March 1st at 3:00 PM (EST) 2:00 PM (CST) 1:00 (MST) or 12:00 (PST) will be the most important day in the struggle to bring Obama to justice.
Sherriff Joe Arpaio will be the most important person in this crusade.
All we have sought from the beginning of our investigations is justice. All we have sought is for some court, judge, congressman, senator, or law enforcement official to judge Obama by the same standards we all face. We only want the rule of law. But what we have seen is nearly four years of Obama beinggiven special treatment because of his race. America’s system of law must be color blind and impartial.
Hundreds of officials to date have turned a blind eye to Obama’s obvious fraud. He hasn’t even
established yet if he is eligible to be President under the US Constitution.
Well, on March 1st we will finally get some justice. After reading reports of the fraud, Maricopa County’s long serving sheriff Joe Arpaio has empaneled a “Cold Case Posse” to get at the truth.
We invite you to watch his findings live on our website at Western Journalism.com. In conjunction with WND.com, we will be live streaming this important event.
In addition, WesternJournalism and WND.com will make available to the public, the same day, the
official report distributed to media by Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse.”
“When I took this mission on, I took it on to possibly be able to clear the president,” Arpaio said during a speech in Maricopa County. “I was doing him a favor. We’ll see what happens.”
Arpaio has kept the results of the investigation close to the vest, but suggested in a speech Tuesday that new information would be revealed.
“I don’t have press conferences just to get my name on television. When I have a press conference, I talk about something,” Arpaio said. “I had about 250 tea party people, to sign a petition . . . came to me and asked their sheriff to investigate Obama and the birth certificate. So what should I do? Throw it in the waste basket and forget it like everybody else has done?”
The comments drew applause from the crowd.
Attorney Orly Taitz vowed to shove everything she had concerning Barack Obama’s evidentiary problem at last week’s eligibility challenge in front of Indiana’s election board. Taitz, whose airline ticket to the hearing was purchased by a concerned citizen, presented evidence of a “stolen social security number and a forgery instead of a birth certificate!” She told WND reporter Bob Unruh that Indiana just removed their Secretary of State Charlie White for his discrepancies with voter registration irregularities over “minor” problems. Taitz said our sitting president’s eligibility problems are major in comparison.
But new questions about the status of BHO’s teen age mother Stanley Ann Dunham are surfacing as analysis at another web site is revealing a Congressional rule change for people born between December 23, 1952 and November 13, 1986 puts in serious doubt Stanley Ann Dunham’s ability to confer citizenship status on her son.
Since Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. was born in 1961, this newly discovered law involves Dunham’s age because she was only 18 at time of delivery! The law says:
”When one parent was a U.S. citizen and the other a foreign national, the U.S. citizen parent must have resided in the U.S. for a total of 10 years prior to birth of the child with FIVE of the years after the age of 14.” Stanley Ann Dunham did not meet requisite status according to blog discovery. One commenter said, “She was not old enough to register Obama’s birth in Hawaii or anywhere else in the U.S. as a Natural Born Citizen as she did not meet the residency requirements! Backing this statement up, another commenter reiterates:” The law specifically outlines the requirements for a CITIZEN mother to confer citizenship to her baby. Ann Dunham was NOT old enough-case closed!”
Judge Malihi in his pg. 6 footnote went back 20 years to cite Jill Pryor’s statement to the Yale Law Journal in which she said: “Despite its apparent simplicity, the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution has never been completely understood.” Pryor goes on to begin her next sentence with the nonsensical anonymous pronoun IT: “It is well settled that Native Born citizens, those born in the U.S., qualify as natural born.”
Huh? Who is “It” Judge?
The WND analysis found the state Supreme Court of North Dakota over seventy years ago threw out of office a governor because his “lack of residential qualifications is a legal disability!” You can view the C-Span video of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas telling Puerto Rican Representative Jose Serrno: “We’re evading that one!” when his questioner asked about the NBC clause. So a new angle enters the Obama NBC protest. While state and federal officialdom keeps ignoring American citizens, Attorney Orly Taitz, who was born in the USSR and who fears her beloved naturalized country is heading toward the fate of Germany, is keeping the controversy up on court dockets. If she and her other appeals colleagues get rebuffed on the birth father’s NBC issue, maybe they can start in on a new round of hearings using the birth mother’s status. They just won’t have President Obama’s own words telling them his father was NOT a U.S. citizen!
So I guess officially it is beyond a thrill up Mr. Matthews’ leg? Is that what you want Chris?
According to a Pew poll released earlier this month, even before Barack Obama went public with his all-out war on the Catholic Church, white non-Hispanic Catholics started moving away from the Democrats and toward a Republican self-identification.
The quietly released survey, which contains lots of bad news for Democrats, was completed last December by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.
What Pew found was as follows:
The Democrat identification all Catholics (practicing and non-practicing) had in 2008 is gone. Democrat identification has slipped from 53/37 to 48/43 – again this was BEFORE Obama’s declaration of war.
While this general trend should be enough to cause alarm for Democrats, digging a bit deeper brings worse news. Among white non-Hispanic Catholics – who make up a much larger portion of those who will actually vote- the numbers have reversed to a 49/42 Republican advantage. Moreover, Democrats are now even upside down among non-practicing Catholics, falling to a 47/45 GOP advantage.
It’s not just Catholics who have moved from the Democrats and toward the Republicans.
Pew tells us that Democrats have lost and Republicans have gained ground with all religious groups. Among Jewish voters, there has been a 9 point shift; among Mormons, there has been a 12 point move toward the GOP.
The significance of the Catholic vote for a Democrat presidential candidate cannot be overestimated. Republicans can lose the Catholic vote and still win, but Democrats cannot. Dwight Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan each won two elections without carrying the Catholic vote either time. Reagan had a record victory margin over Walter Mondale despite losing Catholics 47/50.
Richard Nixon crushed George McGovern in 1972 but lost Catholics 37/63. Al Gore won the Catholic vote in 2000 and still lost.
Clearly, Democrats cannot win without the Catholic vote, but Republicans win all the time without it. Right now that vote is moving away from Democrats and toward Republicans, and there is no reason to think that it will turn around before November.
The danger zone with Jewish voters is 67% or less.
Since 1920, whenever a Democrat has gotten less than 68% of the Jewish vote, he has lost. Pew’s survey shows Obama’s support among Jewish voters is at 65% – down from the 78 he got in 2008.