper trail”… that is, they can be recounted… it would secondarily allows for the counts to be “impeached” (questioned). You could actually recount those beautifully paper-produced ballots… after all, those machine are there to make the production of “Voter Intent” pieces of paper… not record electronic blips (which can’t be impeached) in a machine. Electronic Voting… without the ability to recount… is completely untrustworthy. I doesn’t matter if you have Poll Watchers or US Programmers/Corporations… the boxes themselves are fraught with problems.
Here’s a (2) point plan that would fix 90% of the voting problems:
1. Show ID (equal to society standard for cashing a check)
2. Paper Ballots (hand marked, machine marked, you name it).
Of course, each Paper Ballot would have a “HASH” code (encrypted code) to prevent substitution at some later date (replacement of ballots or addition of ballots)… That HASH code could be verified in seconds (if you know the decryption algorithm)… it would take the NSA months to crack such a hash code… no time or awkward ballot manipulation.
polesitter
If for some strange the illegals would have made it know that would be voting for the GOP in the past 2012 election the Liberals and Democrats would jhave had every illegal arrested and deported/
That free voter ID would prove to save billions of dollars in the long run by not having to oust frauds after they have bankrupted the country. Just make sure it cannot be manipulated and used by someone else. That would require machines at the polls to check them, but there again, it would save billions in the long run. This man pretending to be a US President needs to be in jail and our country must be righted if we are going to continue being the United States of America. This is not jumping the gun. In fact we are behind schedule getting these things done and the cost is going to be greater than anyone could imagine if this keeps going on. Why should one man be allowed to treat US citizens like he has a right to destroy this country? They are, in fact a very minority but have made the public think they are who the public wants. It is not so at all. They are just controlling the media. That was their first goal on their agenda after getting their people into places across the country in local, state and federal positions where they could interefere with information flow in various and sundry mail room, clerical, teaching and low key jobs until they could get more people into the upper echelon jobs. In fact they are constantly promoting their own. A conservative would have trouble getting a federal, state, local or county job about anywhere if these people throw away applications, destroy information needed by decision makers to make objective decisions. This has been planned for some time and planned well. Clean them all out and require civil service tests so they cannot stock people into jobs just because of their political leanings. The people qualified for jobs are being held back and dumb azzes are put into positions who will promote the Obama agenda from lower on up. This should be stopped NOW.
I am posting this link everywhere I am able. I hope you do the same. I doubt it will do any good, but I have to try!
http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2012/12/breaking-news-hawaii-state-registrar-alvin-onaka-has-publicly-certified-to-az-sos-ken-bennett-that-barack-obamas-hi-birth-certificate-is-legally-non-valid-and-the-white-house-image-2549640.html
bobmann101,
Why haven’t we seen anything on this from Jerome Corsi, WND or any of the otherleading sites who have been reporting on Obama’s eligibility status?
Source: http://www.mfs-theothernews.com/2012/12/breaking-news-hawaii-state-registrar.html
Important Update From Dr. Orly Taitz’s Facebook page:
Someone is spreading false information. Alvin Onaka never issued any statement admitting to forgery. PP simmons posted an article, where he said that it might be related to my subpoenas. This is not correct. The only thing I got was a fax from Jill Nagamine, deputy attorney general of Hawaii, where she objected to subpoena. Among the objections is that $975 received by Onaka with the subpoena is not enough, that the court (Judge England and the plaintiffs, presidential electors and Presidential Candidates do not have a tangible interest) and so on. I am dealing with it an a number of other issues, such as filing proofs of service of process and buying tickets for witnesses. there are a number of other things. At any rate a report by Albert Hendershott that Onaka admitted to forgery is flagrantly wrong, there is no such admission .
Will – MFS I sincerely hope The Obama Hustle will issue a denial of this story, i believed his ‘sources’ were genuine, in view of the following statement he made on his site , I can only say it seeme
How does anyone know what to believe. One person says one thing.. another say another. One link say something totally different too. I know what I want to believe… but the question is… will anyone do anything about it. They better hurry up before Obama takes control of the Supreme Court.
If anything.. he should be jailed for making FOOLS out of the stupid Republicans…
I signed up to help True the Vote, but there was nothing local. I cannot drive 4 hours one way to attend meetings that will not have anything to do with a locality near me. That said, when my daughter went to vote (early, because of her work schedule), she was handed a filled-in ballot as soon as she walked in the door and told to step over to the table to sign it. Of course, it was all filled in for democrats. She noticed that most of the elderly in line ahead of her just complied. She handed it back. This was in Jacksonville, FL. I wonder how many people just signed the form handed to them, not thinking that they could refuse?
We do need reform, and as several polls showed, even in minority communities, a good 75% wanted voter ID. The administration’s complaint was that it would discriminate against minorities, who might not have a form of ID. However, it has been shown that nearly everyone, unless bedridden, has to show a form of ID at some time, so everybody has something that could be used, if not a driver’s license.
Vote reform will only be effective when it is enforced and upheld. My senator told me that there is no way to make a national law to reform this, as it is up to each state to verify there voter rolls, etc. Does anyone know if this is so?
Obama has the money and power backing him so he can do what he is told and he will be safe until his big money,string pulling,puppet mastetrs are finished with him then he will somehow be eliminated.
Jewish man on Voter fraud.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/romney-defeated-obama-if-not-for-voter-fraud/